Amendment 1 75H70122R00005.pdf
PDF 278 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 75H70122R00005
About this file
This document is an amendment to a Request for Proposal for the renovation of the Fort Duchesne PHS Indian Health Clinic. The amendment provides responses to offeror questions, updates the past performance submission requirements, and clarifies that relevant projects must be at least 75% complete or completed within the last seven years. It advises that past performance will be evaluated using the CPARS database and allows for optional submission of a past performance questionnaire if no CPARS information is available. A maximum of five customer satisfaction surveys or past performance questionnaires will be considered for the prime contractor. The performance period for the contract is 365 calendar days from issuance of the notice to proceed. This is a total small business set-aside for the renovation of the Fort Duchesne PHS Indian Health Clinic located in Utah, with an estimated magnitude of construction over $10 million. Proposals were due by the date specified in the solicitation.
View the file
Other files
Show all 25
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)
7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE
STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)
Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
FACILITY CODE
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER
9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER
NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15C. DATE SIGNED
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
PAGE OF PAGES
6. ISSUED BY CODE
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)
CODE
15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of person authorized to sign)
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(Signature of Contracting Officer)
Previous edition unusable
A0001
SUMMARY OF CHANGES:
The purpose of this amendment is to:
1. Answer a pre-proposal inquiry;
2. Update 2. RFP Section L.12 PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS, section (d)(2) FACTOR 2:
Past Performance Submission Requirements
See continuation page.
Indian Health Service – Division of Engineering Services 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 1650 Seattle, WA 98104
SEE BLOCK 6.
75H70122R00005
1 3
11/18/2021
11/10/2021
75H70122R00005, Amendment A0001
1. Responses to PPI:
Question No. 1: On Page 67 of the solicitation it reads:
VOLUME I (Technical Proposal)
1. FACTOR 1: Specialized Experience Submission Requirements: Offerors are required to submit a comprehensive and complete technical proposal that demonstrates their ability to perform the work described in this solicitation and demonstrate a minimum of three (3) projects but no more than five (5) projects of similar scope and complexity. All projects submitted for consideration must be at least 75% construction progress complete or completed within 7 years preceding the date proposals are due.
For the purposes of this solicitation, relevant projects would be similar construction of a Healthcare Facility in size, scope and complexity to the instant requirement.
Construction should include mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems as well as medical equipment and furniture installation.
Would the Indian Health Service accept other Federal construction renovation projections of similar size and scope, other than medical facilities as similar past performance examples? E-Corp has completed many federal renovation projects for the US Airforce, FAA, and GSA that are of similar values and scope. Can these other federal projects also been seen as acceptable past performance?
Answer: Project experience is under Factor 1 and past performance is under Factor 2. The definition of relevancy is provided and states, “…relevant projects would be similar construction of a Healthcare Facility in size, scope and complexity to the instant requirement…”. While offerors are allowed to submit any projects that they think meet these requirements, the evaluation criteria in Section M states that “to achieve an Acceptable rating, at least three (3) relevant projects but no more than five (5) projects submitted must be at least 75% complete within the preceding seven (7) years from the date of proposals and must be determined to be relevant in similar size, scope and complexity to the requirements described in this solicitation.”
2. RFP Section L.12 PROPOSAL PREPARATION INSTRUCTIONS, section (d)(2)
FACTOR 2: Past Performance Submission Requirements is replaced with the following:
FACTOR 2: Past Performance Submission Requirements: In accordance with FAR 42.1503(e), past performance will be evaluated using the CPARS database. If no relevant past performance history is available for your DUNS number, you may choose to utilize the attached Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) Form PPQ-0 (Attachment J07) which will be used for evaluation. Projects submitted under Factor 1 should also include consideration under this Factor by either a PPQ submission or information obtained in CPARS. The Government will only evaluate up to five (5) Customer Satisfaction Surveys/ Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) combined for the prime contractor.
Government databases will be checked and previous customers and/or evaluators may be
75H70122R00005, Amendment A0001 contacted as references or verification of performance. All performance ratings shall be considered for contracts ongoing or completed within the past 7 years from the date proposals are due. The Government reserves the right to evaluate past performance information on proposals submitted in response to this solicitation from any available source.
All projects submitted on a Customer Satisfaction Survey/Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) must be at least 75% construction progress complete or completed within 7 years preceding the date proposals are due. The PPQ included in the solicitation is provided for the offeror to submit to the client for each project the offeror includes in its proposal for Factor 1, Specialized Experience if that project is not in the CPARS database. Ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client point of contact. Completed PPQs should be submitted with your proposal, but are not required and can be submitted by the owner. Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Matthew.Phelps@ihs.gov, via email prior to proposal closing date. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs.
This does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. While the Government may elect to consider data from any and all other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the offeror.
All other terms, conditions, and requirements remain unchanged.
| B05 SF30 Amendment 1 |
| B05 Amendment 1 Pg 2 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .