3-Attachment B RFP - Score Sheet - Compliance Auditor Services 2026.pdf
PDF 161 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- SLCAIR26014
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This is a proposal evaluation scoresheet for the Salt Lake City Corporation Department of Airports seeking compliance audit services related to the Airport Redevelopment Plan terminal construction program at Salt Lake City International Airport. The solicitation number is SLCAIR26014. The scoresheet establishes evaluation criteria and scoring methodology for reviewing proposals from qualified independent audit firms to perform forensic and compliance audits of the construction project. Proposals will be assessed on mandatory requirements including demonstrated experience with capital projects and airports, as well as scorable technical criteria including relevant experience and qualifications, methodology and understanding of scope, staffing plan and team qualifications, Yellow Book and Red Book experience, FAA grant compliance experience, and specific staffing requirements including at least one CFE (Certified Fraud Examiner), at least one CCA (Certified Construction Auditor), and at least one CIA (Certified Internal Auditor), along with independence demonstration under GAGAS and Code of Ethics requirements.
The evaluation scoresheet allocates 500 total points across technical and cost components, with technical criteria weighted at 80 percent (325 points) and cost proposals weighted at 20 percent (175 points). Technical scoring utilizes a scale of 0 to 5, with three primary technical criteria weighted at 30 percent, 25 percent, and 25 percent respectively. Cost points are awarded using a comparative formula where the lowest proposed price receives 100 percent of available cost points, with all other offerors receiving proportional points based on their price variance from the lowest bid using the calculation: Cost Points × (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price). The scoresheet template shown is blank, prepared for completion during the formal evaluation process of submitted proposals.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score will be assigned as follows:
0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information.
1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information.
2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner.
3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner.
4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them.
5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP.
RFP Section Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
1 3.B.1 2 3.B.2 3 3.B.3 4 3.B.4 5 3.B.5 6 3.B.6 7 3.B.7 8 3.B.8
RFP Section Evaluator
Score (0-5) Criteria Weight
% of Tech Criteria
Points Possible
Points Earned
1 9.A.1 30 46.2% 150.0 0.0 2 9.A.2 25 38.5% 125.0 0.0 3 9.A.3 25 38.5% 125.0 0.0
123.1% 325.0 0.0
Possible Points Points Earned
100.00% 325.00 0.00
RFP Section Low Cost Option
Offered Cost
Percent of Total
Points Possible Points Earned
9.A.4 $0.00 $0.00 20% 175.0 0.0
Percent of Total Points
Possible Points Earned
80% 325.0 0.0 20% 175.0 0.0
100% 500.0 0.0
Total Evaluation Points
Total Technical Evaluation Points Total Cost Evaluation Points
Total Evaluation Points
Total Technical Points
Cost
Fee
* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).
Scorable Technical Criteria Total
Scoreable Technical Criteria
Relevant experance and qualifications Methodology and understanding of scope Staffing plan and team qualifications
Demonstrate Yellow Book and Red Book experience Experience with FAA grant compliance At least one CFE At least one CCA At least one CIA Experance with construction cost estimating Demonstrate independence under GAGAS and Code of E
Evaluator:
Date:
Minimum Mandatory Requirements
Demonstrate experience with capital projects/airports
COMPLIANCE AUDITOR SERVICES RFP
SOLICITATION # SLCAIR26014
RFP/RFQ EVALUATION SCORESHEET
Firm Name:
Submittal 1
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .