Solicitation 47PM0123R0022 A001 RFK Evaluation Factors.pdf

PDF 59 KB Posted

Attached to
Elevator Modernization Project, Robert F. Kennedy Federal Building, Washington, DC
Solicitation number
47PM0123R0022
Issued by

About this file

This solicitation requests proposals for an elevator modernization project at the Robert F. Kennedy Federal Building in Washington, DC. The General Services Administration seeks a design-build contract to modernize thirty public elevators, two private elevators, and associated elevator equipment. Proposals are due July 17, 2023. The selected contractor will provide professional engineering, construction management, inspection, testing, and commissioning services. The project involves renovating elevators that service eight to nine levels of the 1.25 million square foot building, which is occupied by the Department of Justice. The North American Industry Classification System code for this work is 236220 and the small business size standard is $45 million in average annual receipts.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
A0005 Solicitation 47PM0123R0022 RFI Clarification 2023 07 25.pdf PDF
A0005 Solicitation 47PM0123R0022 SF30 2023 07 25.pdf PDF
A004 Solicitation 47PM0123R0022 DOJ RFK Elevators Bid Sheet Rev 2023 07 19.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A004 Solicitation 47PM0123R0022 SF30 2023 07 19.pdf PDF
A004 Solicitation 47PM0123R0022 FY23 Division One Section List and Links.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A0004 Solicitation No. 47PM0123R0022 RFI and Clarifications 2023 07 19 .pdf PDF
A0003 Solicitation 47PM0123R0022 SF30 2023 07 13.pdf PDF
A0003 Solicitation 47PM0123R0022 Evaluation Factors 2023 07 13.pdf PDF
A003 Revised Solicitation 47PM0123R0022 2023 07 13.pdf PDF
A0003 Solicitation 47PM0123R0022 Pre-Proposal Meeting Site Visit Slide Deck 6-29-2023.pdf PDF
A0003 Solicitation 47PM0123R0022 Bid Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
A0003 Solicitation 47PM0123R0022 RFI 2023 07 13.pdf PDF
A0003 Solicitation 47PM0123R0022 Sign In Sheet 2023 06 29 (2).pdf PDF
Amendment 0002 Wage DC20220002 20230602.pdf PDF
Amendment 0002 Revised Solicitation 47PM0123R0022 2023 06 23.pdf PDF
Amendment 0002 47PM0123R0022.pdf PDF
Revised Solicitation No. 47PM0123R0022 A001 2023 06 21.pdf PDF
Solicitation 47PM0123R0022 A0001 2023 06 21.pdf PDF
C D Waste Monthly Report TEMPLATE.pdf PDF
Solicitation No. 47PM0123R0022 DB Agreement 2023 06 14.pdf PDF
Solicitation No. 47PM0123R0022 2023 06 14.pdf PDF
PBS Past Performance Form 20210524 (1).docx DOCX document
Solicitation 47PM0123R0022 SOW Design-Build 2023 06 05.pdf PDF
C D Waste Mgmt Plan TEMPLATE.pdf PDF
47PM0123R0022 SF1442 Form 2023 06 07.pdf PDF
RFK-DOJ_DC0023ZZ_Elevator_Modernization_TechStudy_2019-07-29 (1).pdf PDF
Solicitation No. 47PM0123R0022 Reps and Certs 2023 06 14.pdf PDF
Show all 27

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Evaluation Factors

U.S. Department of Justice Elevator Project at Robert F. Kennedy Federal Building

PROJECT TYPE: Elevator Modernization

DESIGN-BUILD (DB) TEAM | DESIGN-BUILD PROJECT DELIVERY

PROJECT IDENTIFICATION:

PROJECT NAME U.S. Department of Justice Elevator Project at Robert F. Kennedy Federal Building

SOLICITATION

NUMBER

47PM0123R0022

REGION Region 11

DIVISION GSA OFFICE OF DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION

BUILDING NAME Robert F. Kennedy Federal Building

BUILDING

ADDRESS

850 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530

CONTRACTING

OFFICER

Kelly DeShields

PROJECT

MANAGER

Courtney Brown

LAST REVISION 03.14.2023

Technical Evaluation Criteria

The Government intends to award a firm-fixed price task order through Lowest Price Technically

Acceptable (LPTA) source selection procedures in accordance with FAR 15.101-2, as supplemented. Accordingly, all evaluation factors will not be scored, but will instead be evaluated on a “Go/No Go” basis. The Government will evaluate the three (3) lowest price proposals first for technical acceptability. If they are considered technical acceptable, award will be made to the lowest price technically acceptable offeror. If the 3 lowest price proposals are determined to be technically unacceptable, the Government will review the next 3 lowest price proposals. The evaluation process shall continue until the Government determines a lowest price technically acceptable offeror.

Factor 1 - Experience on Similar Projects:

Evaluation Criteria:

This factor evaluates the extent of the Offeror’s past experience as a firm in providing similar construction services to determine the firm’s experience in completing the tasks detailed in the performance work statement.

The Offeror must demonstrate successful experience as a General Construction (GC)

Contractor responsible for the construction of at least three (3) similar projects substantially completed within the last eight (8) years. A “similar project” is defined as a project that is comparable in nature, type, and complexity as defined by all of the following characteristics:

● Project involved renovation or the modernization of comparably the design and construction of 10 elevators;

● Project was performed in an occupied office building;

● Project involved all of the following discipline - elevators (machine room and associated equipment: Fire/Life Safety, Mechanical and Electrical);

● The total project construction cost at award of the construction contract(s) was not less than $8 million.

Submittal Requirement:

List three (3) construction projects that your firm has successfully completed over the last 8 years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. All 3 projects must, at a minimum, contain the following:

● Project title and contract number

● Offeror’s role in the contract (prime or subcontractor); if subcontractor, list name, address, and phone number of prime contractor

● (Reference) Name of person representing the customer who is familiar with the project and their current phone number

● Project description and place of performance

● Contract period

● Project of minimum 10 elevators for design and construction services

● Description of work done directly by offeror

● Description of work done by subcontractor(s), if applicable (subcontracting plan)

● Original construction award amount

● Actual completion amount

Standard

This standard is met when the offeror demonstrates successful experience as a General

Contractor responsible for the design/construction of three similar projects as indicated in the

Submittal Requirement for Factor 1.

Factor 2 - Past Performance of Offeror

Evaluation Criteria: This factor evaluates the past performance of the Offeror to determine responsibility.

The Offeror’s past performance record demonstrates satisfactory performance on at least three

(3) similar projects substantially completed within the last five (5) years. Any proposal which does not demonstrate satisfactory performance on at least three (3) similar projects substantially completed within the last five (5) years will not be considered technically acceptable.

Submittal Requirement:

List three (3) design/build projects that your firm has successfully completed over the last 5 years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. All 3 projects must, at a minimum, contain the following:

Project title and contract number Offeror’s role in the contract

(prime or subcontractor); if subcontractor, list name, address, and phone number of prime contractor

(Reference) Name of person representing the customer who is familiar with the project and their current phone number

Project description and place of performance Contract period

Project of minimum 10 elevators for design and construction services

Description of work done directly by offeror

Description of work done by subcontractor(s), if applicable (subcontracting plan)

Original construction award amount Actual completion amount

This factor considers the past performance of the Offeror. For each project submitted under Factor 1, the Offeror shall submit no more than two Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ)

(Attachment 1) filled out by owner references with knowledge of the Offeror’s performance of the associated design build contract.

The Government requests that the offeror’s reference complete the PPQ and submit it directly back to the contract specialist along with the technical proposal. Questionnaires may also be submitted by references directly to the Government via email to Contracting Specialist. Offerors are entirely responsible for ensuring that PPQs are submitted by the due date and time for receipt of proposals. The government reserves the right to verify any and all information on this form.

Offerors are reminded that the completed Past Performance Questionnaires are confidential and are considered to be procurement sensitive information (until determined otherwise).

Standard

This standard is met when the offeror clearly submits all Criteria as indicated in the Submittal

Requirement for Factor 2.

The Government reserves the right to use other government data available in its assessment of the offeror. The quality of the reference information supplied will be considered. In accordance with FAR 15.306, the offeror will be given the opportunity to respond to adverse past performance information.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .