Tomo CMc PPQ.pdf
PDF 115 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 47PF0020R0071
About this file
This document contains a source selection plan and past performance reference questionnaire for a federal solicitation. The General Services Administration is seeking a Construction Manager as Constructor for the alteration of the Tomochichi Federal Building and U.S. Courthouse in Savannah, Georgia. The estimated total construction costs are between $50-60 million, with an anticipated construction contract award date of January 2021 and performance period of approximately 2.5 years. Offerors are to download the solicitation from beta.SAM.gov and monitor for amendments. A pre-proposal conference will be held on September 9, 2020, with proposals due around September 28, 2020. The work involves repair, renovation, rehabilitation, preservation, and alteration of the historic structure while upgrading major building systems. The selected CMc will work with GSA, the Architect and Engineer firm, and Construction Manager as Agent/Commissioning Agent on the project and be responsible for construction administration on a firm-fixed price contract.
View the file
Other files
Show all 31
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Source Selection Plan RFP# 47PF0020R0071
Instructions for Questionnaire
Dear Respondent, The United States General Services Administration would like to thank you for taking the time to assist us in the selection of a Construction Manager as Constructor (CMc) for our Project.
Please complete the questionnaire to the best of your ability. We ask that you keep your responses to this questionnaire confidential. The information you provide on this questionnaire will not be shared with the Offeror.
When completed, please send a scanned or electronic copy of the questionnaire to the following e-mail addresses:
helen.dimonte@gsa.gov daniel.ramirez@gsa.gov
Please request a read receipt and include the following information in the subject line of the e-mail:
Solicitation No. 47PF0020R0071
We ask that the questionnaire be returned ON or BEFORE October 26, 2020.
We appreciate your time and efforts in assisting us in serving the American public.
GSA, Region 5 Public Buildings Service Acquisition Management Division 32 September 21, 2020 mailto:helen.dimonte@gsa.gov mailto:daniel.ramirez@gsa.gov
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE - 2 Parts
Part 1 (To be completed by Offeror)
CONTRACTOR:________________________________________
FIRM/KEY PERSONNEL:_________________________________
Reference Information:
Name:________________________________________________ Company:_____________________________________________ Telephone Number:_____________________________________ Contracted Role: _______________________________________ Project Name: _________________________________________ High level description of Scope of Services provided:_____________________________________________________________________ Contract Number: ______________________________________ Location of Contract Performance: _________________________ Completion Date: ______________________________________ Length of time contractor employed: ________________________ Price/cost for services provided: __________________________ Type of space/building: __________________________________ Delivery Method/Type of Contract:(ie CMc, GC, D/B) ___________ Actual Square Footage: _________________________________ New Construction: Yes___ No____ Number of Stories of Bldg: _______________________________ Rehabilitation: Yes___ No____ Additional Comments_____________________________________
Acquisition Management Division 33 September 21, 2020
Part 2 (To be completed by Offeror’s Client)
Questions: (Some questions may not apply to roles)
BUDGET
1. Did the contractor complete the project within the original contract budget? If not, what was the reason for the difference in actual costs for the project?
Poor Fair Good Very Good Excellent N/A Comments:
SCHEDULE
1. Did the contractor cause any delays to the original project schedule? If so, what was the reason for delays?
STAFFING
3. Did the contractor staff the job adequately? Were key personnel adequately qualified for their positions?
ADMINISTRATION
4. How responsive and responsible was the contractor in administrative areas? (e.g.
submitting reports, documenting progress/problems, filing correspondence, tracking changes, responding to Requests for Information (RFI’s), processing payments, etc.)
Acquisition Management Division 34 September 21, 2020
SAFETY
5. Did the contractor address safety issues? (Developed a good safety plan, followed it, enforced it with subcontractors, posted OSHA information, etc.)
PROJECT MANAGEMENT
6. Did the prime contractor manage the subcontractors effectively? (Coordinate work, update them on changes, pay promptly, address work if performance was poor, etc.) How well did the contractor demonstrate sensitivity to client/tenant concerns (coordination issues, debris, noise, fumes, inconveniences, disruptions within the occupied spaces, etc.)?
PERFORMANCE
7. Overall, how would you rate the contractor’s performance? How would you describe the quality of work? If you had a chance, would you hire the contractor again? Why or why not?
Would you like to make any additional comments, positive or negative, concerning the Offeror’s past performance on your contract(s)?
Acquisition Management Division 35 September 21, 2020
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .