36C77626Q0140 0001.docx

5. PROJECT NUMBER (if applicable)

CODE

7. ADMINISTERED BY

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

CODE

6. ISSUED BY

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NUMBER

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED

PAGE OF PAGES

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED

BPA NO.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

FACILITY CODE

CODE

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers

E. IMPORTANT:

is extended,

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning __________ copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

(REV. 11/2016)

is required to sign this document and return ___________ copies to the issuing office.

is not, A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO:

Specify authority)

THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

15C. DATE SIGNED

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER

Contractor

16C. DATE SIGNED

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

STANDARD FORM 30

PREVIOUS EDITION NOT USABLE

Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.243 (Type or print) (Type or print) (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

(Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (If other than Item 6) (Specify type of modification and authority) (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.)

(If required)

(SEE ITEM 11)

(SEE ITEM 13)

(X)

CHECK

ONE

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer) 06-04-2026 36C776 Department of Veterans Affairs Program Contracting Activity Central 6100 Oak Tree Blvd, Suite 490 Independence OH 44131 36C776 Department of Veterans Affairs Program Contracting Activity Central 6100 Oak Tree Blvd, Suite 490 Independence OH 44131 To all Offerors/Bidders

36C77626Q0140 05-20-2026

X X X X The purpose of this Amendment is to post the answers to questions submitted for the solicitation referenced in block 9A.

Kathleen Klotzbach

CONTRACTING OFFICER

CONTINUATION PAGE

Junction City IOTA Solicitation 36C77626Q0140 Questions & Answers

1. Question: What is the destination address for the final CBOC?

Answer: This information is unavailable as lease is presently not awarded. CBOC address will be provided when available to IOTA vendor post-award.

2. Question: “Potential conference room setup”. Will this remain “potential” Or has it been ruled out? Or confirmed” If yes, what else would this room include other than an assumed conference table?

Answer: This to remain potential.

3. Question: Page 33. Solicitation, Section E.1, (F)(2) Technical Submission: For the technical and management approach, does the VA only want bidders to describe their approach for PWS sections 16.1, 16.2, 16.4, and 16.7?

Answer: Yes. Vendors only need to submit a technical and management approach for those Tasks identified in Section E.1(F) (2).

4. Question: Page 33. Solicitation Section E.3, (a) Evaluation Factors. In the non-priced factor table providing the criteria for comparative evaluations, it states that for Technical Submission, the VA will evaluate submissions based on the PWS to “the degree to which the submission describes a detailed technical/management approach for accomplishing the tasks identified in 52.212-1(F)(2)(a)”.

Please confirm that the VA is only evaluating 16.1, 16.2, 16.4, and 16.7 and that the evaluators will not downgrade or view a proposal as weak if bidders do not detail their technical/management approach to the PWS sections not identified in 52.212-1(F)(2)(a).

Answer: The technical evaluation of the tasks will only include the Technical and Management approach to those tasks identified in 52.212-1(F)(2)(a), as well as the Basis of Estimate for those tasks only.

5. Question: Solicitation, Section E.1, (F)(2), Technical Submission. Solicitation, Section E.3, (a) Evaluation Factors. 52.212-1(F)(2)(a) specifies the PWS sections for bidders to describe their technical and management approach. The following PWS sections are not included: 16.3, CONOPS Transition Planning and Project Staffing Planning, 16.5, Acquisition Packages Development, 16.6 Relocation of Reuse and Personnel Files, 16.8 Staff Training and Orientation, or 17.1 Warehousing Management. In the non-priced factor table providing the criteria for comparative evaluations, it states that for Technical Submission, Government will evaluate the technical submission based on the PWS to (1) determine the Government’s confidence in the offeror’s approach to meet the requirements.

This evaluation criterion in context would seem to require evaluation of the bidders’ approach to all of the PWS requirements and not just those called out in 52.212-1(F)(2)(a). How is the Government determining their confidence in the offeror’s approach to meet the requirements as a whole??

Answer: The Government’s evaluation is limited to the specific PWS sections identified in Section 52.212‑1(F)(2)(a). Offerors are not required to address all PWS tasks, and the Government will not evaluate their approach to sections that were not requested. The confidence assessment under the Technical Submission factor is therefore based solely on the offeror’s approach to the designated PWS tasks listed in the solicitation.

6. Question: Solicitation, Section E.1, (F)(2), Technical Submission. If the VA does want the bidder to describe their technical and management approach to all of the PWS sections, then we would ask that the page count for the technical submission be increased to 10. This would be a total of 15 pages with the technical and the 5 pages of betterments.

Answer: Vendors are only required to submit a technical and management approach for those tasks identified in Section 52.212-1(F)(2)(a). The max page count in this section is 9 pages, approximately 1.25 pages per task. The Betterment section is allowing maximum of 5 pages, for a total of 14 pages.

End of Document