2-WK2664-NS - Attachment D Evaluation Scoresheet.xls
XLS spreadsheet 55 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFP - Nursing Services
- Solicitation number
- WK2664-NS
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This is an evaluation scoresheet for a Request for Proposals issued by the Salt Lake City School District (SLCSD) to procure nursing services from qualified vendors. The RFP, designated WK2664-NS, seeks licensed registered nurses (RN) to provide health care services to students with complex health care needs within the district. The solicitation requires competitive sealed proposals submitted through the Bonfire system, with all official communications and modifications issued exclusively through that platform or authorized addenda. Proposals must be submitted by the specified deadline, and evaluation will proceed in accordance with the criteria detailed in the scoresheet.
The evaluation scoresheet allocates 1,000 total points across three categories: technical evaluation (700 points, 70% of total), price evaluation (300 points, 30% of total), and mandatory requirements that must be satisfied to advance in the evaluation process. Mandatory requirements include five years of nurse staffing experience, physical office space and supervisory staff located in Utah, nursing staff living within 50 miles of Salt Lake City, medical malpractice insurance certificates, CMS accreditation documentation, state business licensure, compliance with Medicaid documentation requirements, maintenance of nursing licenses and background checks, staff proficiency in required duties, FERPA compliance, and availability for oral presentation. Technical scoring criteria evaluate the vendor's narrative assessments, experience with schools and pediatric patients, supervisory qualifications, hiring practices, capacity to serve multiple students, backup staffing plans, responsiveness to new student requests, and references from other school districts. Price evaluation focuses on hourly rates for both RN and LPN positions, with a minimum threshold of 70% (490 points) required in the technical evaluation to qualify for further consideration.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Score Sheet
| NURSING SERVICES FOR SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT | |||||||
| SOLICITATION # WK2664-NS | |||||||
| ATTACHMENT D RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET | |||||||
| DRAFT: This document is intended to be a draft and should not be returned to the Purchasing Department. Please return this document to the evaluation committee chairperson | |||||||
| This document is not subject to GRAMA pursuant to Utah Administrative Code R33-7-702(2). | |||||||
| Score will be assigned as follows: | |||||||
| 0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information | |||||||
| Firm Name: | 1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information | ||||||
| 2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner | |||||||
| Evaluator: | 3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner | ||||||
| 4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them | |||||||
| Date: | 5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP | ||||||
| Minimum Mandatory Requirements | RFP Section | Evaluation (Pass/Fail) | |||||
| 1 | Five (5) Years of nurse staffing service | 2.2 | |||||
| 2 | Phyical Office Space and Supervisory Staff Located in Utah | 2.2 | |||||
| 3 | Provide Nursing Staff Living within 50 miles of Salt Lake City, UT | 2.2 | |||||
| 4 | Provide Certificates of Vendor Medical Malpractice Policy | 2.2 | |||||
| 5 | Provide Documented Accrditation by a CMS Recognized Health Care Accrditing Agenty and/or Proof of State Survey and Medicar/Medicaid Certification | 2.2 | |||||
| 6 | Provide License to Conduct Business in the State of Utah | 2.2 | |||||
| 7 | Must Agree to Make Sure Agency Nurses Adhere to All State Medicaid Requirements for Documentation and Time Study | 2.2 | |||||
| 8 | Must Agree to Maintain Nursing Licenses, Skills Validation Checklist, Background Checks, Random Drug Test Results, Proof of Current CPR Card, and Provide them to the Health Services Coordinator upon request. | 2.2 | |||||
| 9 | Must Provide Nursing Staff that is Proficient to Perform All Duties Expected in Section 2.1 | 2.2 | |||||
| 10 | Must Maintain Compliance to the Family Educational Rights and Oprivacy Act (FERPA) | 2.2 | |||||
| 11 | Availability for Oral Presentation | 2.2 | |||||
| 12 | References | 2.2 | |||||
| Scoreable Technical Criteria | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Tech Criteria | Points Possible | Points |
Earned
| 1 | Narrative of Assesment of Work to be Performed | 2.3 | 0 | 20 | 14% | 100 | 0 |
| 2 | Detailed Narrative of Agency's History and General Experience of Nursing Staff | 2.3 | 0 | 20 | 14% | 100 | 0 |
| 3 | Detailed Narrative of Agency's Experience Working with Schools, Governmental Agencies and Pediatric Patients | 2.3 | 0 | 20 | 14% | 100 | 0 |
| 4 | Detailed Narrative of Qualifications of Clinical Supervisory Staff | 2.3 | 0 | 10 | 7% | 50 | 0 |
| 5 | Detailed Narrative of Agency's Hiring Requirements for Nursing Staff and How Often OIG Exclusion List is Checked | 2.3 | 0 | 20 | 14% | 100 | 0 |
| 6 | Detailed narrative of Agency’s Willingness and Capacity to Provide Nursing Care to Other Students in the Classroom | 2.3 | 0 | 10 | 7% | 50 | 0 |
| 7 | Detailed Narrative of Agency's Back up/Substitue Plan | 2.3 | 0 | 10 | 7% | 50 | 0 |
| 8 | Detailed Narrative of How Quickly Agency Can Provide for a New Student | 2.3 | 0 | 15 | 11% | 75 | 0 |
| 9 | Provide Three (3) References from Other School Districts Agency Has Worked With Within the Past Five (5) years. | 2.3 | 0 | 15 | 11% | 75 | 0 |
| 100.0% | 700 | 0 | |||||
| Required Technical Point Threshold | RFP Section | Min Percent | Min Points Required | Points Earned | Percent Earned | Evaluation | |
| 4.2 | 70% | 490 | 0 | 0% | 0 | ||
| Price | RFP Section | Evaluator Score (0-5) | Criteria Weight | % of Price Points | Points Possible | Points |
Earned
| 1 | Hourly Rate for RN | 4.2 | 30 | 50% | 150 | 0 | |
| 2 | Hourly Rate for LPN | 4.2 | 30 | 50% | 150 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 | |||
| 4 | 0 | 0% | 0 | 0 | |||
| 100% | 300 | 0 | |||||
| Total Evaluation Points | Percent of Total | Points Possible | Points Earned | ||||
| Total Technical Evaluation Points | 70% | 700 | 0 | ||||
| Total Price Evaluation Points | 30% | 300 | 0 | ||||
| Total Evaluation Points | 100% | 1,000 | 0 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .