9-Attachment B-Evaluation Sheet.docx

DOCX document 32 KB Posted

Attached to
NOFA for Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) Program
Solicitation number
OCC-2025-00028249
Issued by
Dallas County, Texas

About this file

This document is an evaluation sheet for the City of Dallas Office of Community Care and Empowerment's Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) program. The solicitation seeks eligible organizations to serve as Subrecipients providing housing assistance and related supportive services for low-income persons living with HIV and their families in the Dallas service area. The program covers multiple service categories including Emergency/Tenant Based Rental Assistance, Facility Based Housing, Emergency Vouchers, Master Leasing, Housing Information Services, Supportive Services Only, and Facility Rehabilitation/Repair.

The evaluation sheet outlines a comprehensive scoring methodology totaling 100 points across four key assessment areas: Historic Narrative & Organizational Capacity (20 points), Work Plan (40 points), Evaluation Plan (20 points), and Cost and Budget (20 points). The scoring criteria evaluate applicants on dimensions such as organizational experience, programming approach, service delivery models, data management, partnership quality, client eligibility processes, outreach strategies, financial management, and overall program effectiveness. The funding is provided through a U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) grant, with the City of Dallas seeking multiple Subrecipients to address housing needs for HIV-affected populations.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
20-Attachment L - Appendix II to 2 C.F.R. Part 200 - Contract Provisions for Non-Federal Enity Contracts Under Federal Awards.docx DOCX document
15-Attachment H- Request for Payment.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
7-Attachment A-Responsiveness Checklist.docx DOCX document
5-Form 5-Suspension Debarment Certification.docx DOCX document
16-Attachment I - Proofs of Performance (Monthly Analysis, Overview of Accomplishments).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
6-Form 6-Federal Funding Acountability and Transperancy Act Certification.docx DOCX document
17-Attachment J - HOPWA CAPER Report-Part 1 (24-25-Updated).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
1-Form 1-Application.docx DOCX document
13-Attachment F-HOPWA Provisions (ML-Facility-EV).docx DOCX document
10-Attachment D-Subrecipient Notification 2 CFR 200.332 (Blank).docx DOCX document
4-Form 4-Board Information.docx DOCX document
14-Attachment G - Income Guidelines Limits and Rent Standards 2025-06.docx DOCX document
12-Attachment F - HOPWA Provisions (Scattered).docx DOCX document
21-NOFA-HOPWA-Specifications final 2025 07.docx DOCX document
19-Attachment K- Certification for Contracts, Grants, Loans, and Coop Agmts.docx DOCX document
11-Attachment E - Statement of Services - Sample Agency.docx DOCX document
18-Attachment J - HOPWA CAPER Report-Part 2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
3-Form 3-Organization Information.docx DOCX document
8-Attachment C - Insurance Requirements.pdf PDF
2-Form 2-Budget.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 20

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

City of Dallas Office of Community Care and Empowerment

Evaluation Sheet – Application Scoring

Name of Agency:

Name of Project:
Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA)

REVIEWER: Please score the Application in each of the categories below. The maximum points available for each category and section are shown. Please fill in your score for each category/section and explain your point determination in the Comments section.

HISTORIC NARRATIVE & ORGANIZATIONAL CAPACITY

Did the organization submit all required documents as requested?
1
Based on the Organization’s History/Experience, does the Organization demonstrate a track record sufficient to undertake and support the program services outlined in the Application – specifically a history of grantmaking and grants administration? Does the organization have the required minimum experience outlined in the solicitation? Does the organization’s prior performance on City contracts demonstrate that the organization is likely to be successful? Does the organization have experience serving the population that it intends to serve?
3
Does the organization articulate the necessary collaborations and partners necessary for successful program implementation?
3
Based on the Organization’s Organizational Capacity, does the organization have experience delivering the proposed programming? Does the Organization have the professional staff capacity with appropriate credentials to undertake and support the program services outlined in the Application? Does the organization’s staff and leadership reflect the population that it intends to serve?
8
Does the organization demonstrate measures (including cybersecurity) to safeguard protected personally identifiable information and other types of information? Does the organization have policies and processes in place to deter and detect fraud, waste, abuse, conflict of interest, or other misconduct?
5
Total Points
20

WORK PLAN

Based on the Organization’s Work Plan, does the work plan (including narratives outlining program activities) demonstrate a plan that is reasonable and appropriate to undertake and support the program services outlined in the Application? Is it clear that the programming will deliver the desired scope of services for the benefit of eligible persons (including target populations)?
10
Does the organization demonstrate utilization of best practice service delivery model(s) or research-based service delivery model(s) for the selected program design, and does the selected model(s) best meet the needs of the population?
5
Does the organization outline clear eligibility criteria aligned with grant requirements and a process to determine client and/or site eligibility? Does the organization demonstrate a plan for collection and maintenance of eligibility and service records sufficient to ensure compliance with grant requirements?
5
Does the proposer articulate a plan for outreach to potentially eligible clients with an emphasis on identified target populations?
5
Does the organization articulate how the program will minimize barriers to accessing assistance?
5
Does the organization have the necessary partnerships and collaborations for successful program implementation?
5
Does the organizations articulate how it will apply data to drive outreach and service delivery?
5
Total Points
40

EVALUATION PLAN

Based on the Organization’s Evaluation Plan, did the organization clearly specify numeric target goals for the required performance measures for each proposed service (in table or chart format)? Did the organization demonstrate that those goals are reasonable and appropriate for the proposed services?
5
Did the organization include a plan for data collection and evaluation for the target goals and the program overall, including who is responsible for the collection, analysis, and reporting of data, and the frequency or timetable for data collection, analysis and reporting?
5
Is it clear that the organization has the staffing, systems, and expertise in place to effectively deliver services and to track and report all required performance goals and outcome measures?
5
Does the organization demonstrate a plan to use the data to evaluate the effectiveness and impact of services, and make improvements where needed?
5
Total Points
20

COST AND BUDGET

Based on the Organization’s Budget, is the budget reasonable and appropriate to undertake and support the program services outlined in the Application?
5
Does the budget narrative adequately account for and explain/justify the costs included with the submitted Budget?
3
Does the budget align with eligible costs, applicable caps, and other budget requirements?
3
Based on the estimated cost per client (funded by the grant compared to total cost), Is the program a good value for the expected impact, considering clients reached and services delivered and leveraged resources?
4
Does the Organization have adequate financial management systems in place to operate the program, track the budget, and submit timely and accurate billing? Does the Organization undergo regular financial or other audits?
5
Total Points
20

SUMMARY

Historic Narrative & Organizational Capacity
20
Work Plan
40
Evaluation Plan
20
Cost and Budget
20
TOTAL POINTS AWARDED
100

Reviewer Signature:

Date:

Revised: 1/1/2025

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .