Q&A_02-07-19.pdf
PDF 62 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MT DOT 569 (3), North of Moose Creek North
- Solicitation number
- 69056718B000024
About this file
Q&A 02-07-2019
View the file
Other files
Show all 37
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
MT DOT 569 (3)
North of Moose Creek North
# General Technical Question Answer Date
1 X Is there a ceiling for the number of days retained by the contractor if finished earlier than the days bid?
No days are retained by the contractor if the project is finished earliar than days bid.
In other words, no payment incentives are provided for the project to be completed prior to the day established in Part B of the bid schedule.
1/25/19
2 X
On E‐15 of the specs SCR 107.12 states the need to provide a Professional Archaeologist meeting the Secretary of Interior Standard’s to conduct monitoring at six locations on the project. Is there an approved list of Archaeologist’s available you would provide for bidding?
No. Bid accordingly. 1/28/19
3 X
According to the Offer Submittal Checklist, the Subcontracting Plan is required with the Offer Submission. On page A‐6, Subcontracting Plan, it states “Do not submit this form with your bid”.
Please clarify if the Subcontracting Plan as provided in A‐6a thru A‐6f is required to be submitted with the Offer.
Do not submit the subcontracting plan with your bid.
2/1/19
Check General or Technical
4 X
Per box #8 of SF1442, offers are to be submitted to the following address:
Federal Highway Administration Western Federal Lands Highway Division 610 East Fifth Street Vancouver, WA 98661‐3801
In the past for Montana projects, we have delivered them to FHWA in Helena. Will the bid opening be changed to Helena or will Vancouver, WA remain the location of the bid opening?
If it will remain in Vancouver, is there any special instructions required for USPS or FedEx delivery personnel besides the address and bid envelope information?
Bid accordingly. 2/1/19
5 X
Will the Archaeological Monitoring be required during the following scopes of work adjacent to the stations listed on page E‐15: Clearing & Grubbing; Temporary Traffic Control Plastic Fencing; Culvert installation; Rip‐Rap installation; Erosion Control; Excavation & Borrow operations; Aggregate base installation;
Paving; Guardrail installation; Topsoil Placement; Turf Establishment; Rumble Strips;
and Pavement Markings?
In accordance with Subsection 107.12, archaeological monitoring is required for all ground disturbing activities occurring adjacent to archaeological sites.
2/5/2019
6 X Will there be any reporting required by the Professional Archaeologist?
This will be addressed in a forthcoming amendment.
2/5/2019
7 X
If reporting is required by the Professional Archeologist, what reports will be required and at what frequency will these reports need to be completed?
This will be addressed in a forthcoming amendment.
2/5/2019
8 X
I see on the tabulation sheet H‐1 of the plans that concrete is listed as the only allowable pipe. Does that mean the existing pipes are concrete?
I see some are being extended.
This will be addressed in a forthcoming amendment.
2/5/2019
9 X Per the bid schedule, there are 16 pipe culverts that need to be cleaned. On Plans D.2 to D.14 it shows and calls out 19 ea. Which is correct?
This will be addressed in a forthcoming amendment.
2/7/2019
10 X
According to FP‐14 Section 203.05, the debris from culvert cleaning can be buried in the R/W, obviously with the exception of any trash if present?
FP‐14 allows burying debris in approved areas within the right‐of‐way when approved by the CO; and SCR Subsection 203.05(c) has additional constraints for disposing of material by burying.
2/7/2019
11 X
For Bid Item A1080 MONUMENT, the plans say “Protect Monument”. What is the scope of work? Are we replacing the Monument or simply protecting the Monument from construction activities?
This will be addressed in a forthcoming amendment.
2/7/2019
File details come from the government source that posted it.