7-Attachment 4 - Score Sheet.xls
XLS spreadsheet 281 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Salt Lake City Request for Proposals SLCI26091 Court Bailiff, Security, and Prisoner Transport Services
- Solicitation number
- SLCI26091
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This is a score sheet for evaluating proposals submitted in response to Salt Lake City Corporation's Request for Proposals SLCI26091 for Court Bailiff, Security, and Prisoner Transport Services at the Salt Lake City Justice Courts located at 333 South 200 East, Salt Lake City, Utah. The evaluation process consists of three stages: Stage 1 is a mandatory minimum requirements evaluation assessed on a pass/fail basis, which includes requirements that offerors be public law enforcement agencies or companies with a duly appointed constable principal officer under Utah law, that all guards and bailiffs be POST-certified peace officers carrying weapons, that no offerors or assigned guards be employees of Salt Lake City Corporation, and that the City approve uniforms in advance. Stage 2 comprises scoreable technical criteria weighted across four categories—Qualifications (30%), Qualifications of Staff (35%), Approach to Scope of Work (35%), and Scheduling and Billing (25%)—totaling 625 possible points, plus policy criteria addressing Sustainability, Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Apprenticeships, and Local Small Business for an additional 31.25 points. Proposals must achieve a minimum of 60 percent of technical points (393.75 points) to proceed to evaluation.
Stage 3 applies a cost evaluation component weighted at 30 percent of total points possible (281.25 points), with the lowest-cost offeror receiving 140.625 points and all other offerors receiving points calculated proportionally based on their cost relative to the lowest bid. The total evaluation is structured as 70 percent technical evaluation (656.25 points) and 30 percent cost evaluation (281.25 points), for a combined possible score of 937.5 points. The scoring scale ranges from 0 (fail) through 5 (excellent), with 3 representing satisfactory performance meeting all RFP requirements.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 4-Attachment 5 - Sample Court Calendar.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 3-Attachment 1 - Sample Agreement.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1-Confidential+and+Proprietary+Info+Declaration+Form.pdf | ||
| 2-SLCI26091.docx | DOCX document | |
| 5-Attachment 3 - Cost Proposal.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 6-Attachment 2 - Scope of Work.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| Bailiff, Security, and Prisoner Transport Services | ||||||
| SOLICITATION # SLCI26091 | ||||||
| Attachment 4 - Score Sheet | ||||||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | ||||||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information. | ||||||
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information. | |||||
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner. | ||||||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner. | |||||
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them. | ||||||
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP. | |||||
| Stage 1: Minimum Mandatory Requirements | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |||||
| 1 | City Ethics Requirement. | |||||
| 2 | Offeror certifies that Offeror is either a public law enforcement agency or a company with a constable who is a principal officer and who is duly appointed pursuant to Utah state and local laws. If Offeror is not current a constable, Offeror may submit a proposal but must be appointed a constable, on or before the date of the notice of conditional selection. | |||||
| 3 | Offeror certifies that all guards including those who provide transport services and bailiffs are required to carry weapons and Police Officer Standards & Training (POST) certified peace officers. | |||||
| 4 | Offeror certifies that Offeror is not an employee of Salt Lake City Corporation and guards assigned to this contract cannot be employees of Salt Lake City Corporation. | |||||
| 5 | Offeror agrees that if awarded, City shall approve uniforms worn by the guards in advance before commencing work. | |||||
| 0 | ||||||
| Stage 2: Scoreable Technical Criteria | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points |
Earned
| 1 | Qualifications. | 0 | 30 | 24.0% | 150.0 | 0.0 | |
| 2 | Qualifications of Staff. | 0 | 35 | 28.0% | 175.0 | 0.0 | |
| 3 | Approach to Scope of Work. | 0 | 35 | 28.0% | 175.0 | 0.0 | |
| 4 | Scheduling and Billing. | 0 | 25 | 20.0% | 125.0 | 0.0 | |
| Scorable Technical Criteria Total | 100.0% | 625.0 | 0.0 | ||||
| Stage 2: Policy Criteria | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Available Points | Possible Points | Points Earned | |||
| 1 | Sustainability | 0 | 1.25% | 7.81 | 0.00 | ||
| 2 | Disadvantaged business enterprise | 0 | 1.25% | 7.81 | 0.00 | ||
| 3 | Apprenticeships | 0 | 1.25% | 7.81 | 0.00 | ||
| 4 | Local Small Business | 0 | 1.25% | 7.81 | 0.00 | ||
| Policy Criteria Total | 5.00% | 31.25 | 0.00 | ||||
| Possible Points | Points Earned | ||||||
| Total Technical Points | 100.00% | 656.25 | 0.00 | ||||
| Required Evaluation Criteria Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation | |
| RFP | 60% | 393.8 | 0.0 | 0.0% | 0 | ||
| Stage 3: Cost | RFP Section | Low Cost Option | Offered Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | |
| RFP | $0.00 | $0.00 | 30% | 281.25 | 0.0 | ||
| For each cost category, the Offeror with the lowest total cost will receive 140.625 points, or 50% of the total cost points. All other Offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their total cost is than the total lowest cost. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price). | |||||||
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | ||||
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 70% | 656.25 | 0.0 | ||||
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 30% | 281.25 | 0.0 | ||||
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 937.5 | 0.0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .