17-NRCA Roof Wind Designer.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Gerry Hyland GC Roof and HVAC
- Solicitation number
- IFB 2000004148
- Issued by
- Fairfax County, Virginia
About this file
This document is a Report of Roof System Design Wind-load Analysis prepared by the National Roofing Contractors Association (NRCA) using the Roof Wind Designer software, following the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) standard ASCE 7-16. The report specifically addresses wind load analysis for the main roof of a building located at 8350 Richmond Hwy in Alexandria, VA, with a roof area measuring 257 x 120 feet and a mean roof height of 60 feet. The analysis utilizes the ASCE 7-16 Envelope Procedure for low-rise buildings, calculating design wind loads for different roof zones and determining the minimum recommended design uplift-resistance capacities for the roof system.
The report provides detailed wind load calculations for various roof zones, converting strength design values to Allowable Stress Design (ASD) values, and recommends minimum design wind-resistance loads with a safety factor. For the specific roof configuration, the analysis determined wind load values ranging from 14.6 to 45.6 pounds per square foot in different zones, with recommended design uplift-resistance capacities between 29.1 and 91.2 pounds per square foot. The roof is classified as having a flat slope (1½:12 or less), an enclosed building configuration, Exposure B, and a Risk Category II, with a basic wind speed of 110 mph. The roof deck is structural concrete with a modified bitumen roof covering, and the analysis aims to ensure the roof system can withstand potential wind loads in compliance with building code requirements.
View the file
Other files
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Report of Roof System Design Wind-load Analysis Report Date: 8/20/2025
ASCE 7 Version: ASCE 7-16
This report is applicable to: This report has been prepared by:
Main Roof Gerry Hyland 8350 Richmond Hwy Alexandria, VA, 22309
Krista Strickland Gauthier, Alvarado & Associates 10201 Fairfax Blvd Fairfax, VA 22030
Preparer's comments:
None
Roof Wind Designer provides users an easy-to-use means for accurately determining design wind loads and design uplift resistance capacities for roof systems on many commonly encountered building types that are subject to building code compliance.
Design wind loads are derived using American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) standard ASCE 7-16, "Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures," Chapter 30—Wind Loads—Components and Cladding (C&C), Envelope Procedure, Part 2: Low-rise Buildings (Simplified) and Part 4: Buildings with 60ft < h ≤ 160ft (Simplified). ASCE 7-16 is a widely-recognized consensus standard and is referenced in and serves as the technical basis for wind load determination in the 2018 edition of the International Building Code.
The fundamental concept of wind design for roof systems is the tested uplift-resistance capacity for a building's roof system needs to be equal to or greater than the roof systems' design wind loads. Roof Wind Designer determines roof systems' minimum recommended design wind loads. From these values, Roof Wind Designer determines the necessary design wind-resistance capacities for the roof system incorporating an appropriate safety factor. Users can select wind-resistance roof systems using these design uplift capacity values.
Roof Wind Designer also provides design wind load calculations related to edge-metal flashing systems for buildings with roof slopes of 1½:12 or less. These calculations are applicable to roof systems using metal fascia, embedded edge-metal or metal copings to secure membrane roof systems' perimeter edges.
Roof Wind Designer relies solely upon the preparer who generates this report to accurately input appropriate information that is applicable to the specific building to which this report applies. This report applies to only the specific roof area and building that is indicated above. Any misinformation, miscalculations, mistakes or changes that have been input into this application may affect the results, accuracy, reliability and results of this report.
Use of Roof Wind Designer is subject to a license agreement and important legal notices and disclaimers. By inputting project information and generating this report, the preparer who generates this report accepts this license agreement and important legal notices and disclaimers. A copy of this license agreement and important legal notices and disclaimers is included at the end of this report and is considered to be a part of this report.
Summary of the building and roof area information input by the preparer:
Roof Area Dimensions (feet): 257 x 120 Mean Roof Height (feet): 60.0 Roof Slope: Flat: 1½:12 or less Parapet(s) (minimum 36 inches high): No Building Configuration Enclosed Exposure: B Risk Category: II Basic Wind Speed (three-second peak gust, mph): 110 from ASCE 7-16, Figure 26.5-1B Basic Wind Speed
Roof Deck Type: Structural Concrete Roof Covering Type: Modified Bitumen
In ASCE 7-16, the Envelope Procedure, Part 2: Low-rise Buildings (Simplified) and Part 4: Buildings with 60ft < h ≤ 160ft (Simplified), roof area dimensions, mean roof height, roof slope, the building's configuration and exposure, risk category, and basic wind speed are used in the determination of the design wind loads.
The building's configuration (open, partially enclosed, enclosed) affects design wind loads of the roof system.
ASCE 7-16, the Envelope Procedure, Part 2: Low-rise Buildings (Simplified), as well as part 4: Buildings with 60ft < h ≤ 160ft (simplified), is limited to buildings of an enclosed configuration. An enclosed configuration is defined by ASCE 7-16 as a building that does not comply with the requirements for open or partially enclosed buildings.
An open building is one having each wall at least 80 percent open. A partially enclosed building is one where the total area of openings in a wall that receives positive external pressure exceeds the sum of the area openings in the balance of the building envelope (walls and roof) by more than 10 percent and where the total area of openings in a wall that receives positive external pressure exceeds 4 ft2 or 1 percent of the area of that wall, whichever is smaller, and the percentage of openings in the balance of the building envelope does not exceed 20 percent.
A building's exposure has an effect on the magnitude of design wind loads that act on a building and the building's roof system. ASCE 7-16 provides for three Exposure Categories: B, C and D. Exposure Category C shall apply for all cases where Exposure Categories B or D do not apply. Exposure B shall apply where the ground surface roughness condition, as defined by Surface Roughness B, prevails in the windward direction for a distance of at least 2,600 feet. For buildings whose mean roof height is less than or equal to 30 feet, the upwind distance may be reduced to 1,500 feet. Exposure D shall apply where the ground surface roughness, as defined by Surface Roughness D, prevails in the upwind direction for a distance greater than 5,000 feet. Exposure D shall also apply where the ground surface roughness immediately upward of the site is B or C, and the site is within a distance of 600 feet or 20 times the building height, whichever is greater from an Exposure D condition.
A building's occupancy has an effect on the magnitude of design wind loads that act on a building and the building's roof system. In ASCE 7-16, a building's occupancy determines a risk category. ASCE 7-16 provides for four Risk Categories: I, II, III, and IV. Part 2: Low-rise Buildings (Simplified) uses risk category to determine the applicable basic wind speed map.
Risk Category II applies to all buildings except those listed in Risk Categories I, III, or IV. Risk Category I applies to buildings that represent a low hazard to human life in the event of failure. Risk Category III applies to buildings that represent a substantial hazard to human life in the event of failure. Risk Category IV applies to buildings designated as essential facilities or buildings where the failure of which could pose a substantial hazard to the community. Essential facilities are defined as buildings that are intended to remain operational in the event of extreme environmental loading from wind, snow or earthquakes.
The basic wind speed is representative of a 3-second peak gust wind speed at 33 feet above the ground in Exposure C and is determined from Figure 26.5-1A—Basic Wind Speeds for Occupancy Category I Buildings and Other Structures, Figure 26.5-1B—Basic Wind Speeds for Occupancy Category II Buildings and Other Structures, Figure 26.5-1C—Basic Wind Speeds for Occupancy Category III Buildings and Other Structures and Figure 26.5-1D —Basic Wind Speeds for Occupancy Category IV Buildings and Other Structures.
Roof edge parapets may assist in reducing design wind loads acting in the corner regions of the roof area. ASCE 7-16, Part 3: Buildings with h > 60 ft., allows for this reduction only when a minimum 36-inch-high parapet occurs at the two outside edges of the specific corner area where the design wind load is being reduced.
Wind Design for Roof Systems
ASCE 7-16 specifies wind design procedures for buildings and organizes them into two categories: main wind force-resisting systems, and component and cladding elements. Main wind force-resisting systems are the structural elements assigned to provide the support and stability for the overall building. Components and cladding are elements of the building envelope that do not qualify as part of the main wind force-resisting system. Roof systems and edge-metal flashing systems are considered components and cladding.
ASCE 7-16 provides two methods to determine minimum design load requirements for buildings: strength design method and allowable stress design (ASD) method. Design wind load calculations determined by the Envelope Procedure, Part 2: Low-rise Buildings (Simplified) method result in strength design values.
Roof systems and roof system components generally are designed using the ASD method. Because the ASD method's results often are used, a designer can adjust the strength design method's values to ASD method's values. A load-reduction factor is applied as a multiplier to the strength design values to determine the ASD values. ASCE 7-16 provides a load-reduction factor of 0.6 for this purpose, and the calculation is expressed as follows:
ASD value = Strength design value x 0.6
Roof Wind Designer determines design wind loads based upon the strength design method and then adjusts those values to the ASD method's values. This conversion and further explanation can be found in ASCE 7-16 commentary section C26.5.1.
2018 building code allows a conversion between wind speeds where . This works out to be the same as the load conversion above since windspeed squared is among the factors multiplied together in the equation for design wind load is ASCE 7.
Design Wind Loads
To determine design wind loads on roof areas, ASCE 7-16 identifies multiple primary areas of differing wind loads on a roof area. Within ASCE 7-16 these areas are designated as Zones 1, 1', 2, 2e, 2n, 2r, 3, 3e, 3r, 4, and 5.
Also, ASCE 7-16 identifies a dimension determined by calculation, referred to as "a," that defines the depth of the perimeter and corner zones from the roof area's edges.
Strength Design Method:
ASCE 7-16 uses four basic wind speed maps for different categories of building occupancies. These maps provide basic wind speeds that are applicable for calculating pressures and they are based on strength design. The strength design values determined for the roof area described by this report are as follows:
Zone1' 24.3 pounds per square foot Zone1 42.3 pounds per square foot Zone2 55.8 pounds per square foot Zone3 76.0 pounds per square foot
Also, the calculated "h" dimension is as follows:
a: 12.0 feet h: 60.0 feet 0.2h: 12.0 feet 0.6h: 36.0 feet
Graphically, the strength design values are depicted as follows:
Adjustment of Strength Design to Allowable Stress Design (ASD):
To adjust the strength design values to ASD values, the load-reduction factor of 0.6 is applied. The ASD values determined for the roof area described by this report are as follows:
Zone1' 14.6 pounds per square foot Zone1 25.4 pounds per square foot Zone2 33.5 pounds per square foot Zone3 45.6 pounds per square foot
42.3 pounds per square foot
55.8 pounds per square foot
76.0 pounds per square foot
Graphically, the ASD values are depicted as follows:
Minimum Recommended Design Uplift-resistance Capacities
Accepted engineering principles practice provides for applying a reasonable "safety factor" to design wind-uplift loads when using the ASD method to determine the minimum recommended design uplift-resistance capacities.
This safety factor is intended to address possible variances in design wind load determination, normally anticipated variances in the materials and construction of the building, including the roof system, and any normally anticipated deterioration of the materials' physical properties because of aging. This safety factor is applied to the ASD values.
The equation to determine required design uplift-resistance capacity is:
Design uplift-resistance capacity = ASD Design wind load x Safety factor
For membrane roof systems, Roof Wind Designer determines roof systems' minimum recommended design uplift-resistance capacities, using a safety factor defined in ASTM D6630, "Standard Guide for Low Slope insulated Roof Membrane Assembly Performance." This recognized consensus standard indicates design uplift-resistance loads shall have a minimum 2.0 safety factor from the design wind uplift loads determined using ASCE 7.
For roof assemblies with steel deck and a steel or aluminum metal panel roof system, Roof Wind Designer applies a safety factor of 1.67. This safety factor is recommended in AISI S100, "North American Specification for the Design of Cold-formed Steel Structural Members" and "Aluminum Design Manual: Part 1—Specification for Aluminum Structures" for bending.
On this basis, taking into consideration the ASD design wind-uplift loads and the safety factor, the minimum recommended design uplift-resistance capacities for the specific roof area and building identified in this report are as follows:
Zone1' 29.1 pounds per square foot Zone1 50.8 pounds per square foot Zone2 66.9 pounds per square foot Zone3 91.2 pounds per square foot
Using these minimum recommended design uplift-resistance capacity values, a user can select an appropriate wind-resistant roof system. The tested uplift-resistance capacity of the roof system should be greater than the minimum recommended design wind-resistance loads for the roof system to be considered appropriately wind resistant. This is expressed as:
Tested uplift-resistance capacity ≥ Design uplift-resistance capacity
Important note: To determine minimum recommended design uplift-resistance capacity values using the strength
25.4 pounds per square foot
33.5 pounds per square foot
45.6 pounds per square foot design method, designers will have to determine an appropriate safety factor on their own. Because the strength design method already includes a more conservative determination of design uplift loads, it is generally recognized any safety factor applied to design loads derived from using the strength design method can be less than the safety factor applied to the design loads derived from the ASD method.
Tested Uplift-resistance Load Capacities of Roof Systems
Roof systems' tested uplift-resistance load capacities typically are determined by laboratory testing or engineering analysis. In the International Building Code's 2009 and previous editions, four recognized test methods are referenced as acceptable methods for determining roof systems uplift-resistance capacities: FM 4450, FM 4470, UL 580 and UL 1898. The International Building Code's 2012, 2015, and 2018 editions reference FM 4474 instead of FM 4450 and FM 4470.
FM 4450, "Approval Standard for Class 1 Insulated Steel Roof Decks," and FM 4470, "Approval Standard for Single Ply, Polymer-Modified Bitumen Sheet, Built-Up Roof and Liquid Applied Roof Assemblies for use in Class I and Noncombustible Roof Deck Construction," are the laboratory test methods and serve as the technical basis of the FM Approvals' approval classifications (FM 1-60, FM 1-75, FM 1-90 etc.), with which most roofing professional are familiar. FM Approvals' applies a safety factor of 2 within these classifications. For example, a roof system that has an FM 1-60 approval classification is recommended for use where the ASD design wind load is 30 pounds per square foot (psf) or less, a FM 1-75 approval designation is recommended for use where the design wind load is
37.5 psf or less, and an FM 1-90 approval classification is recommended for use where the design wind load is 45 psf or less, and so forth.
FM 4474, "American National Standard for Evaluating the Simulated Wind Uplift Resistance of Roof Assemblies Using Static Positive And/or Negative Differential Pressures," is similar to the uplift-resistance test methods contained in FM 4450 and FM 4470 and results in uplift classifications Class 60, Class 75, Class 90, etc., which are similar to the FM 1-60, FM 1-75, FM 1-90, etc., respectively derived using FM 4450 and FM 4470. For example, a roof system that has an FM Class 60 approval classification is recommended for use where the ASD design wind load is 30 pounds per square foot (psf) or less, an FM Class 75 approval designation is recommended for use where the design wind load is 37.5 psf or less, and an FM Class 90 approval classification is recommended for use where the design wind load is 45 psf or less, and so forth.
FM Global's Loss Prevention Data Sheet 1-29, "Roof Deck Securement and Above-deck Roof Components," addresses FM Global's recommended guidelines for addressing wind-uplift capacity in Zone 2 (roof area perimeter) and Zone 3 (roof area corners).
FM Approvals online approval directory containing a listing of FM Approval's-approved roof systems and a copy of FM Global's Loss Prevention Data Sheet 1-29 can be viewed in the reference documents section of FM Approval's RoofNav application accessible at www.roofnav.com.
UL 580, "Standard for Tests for Uplift Resistance of Roof Assemblies" and UL 1897, "Standard for Uplift Tests for Roof Covering Systems" are the laboratory test methods and serve as the technical basis for Underwriters Laboratories (UL's) Inc.'s classifications (Class 30, Class 60, Class 90, etc.) for uplift resistance. UL's classifications do not apply a safety factor. A UL classification indicating a roof system that has a Class 30 designation has been tested and found resistant to uplift loads of 30 psf, a Class 60 designation has been tested and found resistant to uplift loads of 60 psf, a Class 90 designation has been tested and found resistant to uplift loads of 90 psf, and so forth. UL does not provide specific guidance regarding addressing wind-uplift capacity in Zone 2 (roof area perimeter) and Zone 3 (roof area corners).
Additional information regarding UL's wind-uplift classifications is available in UL's Roofing Materials & Systems Directory and in the certifications section of UL's website by accessing www.ul.com and typing "TGIK" into the UL category code field.
Additional information regarding roof systems' wind-uplift capacities may also be available by contacting individual roof system manufacturers.
Wind Load Design for Perimeter Edge Metal
The International Building Code references standard ANSI/SPRI ES-1, "Wind Design Standard for Edge Systems Used with Low Slope Roofing Systems." This code requirement is applicable to roof slopes less than 2:12.
Because a roof slope of 1½:12 or less was selected for this project, this report also contains design load calculations related to edge-metal system design.
ANSI/SPRI ES-1 includes two primary elements: determination of design wind loads at roof edges (perimeter edge metal) and testing for resistance loads of perimeter edge metal. However, IBC does not adopt ANSI/SPRI ES-1 in its entirety. It requires low-slope metal edge securement be designed and installed using IBC's Chapter 16— Structural Design and tested for resistance in accordance with ANSI/SPRI ES-1's Test RE-1, "Test Method for Dependently Terminated Roof Membrane Systems," RE-2, "Test Method for Dependently or Independently Terminated Edge Systems," and Test RE-3, "Test for Copings," as applicable.
The fundamental concept of wind design as it applies to perimeter edge-metal systems is that the tested wind-resistance (uplift-resistance) capacity of perimeter edge-metal system should be greater than or equal to the design resistance loads that will act upon the perimeter edge-metal system. Design wind-resistance loads are derived from a building's design wind loads, taking into consideration an appropriate safety factor. Roof Wind Designer determines roof systems' minimum recommended design wind-resistance loads. Using these minimum recommended design wind-resistance loads, users can select appropriate wind resistance perimeter edge-metal systems.
Wind-resistance capacities of perimeter edge-metal systems are determined by testing in accordance with the test methods in ANSI/SPRI ES-1. Once design wind loads and minimum recommended design wind-resistance loads (including a safety factor) are determined, designers can select appropriate perimeter edge-metal systems that have tested capacities equal to or greater than the minimum recommended design wind resistance loads.
Design Wind Loads Using ASCE 7
IBC Chapter 16—Structural Design of IBC uses ASCE 7 as the basis for determining design wind loads; therefore, NRCA recommends using ASCE 7 for design wind load calculations instead of ANSI/SPRI ES-1.
As previously discussed in the section on Wind Load Design for Roof Systems, ASCE 7-16 provides two design methods to determine minimum load requirements for buildings: strength design and allowable stress design (ASD). The wind load calculations determined by the Envelope Procedure, Part 2: Low-rise Buildings (Simplified) method result in strength design values. However, roof systems and roof system components generally are designed using ASD.
Because ASD results often are used, a designer may want to adjust the strength design values to ASD values. A load-reduction factor is applied as a multiplier to adjust the values. An appropriate load-reduction factor is 0.6 and the calculation is expressed as follows:
Strength design value x 0.6 = ASD value
Roof Wind Designer provides the calculations for strength design and then adjusts those values to ASD values.
Strength Design Method:
ASCE 7 identifies a vertical surface as a "roof zone" and a horizontal surface as a "wall zone." As previously mentioned, Zones 1 through 3 are associated with roof areas. For wall areas, ASCE 7-10 identifies two primary areas of differing horizontal wind loads: perimeter and corners. These areas are designated as Zones 4 and 5, respectively. The dimension that defines the distance of the perimeter and corner zones is the same distance "a" used with defining Zones 1 through 3 for roof areas.
For the zones described by this report, the strength design wind loads determined using ASCE 7-10 are as follows:
Zone2 55.8 pounds per square foot Zone3 76.0 pounds per square foot Zone4 28.8 pounds per square foot Zone5 35.5 pounds per square foot
Also, the calculated "h" dimension is as follows:
a: 12.0 feet h: 60.0 feet 0.2h: 12.0 feet 0.6h: 36.0 feet
Graphically, these values are depicted as follows:
55.8 pounds per square foot
76.0 pounds per square foot
28.8 pounds per square foot
35.5 pounds per square foot
Adjustment of Strength Design to Allowable Stress Design (ASD):
To adjust the strength design values to ASD values, a load-reduction factor of 0.6 should be applied. The ASD values determined for the wall area described by this report are as follows:
Zone2 33.5 pounds per square foot Zone3 45.6 pounds per square foot Zone4 17.3 pounds per square foot Zone5 21.3 pounds per square foot
Graphically, these values are depicted as follows:
33.5 pounds per square foot
45.6 pounds per square foot
17.3 pounds per square foot
21.3 pounds per square foot
Minimum Recommended Design Wind-resistance Loads
NRCA recommends designers include an appropriate safety factor in their design wind-resistance calculations for perimeter edge-metal flashings. NRCA suggests a minimum safety factor of 2.0 be applied to steel or aluminum edge-metal flashings. This is consistent with the minimum safety factor recommended in ANSI/SPRI ES-1's design wind load calculations section.
The safety factor is applied to the ASD values. The equation to determine required design wind-resistance load is:
Design wind-resistance capacity = [ASD Design wind load] x [Safety factor of 2.0]
Taking into consideration the design wind-uplift loads, the minimum recommended design wind-resistance loads for the specific roof and wall areas described in this report are as follows:
Zone2 66.9 pounds per square foot Zone3 91.2 pounds per square foot Zone4 34.6 pounds per square foot Zone5 42.6 pounds per square foot
Please note: The safety factor used to determine minimum recommended design wind-resistance loads for perimeter edge metal may be a different value than the safety factor used in the roof system calculations.
Tested Resistance Load Capacities of Perimeter Edge Metal
Using the minimum recommended design wind-resistance values, a user can select an appropriately wind-resistant perimeter edge metal. The tested wind-resistance load capacity—commonly referred to as "load capacity"—of the perimeter edge metal should be greater than the minimum recommended design wind-resistance capacities for the perimeter edge-metal system to be considered appropriately wind-resistant.
Tested wind-resistance capacities of edge-metal flashing systems are determined by testing. IBC requires the testing be done in accordance with the RE-1, RE-2 and RE-3 test methods contained in ANSI/SPRI ES-1 as applicable to the specific roof perimeter edge metal configuration. These three test methods are:
Test RE-1, "Test Method for Dependently Terminated Roof Membrane Systems."
Test RE-2, "Test Method for Dependently or Independently Terminated Edge Systems."
Test RE-3, "Test for Copings."
The following images illustrate how to apply the design wind-resistance capacities (including a safety factor) for fascia, embedded edge metal and copings based on RE-1, RE-2 and RE-3:
Note: The resultant forces indicated on the figure need to be further adjusted, depending on row spacing of the membrane fasteners or if the roof system is ballasted.
RE-1 tests an edge metal system's ability to restrain a membrane force from billowing. This test method is only applicable to ballasted and mechanically attached membrane systems that do not contain a "peel stop" within 12 inches of the roof edge. RE-1 is not applicable to adhered roof membranes.
158.3 pounds per square foot
215.8 pounds per square foot
RE-2 tests resistances to horizontal (outward from building face) loads for gravel stops or fascias.
RE-3 tests copings' resistances to outward (horizontal) and upward (vertical) pressures.
Using these minimum recommended design wind-resistance load values, a user can select an appropriately wind-resistant edge-metal flashing system. The tested wind-resistance capacity of the edge-metal flashing system should be greater than the minimum recommended design wind-resistance loads for the edge-metal flashing system to be considered appropriately wind-resistant. This is expressed as:
Tested wind-resistance capacity ≥ Design wind-resistance capacity
NRCA has conducted extensive testing using methods RE-2 and RE-3 of various edge-metal flashing profiles that are usually shop-fabricated. The edge-metal profiles tested are based upon the construction details contained in The NRCA Roofing Manual.
Visit www.nrca.net/roofing/Shop-fabricated-edge-metal-testing-242 to view drawings of the specific edge-metal flashings that have been tested. The drawings contain the tested wind-resistance capacity values for each edge-metal flashing profile. NRCA maintains certification programs with Underwriters Laboratories Inc. and Intertek Testing Services, N.A. Each program has its specific set of tested edge-metal flashing profiles.
Tested Resistance Load Capacities of Gutters Using the minimum recommended design wind-resistance values, a user can select appropriately wind-resistant gutters. The tested wind-resistance load capacity—commonly referred to as "load capacity"—of the gutter should be greater than the minimum recommended design wind-resistance capacities for the gutter system to be considered appropriately wind-resistant.
Tested wind-resistance capacities of gutter systems are determined by testing. IBC requires the testing be done in accordance with SPRI G-1 and G-2. Test G-1: Horizontal test measures the resistance of the gutter system to test forces acting outwardly (away from the building.) Test G-2 measures the resistance of the gutter system to test forces acting upwardly tending to lift the gutter off the building.
The following image illustrates how to apply the design wind-resistance capacities (including a safety factor) gutters based on G-1 and G-2:
34.6 pounds per square foot
42.6 pounds per square foot
66.9 pounds per square foot
91.2 pounds per square foot
34.6 pounds per square foot
42.6 pounds per square foot
License Agreement and Important Legal Notices & Disclaimers National Roofing Contractors Association (NRCA) — Roof Wind Designer
Clicking the "I Accept" button below constitutes your acceptance and acknowledgment of the terms and conditions set forth below. If you do not agree to these terms and conditions, you may not use the Roof Wind Designer software application. By accepting these terms and conditions, you acknowledge and agree as follows:
1. NRCA grants you a one-time, personal, nontransferable, and nonexclusive license to use the Roof Wind Designer. This license is valid for one-time use of the Roof Wind Designer and automatically terminates upon delivery of the written report generated by the Roof Wind Designer application (the "Report").
2. The Roof Wind Designer application, the contents of the Roof Wind Designer application, and the Report are copyrighted by NRCA. The license granted above is not a sale, and this agreement does not give you any rights to copyrights, trademarks or patents with respect to the NRCA Roof Wind Designer software application.
3. You may not copy, alter any of the text, or manipulate any aspect of the Roof Wind Designer application or the Report.
4. Neither NRCA or the organizations supporting the Roof Wind Designer application (collectively, the "Supporting Organizations") "approve" or "endorse" any specific products, methods, companies, practices or sources of information referred to or suggested by Roof Wind Designer. You should not reference Roof Wind Designer or do anything that in any way would imply such approval or endorsement.
5. The calculations used in Roof Wind Designer are based on recognized engineering principles including recognized consensus standard ASCE 7 "Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures," which is referenced in most building codes as the method for determining design wind loads for buildings, and building components and claddings, including roof systems. Roof Wind Designer only may be used for determining design wind loads pursuant to ASCE 7-05's Method 1—Simplified Procedure, ASCE 7-10's Envelope Procedure, Part 2: Low-rise Buildings (Simplified), ASCE 7-16's Envelope Procedure, Part 2: Low-rise Buildings (Simplified), and ASCE 7-16's Part 4: Buildings with 60ft < h ≤ 160ft (Simplified). When using ASCE 7-05, buildings requiring the use of Method—2 Analytical Procedure or Method 3—Wind Tunnel Procedure are beyond the scope of Roof Wind Designer. When using ASCE 7-10 and ASCE 7-16, buildings requiring the use of the Envelope Procedure, Part 1:
Low-rise Buildings, Directional Procedure, the Wind Tunnel Procedure, or where topographic effects must be included in the determination of wind loads, are beyond the scope of Roof Wind Designer.
6. The safety factors used in calculating the minimum recommended design wind resistance loads for which your roof system should be designed is determined in reliance on ASTM D6630, "Standard Guide for Low Slope Insulated Roof Membrane Assembly," AISI S100, “North American Specification for the Design of Cold-formed Steel Structural Members,” AA ADM1, "Aluminum Design Manual: Part 1-A—Specification for Aluminum Structures, Allowable Stress Design; and Part 1-B—Aluminum Structures, Load and Resistance Factor Design," and ANSI/SPRI ES-1 "Test Standard for Edge Systems Used with Low Slope Roofing Systems."
7. Roof Wind Designer relies upon your input to generate a Report intended to serve as a guide in determining the appropriate design wind loads and minimum recommended design resistance loads for roof systems. The Report applies only to the specific building identified by you and relies solely on the input supplied by you.
8. Any misinformation, miscalculations, mistakes or changes in the information that you enter into the application may affect the results, accuracy, reliability and/or other aspects of the Report.
9. By agreeing to use Roof Wind Designer, you specifically acknowledge that neither NRCA or the Supporting Organizations is undertaking to render specific professional advice. You must rely solely on your own judgment or consult a technically competent roof professional to determine what application or design resistance loads, whether included in the Report or not, is appropriate for your purpose. Neither NRCA or the Supporting Organizations assume responsibility for any decision made by you relating to the suitability or use of Roof Wind Designer or the Report.
10. Neither NRCA or the Supporting Organizations make any guarantee, representation or warranty, express or implied, at law or in equity, and NRCA and the Supporting Organizations expressly disclaim any and all such guarantees, representations or warranties whatsoever as to the validity, accuracy or sufficiency of the information supplied by Roof Wind Designer and/or the Report and assumes no responsibility or liability in connection therewith. NRCA and the Supporting Organizations assume no liability or responsibility in connection with the use or misuse of Roof Wind Designer or the information included therein or supplied thereby or in connection with any modifications to or adaptations of Roof Wind Designer and/or the Report by you or any other party and expressly disclaim any such liability or responsibility.
11. You expressly assume all risk of loss, harm and/or injury resulting from the use or misuse of the Roof Wind Designer and/or the Report.
Additionally, the wind-resistance loads suggested by the Report may not be appropriate in all instances and requires verification and use by technically competent roof professionals.
12. Links or pointers connecting the Roof Wind Designer website with other Internet sites are provided as a courtesy only and do not imply, directly or indirectly, the endorsement, sponsorship or approval by NRCA or the Supporting Organizations of the linked site, the company, organization or individual operating the site, or any product, service, company or organization referenced in the site. In general, any website that has an address (or URL) that does not contain "nrca.net" is a linked website. The content of any linked site does not necessarily reflect the opinions, standards or policies of NRCA. NRCA assumes no responsibility or liability for the accuracy or completeness of content contained in any linked site or for the compliance with applicable laws of such linked sites.
13. You acknowledge and accept the foregoing limitation of liability and disclaimers and agree that neither NRCA or the Supporting Organizations is responsible for injuries, claims, losses or damages to you or third parties arising, directly or indirectly, out of your use of Roof Wind Designer and/or the Report.
34.6 pounds per square foot
42.6 pounds per square foot
62.0 pounds per square foot
86.4 pounds per square foot
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .