3-USBE-CC26335-RFP - Formative Writing Tool - Technical Evaluation Scoresheet.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 76 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USBE - Formative Writing Tool
- Solicitation number
- USBE-CC26335-RFP
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This is a Technical Evaluation Scoresheet for a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by the Utah State Board of Education (USBE) for a Formative Writing Tool system. The solicitation number is USBE-CC26335-RFP, and the procurement seeks an integrated formative online writing system for students in grades 3 through 12. The resulting contract is anticipated to be for approximately five years, with USBE retaining the right to terminate at any time in accordance with standard terms and conditions. The scoresheet establishes mandatory minimum requirements that all proposals must satisfy, including response to all required questions, demonstrated ability to meet the Scope of Work, compliance with Sections 504 and 508 of the Rehabilitation Act, protection of student-level data, and acknowledgment of formative assessment requirements.
The evaluation framework allocates 70 percent of total points (590 points from a possible 840) to technical criteria and 30 percent (250 points) to cost evaluation. Technical scoring is distributed across eight categories: Formative Assessment Requirements, Required System Components, Feedback System Components, Reporting, System Technical Specifications, Scoring, Accessibility/Accommodations, and Management and Personnel. Proposals must achieve a minimum of 65 percent of technical points (383.5 points) to be deemed responsive. Cost points are calculated using a formula in which the lowest-cost offeror receives 100 percent of price points, while other offerors receive points proportionally based on their cost relative to the lowest cost; any offeror whose proposed cost exceeds 200 percent of the lowest cost receives no cost points. The maximum contract award is $2.2 million, with an overall evaluation threshold of 65 percent of total possible points (546 points) required for contract award.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Offeror
| FORMATIVE WRITING TOOL |
| SOLICITATION # USBE-CC26335-RFP |
| RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET |
| Scores will be assigned from 0-10 as follows: | |
| Firm Name: | 0 = the proposed solution does not meet requirements and expectations as described in the request for proposal. |
| 5 = the proposed solution satisfactorily meets requirements and expectations as described in the request for proposal. | |
| Evaluator: | 10 = the proposed solution measurably exceeds requirements and expectations as described in the request for proposal. |
| NOTE: The requirements and criteria listed in this RFP score sheet may be abbreviated headings. Offerors should refer to the corresponding RFP section for a complete description of criteria. | |
| Date: |
| Mandatory Minimum Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |
| 1 | Offerors must respond to all questions that are marked as "required". Do you understand and agree to comply with this requirement? | ||
| 2 | Offeror must demonstate the ability to meet the Scope of Work as described. Do you understand and agree to comply with this requirement? | ||
| 3 | Agreement to comply with Sections 504 and 508 of Rehabilitation Act | ||
| 4 | Protection of Student Level Data | ||
| 5 | Wherever possible in this RFP, the word "shall" is used to express mandatory proposal elements, and optional proposal elements are identified. Only those proposals that sufficiently address and comply with all mandatory elements will be deemed responsive. Do you understand and agree to comply with this requirement? | ||
| 6 | Section I - Formative Assessment Requirement Acknowledgement |
Scoreable Technical Criteria RFP Section Evaluator Score (0-10) Criteria Weight % of Tech Criteria Points Possible Points Earned
| 1 | Formative Assessment Requirements | 7 | 11.9% | 70.0 | 0.0 |
| 2 | Required System Components | 10 | 16.9% | 100.0 | 0.0 |
| 3 | Feedback System Components | 8 | 13.6% | 80.0 | 0.0 |
| 4 | Reporting | 7 | 11.9% | 70.0 | 0.0 |
| 5 | System Technical Specifications | 8 | 13.6% | 80.0 | 0.0 |
| 6 | Scoring | 7 | 11.9% | 70.0 | 0.0 |
| 7 | Accessibility/Accomodations | 7 | 11.9% | 70.0 | 0.0 |
| 8 | Management and Personnel | 5 | 8.5% | 50.0 | 0.0 |
| 100.0% | 590.0 | 0.0 |
| Required Score Threshold | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation |
| 65% | 383.5 | 0.0 | 0.0% | Fail |
| Grand Total (from Cost Proposal Sheet) | RFP Section | Low Cost Option | Offered Cost | Percent of Total Points Possible Earned | Points Possible | Points Earned |
| 0% | 250.0 | 0.0 |
* USBE will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest total cost over 3 years. The offeror with the Lowest Total Cost will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Total Cost is than the Lowest Total Cost. An offeror whose Proposed Total Cost is more than double (200%) the Lowest Total Cost will receive no points. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (2- Proposed Total Cost/Lowest Total Cost).
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total Points Possible | Points Possible | Points Earned | Minimum Percent Required | Minimum Points Required | Evaluation Result |
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 70% | 590.0 | 0.0 | 65% | 383.5 | FAIL |
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 30% | 250.0 | 0.0 | N/A | N/A | N/A |
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 840.0 | 0.0 | 65% | 546.0 | FAIL |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .