1352.213-70 EVALUATION USING SAP.docx
CAR Clause DOCX document 15 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 141016-25-0026
About this file
The document is an Evaluation Utilizing Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) clause detailing the evaluation methodology for a federal contract opportunity issued by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). The solicitation seeks 5 Aqua TROLL 200 Data Loggers and associated equipment for the Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services in Chesapeake, VA, with a specific focus on the In-Situ Aqua TROLL 200 Level Sensor (Part Number: 0056020).
The evaluation will use a Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA) approach, with two primary evaluation factors: past performance and price. Offerors must provide 2-3 past performance references and unit prices for all items, with the total price based on Contract Line-Item Numbers (CLINs) 0001-0004. The solicitation is set aside for small businesses, specifically Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) enterprises under NAICS code 334513, with quotes due by July 8, 2025, and delivery required by July 15, 2025. Contractors must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) with a unique entity identifier to be eligible for award consideration.
View the file
Other versions and copies of CAR 1352.213-70
Who attaches CAR 1352.213-70
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1305M225Q0100.pdf | ||
| 1305M225Q0100.pdf | ||
| Statement of Need.docx | DOCX document | |
| OFFEROR INSTRUCTIONS.docx | DOCX document | |
| 52.212-3 Offeror Representations and Certifications—Commercial Products and Commercial Services DEV FEB 2025.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
1352.213-70 Evaluation utilizing simplified acquisition procedures.
Evaluation Utilizing Simplified Acquisition Procedures (APR 2010) The Government intends to award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose quotation conforms to the solicitation and is determined to be the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA). The Government may award without discussions; therefore, each initial quotation should contain the offeror’s best terms.
Technical acceptability is defined as the offeror’s ability to meet all the required characteristics identified in the specifications outlined in the RFQ and the offeror’s demonstrated ability to successfully perform the contract, based on an evaluation of past performance. Only the lowest-priced quote will be evaluated for technical acceptability. If the lowest-priced quote is found not technically acceptable, the Government will proceed to evaluate the next lowest-priced quote, and so on, until a technically acceptable offer is identified. As a result, not all offers submitted may be evaluated.
(c) The following factors shall be used to evaluate quotations:
1. Past Performance The Government will evaluate the offeror’s past performance on related contracts to assess the likelihood of successful performance. This includes, as appropriate, successful completion of contract requirements, quality and timeliness of delivery, cost control, communication with contracting officials, proactive management, and customer satisfaction. Offerors shall provide a minimum of two, but no more than three, past performance references. Each reference must include: the company or Government agency name, project title, address, point of contact’s name, telephone number, and email address.
2. Price Price will be evaluated for reasonableness, and award will be made to the lowest-priced technically acceptable offer. Offerors are required to provide a unit price for all items. Evaluation of price will be based on the total of Contract Line-Item Numbers (CLINs) 0001 through 0004. A unit price of $0.00 will be interpreted as the item or service being provided at no cost to the Government. Unit prices that are left blank or annotated with anything other than a numeric dollar amount may be considered unacceptable, and the Government reserves the right to reject such offers without further consideration. Additionally, the Government may determine an offer unacceptable if the pricing is significantly unbalanced.
(End of clause)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .