7-SLCI27003 Attachment 4 Score Sheet.xls

XLS spreadsheet 338 KB Posted

Attached to
Salt Lake City Request for Proposals SLCI27003 - Fire Training Tower Maintenance
Solicitation number
SLCI27003
Issued by
Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah

About this file

This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for Salt Lake City Corporation's Fire Training Tower Maintenance solicitation (SLCI27003). The scoresheet template is designed to standardize the evaluation process for contractor proposals submitted in response to the maintenance services described in Attachment 2 of the RFP. The document establishes a structured framework for multiple evaluators to assess and score competing bids based on defined technical and cost criteria.

The evaluation methodology employs a 0-5 scoring scale across three primary technical criteria: Qualifications (20% weight, 100 points), Technical Approach (20% weight, 100 points), and Project Management (20% weight, 100 points), for a total possible technical score of 300 points. Offerors must first satisfy two mandatory minimum requirements: City Ethics Requirement compliance and demonstrated five years of experience or similar experience relevant to the scope of work. Only proposals meeting these minimum thresholds proceed to technical evaluation. The scoresheet accommodates up to five evaluators per criterion and specifies a minimum required technical score threshold of 70% (210 points) for advancement. Cost evaluation comprises 30% of the total score (128.6 points maximum), calculated using a comparative formula where the lowest-priced proposal receives 100% of cost points, with other proposals receiving proportional points based on their price differential. The final award determination combines technical scores (70% weight, 300 points) and cost scores (30% weight, 128.6 points) for a grand total of 428.6 possible evaluation points.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
6-SLCI27003 Fire Training Tower RFP.docx DOCX document
3-SLCI27003 Attachment 2 Scope of Work.docx DOCX document
2-Confidential+and+Proprietary+Info+Declaration+Form.pdf PDF
5-SLCI27003 Attachment 3 Cost Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
8-SLCI27003 Attachment 5 Photos.pdf PDF
1-SLCI25024.docx DOCX document
4-SLCI27003 Attachment 1 Sample Agreement.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Score Sheet

TRAINING TOWER MAINTENANCE
SOLICITATION # SLCI27003
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Score will be assigned as follows:
0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information.
Firm Name:1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information.
2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner.
Evaluator:3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner.
4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them.
Date:5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP.
Minimum Mandatory RequirementsRFP SectionEvaluation (Pass/Fail)
1City Ethics RequirementVII.a.i
2Offeror certifies that Offeror's proposed team has five (5) years experience or similar experience to the work described in Attachment 2: Scope of Work.VII.a.ii
0
Scoreable Technical CriteriaRFP SectionEvaluator Score (0-5)Criteria Weight% of Tech CriteriaPoints PossiblePoints
EarnedMinimum Required
1QualificationsVII.b.i2033.3%100.00.0
2Technical ApproachVII.b.ii2033.3%100.00.0
3Project ManagementVII.b.iii2033.3%100.00.0
Scorable Technical Criteria Total99.9%300.00.00.0
Possible PointsPoints Earned
Total Technical Points100.00%300.000.00
Required Technical Point ThresholdRFP SectionMin PercentMin Points RequiredPoints EarnedPercent EarnedEvaluation
70%210.00.00.0%0
CostRFP SectionLow Cost OptionOffered CostPercent of TotalPoints PossiblePoints Earned
$0.00$0.0030%128.60.0
* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).
Total Evaluation PointsPercent of TotalPoints PossiblePoints Earned
Total Technical Evaluation Points70%300.00.0
Total Cost Evaluation Points30%128.60.0
Total Evaluation Points100%428.60.0

Scoresheet Summary

Training Tower Maintenance
SOLICITATION # SLCI26115
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET SUMMARY
Instructions:
Enter the solicitation number and name.
Enter each Offeror name.
Enter the Criteria name for each category.
Enter the Weight in column B that corresponds to the Criteria Weight on the Score Sheet tab column J for each criterion.
Enter the Total Possible Points for each Criterion, Cost Points, and Score Summary section.
Mandatory Minimum Requirements: Evaluate each offer and enter pass or fail
Ensure that the number of evaluator lines matches the number of evaluators.
Offers not meeting the Minimum Mandatory Requirements will not be evaluated further.
Ensure that the Total Average Score formula includes all of the evaluator line items.
Technical Scores: Enter each evaluator score for each offer.
Signatures:Date:
Evaluator 1__________________
Evaluator 2__________________
Evaluator 3__________________
Evaluator 4__________________
Evaluator 5__________________
Minimum Mandatory RequirementsOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor GOfferor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
1
2
3
WeightTechnical ScoresOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor GOfferor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
Criteria #1
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #1 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #2
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #2 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #3
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #3 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #4
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #4 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #5
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #5 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #6
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #6 - Total Points (Total Possible XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #7
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #7 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Total Technical Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Total Cost PointsCost ScoresOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor GOfferor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
Cost
0.0Cost Points0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Score SummaryOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor GOfferor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
Total Technical Points (Total Possible = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Total Cost Points (Total Possible = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Grand Total Points (Total Possible = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .