Site_Visit_PowerPoint_Presentation_-_140R3023R0003_0001.pdf

12/6/2022

Visitor Center Exhibit Level Renovations

Site Visit

Lower Colorado Dams Office 11/17/2022

• Background

• Hoover Dam owned and operated by the

Bureau of Reclamation

• Visitor Center opened in 1995

• Phase 2 of first major renovation since construction

• Phase 1 was our theater level completed March 2019

• We receive no federal appropriated funds

• All expenses paid by our 46 power customers though sale of power

• This project primarily paid for by Southern Nevada Public Lands Management Act (SNPLMA) program

Building Renovation

• Project Objectives

• Expand and improve the flow of the self-guided tour experience

• Replace end of life interior finishes with new durable easily maintened finishes

• Install new interactive exhibits to tell a broader Hoover Dam story

• Minimize impacts to tour operations during construction

• Minimize time exhibit level is out of service

Building Renovation

• Demolition and build out of Hoover Dam existing exhibit level space and construction of addition and coordination for installation of interpretive elements. Build out of new office space.

• Period of performance from date of award not to exceed 365 calendar days. This includes close out.

• Concurrent contract will be awarded for the Fabrication of Interpretive Elements, referred to as “Interpretive Contract”

Building Renovation

• Interpretive Contract baseline schedule accepted by the Government after award will drive the start date of Building Contract

• Anticipate award of Interpretive Contract within one week , period of performance not to exceed 425 days . NTP for Building Contract dependent upon Interpretive baseline schedule

• Building construction activity expected to take 180 days from start of demolition to ready for exhibit installation

• Government intention is to minimize the time period exhibits are not available to the public

Building Renovation

Contract

Award NTP

Close outAward NTP? Construction Installation

Interpretive Contract Fabrication Installation Close out

Contract Building Construction Contract

• Re-purposed items

• Concrete Bucket

• Dam Site model

• Generator model

• Removal of these exhibits will be coordinated with Interpretive Fabricator prior to start of demo

• Other items to be salvaged and turned over to Government to be coordinated with COR

• Building Contractor will coordinate closely with Interpretive Contractor and Government throughout performance period

• Weekly coordination meetings will be conducted throughout the performance period and all three parties are required to participate

• Each contractor will be responsible for presenting a 3 week look ahead schedule

• Tracking of submittal, RFI, change order, etc. status

• Other issues as identified by the COR or the team necessary for successful execution of this project

Building Renovation

Section L - Proposal Instructions

Factor 1 – Experience

Proposal Submission Requirements: The Offeror shall demonstrate acceptable level of experience to perform the work to be completed under this solicitation through presentation of prior completed works. Additional details found in section L.

Building Renovation

Building Renovation – Section L

Factor 2 - Technical Approach

Proposal Submission Requirements: The Offeror shall demonstrate through narrative description, graphs, tables, or other graphic means the Offeror deems valuable, a complete and thorough understanding of all features of work to be performed under this solicitation/contract. Additional details in Section L.

Building Renovation – Section L

Factor 3 - Past Performance

The Offeror must provide to the project references included in Factor 1, Experience. The Offeror shall provide a minimum of three (3) past performance references of contracts that are similar in size, complexity, and nature to this project on which the Offeror was the prime contractor or a major subcontractor. Projects shall represent work which is either on-going or has been completed during the past seven (7) years from the closing date of the solicitation. Additional details in Section L.

Building Renovation – Section M Factor 1: Experience Evaluation Standards:

1. Evaluation will be based on Offeror’s proposal addressing all of the proposal submission requirements of this factor and that submission clearly demonstrates past relevant experience of Offeror through exemplar project.

2. Information provided in Offeror’s exemplar projects must be verifiable via customer contact information provided. Customer feedback may also be considered.

Building Renovation – Section M Factor 1: Experience

3. In establishing what is relevant for this acquisition, consideration shall be given to an Offeror’s history of contract (or subcontract) performance that would provide the most context and give the greatest ability to measure the Offeror’s likely ability to successfully satisfy the current requirement. Common aspects of relevancy include similarity in size, scope and complexity, use of key personnel for this project from past similar projects, and ability to manage subcontracting.

Building Renovation – Section M Factor 2: Technical Approach Evaluation Standards:

1. Evaluation will be based on Offeror clearly addressing all of the proposal submission requirements outlined under this factor and that submission clearly demonstrates a thorough understanding of the work to be performed under this solicitation/contract.

2. Proposed milestone schedule includes all major activities required to complete work to be performed under this solicitation/contract and that durations and sequencing tasks are feasible.

Building Renovation – Section M

Factor 3: Past Performance Evaluation Standards:

1) Past performance will be evaluated in the areas of quality of service, timeliness of performance, customer satisfaction and cost control. Past performance will be evaluated in terms of overall relevancy to this project and in terms of overall level of confidence in the firms’ ability to successfully execute and complete this project supported by the indicated past performance.

Building Renovation – Section M

Factor 3: Past Performance Evaluation Standards:

2) Offerors demonstrating a higher level of successful past performance in the evaluated areas or that demonstrate past performance relevant to the work to be performed under this contract may receive a more favorable rating. In the case of an

Offeror without a record of relevant, recent past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the Offeror will be rated as neutral.

Building Renovation – Section M Factor 3: Past Performance Evaluation Standards:

3) The evaluation will be based on information obtained from the Past Performance Questionnaires, and other relevant past performance information obtained from other sources known to the Government, to include additional references, and the

Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS).

4) The Government will assess the relative risks associated with each Offeror. Performance risks are those associated with an

Offeror’s likelihood of success in performing the acquisition requirements as indicated by that Offeror’s record of past performance.

Building Renovation – Section M

Factor 4: Price:

Evaluation Standard: The price proposal (Price Schedule, Section

B.) will be evaluated for price reasonableness and any instances of unbalanced pricing.

• Full Disclosure

• First large-scale Interpretive contract for our team

• During construction Government has LGA Architecture and AldrichPears (APA) under support contracts

• What else do we need to discuss

• Answers are only official answers when in writing

Questions?