Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 174 KB Posted

Attached to
Administrative and Technical Support Services Contract Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
47PJ0022R0019
Issued by
General Services Administration Public Buildings Service Region 8

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Administrative and Technical Support Services Contract, newest first.
File Type Posted
Attachment J-02 - Bid Sheet Revision 002.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment 22R0019_0004.pdf PDF
Past Performance Questionnaire Revision 001.pdf PDF
R8 Task Order Bid Sheet Revision 002.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Amendment 0004 031122.pdf PDF
R8 Task Order Bid Sheet Revision 001.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
22R0019 Solicitation Revision 001.pdf PDF
Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
PDs Consolidated Revision 001.pdf PDF
22R0019 Amendment 0003.pdf PDF
Attachment J-02 - Bid Sheet Revision 001.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
R8 PDs Consolidated Revision 001.pdf PDF
Region 8 PWS Revision 001.pdf PDF
Attachment J-01 Admin Tech Support PWS Revision 0001.pdf PDF
Amendment 22R0019_0002.pdf PDF
WD Utah .pdf PDF
WD Ramsey Rolette.pdf PDF
WD Grand Forks.pdf PDF
WD Cass.pdf PDF
R8 PDs Consolidated.pdf PDF
Attachment J-02 - Bid Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
22R0019 Solicitation.pdf PDF
WD Weber.pdf PDF
WD Washington.pdf PDF
WD Beadle Brown.pdf PDF
WD Burke Ward.pdf PDF
WD Sheridan.pdf PDF
R8 Task Order Bid Sheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
WD DenverJefferson.pdf PDF
WD Natrona.pdf PDF
WD Laramie.pdf PDF
WD Salt Lake.pdf PDF
WD Pennington.pdf PDF
WD Hughes.pdf PDF
WD Pembina.pdf PDF
WD Burleigh.pdf PDF
WD Yellowstone.pdf PDF
WD Missoula.pdf PDF
WD Lincoln.pdf PDF
WD Boulder.pdf PDF
Region 8 PWS.pdf PDF
Solicitation Amendment 22R0019 0001.pdf PDF
Lincolin Minniehaha.pdf PDF
WD Gallatin Silver Bow.pdf PDF
WD Blaine Hill.pdf PDF
WD Mesa.pdf PDF
WD Larimer.pdf PDF
PDs Consolidated.pdf PDF
Attachment J-01 Admin Tech Support PWS.pdf PDF
47PJ0022R0019 Form.pdf PDF
Show all 50

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Attachment J-64

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Please have the reference complete and submit directly to the GSA Contracting Office, Sarah Callies, sarah.callies@gsa.gov no later than March 28, 2022, 2:00 PM Mountain Time.

Section 1 – To be completed by the Contractor

Contractor’s Name:

Address:

Telephone Number:

Point of Contact (POC):

Role of the POC:

Project Title or Brief Description of the Work:

Contract Number:

Initial Award Amount:

Total Award Amount – with Mods:

Dates of Performance:

To be Completed by the Reference

Note: Please complete the following questionnaire on behalf of the contractor proposing to complete the work under this Request for Proposal. The following information is requested based on your experiences with the contractor named above. The completed questionnaire should be emailed directly to the Contracting Office to ensure the confidentially of your responses. Your responses will be reviewed solely for the purposes of past performance and no one other than the selection committee will see your response. Thank you, in advance, for your time and providing us with this valuable input.

Section 2 – To be completed by the Reference

NOTE: If the contractor holds or has held other contracts or task orders with your agency/organization in the last five (5) years, please complete separate evaluation forms for those contracts as well.

Name of Respondent:

Title/Company Name:

Role of Respondent on the project Contract:

Address:

Telephone:

Email:

mailto:sarah.callies@gsa.gov

Performance Information: Select the term that most accurately describes the Contractor’s performance in accordance with the following questions. Please provide a narrative explanation for each.

1. Effectiveness of management (For example: Coordination and responsiveness, management of resources/personnel, flexibility, and coordination/control of contractor personnel)

Outstanding

Good

Satisfactory

– Neutral

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Not

Applicable

Narrative Explanation:

2. Effectiveness in retaining qualified staff.

Applicabl e

3. Effectiveness of communicating with agency regarding employee performance.

4. Ability to provide employees that match the performance criteria of the customer.

5. Ability to complete work within the stated period of performance, i.e., worked progressed in accordance with the progress schedule.

6. Timeliness and professionalism of monthly report submittals.

7. Ability to integrate with the Region's workplace culture.

8. Errors in work/rework or was addressed promptly and professionally.

9. How would you rate this contractor’s overall performance and quality of work?

10. Considering what you know today about the contractor’s ability to execute the work under the contract or task order and what they promised in their proposal, would you award to them again given the choice?

Definitely

Would

Probably

Would

Might or

Might Not

Probably

Would Not

Definitely

Would Not

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .