4-TB2718-RCM - Attachment D - RFP Evaluation Scoresheet.pdf
PDF 126 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- TB2718-RCM
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This is an RFP Evaluation Scoresheet for the Salt Lake City School District's solicitation for Construction Manager/General Contractor (CM/GC) services for a Career Technical Center renovation project. The project involves substantial renovations to the former Riley Elementary School site located at 1410 South 800 West in Salt Lake City, Utah. The evaluation framework establishes a comprehensive scoring methodology to assess vendor proposals based on technical qualifications and pricing.
The evaluation scoresheet allocates 800 points (80% weighting) to technical criteria and 200 points (20% weighting) to price evaluation, for a total possible score of 1,000 points. Technical evaluation categories include company experience and management plan, qualifications of key personnel, approach to preconstruction phase, approach to construction phase, approach to closeout and warranty phase, project references, and self-performed work considerations, among other factors. Price evaluation components assessed across Attachment C include preconstruction fees, construction management fees, construction supervision costs, general conditions, bonding costs, change order markups, weather allowance, site security allowance, and owner contingency. A minimum mandatory requirement threshold of 75% (600 points) must be achieved in the technical evaluation for a proposal to remain eligible. The scoresheet utilizes a standardized 0-10 point scale for technical criteria (where 0 indicates failure to address requirements and 10 indicates excellence) and a 0-5 point scale for price criteria, enabling consistent evaluation across all submitted proposals. The evaluation committee is permitted to utilize half-point increments as deemed appropriate during assessment.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DRAFT: This document is intended to be a draft and should not be returned to the Purchasing Department. Please return this document to the evaluation committee This document is not subject to GRAMA pursuant to Utah Administrative Code R33-7-702(2).
RFP
Section
Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
1 2.2 2 2.2 3 2.2 4 2.2 5 2.2 6 2.2
RFP
Section
Evaluator Score (0-10)
Criteria Weight
% of Tech Criteria
Points Possible Points Earned
1 2.3(A) 4 5.0% 40 0 2 2.3(B) 8 10.0% 80 0 3 2.3(C)
3a 2.3(C) 7.2 9.0% 72 0 3b 2.3(C) 12 15.0% 120 0 3c 2.3(C) 6.4 8.0% 64 0 3d 2.3(C) 8 10.0% 80 0 3e 2.3(C) 8 10.0% 80 0 4 2.3(D) 4.8 6.0% 48 0 5 2.3(E) 4.8 6.0% 48 0 6 2.3(F) 4 5.0% 40 0 7 2.3(G) 4 5.0% 40 0 8 2.3(H)
8a 2.3(H) 2.4 3.0% 24 0 8b 2.3(H) 6.4 8.0% 64 0
100% 800 0
RFP
Section
Min Percent
Min Points Required
Points Earned
Percent Earned Evaluation
4.2 75% 600 0 0%
RFP
Section
Evaluator Score (0-5)
Criteria Weight
% of Price Points
Points Possible Points Earned
1 Attach C 3 15.0% 30 0 2 Attach C 5 25.0% 50 0 3 Attach C 5 25.0% 50 0 4 Attach C 5 25.0% 50 0 5 Attach C 0.4 2.0% 4 0 6 Attach C 1.6 8.0% 16 0
100% 200 0
Percent of Total
Points Possible
Points Earned
80% 800 0 20% 200 0
100% 1,000 0
10 = Excellent, the proposal addresses all aspects of the requirements, with exceptional support and
Current Licensing
Availability for In-Person Interviews
Bonding and Insurance Termination or Debarment Certifications
Page Limitation
Required Technical Point Threshold
- Approach to Preconstruction Phase
- Approach to Construction Phase
- Approach to Closeout and Warranty Phase
- Project References
- Key Personnel References
Total Evaluation Points Total Cost Evaluation Points Total Technical Evaluation Points
Total Evaluation Points
Price Evaluation
Preconstruction Fee Construction Management Fee Construction Supervision Cost General Conditions Cost of Bonds Change Order Markups
- Approach to Subcontractor Selection Process
- Approach to Project Schedule Correction
References Self Performed Work
Weather Allowance Site Security Allowance Owner Contingency
Construction Manager/General Contractor for Career Technical Center
RFP Evaluation Scoresheet
Firm Name:
Evaluator:
Date:
1-4 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal has major gaps in addressing some or all of the requirements of the RFP or has serious deficiencies in support or detail for multiple requirements.
5-7 = Substandard, the proposal does not address all of the requirements or criteria in the RFP or does not provide sufficient support or detail to address all of them.
Solicitation # TB2718-RCM
Scores will be assigned as follows:
0 = Fail, the proposal does not answer or address the requirement
Qualifications of Key Personnel
Scoreable Technical Criteria
Company Experience
Management Plan
7.5 = Pass, the proposal addresses all requirements with sufficient support and detail for each requirement.
8 = Good, the proposal addresses all aspects of the requirements, with ample support and detail for each requirement.
9 = Great, the proposal addresses all aspects of the requirements, with abundant support and detail for each requirement.
NOTE: the evaluation committee may also utilize half points (i.e. 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, etc) where it deems appropriate
Minimum Mandatory Requirements
Adherence to Utah Procurement Code Requirements When
Score Sheet
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .