2-SLCI26032 Attachment 4 - Score Sheet.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 76 KB Posted Dec 2, 2025

Attached to: Salt Lake City Request for Proposals SLCI26032 - Data Telematics Software
Solicitation number: SLCI26032
Issued by: Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Dec 8, 2025

This is an RFP evaluation scoresheet for Salt Lake City Corporation's Solicitation SLCI26032 for Data Telematics Software. The selected vendor will provide a cellphone data software solution capable of delivering detailed analytics on visitors to various city locations including parks, golf courses, and business areas. The system must provide information on visitor behavior, travel patterns, and surrounding economic activity within Salt Lake City and surrounding areas, with data available for other U.S. and international locations as applicable. The software should deliver both real-time and historical data through a user-friendly interface to enable city staff to make data-driven decisions.

The evaluation scoresheet establishes a total possible score of 500 points, comprising 400 points for technical criteria and 100 points for cost. Technical evaluation includes four scoreable criteria: Qualifications (150 points, 37.5% weight), Data Quality & Reports (100 points, 25% weight), Privacy, Security & Technical Architecture (100 points, 25% weight), and Implementation and Ongoing Technical Support (50 points, 12.5% weight). Mandatory requirements include acceptance of the City's Ethics clause and compliance with the City's Generative Artificial Intelligence Usage Policy if such technology is offered. The scoresheet also evaluates policy criteria including Sustainability, Business Certification, Apprenticeship, and Local Small Business designations. A minimum technical point threshold of 280 points (70% of 400) is required for further evaluation. Cost points are calculated using a formula where the lowest-priced proposal receives 100% of cost points, with other proposals receiving proportional points based on their cost relative to the lowest bid.

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
5-SLCI26032 Attachment 2 Scope of Work.pdf	PDF	Dec 2, 2025
4-SLCI26032 Attachment 3 - Cost Sheet.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Dec 2, 2025
6-SLCI26032 Attachment 1- Sample Agreement.docx	DOCX document	Dec 2, 2025
3-SLCI26032 RFP.pdf	PDF	Dec 2, 2025
1-Confidential+and+Proprietary+Info+Declaration+Form.pdf	PDF	Dec 2, 2025

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

Score Sheet

Data Telematics Software

SOLICITATION # SLCI26032

RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET

	Score will be assigned as follows:
	0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information.
Firm Name:	1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information.
	2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner.
Evaluator:	3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner.
	4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them.
Date:	5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP.

Minimum Mandatory Requirements		RFP Section	Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
1	City Ethics Requirement. Offeror must accept the City's Ethics clause.	RFP Doc. V.a.i
2	Generative Artificial Intelligence if offered which complies with the City's Gen AI Usage Policy.	RFP Doc. V.a.ii

		Scoreable Technical Criteria		RFP Section	Evaluator Score (0-5)	Criteria Weight	% of Tech Criteria	Points Possible	Points
Earned	Minimum Required
		1	Qualifications - A statement of the firm’s experience and qualifications to meet the requirements of the City as outlined herein	RFP Document, V.b.a		30	37.5%	150.0	0.0
		2	Data Quality & Reports	RFP Document, V.b.b		20	25.0%	100.0	0.0
		3	Privacy, Security & Technical Architecture	RFP Document, V.b.c		20	25.0%	100.0	0.0
		4	Implementation and ongoing technical support	RFP Document, V.b.d		10	12.5%	50.0	0.0
		Scorable Technical Criteria Total					100.0%	400.0	0.0	0.0

		Possible Points	Points Earned
Total Technical Points	100.00%	400.00	0.00

Required Technical Point Threshold	RFP Section	Min Percent	Min Points Required	Points Earned	Percent Earned	Evaluation
		70%	280.0	0.0	0.0%

Cost		RFP Section	Low Cost Option	Offered Cost	Percent of Total	Points Possible	Points Earned
			$0.00	$0.00	20%	100.0	ERROR:#DIV/0!
	* Purchasing will use the following cost formula: The points assigned to each offerors cost proposal will be based on the lowest proposal price. The offeror with the lowest Proposed Price will receive 100% of the price points. All other offerors will receive a portion of the total cost points based on what percentage higher their Proposed Price is than the Lowest Proposed Price. The formula to compute the points is: Cost Points x (Lowest Proposed Price/Proposed Price).

Total Evaluation Points	Percent of Total	Points Possible	Points Earned
Total Technical Evaluation Points	0%	400.0	0.0
Total Cost Evaluation Points	0%	100.0	ERROR:#DIV/0!
Total Evaluation Points	0%	500.0	ERROR:#DIV/0!

Scoresheet Summary

TITLE OF PROJECT (to be inserted by the Division of Purchasing)

SOLICITATION # (to be inserted by the Division of Purchasing)

RFP EVALUATION SCORESHEET SUMMARY

Instructions:

Enter the solicitation number and name.

Enter each Offeror name.

Enter the Criteria name for each category.

Enter the Weight in column B that corresponds to the Criteria Weight on the Score Sheet tab column J for each criterion.

Enter the Total Possible Points for each Criterion, Cost Points, and Score Summary section.

Mandatory Minimum Requirements: Evaluate each offer and enter pass or fail

Ensure that the number of evaluator lines matches the number of evaluators.

Offers not meeting the Minimum Mandatory Requirements will not be evaluated further.

Ensure that the Total Average Score formula includes all of the evaluator line items.

Technical Scores: Enter each evaluator score for each offer.

Signatures:	Date:
Evaluator 1	__________________
Evaluator 2	__________________
Evaluator 3	__________________
Evaluator 4	__________________
Evaluator 5	__________________

Minimum Mandatory Requirements

Offeror A

Offeror B

Offeror C

Offeror D

Offeror E

Offeror F

Offeror G

Offeror H

Offeror I

Offeror J

Offeror K

Offeror L

Offeror M

Offeror N

Offeror O

Offeror P

Offeror Q

Offeror R

Offeror S

Offeror T

Weight	Technical Scores	Offeror A	Offeror B	Offeror C	Offeror D	Offeror E	Offeror F	Offeror G	Offeror H	Offeror I	Offeror J	Offeror K	Offeror L	Offeror M	Offeror N	Offeror O	Offeror P	Offeror Q	Offeror R	Offeror S	Offeror T
	Criteria #1
	Evaluator 1
	Evaluator 2
	Evaluator 3
	Evaluator 4
	Evaluator 5
	Total Average Score	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Criteria #1 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Criteria #2
	Evaluator 1
	Evaluator 2
	Evaluator 3
	Evaluator 4
	Evaluator 5
	Total Average Score	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Criteria #2 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Criteria #3
	Evaluator 1
	Evaluator 2
	Evaluator 3
	Evaluator 4
	Evaluator 5
	Total Average Score	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Criteria #3 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Criteria #4
	Evaluator 1
	Evaluator 2
	Evaluator 3
	Evaluator 4
	Evaluator 5
	Total Average Score	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Criteria #4 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Criteria #5
	Evaluator 1
	Evaluator 2
	Evaluator 3
	Evaluator 4
	Evaluator 5
	Total Average Score	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Criteria #5 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Criteria #6
	Evaluator 1
	Evaluator 2
	Evaluator 3
	Evaluator 4
	Evaluator 5
	Total Average Score	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Criteria #6 - Total Points (Total Possible XX)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Criteria #7
	Evaluator 1
	Evaluator 2
	Evaluator 3
	Evaluator 4
	Evaluator 5
	Total Average Score	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Criteria #7 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Total Technical Points (Total Possible Points = XX)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Policy Criteria	Offeror A	Offeror B	Offeror C	Offeror D	Offeror E	Offeror F	Offeror G	Offeror H	Offeror I	Offeror J	Offeror K	Offeror L	Offeror M	Offeror N	Offeror O	Offeror P	Offeror Q	Offeror R	Offeror S	Offeror T
Weight	Technical Scores
	Policy Criteria #1: Sustainability
	Evaluator 1
	Evaluator 2
	Evaluator 3
	Evaluator 4
	Evaluator 5
	Total Average Score	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
0.000	Criteria #1 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = xx)	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
	Policy Criteria #2: Business Certification
	Evaluator 1
	Evaluator 2
	Evaluator 3
	Evaluator 4
	Evaluator 5
	Total Average Score	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
0.000	Criteria #2 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = xx)	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
	Policy Criteria #3: Apprenticeship
	Evaluator 1
	Evaluator 2
	Evaluator 3
	Evaluator 4
	Evaluator 5
	Total Average Score	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
0.000	Criteria #3 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = xx)	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
	Policy Criteria #4: Local Small Business
	Evaluator 1
	Evaluator 2
	Evaluator 3
	Evaluator 4
	Evaluator 5
	Total Average Score	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
0.000	Policy Criteria #4 - Total Points (Total Possible Points = xx)	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00	0.00
	Policy Criteria - Total Points (Total Possible Points = XX)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Total Technical Criteria Points (Total Technical Criteria Possible Points = XX) Minimum Threshold = XX	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
Total Cost Points	Cost Scores	Offeror A	Offeror B	Offeror C	Offeror D	Offeror E	Offeror F	Offeror G	Offeror H	Offeror I	Offeror J	Offeror K	Offeror L	Offeror M	Offeror N	Offeror O	Offeror P	Offeror Q	Offeror R	Offeror S	Offeror T
	Cost
0.0	Cost Points	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Score Summary	Offeror A	Offeror B	Offeror C	Offeror D	Offeror E	Offeror F	Offeror G	Offeror H	Offeror I	Offeror J	Offeror K	Offeror L	Offeror M	Offeror N	Offeror O	Offeror P	Offeror Q	Offeror R	Offeror S	Offeror T
	Total Technical Points (Total Possible = XX)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Total Cost Points (Total Possible = XX)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0
	Grand Total Points (Total Possible = XX)	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0	0.0

image1.png image2.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Dec 8, 2025.