3-Attachment 4 - Score Sheet.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 30 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Salt Lake City Request for Proposals SLCI26058 - Holiday Lighting and Decoration Services
- Solicitation number
- SLCI26058
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This is a scoring sheet for Salt Lake City Corporation's Request for Proposals SLCI26058 for Holiday Lighting and Decoration Services. The evaluation document establishes the framework for assessing contractor proposals for professional services including design, installation, maintenance, removal, storage, and support for holiday lighting, seasonal decorations, and thematic displays for public areas during the holiday season and City-approved special events throughout the year.
The scoring sheet allocates 70 percent of total evaluation points (525 points) to technical criteria and 30 percent (225 points) to cost evaluation, with a combined possible total of 750 points. Technical evaluation encompasses six scoreable criteria weighted between 10 and 25 percent, including the firm's experience and qualifications, subcontracting plans, relevant project experience, special skills or knowledge, detailed work plans, and proposed service approach. Four policy criteria categories—sustainability, disadvantaged business enterprise participation, apprenticeships, and local small business involvement—each carry 1.25 percent weight (6.25 points). Proposals must achieve a minimum threshold of 70 percent of technical points (367.5 points) to advance to cost evaluation. Cost points are awarded based on a comparative formula where the lowest-priced proposal receives 100 percent of available cost points, with other proposals receiving proportional points calculated as the ratio of the lowest proposed price to their proposed price. All proposals must satisfy a mandatory City Ethics Requirement acceptance clause to be considered for evaluation.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 4-SLCI26058 RFP Doc.docx | DOCX document | |
| 6-Attachment 1-Sample Agreement.docx | DOCX document | |
| 5-Attachment 2-Scope of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1-Confidential+and+Proprietary+Info+Declaration+Form.pdf | ||
| 2-Attachment 3 Cost Sheet.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| HOLIDAY LIGHTING AND DECORATION SERVICES |
| SOLICITATION # SLCI26058 |
| Attachment 4 - Score Sheet |
| Score will be assigned as follows: | |
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information. | |
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information. |
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner. | |
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner. |
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them. | |
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP. |
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |
| 1 | City Ethics Requirement. Offeror must accept the City's Ethics clause in Section VII, Proposed Content Paragraph "a." | RFP Doc.V.a.i |
Scoreable Technical Criteria RFP Section Evaluator Score (0-5) Criteria Weight % of Tech Criteria Points Possible Points Earned
| 1 | A statement of the firm’s experience and qualifications to meet the requirements of the City as outlined herein | Section V.b.1 | 10 | 10.0% | 50.0 | 0.0 |
| 2 | Identify any of the work that you intend to subcontract | Section V.b.2 | 10 | 10.0% | 50.0 | 0.0 |
| 3 | Qualification - Detail your firm's experience in providing the services requested for similar size | Secton V.b.3 | 15 | 15.0% | 75.0 | 0.0 |
| 4 | Identify any special skills, knowledge, or skills that may be related or helpful to the services. | Section V.b.4 | 20 | 20.0% | 100.0 | 0.0 |
| 5 | A detailed work plan outlining each service necessary for completion of the lighting and decorations described in the scope of services | Section V.b.5 | 20 | 20.0% | 100.0 | 0.0 |
| 6 | Provide a statement of your understanding of the service and general description of your proposed approach to the services. | Section V.b.6 | 25 | 25.0% | 125.0 | 0.0 |
| Scorable Technical Criteria Total | 100.0% | 500.0 | 0.0 |
| Policy Criteria | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Available Points | Possible Points | Points Earned | |
| 1 | Sustainability | Attachment 1 IV.E.1 | 1.25% | 6.25 | 0.00 | |
| 2 | Disadvantaged business enterprise | Attachment 1 IV.E.2 | 1.25% | 6.25 | 0.00 | |
| 3 | Apprenticeships | Attachment 1 IV.E.3 | 1.25% | 6.25 | 0.00 | |
| 4 | Local Small Business | Attachment 1 IV.E.4 | 1.25% | 6.25 | 0.00 | |
| Policy Criteria Total | 5.00% | 25.00 | 0.00 |
| Possible Points | Points Earned | ||
| Total Technical Points | 100.00% | 525.00 | 0.00 |
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation |
| Attachment 1 VI. | 70% | 367.5 | 0.0 | 0.0% |
| Cost | RFP Section | Low Cost Option | Offered Cost | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | |
| Attachment 1 VI. | $0.00 | $0.00 | 30% | 225.0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! | ||
| * Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price). |
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned |
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 70% | 525.0 | 0.0 |
| Total Cost Evaluation Points | 30% | 225.0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! |
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 750.0 | ERROR:#DIV/0! |
image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .