Phase II Proposals.docx

36C24226R0060 Amendment 2 630A4-26-401 MRI AHU Modification

PHASE II PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL – This submittal is ONLY open to the offerors that the Government has issued an amendment for Design Concepts, Management Approach, Schedule, and Pricing information.

3.1 Part II of the Request for Proposal is open only to the offerors that the Government provides an amendment to. The top three (3) offerors shall supply the information listed below. Proposals for Part II shall be submitted in two (2) separate PDFs. The Phase II proposal shall address the evaluation factors listed below:

Offerors shall submit via email containing all the information for Phase II Factor 1, Factor 2, and Factor 3. PDFs must state Phase II Proposal Submittal information. Failure to place the required submission information under the appropriate tab (factor or subfactor) may result in a lower rating if the evaluators cannot readily find the appropriate information.

The offeror shall submit a separate PDF for Factor 4 – Price. Offerors can use the PDF provided for Factor 1, 2 and 3 above to provide all the information for the pricing portion of the proposal.

3.2 All PDFs proposals – one (1) for Phase II Factor 1, 2, and 3 and one (1) for Phase II Pricing shall be submitted to:

Kim Gomez kimberly.gomez@va.gov Les Griffith at Vladimir.Stoyanov@va.gov

3.3. Phase II Proposal Evaluation Process

3.3.1 The evaluation process for Phase II consists of three (3) non-priced Factors and one (1) priced Factor: Technical Approach, Technical Qualifications (Specialized Experience and Capability to Perform) and Past Performance. Proposals will be evaluated these factor and criteria identified below.

3.3.1.1 The Design Concepts, Management Approach and Schedule factors are all equal to each other and when combined are more important than Price.

3.3.1.2 As demonstrated in their proposals, Offerors shall be evaluated in terms of the Offeror’s ability to meet or exceed the project’s requirements as identified in the SOW, and those proposals demonstrating an ability to exceed specified requirements may be rated higher in those areas than proposals demonstrating only the ability to meet requirements.

3.3.1.3 Provide a clear and concise narrative for each of the factors below. The narrative shall address the information stated in the factors and subfactors. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s answers for information and completeness, and offerors not submitting required information may not be considered for evaluation.

3.3.2 Phase II Evaluation Factors

3.3.2.1 Evaluation Factor 1 – Design Concepts:

This factor evaluates the offers schematic design based on existing condensate trap data provided. Offeror shall provide a schematic of any potential piping changes to the current set-up and provide narrative to support the offeror’s design concept. Offeror shall address phasing to allow operations to continue during the construction and must work within budget so allow for the VA to continue operations at minimal interference.

3.3.2.2 Evaluation Factor 2 – Management Approach:

This factor evaluates the individual experience of persons that are to be assigned to this project. The offeror shall provide information (resume) for personnel in the following functions as a minimum (offeror to provide any additional discipline it feels appropriate) —Project Management, site superintendence, quality control manager, infection, and safety, as well as a list of major subcontractors. Offeror shall provide resumes of the individuals for the Design Engineering firm that offeror will be using that will be generating the design documents necessary for construction. The offeror shall provide a listing of projects, with a brief description of the projects, where the Offeror and the Design Engineering firm personnel worked together as a team on previous Design-Build projects.

3.3.2.3 Evaluation Factor 3 – Schedule:

This factor evaluates the Offeror’s methodology of the scheduling processes that ensure completion and control of the project from the beginning to the end of the project. The detailed schedule provides the SSEB the extent to which the offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the architectural and engineering requirements for the construction period and general project delivery. Offeror’s Schedule shall indicate all elements of the design and construction timeline, from notice to proceed (NTP) (in order to establish a common baseline among all offerors) to contract completion, including but not limited to site investigation for design, design meetings, design submittals, preconstruction meetings, material submittals, mobilization, demolition, material lead times, utility installations, abatement (if required), testing, training, commissioning, construction and post-construction submittals, close-out.

3.4 Price Information:

3.4.1 The offeror shall complete and submit Standard Form 1442. The offeror shall submit a price based on the line items. Note; If discussions or negotiations occur, the Government may require additional cost information. Offerors shall sign and submit all amendments to the solicitation. Please be advised that the Government intends award a contract from Phase II proposals without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the offeror’s initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms from a cost or price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary.

3.4.2 The offeror shall complete and submit Exhibit B Calculation of Self-Performed Work.

3.4.3 Bid Bond – Phase II only. Offerors shall submit a Bid Guarantee. A bid guarantee is required in an amount not less than 20 percent of the bid price but shall not exceed $3,000,000.00 Bid Bond is to be executed on a SF 24. Failure to furnish the required bid guarantee on the proper form and amount, by the time set for the opening of bids, will require rejection of the bid in all cases except those listed in FAR 28.101-4, and may be cause for rejection even then.

3.4.4 Annual Representation and Certifications shall be completed by offeror.

3.4.5 Discounts: Prompt payment discounts will not be considered in the evaluation of offers.

3.4.6 In the event a minor clerical error has occurred, then the offeror may be given an opportunity to correct the minor error within the constraints of the “clarifications” process or the Contracting Officer determines discussions are required.

4.0 Evaluation Criteria

The price will be evaluated by the Contracting Officer for reasonableness by using price analysis. The Contracting Officer shall perform the Best Value Tradeoff using the evaluation factors along with price.

5.0 Discussions

Government intends to make award to a responsible Offeror submitting a conforming proposal without discussions if deemed to be in the best interest of the Government. The Government reserves the right to clarify certain aspects of proposals or conduct discussions providing an opportunity for the offeror to revise its proposal.

The Government reserves the right to reject any or all proposals at any time prior to award and to award the contract to other than the offeror submitting the lowest total price.