3-Attachment 3 - Score Sheet.pdf
PDF 185 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- SLCI26039
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for Salt Lake City Corporation's solicitation (SLC26039) for dockless shared mobility device services. The city seeks qualified offerors to provide dockless shared mobility devices, including motor-assisted scooters, bicycles, and electric bicycles, for hire within Salt Lake City's municipal jurisdiction. The evaluation scoresheet establishes a comprehensive scoring framework with mandatory pass/fail requirements (RFP Sections VII.a.i, VII.a.ii, and VII.a.iii) that proposals must satisfy. The technical evaluation criteria carry a total of 190 possible points across 19 scored categories, while policy criteria related to sustainability, disadvantaged business enterprise participation, apprenticeships, and local small business considerations contribute an additional 9.5 possible points, for a combined total evaluation score of 199.5 points.
The scoresheet employs a standardized 0-5 scoring scale, where 0 indicates failure to address requirements, 1 represents poor adequacy, 2 denotes unsatisfactory responses, 3 indicates satisfactory compliance, 4 represents good performance, and 5 reflects excellent performance exceeding all requirements. Key technical evaluation areas include fleet size, diversity and deployment zones (30 points), contractor enforcement and noncompliance procedures, device user enforcement and noncompliance policies, parking operational requirements and labor practices, experience requirements (5 years in 5 markets similar to Salt Lake City size), insurance requirements, qualifications and program goals, management integration with transit systems, equity considerations, marketing and outreach, pricing and payment accessibility, data management and privacy, device safety, user education and safety, and additional services and innovations. The evaluation framework provides weighted percentages for each criterion, with the most heavily weighted category being fleet size, diversity, and deployment zones at 15.8 percent of total technical criteria points.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score will be assigned as follows:
0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or ca 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RF 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in s 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria describ
RFP Section Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
1 RFP VII.a.i 2 RFP VII.a.ii 3 RFP VII.a.iii
RFP Section Evaluator
Score (0-5) Criteria Weight
% of Tech Criteria
Points Possible
Points Earned
Minimum Required
1 VII.b.i 4 10.5% 20.0 0.0 2 VII.b.ii.1,2 1 2.6% 5.0 0.0 3 VII.b.ii.3.1) 3 7.9% 15.0 0.0 4 VII.b.ii.3.2) 3 7.9% 15.0 0.0
| 5 VII.b.ii.3.3) | 1 2.6% 5.0 0.0 |
| 6 VII.b.ii.3.4) | 2 5.3% 10.0 0.0 |
7 VII.b.ii.3.5) 3 7.9% 15.0 0.0 8 VII.b.ii.3.6) 2 5.3% 10.0 0.0 9 VII.b.ii.3.7) 1 2.6% 5.0 0.0
| 10 VII.b.ii.3.8) | 2 5.3% 10.0 0.0 |
| 11 VII.b.ii.3.9) | 2 5.3% 10.0 0.0 |
12 VII.b.ii.3.10) 1 2.6% 5.0 0.0 13 VII.b.ii.3.11) 2 5.3% 10.0 0.0 14 VII.b.ii.4 6 15.8% 30.0 0.0 15 VII.b.ii.6 1 2.6% 5.0 0.0 16 VII.b.ii.7 1 2.6% 5.0 0.0 17 VII.b.ii.8 1 2.6% 5.0 0.0 18 VII.b.ii.9, 10 1 2.6% 5.0 0.0 19 VII.b.ii.11 1 2.6% 5.0 0.0
100.0% 190.0 0.0 0.0
RFP Section Evaluator
Score (0-5) Available
Points Possible Points Points Earned
1 VII.c.i 0 1.25% 2.38 0.00 2 VII.c.ii 0 1.25% 2.38 0.00 3 VII.c.iii 0 1.25% 2.38 0.00 4 VII.c.iv 0 1.25% 2.38 0.00
5.00% 9.50 0.00
Possible Points Points Earned
100.00% 199.50 0.00
Percent of Total Points
Possible Points Earned
100% 199.5 0.0 100% 199.5 0.0Total Evaluation Points
Policy Criteria Total
Total Technical Points
Total Evaluation Points
Policy Criteria
Sustainability Disadvantaged business enterprise Apprenticeships Local Small Business
Total Technical Evaluation Points
Advocacy Timeline for Initial Deployment Risks Claims Handling Process Additional Services and Innovations
Scorable Technical Criteria Total
Fleet Size, Diversity, and Deployment Zones Management Integration with Transit and Broader Transportation System Equity Marketing, Outreach, and Community Partnerships Pricing, Payment Options, and Price Accessibility.
Data Management and Privacy
Device Safety User Education and Safety Contractor Enforcement/Noncompliance Device User Enforcement and Noncompliance Parking Operational Requirements and Labor Practices
Experience (5 years, 5 markets similar to SLC size) Insurance requirements
Scoreable Technical Criteria
Qualifications Overview and Program Goals
Evaluator:
Date:
Minimum Mandatory Requirements
City Ethics Requirement
Dockless Shared Mobility Device Services
SOLICITATION # SLC26039
RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Firm Name:
Score Sheet
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .