6-SLCI27030 - Attachment 4 - Score Sheet.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 73 KB Posted

Attached to
Salt Lake City Request for Proposals SLCI27030 - Virtual Reality Law Enforcement Training System
Solicitation number
SLCI27030
Issued by
Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah

About this file

This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for Salt Lake City Corporation's solicitation (SLCI27030) for a Virtual Reality Law Enforcement Training System. The scoresheet is designed to evaluate competitive sealed proposals from qualified vendors and establishes the framework for assessing each offeror's response against defined criteria. The evaluation process accommodates up to 20 potential offerors and requires completion of mandatory minimum requirements, including city ethics compliance and disclosure of any use of Generative AI technology or services.

The technical evaluation comprises 11 scoreable criteria weighted across 285 total possible points, with evaluations conducted by up to five evaluators using a 0-5 scale (0=Fail through 5=Excellent). Primary technical criteria include VR system and technical capabilities (14% weight), law enforcement training and scenario library (14%), de-escalation and crisis response capabilities (14%), scenario control and customization (14%), assessment and debriefing functions (14%), implementation and technical support (14%), vendor qualifications and experience (8.8%), project risk identification (3.5%), and additional service proposals (3.5%). Offerors must achieve a minimum score of 70% (200 points) on technical evaluation to advance to cost evaluation. Cost evaluation constitutes 30% of the total evaluation points (122.1 points possible), with points awarded based on a formula where the lowest cost proposal receives 100% of price points and other proposals receive proportional points based on their cost differential from the lowest bid. The total evaluation results in a maximum of 407 possible points, combining 70% technical score weight (285 points) with 30% cost score weight (122 points).

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Score Sheet

Virtual Reality Law Enforcement Training System
SOLICITATION # SLCI27030
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Score will be assigned as follows:
0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information.
Firm Name:1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information.
2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner.
Evaluator:3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner.
4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them.
Date:5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP.
Minimum Mandatory RequirementsRFP SectionEvaluation (Pass/Fail)
1City Ethics RequirementVII. a. i
2Offeror shall indicate if Offeror and/or Offeror’s subcontractor(s) will be using or offering GenAI technology, model(s), service(s), or system(s)sVII. a. ii
Scoreable Technical CriteriaRFP SectionEvaluator Score (0-5)Criteria Weight% of Tech CriteriaPoints PossiblePoints
EarnedMinimum Required
1VR System & Technical CapabilitiesVII. b. i814.0%40.00.0
2Law Enforcement Training & Scenario LibraryVII. b. ii814.0%40.00.0
3De-Escalation & Crisis Response CapabilitiesVII. b. iii814.0%40.00.0
4Scenario Control & CustomizationVII. b. iv814.0%40.00.0
5Assessment, Debriefing & After-Action ReviewVII. b. v814.0%40.00.0
6Implementation, Training & Technical SupportVII. b. vi814.0%40.00.0
7Vendor Qualifications & Relevant ExperienceVII. b. vii58.8%25.00.0
10Identify the major risks associated with this projectVII. b. x23.5%10.00.0
11In addition to the specific service proposals specified aboveVII. b. xi23.5%10.00.0
Scorable Technical Criteria Total100.0%285.00.00.0
Possible PointsPoints Earned
Total Technical Points100.00%285.000.00
Required Technical Point ThresholdRFP SectionMin PercentMin Points RequiredPoints EarnedPercent EarnedEvaluation
VIII70%2000.00.0%

Presentations: Offerors must receive a minimum score of 70% (199.5 points) of the total available technical evaluation points to advance to the cost evaluation phase. Cost proposals for Offerors that do not meet the 70% technical scoring threshold will not be evaluated.

CostRFP SectionLow Cost OptionOffered CostPercent of TotalPoints PossiblePoints Earned
VIII.d$0.00$0.0030%122.1ERROR:#DIV/0!
* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).
Total Evaluation PointsPercent of TotalPoints PossiblePoints Earned
Total Technical Evaluation Points70%2850.0
Total Cost Evaluation Points30%122ERROR:#DIV/0!
Total Evaluation Points100%407ERROR:#DIV/0!

Scoresheet Summary

TITLE OF PROJECT (to be inserted by the Division of Purchasing)
SOLICITATION # (to be inserted by the Division of Purchasing)
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET SUMMARY
Instructions:
Enter the solicitation number and name.
Enter each Offeror name.
Enter the Criteria name for each category.
Enter the Weight in column B that corresponds to the Criteria Weight on the Score Sheet tab column J for each criterion.
Enter the Total Possible Points for each Criterion, Cost Points, and Score Summary section.
Mandatory Minimum Requirements: Evaluate each offer and enter pass or fail
Ensure that the number of evaluator lines matches the number of evaluators.
Offers not meeting the Minimum Mandatory Requirements will not be evaluated further.
Ensure that the Total Average Score formula includes all of the evaluator line items.
Technical Scores: Enter each evaluator score for each offer.
Signatures:Date:
Evaluator 1__________________
Evaluator 2__________________
Evaluator 3__________________
Evaluator 4__________________
Evaluator 5__________________
Minimum Mandatory RequirementsOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor GOfferor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
1
2
3
WeightTechnical ScoresOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor GOfferor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
Criteria #1
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #1 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #2
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #2 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #3
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #3 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #4
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #4 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #5
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #5 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #6
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #6 - Total Points (Total Possible XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #7
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Criteria #7 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Total Technical Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Policy CriteriaOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor GOfferor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
WeightTechnical Scores
Policy Criteria #1: Sustainability
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
0.000Criteria #1 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = xx)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Policy Criteria #2: Business Certification
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
0.000Criteria #2 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = xx)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Policy Criteria #3: Apprenticeship
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
0.000Criteria #3 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = xx)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Policy Criteria #4: Local Small Business
Evaluator 1
Evaluator 2
Evaluator 3
Evaluator 4
Evaluator 5
Total Average Score0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
0.000Policy Criteria #4 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = xx)0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
Policy Criteria - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Total Technical Criteria Points (Total Technical Criteria Possible Points = XX) Minimum Threshold = XX0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Total Cost PointsCost ScoresOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor GOfferor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
Cost
0.0Cost Points0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Score SummaryOfferor AOfferor BOfferor COfferor DOfferor EOfferor FOfferor GOfferor HOfferor IOfferor JOfferor KOfferor LOfferor MOfferor NOfferor OOfferor POfferor QOfferor ROfferor SOfferor T
Total Technical Points (Total Possible = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Total Cost Points (Total Possible = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0
Grand Total Points (Total Possible = XX)0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0

image1.png image2.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .