Past Performance Survey 5.13.25.docx
DOCX document 30 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Technical, Management, and Administrative Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 6973GH-26-R-00002
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Survey form for a federal contract opportunity for Technical, Management, and Administrative Support Services at the FAA's Civil Aerospace Medical Institute (CAMI) in Oklahoma City. The solicitation (No. 6973GH-26-R-00002) is set-aside for Certified 8(a) Small Businesses, with proposal submissions due by November 6th at 3 P.M. CT and questions due by October 14th at 3 P.M. CT. The survey is designed to gather detailed feedback from previous clients about a contractor's performance, including ratings on contract compliance, timeliness, personnel performance, and overall recommendation for future work.
The survey captures critical past performance information through a comprehensive questionnaire that evaluates contractor performance across multiple dimensions, including contract adherence, schedule management, potential terminations or cure notices, key personnel performance, and integrity. The document is marked as Procurement Sensitive and For Official Use Only, with the contracting officer Neil Amaral listed as the point of contact. The survey is specifically related to a potential contract for support services at the FAA's Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center, with the goal of collecting objective performance data to inform future contract award decisions.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Q_A dated 10.15.25.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Q_A dated 10.9.25.docx | DOCX document | |
| SIR 6973GH-26-R-00002 Final 10.6.25.pdf | ||
| Tab 6 Section B - Service Prices Schedule dated 8.5.25.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Tab 3 SOW AAM-600 Support Contract 8.8.25 Final.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PROCUREMENT SENSITIVE WHEN COMPLETED May 13, 2025
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
Proposed Project: CAMI AAM-600 Technical, Management, and Admin Support Services
PAST PERFORMANCE SURVEY
To: _______________________________________________________________________
Organization:_____________________________________________________________
Fax No.: _________________________ E-mail Address:_________________________
Date: __________________________ Number of Pages (including this sheet): 4 in total
Your name was provided as a past performance point of contract for the following:
Contractor Name:_________________________________________________________
Contract Number: _______________________________ Date(s)____________________
Project Title: ___________________________________________________________
Contractor Role / Responsibility (circle one):
(Prime Contractor) (Mechanical Subcontractor) (Electrical Subcontractor) (Other Subcontractor)
In regard to the above contractor’s performance on the referenced contract, please complete the attached Past Performance Questionnaire and return as follows:
Send to: Neil Amaral, Contracting Officer
E-mail Address: neil.s.amaral@faa.gov
For questions, please contact me on the telephone at 405-954-8381.
Please provide your response no later than the due date stated in the SIR/RFO.
Thank you!
PART 1. OFFEROR TO COMPLETE THIS PAGE:
1. Name of Contractor: ____________________________________________________
2. Provide a brief description of the renovation project and how it is same/similar to the Hangar 9 Renovation. Offeror’s may provide additional description of project on an additional sheet.
3. Type of contract; e.g., firm fixed-price, cost-reimbursable: _______________________________________
4. Contractor Role (circle one):
Prime Contractor, Mechanical Subcontractor, Electrical Subcontractor, Pool Subcontractor
5. Contract Number (if applicable): _______________________________________________
6. Total Contract Amount - Original contract amount: $____________ Final Contract Amount: $_____________ Provide rationale for the difference________________________________________________________
7. Date of Contract Award: ______________________________________________________
8. Contract Period of Performance: Start Complete _________________
9. Was project completion date consistent with the contract completion date? ___________ If no, explain why___________________________________________________________________________________.
10. Was a deficiency notice issued? ___________ If so, was the issue successfully resolved? ___________
11. Was a Cure Notice issued? _____________ If so, was the issue successfully resolved? _____________
12. Was a Show Cause issued? _____________ If so, was the issue successfully resolved? _____________
PART II. CUSTOMER/CLIENT TO COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PAGES:
Name of Responding Point of Contact: _____________________________________________________
Agency/Organization: _________________________________________________________________
Telephone Number: __________________________________
E-mail Address: __________________________________
1. How would you rate the contractor's overall compliance with contract requirements?
( ) Acceptable ( ) Unacceptable
2. How would you rate the timeliness of the Contractor - adhering to the required schedule?
( ) Acceptable ( ) Unacceptable `
3. Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default, or is a termination pending?
( ) Yes / If yes, please explain and indicate the status.
( ) No/Acceptable
4. Has it ever been necessary to send this Contractor a Notice to Cure letter?
( ) Yes If yes, please explain and indicate the status.
( ) No
5. How would you rate the performance of the contractor's key personnel?
( ) Acceptable ( ) Unacceptable
6. Would you recommend awarding similar contracts or using the offeror again for future work?
( ) Yes/Acceptable ( ) No/Unacceptable
7. Did you experience any integrity problems with this Contractor?
( ) Yes If yes, please explain.
( ) No
8. Please provide any other comments you may have.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .