15-Att 4.docx
DOCX document 47 KB Posted
- Attached to
- OWNER’S ADVISOR SERVICES FOR MILL CREEK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT DEWATERING BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS
- Solicitation number
- RFQ 265X901115
- Issued by
- Hamilton County, Ohio
About this file
This document is a Qualifications Questionnaire (RFQ #265X901115) from the Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater Cincinnati (MSDGC) for Owner's Advisor Services related to the Mill Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant Dewatering Building Improvements project. The RFQ seeks an experienced consultant to assist MSD throughout the planning, design-builder procurement, design, and construction phases of the project. The selected offeror will initially develop a Business Case Evaluation (BCE) and finalize project criteria, then help MSD with the RFQ/RFP process to select a design-builder, and subsequently provide technical and project management support during design and construction.
The questionnaire requires offerors to submit details of up to six similar completed projects from the past five years, with a focus on 15% scoring for project similarities. Offerors must provide comprehensive project information including contract amounts, completion dates, key personnel involvement, and project-specific details. The document emphasizes the need for detailed documentation, warning that deviation from the attachment instructions may render the submittal "non-responsive." The project is located in Ohio and appears to be seeking a consultant with extensive experience in municipal infrastructure and wastewater treatment facility improvements.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 10-Affidavit of Accuracy.docx | DOCX document | |
| 17-265X901115 QQ.docx | DOCX document | |
| 16-Att 5.docx | DOCX document | |
| 13-Att 2.docx | DOCX document | |
| 1-PA Template 9 1 2022.pdf | ||
| 12-Att 1.docx | DOCX document | |
| 11-Att 0.docx | DOCX document | |
| 4-Professional Services Small Business Enterprise Rating Rubric 11.6.19.pdf | ||
| 14-Att 3.docx | DOCX document | |
| 3-CorporateResolution2AuthorizedtoSign.doc | DOC document | |
| 18-265X901115 Addendum 1.pdf | ||
| 5-RFP-Q Subconsultant Utilization Plan.pdf.pdf | ||
| 8-AFFIDAVIT CONCERNING AUTHORITY (template).docx | DOCX document | |
| 7-AFFIDAVIT CONCERNING AUTHORITY (Instructions).pdf | ||
| 9-RFQ 265X901115.pdf | ||
| 2-Corporate Resolution 2 Authorized to Sign - Instructions.pdf | ||
| 6-SBE Statement of Intent to Contract Perform.pdf.pdf |
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
MSDGC QUALIFICATIONS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR RFQ # 265X901115
OWNER’S ADVISOR SERVICES FOR MILL CREEK WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT DEWATERING BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS
(Note: Similar Completed Projects = 15%)
The applicability of and successful performance on completed MSDGC and non-MSDGC projects similar in scope to the one identified in this RFQ shall be evaluated for scoring this category.
List of Similar Completed Projects: List no more than six (6) similar projects Offeror has completed in the past five (5) years, including the project name, owner, contract amount, and completion date. The Offeror may attach this information to its submittal in lieu of completing this spreadsheet. However, the attachment MUST contain ALL elements in this spreadsheet (column headings and data requested). If the attachment does not mirror this spreadsheet, the submittal may be deemed incomplete. Please identify the involvement of the key personnel on these projects.
| Project Name |
| Owner |
| Contract Amount |
| Completion Date |
SIMILAR COMPLETED PROJECTS (ATTACHMENT 4 TO RFQ)
MSDGC QUALIFICATIONS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR RFQ # XXXX-XX
PROJECT TITLE
ATTACHMENT 4
Rev. 20250124 Page | 1 2025-10-09 Detailed Project Description: Using the format below, provide the requested information on each project included on the List of Similar Completed Projects in Attachment 4 that are most similar to the work described in this RFQ. Projects must have been performed under Offeror's current legal name or immediately-previous legal name (within past five years), whether as a prime consultant or as a subconsultant, and involve principals employed at the time of this submittal. Additional information: Attach separate sheets (maximum 2 sheets per project) to provide additional information related to the project description – specifically the type of expertise provided. The examples should include the nature of involvement in the project and any special environmental, political, or technical problems resolved during the project.
| 1. | Offeror Name: ___________________________________________________________________ |
| Project Manager Name: _____________________________________________________________ |
| 2. | Name of Project: ___________________________________________________________________ |
| Contract No.: _____________________________ Project No.: __________________________ | |
| Project Description _________________________________________________________________ |
| 3. | Owner Name: _____________________________________________________________________ |
| Address: _________________________________________________________________________ |
Contact Person: ____________________________________________________________________ Position: _________________________________________________________________________ Telephone Number: ________________________________________________________________ Email Address: ____________________________________________________________________
| 4. | Contract Dates - Attach additional information if project was not on schedule. |
| Started: _____________________________________ | |
| Contractual Completion: _______________________ | |
| Actual Completion: ___________________________ |
| 5. | Original Contract Value: $ _____________________ |
| Final Contract Value: $ ________________________ | |
| Value of: Change Orders/Amendments to Date $ ____________________ | |
| Outstanding Claims to Date $ ________________________ |
| 6. | Major Subconsultant(s) | |||
| Name: | _______________________________________________________ | |||
| Address: | _______________________________________________________ | |||
| Contact Person: | _______________________________________________________ | |||
| Telephone Number: | _______________________________________________________ | |||
| Email Address: | _______________________________________________________ | |||
| Role in Project: | _______________________________________________________ | |||
| (Add others as necessary) |
| 7. | Was contract completed on or before the date specified in the contract for contract completion as adjusted by agreement of the parties? | |
| Yes ( ) No ( ) |
If not, explain why, including the original contract period and the final contract period.
8. Key personnel listed in Attachment 2 that worked on this project and their roles.
Deviation of the submitted QQ from compliance with the Attachment 4 instructions and requirements may render the Offeror’s submittal as “non-responsive” by the City.
SIMILAR COMPLETED PROJECTS (ATTACHMENT 4 TO RFQ)
Rev. 20250124 Page | 1 2025-10-09
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .