8-evaluation score sheet usbe-jb26296-rfp (2).xls

XLS spreadsheet 48 KB Posted

Attached to
USBE Migrant Education Data System
Solicitation number
USBE-JB26296-RFP
Issued by
Utah

About this file

This is an RFP evaluation score sheet for the Utah State Board of Education (USBE) solicitation USBE-JB26296-RFP for a Migrant Education Data System. The procurement seeks a qualified vendor to provide a comprehensive migrant education data system capable of uploading migrant student data to the Department of Education's MSIX system on a daily basis and generating required reporting. The contract will be awarded to the responsive and responsible offeror with the highest evaluation score. The resulting contract will have a term of five years, with USBE retaining the right to terminate at any time in accordance with state standard terms and conditions.

The evaluation process consists of three stages: Stage 1 includes nine mandatory pass/fail requirements that offerors must meet, including a minimum of five years' experience providing state migrant education data systems, provision of similar systems to at least three other states, and delivery of a pre-existing off-the-shelf system implementable within 30 days of contract execution; Stage 2 comprises scoreable technical criteria worth 400 points (70 percent of total evaluation), with a minimum threshold of 280 points required, evaluating qualifications, experience, and ability to perform the scope of work; Stage 3 includes an optional presentation component worth 50 points (5 percent of total evaluation) with a 70 percent minimum threshold. Cost evaluation accounts for 20 percent (100 points) of the total score, calculated using a formula where the lowest proposed cost receives 100 percent of cost points and other offerors receive proportional points based on cost variance, with offerors proposing more than double the lowest cost receiving no cost points. The maximum contract budget is $170,000.00, though this is not a guaranteed total amount.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Evaluation score sheet

Migrant Education Data System
SOLICITATION # USBE-JB26296-RFP
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Scores will be assigned from 0-10 as follows:
Firm Name:0 = the proposed solution does not meet requirements and expectations as described in the request for proposal.
5 = the proposed solution satisfactorily meets requirements and expectations as described in the request for proposal
Evaluator:10 = the proposed solution measurably exceeds requirements and expectations as described in the request for proposal
NOTE: The requirements and criteria listed in this RFP score sheet may be abbreviated headings. Offerors should refer to the corresponding RFP section for a complete description of criteria.
Date:
Minimum Mandatory RequirementsRFP SectionEvaluation (Pass/Fail)
STAGE 11Offeror must have a minimum of 5 years’ experience providing state migrant education data systems.Files
2Offeror must have provided a similar system with at least 3 other states.Files
3Offeror’s solution must be a pre-existing, off-the-shelf system that can be fully implemented within 30 days of contract execution.Files
4Offeror’s solution must meet all the requirements of the United States Department of Education Office of Migrant Education (https://results.ed.gov/).Files
5Offeror’s solution must interface with the Department of Education MSIX system and be able to upload information daily.Files
6Offeror’s solution must include all of the required data elements for MSIX and all of the required data collection fields for the CSPR.Files
7Offeror’s solution must be able to provide CSPR reports.Files
8Offeror’s solution must allow for LEA programs to enter data and Certificates of Eligibility into the system to be approved by USBE.Files
9Offeror must submit login to a sandbox or established system to demonstrate
a.The LEA experience
b.The USBE/ State Administration experience
c.Access, if available, to sample reportsFiles
STAGE 2Scoreable Technical CriteriaRFP SectionEvaluator Score (0-10)Criteria Weight% of Tech CriteriaPoints PossiblePoints
EarnedMinimum Required
Category A Qualifications and Experience
1Describe your experience doing similar work for other public entities.Technical Criteria1025.0%100.00.0
2Identify any key staff for this project and include their qualifications.Technical Criteria512.5%50.00.0
Category B Ability to perform scope of work
1Describe and demonstrate how your solution meets the requirements of the Data Exchange Interface RequirementsTechnical Criteria1025.0%100.00.0
2Submit a sample CSPR reportTechnical Criteria1025.0%100.00.0
3Provide a management plan including milestones, deliverable deadlines, and implementation planTechnical Criteria512.5%50.00.0
100.0%400.00.0
Required Technical Point ThresholdRFP SectionMin PercentMin Points RequiredPoints EarnedPercent EarnedEvaluation
70%280.00.00.0%0
STAGE 3RFP Question NumberPresentation (if held at USBE option)Evaluator Score (1-10)Criteria Weight% of Stage 3 Points PossiblePoints PossiblePoints

Earned

N/APresentation5100.0%50.000.00
TOTAL100.0%50.000.00
Required Presentation Point ThresholdMin PercentMin Points RequiredPoints EarnedPercent EarnedEvaluation
70.0%35.00.00.0%Fail
Cost Evaluation*RFP SectionLow Cost OptionOffered CostPercent of TotalPoints PossiblePoints Earned
20%100.00.0
* USBE will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each Offeror's cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposed cost. The Offeror with the Lowest Proposed Cost will receive 100% of the cost points. All other Offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Cost is than the Lowest Proposed Cost. An Offeror whose Proposed Cost is more than double (200%) the Lowest Proposed Cost will receive no cost points. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (2- Proposed Cost/Lowest Proposed Cost).
Total Evaluation PointsPercent of TotalPoints PossiblePoints EarnedMinimum Percent RequiredMinimum RequiredEvaluation Result
Total Technical Evaluation Points70%400.00.070%280.0FAIL
Total Cost Evaluation Points25%100.00.0N/A
Total Presentation Points5%50.00.0
Total Evaluation Points100%550.00.0N/A

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .