Attachment H- Contract Historical Data FINAL.pdf

PDF 82 KB Posted

Attached to
MECHANICAL INTEGRATED SERVICES AND TECHNOLOGIES (MIST II) Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
80GSFC20R0006
Issued by
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Goddard Space Center

About this file

This attachment provides historical data from an incumbent NASA mechanical engineering services contract to support a follow-on solicitation. The attachment requests labor category descriptions, work year equivalents, direct labor rates, and other performance data from the past twelve months. This includes the number of work year equivalents or labor hours by category, current weighted average rates, category descriptions and duties, education and experience requirements, and dates and amounts of last rate escalations. Actual other direct costs by cost element are also requested for the prior year. Estimated indirect labor work year equivalents and category titles are to be provided, along with productive work year hour definitions for exempt and non-exempt employees. Consolidated data is preferred for the prime and any subcontractors performing over a certain percentage of work. This contract historical data will support NASA's MIST II solicitation for mechanical engineering services to support instrument and mechanical systems divisions across formulation, design, development, testing and operations of flight and ground hardware.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to MECHANICAL INTEGRATED SERVICES AND TECHNOLOGIES (MIST II), newest first.
File Type Posted
MIST II Amendment 3.pdf PDF
MIST II Amend 2 Summary C.._.pdf PDF
MIST II FRFP QA Rev. 1.pdf PDF
MIST II Enclosure CC - GPM Amendment 2.pdf PDF
MIST II-Amendment-2 signed (002).pdf PDF
MIST II Amend 1 Summary Changes.pdf PDF
MIST II FRFP QA.pdf PDF
Final MIST II Questions Rev.2.pdf PDF
ENCLOSURE EE- Cover pg IT Security Management Plan.pdf PDF
Exhibits 2-11 Cover Page FRFP.pdf PDF
Attachment K Government Furnished Property FRFP.pdf PDF
Attachment G-OCI Plan Cover Page FRFP.pdf PDF
Exhibit 12 - Past Performance Questionaire FRFP.pdf PDF
Enclosure EE IT Security Management Plan Template.pdf PDF
Exhibits 2-11 GPM FINAL MIST II RFP.pdf PDF
Attachment L.- IT Security M. Plan Cover Page FRFP.pdf PDF
Attachment I PIV Attachment FRFP.pdf PDF
Attachment C- Financial M. Reporting FRFP.pdf PDF
Exhibits 1A-1C GPM MIST II FINAL RFP.pdf PDF
Attachment A- Statement of Work FRFP.pdf PDF
MIST II FINAL RFP.pdf PDF
MIST II SF33-14a FINAL.pdf PDF
MIST II Cover Letter on Letterhead.pdf PDF
Attachment D - DD form 254 FRFP.pdf PDF
Attachment B-IDIQ Cost-Type Rate Matrix FRFP.pdf PDF
Exhibits 1A-1C Cover Page FRFP.pdf PDF
Enclosure DD - Contract Historical Data FRFP.pdf PDF
Final MIST II Questions Rev.1.pdf PDF
Final MIST II Questions.pdf PDF
Attachment C- Financial M. Reporting FINAL.pdf PDF
MIST II DRFP 12-16-2019.pdf PDF
Enclosure DD - Contract Historical Data FINAL.pdf PDF
Enclosure AA MIST II QASP FINAL.pdf PDF
Attachment D - DD form 254 FINAL.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT 12 - Past Performance Questionaire FINAL.pdf PDF
MIST II DRFP GPM Exhibits 2-11 FINAL.pdf PDF
Attachment J - IT Security Applicable Docs List FINAL.pdf PDF
MIST II-DRFP GPM Exhibits 1A-1C FINAL.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT 12 Cover Page FINAL.pdf PDF
MIST II COVER LETTER FINAL.pdf PDF
Attachment I PIV Attachment FINAL.pdf PDF
Attachment F- Quality Assurance Plan Cover Page FINAL.pdf PDF
MIST II SF33 DRFP.pdf PDF
Exhibits 2-11 Cover Page FINAL.pdf PDF
Attachment E Safety and Health Plan Cover Page FINAL.pdf PDF
Attachment K Government Furnished Property FINAL.pdf PDF
Enclosure BB Combined RTOs FINAL.pdf PDF
Exhibits 1A-1C Cover Page FINAL.pdf PDF
Attachment A- Statement of Work FINAL.pdf PDF
Attachment B-IDIQ Cost-Type Rate Matrix FINAL.pdf PDF
Show all 50

MECHANICAL INTEGRATED SERVICES AND TECHNOLOGIES (MIST II) has more files on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

80GSFC20R0006

SEPTEMBER 2019

ATTACHMENT H

CONTRACT HISTORICAL DATA

MARCH 2015

DRFP

CONTRACT TBD

Attachment H

SEPTEMBER 2019

(03/2015)

CONTRACT HISTORICAL DATA

NASA may issue a competitive solicitation for a follow-on effort for services similar to those provided under this contract. As part of this follow-on competition, NASA may include historical labor category descriptions, work year equivalents (WYEs), weighted average direct labor rates, and other information from this contract in the follow-on solicitation for use by all potential offerors. Including this data in the solicitation is intended to ensure a comprehensive and fair evaluation of competitive proposals and increase the probability that realistic pricing is provided in future proposals submitted. Minimizing the potential risk for unrealistic or unsubstantiated pricing materially reduces the risk that cost/price could become an inappropriate discriminator among competing offerors.

Based on the written request from the Contracting Officer, the Contractor shall provide all of the following historical data from this contract within 30 days this request:

(1) All labor resources employed under this contract in the last twelve months, by

Contract Labor Category as specified in Attachment B, Direct Labor Rates, Indirect Rates and Fee Matrices. For each labor category, provide the number of WYEs or the total labor hours incurred for that position over the preceding 12 months, the current weighted average wage rate (unburdened “straight time” rate), and the average seniority level;

(2) For each labor category , identify the most recent date that wages were escalated and provide the percentage by which wages were escalated;

(3) For each labor category, identify whether the category is “exempt,” “non-exempt,” or “union” as governed under the Service Contract Labor Standards;

(4) For each labor category, provide a brief position description in sufficient detail to indicate the duties of each category and any minimum education and experience requirements.

Example Table of Requested Data

Labor Category

Number of *WYE by Labor Category

**Current Weighted Avg.

Unburdened Hourly Rate for this Category

Average Seniority for this Category

Date and Amount of Last Rate Escalation

Identification “Exempt,”

“Non-Exempt,” or “Union”

Engineer 4 9 $18.20 18 months April 2005 (2.8%) Exempt

*1 WYE equals the total Contractor’s Productive Work Year Hours. Example: Four contractor employees each working 1,000 hours per year, divided by the total Contractor’s Productive Work Year Hours, equals the Contractor’s Number of FTEs.

**Straight time labor rates only, not bid rates or burdened rates

Attachment H

SEPTEMBER 2019

(03/2015)

(5) Actual non-labor (i.e. other direct costs (ODCs)) expenditures for the prior twelve months, delineated by each of the following cost elements: materials, equipment, travel, supplies, and any other individual recurring ODCs based on an established cost estimating relationships (e.g. computer usage, program management, depreciation, administrative support.);

(6) Estimate of the number of WYEs, including associated labor category titles/descriptions, for those personnel currently supporting this contract that are accounted for as indirect. This may include administrative employees (e.g., accounting or clerical personnel), management employees and/or technical employees (e.g. computer support personnel);

(7) Provide the Contractor’s Productive Work Year Hours for exempt and non-exempt employees; and

(8) The information required in (1) through (7) above shall be provided for the prime contractor and all significant subcontractors. Significant subcontractors are those subcontractors that have performed at least “TBD” percent of the cumulative contract effort (in terms of dollars) as of the time of the Contracting Officer’s request for this data. A single, consolidated response for the prime contractor and all significant subcontractors is preferred, wherein labor rate data is a total contract average by position (and labor categories where both the prime and subcontractor are providing labor for that position are weighted averages). If such a consolidated response is not feasible due to restrictions over disclosure of company-sensitive cost data between the prime and any subcontractors, then an alternative approach should be discussed with the Contracting Officer at the time of the request for this data.

(End of Attachment)

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .