5-TB2625-SIT - Attachment D - RFP Evaluation Scoresheet.pdf
PDF 118 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- TB2625-SIT
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This document is a Request for Proposal (RFP) evaluation scoresheet for Special Inspections and Testing of Construction Material, issued by the Salt Lake City School District (SLCSD) under Solicitation #TB2625-SIT. The scoresheet provides a detailed scoring framework for evaluating vendor proposals, with a total possible evaluation points of 1,000, broken down into 70% technical evaluation (700 points) and 30% price evaluation (300 points). The scoring methodology includes multiple technical criteria categories such as Company Experience, Qualifications of Key Personnel, Approach to Scope of Work, and References, with each category weighted and scored from 0-5 points.
The pricing evaluation will be conducted using a comparative method where the vendor with the lowest price receives the full allocation of price points, and other vendors receive a proportional percentage based on their proposed total cost. The RFP requires a minimum technical point threshold of 75% (525 points), and vendors will be scored across nine specific technical criteria sections including Site Work, Deep Foundation, Concrete, Masonry, Structural Steel, and other construction-related categories. The scoring rubric provides detailed guidance for evaluators, allowing for nuanced scoring including half-point increments, with descriptive definitions for each point level from 0 (no response) to 5 (best response).
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DRAFT: This document is intended to be a draft and should not be returned to the Purchasing Department. Please return this document to the evaluation committee chairperson This document is not subject to GRAMA pursuant to Utah Administrative Code R33-7-702(2).
Score will be assigned as follows:
RFP Section Evaluator
Score (0-5) Criteria Weight
% of Tech Criteria
Points Possible Points Earned
1a 2.2(A) 14 10.0% 70 0 1b 2.2(A) 21 15.0% 105 0
2a Overall Vendor Response to Scope of Work Section 2.1 21 15.0% 105 0 2b Site Work 2.2(B) 9.8 7.0% 49 0 2c Deep Foundation 2.2(B) 8.4 6.0% 42 0 2d Concrete 2.2(B) 11.2 8.0% 56 0 2e Masonry 2.2(B) 11.2 8.0% 56 0 2f Structural Steel 2.2(B) 9.8 7.0% 49 0 2g Reports 2.2(B) 14 10.0% 70 0 2h Schedule 2.2(B) 5.6 4.0% 28 0 3 2.2(C) 14 10.0% 70 0
100.0% 700 0
RFP Section Min Percent Min Points Required
Points Earned
Percent Earned Evaluation
4.2 75% 525 0 0
RFP Section Low Price
Option Vendored
Price Percent of
Total Points Possible Points Earned
3.1 30% 300 0
Percent of Total
Points Possible
Points Earned
70% 700 0 30% 300 0
100% 1,000 0
- Qualifications of Key Personnel Assigned to the SLCSD
0.0%
3 = The proposal response to this evaluation criteria is identified as being satisfactory, but, if applicable, lacks details or solutions offered by other offerors, as determined valuable by the evaluation committee member.
4 = The proposal response to this evaluation criteria exceeds the expectations of the evaluation committee, but, if applicable, lacked details or solutions offered by the proposal that received a 5.
5 = The proposal response to this evaluation criteria is identified as the best by the evaluation committee member.
NOTE: the evaluation committee may also utilize half points (i.e. 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, etc) where it deems appropriate
- Company History and Qualifications as a Whole Company Experience and Qualification of Key Personnel
Scoreable Technical Criteria
SPECIAL INSPECTIONS AND TESTING OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Firm Name:
Evaluator:
Date:
SOLICITATION # TB2625-SIT
0 = The evaluation committee member could not find a response to this evaluation criteria in the submitted proposal response.
1 = The proposal response to this evaluation criteria confused the evaluation committee member.
2 = The proposal response to this evaluation criteria is identified as unsatisfactory because it lacks details or solutions the evaluation committee member believes are necessary.
Total Evaluation Points Total Price Evaluation Points Total Technical Evaluation Points
Total Evaluation Points
Pricing will be evaluated based on the following:
- The vendor with the lowest price will receive the full allocation of price points.
- All other vendor proposals will receive a percentage of the allocated points based on the following formula:
- (Lowest Total Cost / Proposed Total Cost) x 30 = Vendors awarded price points.
Example: $1,000,000 / $1,150,000 = (87%) 87% x 30 Points = 26.1 Points Awarded
0.0%
Price
Required Technical Point Threshold
Approach to Scope of Work and Requirements
References
Score Sheet
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .