A0003 Solicitation 47PM0123R0022 Evaluation Factors 2023 07 13.pdf
PDF 186 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 47PM0123R0022
About this file
This solicitation requests proposals for an elevator modernization project at the Robert F. Kennedy Federal Building in Washington, DC. The General Services Administration seeks a design-build contract to modernize thirty public elevators, two private elevators, with professional architect, engineering, construction management, inspection, testing and commissioning services. Interested firms must submit proposals by July 17, 2023. The selected contractor will modernize thirty-two elevators in total across nine levels of the 1.26 million square foot building, which is fully occupied by the Department of Justice. Evaluation criteria include relevant past experience, performance references, and pricing.
View the file
Other files
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation Factors
U.S. Department of Justice Elevator Project at Robert F. Kennedy Federal Building PROJECT TYPE: Elevator Modernization
DESIGN-BUILD (DB) TEAM | DESIGN-BUILD PROJECT DELIVERY
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION:
PROJECT NAME U.S. Department of Justice Elevator Project at Robert F. Kennedy Federal Building
SOLICITATION
NUMBER
47PM0123R0022
REGION Region 11
DIVISION GSA OFFICE OF DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION
BUILDING NAME Robert F. Kennedy Federal Building
BUILDING
ADDRESS
850 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530
CONTRACTING
OFFICER
Kelly Deshields
PROJECT
MANAGER
Courtney Brown
LAST REVISION 07.13.2023
Technical Evaluation Criteria
The Government intends to award a firm-fixed price task order through Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) source selection procedures in accordance with FAR 15.101-2, as supplemented. Accordingly, all evaluation factors will not be scored, but will instead be evaluated on a “Go/No Go” basis. The Government will evaluate the three (3) lowest price proposals first for technical acceptability. If they are considered technical acceptable, award will be made to the lowest price technically acceptable offeror. If the 3 lowest price proposals are determined to be technically unacceptable, the Government will review the next 3 lowest price proposals. The evaluation process shall continue until the Government determines a lowest price technically acceptable offeror.
Factor 1 - Experience on Similar Projects:
Evaluation Criteria:
This factor evaluates the extent of the Offeror’s past experience as a firm in providing similar construction services to determine the firm’s experience in completing the tasks detailed in the performance work statement.
The Offeror must demonstrate successful experience as a General Construction (GC) Contractor responsible for the construction of at least three (3) similar projects substantially completed within the last eight (8) years. A “similar project” is defined as a project that is comparable in nature, type, and complexity as defined by all of the following characteristics:
● Project involved renovation or the modernization of comparably the design and construction of 10 elevators.
● Project was performed in an occupied office building.
● Project involved all of the following discipline - elevators (machine room and associated equipment: Fire/Life Safety, Mechanical and Electrical).
● The total project construction cost at award of the construction contract(s) was not less than $8 million.
Submittal Requirement:
List three (3) construction projects that your firm has successfully completed over the last 8 years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. All 3 projects must, at a minimum, contain the following:
● Project title and contract number
● Offeror’s role in the contract (prime or subcontractor); if subcontractor, list name, address, and phone number of prime contractor
● (Reference) Name of person representing the customer who is familiar with the project and their current phone number.
● Project description and place of performance
● Contract period
● Project of minimum 10 elevators for design and construction services
● Description of work done directly by offeror
● Description of work done by subcontractor(s), if applicable (subcontracting plan)
● Original construction award amount
● Actual completion amount
Acceptability Standard
This standard is met when the offeror demonstrates successful experience as a General Contractor responsible for the design/construction of three similar projects as indicated in the Submittal Requirement for Factor 1.
Factor 2 - Past Performance of Offeror
Evaluation Criteria: This factor evaluates the past performance of the Offeror to determine responsibility.
The Offeror’s past performance record demonstrates satisfactory performance on at least three
(3) similar projects substantially completed within the last five (5) years. Any proposal which does not demonstrate satisfactory performance on at least three (3) similar projects substantially completed within the last five (5) years will not be considered technically acceptable.
Submittal Requirements:
List three (3) design/build projects that your firm has successfully completed over the last 5 years from the date of issuance of this solicitation. All 3 projects must, at a minimum, contain the following:
● Project title and contract number Offeror’s role in the contract (prime or subcontractor); if subcontractor, list name, address, and phone number of prime contractor
● (Reference) Name of person representing the customer who is familiar with the project and their current phone number
● Project description and place of performance Contract period
● Project of minimum 10 elevators for design and construction services
● Description of work done directly by offeror
● Description of work done by subcontractor(s), if applicable (subcontracting plan)
● Original construction award amount Actual completion amount
This factor considers the past performance of the Offeror. For each project submitted under Factor 1, the Offeror shall submit no more than two Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) (Attachment 1) filled out by owner references with knowledge of the Offeror’s performance of the associated design build contract or CPARS Report.
The Government requests that the offeror’s reference complete the PPQ and submit it directly back to the contract specialist along with the technical proposal. Questionnaires may also be submitted by references directly to the Government via email to Contracting Specialist. Offerors are entirely responsible for ensuring that PPQs are submitted by the due date and time for receipt of proposals. The government reserves the right to verify any and all information on this form.
Offerors are reminded that the completed Past Performance Questionnaires are confidential and are considered to be procurement sensitive information (until determined otherwise).
The CPARS Report can be submitted directly from the offeror to the Government via email to the Contract Specialist along with the technical proposal.
Acceptability Standard
This standard is met when the offeror clearly submits all Criteria as indicated in the Submittal Requirement for Factor 2.
The Government reserves the right to use other government data available in its assessment of the offeror. The quality of the reference information supplied will be considered. In accordance with FAR 15.306, the offeror will be given the opportunity to respond to adverse past performance information.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .