4-Attachment 3 - Score Sheet.pdf
PDF 185 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- SLC26039
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for Salt Lake City Corporation's solicitation (SLC26039) for dockless shared mobility device services. The scoresheet establishes the evaluation criteria and scoring methodology for competitive sealed proposals from qualified vendors to provide motor-assisted scooters, bicycles, and/or electric bicycles for hire within Salt Lake City's municipal jurisdiction. The evaluation framework includes mandatory pass/fail requirements covering RFP sections VII.a.i through VII.a.iii, followed by a comprehensive technical scoring section with 19 primary evaluation criteria weighted across multiple performance areas.
The technical evaluation criteria are scored on a 0-5 scale (with 0 representing failure and 5 representing excellence) and collectively represent 190 points of the total evaluation. Key evaluation categories include qualifications and experience, fleet size and diversity, management and integration with transit systems, equity considerations, marketing and outreach, pricing and payment options, data management and privacy, device and user safety, parking requirements, operational practices, and labor standards. Additionally, four policy criteria related to sustainability, disadvantaged business enterprise participation, apprenticeships, and local small business involvement contribute 9.5 points (5 percent of total points) to the evaluation. The complete evaluation totals 199.5 possible points, with the scoresheet template providing columns for evaluator scores and points earned across all weighted criteria.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score will be assigned as follows:
0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or ca 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RF 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in s 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria describ
RFP Section Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
1 RFP VII.a.i 2 RFP VII.a.ii 3 RFP VII.a.iii
RFP Section Evaluator
Score (0-5) Criteria Weight
% of Tech Criteria
Points Possible
Points Earned
Minimum Required
1 VII.b.i 4 10.5% 20.0 0.0 2 VII.b.ii.1,2 1 2.6% 5.0 0.0 3 VII.b.ii.3.1) 3 7.9% 15.0 0.0 4 VII.b.ii.3.2) 3 7.9% 15.0 0.0
| 5 VII.b.ii.3.3) | 1 2.6% 5.0 0.0 |
| 6 VII.b.ii.3.4) | 2 5.3% 10.0 0.0 |
7 VII.b.ii.3.5) 3 7.9% 15.0 0.0 8 VII.b.ii.3.6) 2 5.3% 10.0 0.0 9 VII.b.ii.3.7) 1 2.6% 5.0 0.0
| 10 VII.b.ii.3.8) | 2 5.3% 10.0 0.0 |
| 11 VII.b.ii.3.9) | 2 5.3% 10.0 0.0 |
12 VII.b.ii.3.10) 1 2.6% 5.0 0.0 13 VII.b.ii.3.11) 2 5.3% 10.0 0.0 14 VII.b.ii.4 6 15.8% 30.0 0.0 15 VII.b.ii.6 1 2.6% 5.0 0.0 16 VII.b.ii.7 1 2.6% 5.0 0.0 17 VII.b.ii.8 1 2.6% 5.0 0.0 18 VII.b.ii.9, 10 1 2.6% 5.0 0.0 19 VII.b.ii.11 1 2.6% 5.0 0.0
100.0% 190.0 0.0 0.0
RFP Section Evaluator
Score (0-5) Available
Points Possible Points Points Earned
1 VII.c.i 0 1.25% 2.38 0.00 2 VII.c.ii 0 1.25% 2.38 0.00 3 VII.c.iii 0 1.25% 2.38 0.00 4 VII.c.iv 0 1.25% 2.38 0.00
5.00% 9.50 0.00
Possible Points Points Earned
100.00% 199.50 0.00
Percent of Total Points
Possible Points Earned
100% 199.5 0.0 100% 199.5 0.0Total Evaluation Points
Policy Criteria Total
Total Technical Points
Total Evaluation Points
Policy Criteria
Sustainability Disadvantaged business enterprise Apprenticeships Local Small Business
Total Technical Evaluation Points
Advocacy Timeline for Initial Deployment Risks Claims Handling Process Additional Services and Innovations
Scorable Technical Criteria Total
Fleet Size, Diversity, and Deployment Zones Management Integration with Transit and Broader Transportation System Equity Marketing, Outreach, and Community Partnerships Pricing, Payment Options, and Price Accessibility.
Data Management and Privacy
Device Safety User Education and Safety Contractor Enforcement/Noncompliance Device User Enforcement and Noncompliance Parking Operational Requirements and Labor Practices
Experience (5 years, 5 markets similar to SLC size) Insurance requirements
Scoreable Technical Criteria
Qualifications Overview and Program Goals
Evaluator:
Date:
Minimum Mandatory Requirements
City Ethics Requirement
Dockless Shared Mobility Device Services
SOLICITATION # SLC26039
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Firm Name:
Score Sheet
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .