Att_9_140P8425Q0004_Appendices_to_SOW_0001.pdf

WHISKEYTOWN

NATIONAL RECREATION AREA

DEMOLISH CRYSTAL CREEK CAMP

PMIS No. 319078

STATEMENT OF WORK

APPENDIX A:

County Well Records (x2)

APPENDIX B:

State Water Board Tank Closure Record

APPENDIX C:

Bridge Inspection Report

BRIDGE INSPECTION REPORT

CRYSTAL CREEK TRUSS BRIDGE

CRYSTAL CREEK ROAD OVER CRYSTAL CREEK

WHISKEYTOWN NATIONAL RECREATION AREA

LOOKING WEST TOWARD CA ROUTE 299

STRUCTURE NO. 8750-017P

INSPECTION TYPE: ROUTINE

INSPECTION DATE: 7/21/2021

Report prepared by:

Federal Highway Administration Federal Lands Bridge Office Bridge Inspection and Management Program 21400 Ridgetop Circle Sterling, Virginia 20166 https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

SOUTH (UPSTREAM) PROFILE

MILE POINT: 4.0

KILOMETER POINT: 6.44

https://bridge.flhd.fhwa.dot.gov

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 8750-017P

CRYSTAL CREEK TRUSS BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 07/21/2021

BRIDGE IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION

MAIN SPAN MATERIAL: ..... 3 - STEEL NO. OF MAIN SPANS:

MAIN SPAN TYPE: .............. 10 - TRUSS - THRU NO. OF APPR. SPANS:

# OF BEAMS, MAIN SPAN: . 2 STRUCT. TOTAL LENGTH: . 53.3 FT (16.2 M)

DECK TYPE: ........................ 3 - OPEN GRATING MAX. SPAN LENGTH: ......... 50 FT (15.2 M) WEARING SURFACE: ......... N - NA DECK WIDTH: ..................... 12.3 FT (3.7 M)

ABUT. FOUNDATIONS: ....... 0 - UNKNOWN CURB TO CURB WIDTH: .... 11 FT (3.4 M)

PIER FOUDNATION(S): ...... 6 - N/A YEAR BUILT:

ABUTMENT / PIER MAT'L: .. 1 - CONCRETE YEAR RECONSTRUCTED: .

PROJ./PLAN REF. NO: ....... SKEW ANGLE: .................... 0 °

NPS ROAD CLASS: ............ 5 - ADMINISTRATIVE FRACTURE CRITICAL: ....... Y

STRUCTURE HISTORY: ..... (YEAR UNKNOWN) - TRUSS LENGTHENED 10' SINCE INITIAL CONSTRUCTION WITH

TRUSS NO LONGER BEARING ON ABANDONED PIER; MODIFIED FLOORBEAM AND

STRINGER CONFIGURATION IMPLEMENTED.

LOCATION

WHISKEYTOWN NATIONAL RECREATION AREA MILE POINT: .. 4.0 (KM PT 6.44)

STATE: .............................. 069 - CALIFORNIA LOCATION: .... South from CA Route 299 on Crystal

Creek Road, 3.9 miles to locked gate.FACILITY CARRIED: ......... CRYSTAL CREEK ROAD Bridge located 0.1 miles beyond gate.FEATURE INTERSECTED: CRYSTAL CREEK ROAD

INSPECTION TEAM: P. Clark, J. Hensley

CONDITION ASSESSMENT:

Jordan Hensley

REPORT REVIEW:

Marcus Miller

REPORT APPROVAL: Date: 12/20/2021

Jorgomai Ceesay

STRUCTURE EVALUATION SUMMARY

This steel truss bridge is in fair condition overall. The main problem is heavy soil and debris accumulation with vegetation growth on the truss ends, bearings and end floor beams at both abutments. In addition to restricting the truss expansion, the condition will eventually contribute to premature corrosion of the steel superstructure.

Other problems include missing approach guardrail, cracked welds securing the steel grid decking to the stringer top flanges, and the paint system beginning to fail with rusting of the superstructure throughout.

Additionally, fallen trees in the channel restrict flow and trap debris upstream of the structure. The west abutment footing is exposed (16"H, 6"D) at the downstream end, and this condition has possibly been exacerbated by increased flow velocity caused by debris.

It appears that, since the initial construction, the truss has been lengthened 10' at the east end. The floor beam and stringer configurations have been slightly modified at this location, and the truss no longer bears down

STRUCTURE SUMMARY STRUCTURE NO. 8750-017P

CRYSTAL CREEK TRUSS BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 07/21/2021

(5/8" gap) on the abandoned concrete pier.

Concrete actions should be taken as outlined in this report to prevent the possible development of more serious or costly problems in the future. This report also constitutes the Fracture Critical Inspection Report for the structure.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 8750-017P

CRYSTAL CREEK TRUSS BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 07/21/2021

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

Item No.

Maintenance Recomendations

(GENERALLY NOT FLHP ELIGIBLE)

QTY. UNIT UNIT

COST

PRELIM.

COST

ESTIMATE

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

Item No.

REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION

(TYPICALLY NEEDED WITHIN 5 YEARS)

QTY. UNIT

UNIT

COST

PRELIM. COST ESTIMATES

REHAB RECONSTR

222.3 INSTALL APPROACH GUARDRAIL AT ALL FOUR

CORNERS OF STRUCTURE. 1 LS 20000 20000

60.9 INSTALL RIPRAP OR OTHER PROTECTIVE

MEASURES TO PREVENT FURTHER SCOUR OF

EXPOSED WEST ABUTMENT FOOTING.

1 LS 10000 10000

61.4 REMOVE FALLEN TREES AND DEBRIS FROM

CHANNEL. 1 LS 5000 5000

58.1 REPAIR CRACKED WELDS SECURING

STRINGERS TO FLOOR BEAM TOP FLANGES. 1 LS 2000 2000

59.1,59.4, 59.5

CLEAR VEGETATION GROWTH AND DEBRIS

ACCUMULATION ON BEARINGS, BEARING

SEATS, AND SUPERSTRUCTURE.

1 LS 1000 1000

59.11 TRIM BACK TREES OVERHANGING SOUTH SIDE

OF STRUCTURE. 1 LS 1000 1000

59.6 TIGHTEN LOOSE AND DEFLECTED LOWER

LATERAL BRACING MEMBER L6US-L8DS. 1 LS 1000 1000

CONTRACT COSTS FOR MOBILIZATION,

TRAFFIC CONTROL, DESIGN AND

CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING.

1 LS 40000 40000

PRELIM. REHABILITATION/RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : 80000

RECOMMENDATIONS AND ESTIMATED COSTS STRUCTURE NO. 8750-017P

CRYSTAL CREEK TRUSS BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE : 07/21/2021

226 PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT D

A (Critical) - Structure is closed, in immediate damage of collapse, or presents a critical safety danger.

B (Major) - Structure is seriously deficient or presents a safety hazzard, but can remain open at reduced loads or with frequent inspections.

C (Moderate) - Structure is deficient, functionally obsolete, or requires substantial repairs to prevent a serious deficiency or unsafe condition.

D (Minor) - Structure is generally in good condition. Preventive maintenance may be required.

E (Special) - Structure is under construction or reconstruction.

COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY

PRELIM. MAINTENANCE TOTAL :

PRELIM. REHABILITATION TOTAL :

PRELIM. RECONSTRUCTION TOTAL : .. 0

80000TOTAL ITEMIZED COSTS:

PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE TOTAL * :

(*Includes typical contract costs for mobilization, traffic control and design/construction engineering: but does not include detour bridges, work beyond the bridge limits, or work not listed above. Estimates are approximate and are for planning purposes only; they should not be used as a complete or final engineers estimate.)

Remarks : Cost estimates assume that recommended actions will be combined with similar work being performed on other structures.

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 8750-017P

CRYSTAL CREEK TRUSS BRIDGE INSPECTION DATE: 07/20/2021

58. DECK

1. DECK SLAB

4. RIDEABILITY

5. CURBS, SIDEWALKS, AND MEDIAN

6. PARAPETS AND/OR RAILINGS

7. DRAINS AND DRAINAGE

8. UTILITIES

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.OTHER:

59. SUPERSTRUCTURE

1. BEARING DEVICES

2. GIRDERS OR BEAMS

3. ARCH(ES) OR SLAB(S)

4. FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

5. TRUSSES

6. DIAPHRAGMS AND BRACING

7. PAINT

8. FASCIA(E)

9. DEFLECTION AND/OR VIBRATION

10.ALIGNMENT

11.OTHER

60. SUBSTRUCTURE

61. CHANNEL

1. ALIGNMENT

2. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

3. CHANNEL PROTECTION

4. WATERWAY OBSTRUCTIONS

5. OTHER

6. ADEQUACY OF OPENING

7. NORMAL VELOCITY

8. AVERAGE CLEAR OPENING

9. STREAMBED COMPOSITION:

222. APPROACHES

1. APPROACH SLABS

2. RELIEF JOINTS

3. APPROACH GUARDRAIL

4. SURFACING

5. EROSION

6. SETTLEMENT

7. SIGNS

8. ALIGNMENT

9. OTHER

223. RETAINING WALL

1. WALL

2. WEEP HOLES

3. FOUNDATION

4. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR

5. SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

6. OTHER

F

F

F

F

F

G

N

F

N

N

F

F

F

F

N

G

F

F

F

G

N

F

N

1- SUFF

2 - MED

N

N

P

F

G

G

F

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

G

N

2. EXPANSION JOINTS F

3. WEARING SURFACE N

N

VEGETATION

10 FT

CONDITION RATING CODE EQUIVALENTS FOR SUB-ELEMENTS

G = GOOD (CODES 7 - 9) F = FAIR (CODES 5 - 6) P = POOR (CODES 0 - 4)

CONDITION RATING CODES FOR ITEMS 58 - 62, 222, 223

NOT APPLICABLEN

EXCELLENT CONDITION9

VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted.8

GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems.7

SATISFACTORY CONDITION - structural elements show some minor deterioration.6

FA R CONDITION - all primary structural elements are sound but may have minor section loss, cracking, spalling, or scour.

POOR CONDITION - advanced section loss, deterioration, spalling, or scour.4

SERIOUS CONDITION - loss of section, deterioration, spalling, or scour have seriously affected primary structural components. Local failures are possible. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present.

CRITICAL CONDITION - advanced deterioration of primary structural elements. Fatigue cracks in steel or shear cracks in concrete may be present or scour may have removed substructure support. Unless closely monitored it may be necessary to close the structure until corrective action can be taken.

“ MM NENT” FA LURE CONDITION - major deterioration or section loss present in critical structural components or obvious vertical or horizontal movement affecting structure stability.

Structure is closed to

FA LED CONDITION - out of service; beyond corrective action. 0

ROCK, GRAVEL, SAND

ABUTMENTS

1. BREASTWALLS OR COLUMNS F

2. PILE BENTS N

3. CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS F

4. BACKWALLS AND/OR BULKHEADS F

5. FOUNDATIONS G

6. WINGWALLS G

7. WEEP HOLES N

8. EXPANSION JOINTS F

9. EROSION AND/OR SCOUR G

10.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION G

11.SLOPE PROTECTION N

12.OTHER N

36. TRAFFIC AND SAFETY FEATURES

A. BRIDGE RAILINGS:

B. TRANSITIONS:

C. APPROACH GUARDRAILS:

D. APPROACH GUARDRAIL ENDS:

PIER(S) TRAFFIC SAFETY RATING CODES

13. WALLS AND/OR COLUMNS N

N

N

N

N

N

N

0 - Does not meet standards or a safety features is 14.PILE BENTS required and none is provided.

15.CAPS AND/OR BEARING SEATS

1 - Meets currently acceptable standards.

16.FOUNDATIONS

17.EROSION AND/OR SCOUR N - Not applicable or a safety features is not required.

18.SETTLEMENT OR DEFLECTION

19.OTHER

FIELD INSPECTION REPORT STRUCTURE NO. 8750-017P

ITEM REFERENCE AND REMARKS

58.1 MINOR TO MODERATE RUSTING OF STEEL GRID DECKING. SEVERAL MINOR DAMAGED SECTIONS OF GRID DECKING. SEVERAL

CRACKED WELDS SECURING STEEL GRID DECKING TO STRINGER TOP FLANGES.

58.2 1" WIDE OPEN JOINT AT WEST ABUTMENT (EXPANSION END). STEEL GRID DECKING IS IN CONTACT WITH BACKWALL AT EAST

ABUTMENT (FIXED END).

58.5 MINOR SCRAPES WITH RUSTING OF STEEL CURBS.

58.6 TRUSS TOP CHORD FUNCTIONS AS RAILING TOP MEMBER. MINOR RUSTING WITH SEVERAL AREAS OF MINOR IMPACT DAMAGE

TO RAILING.

58.7 OPEN GRID DECKING DIRECTS DRAINAGE ONTO TRUSS AND SUBSTRUCTURE, PRIMARILY AT ABUTMENTS.

59.1 EXPANSION BEARINGS AT WEST ABUTMENT AND FIXED BEARINGS AT EAST ABUTMENT. WEST ABUTMENT BEARINGS FULLY EXPANDED AT 80 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT. MINOR RUSTING OF BEARINGS. HEAVY DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON BEARINGS AT

BOTH ABUTMENTS.

59.4 MODERATE RUSTING WITH DEBRIS ACCUMULATION AND MOSS GROWTH ON FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS. END FLOO RBEAMS #1 AND #10 BLOCKED WITH STEEL BEAM AND STACKED STEEL PLATES AT APPROXIMATELY 2' SPACING. SEVERAL

CRACKED WELDS SECURING STRINGERS TO FLOOR BEAM TOP FLANGES.

59.5 THIS REPORT ALSO CONSTITUTES THE FRACTURE CRITICAL INSPECTION REPORT FOR THE STRUCTURE.

TRUSS LENGTHENED 10' SINCE INITIAL CONSTRUCTION. TRUSS NO LONGER BEARS DOWN (5/8" GAP) ON ABANDONED PIER.

MODIFIED FLOORBEAM CONFIGURATION USED WITH DUAL NESTED STEEL TUBE AND ANGLE MEMBERS AT FLOORBEAMS #8

AND #9. MODIFIED STRINGER CONFIGURATION IN PANELS #9 AND #10.

MINOR RUSTING OF TRUSSES. DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON TRUSS BOTTOM CHORDS THROUGHOUT, HEAVIEST AT ABUTMENTS.

MINOR TO MODERATE RUSTING OF L-BOLTS (CONNECTIONS BETWEEN TRUSS AND FLOORBEAM).

59.6 DIAPHRAGMS BETWEEN STRINGERS ONLY IN PANELS #9 AND #10. MINOR RUSTING OF DIAPHRAGMS AND LOWER LATERAL BRACING. LOWER LATERAL BRACING MEMBERS L6US-L8DS IS LOOSE AND DEFLECTED DOWNWARD 3".

59.7 PAINT SYSTEM BEGINNING TO FAIL WITH MINOR TO MODERATE RUSTING OF SUPERSTRUCTURE THROUGHOUT

59.11 TREES OVERHANG UPSTREAM SIDE OF STRUCTURE.

60.1 MODERATE MOSS GROWTH AND MINOR GRAFFITI ON WEST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL. MINOR VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL

CRACKING OF WEST ABUTMENT BREASTWALL.

60.3 MODERATE VEGETATION GROWTH AND DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON BEARING SEATS AT BOTH ABUTMENTS.

60.4 MINOR SCALING OF ABUTMENT BACKWALLS. MODERATE EDGE SPALLING ALONG TOP OF WEST ABUTMENT BEACKWALL; MINOR

AT EAST ABUTMENT BACKWALL.

60.9 WEST ABUTMENT:

EMBANKMENT ERODED ALONG DOWNSTREAM END.

FOOTING EXPOSED UP TO 12"H FOR 3' ALONG BREASTWALL. FOOTING EXPOSED UP TO 16"H FOR 20.5' ALONG NORTHWEST

WINGWALL. FOOTING UNDERMINING UP TO 6".

60.6 WEST ABUTMENT:

MINOR SPALLING OF SOUTHWEST WINGWALL. MINOR SCALING AND MOSS GROWTH ON WINGWALLS. MINOR GRAFFITI ON

WINGWALLS.

60.13 PIER ABANDONED WITH TEMPORARY STEEL BLOCKING REMAINING (NOT ENGAGED) BELOW TRUSS PANEL POINT #8.

61.1 STREAM FLOW DIRECTED AGAINST EAST EMBANKMENT (SOLID ROCK).

61.4 SEVERAL FALLEN AND LODGED TREES COLLECT DEBRIS AT UPSTREAM SIDE OF STRUCTURE. SEVERAL TREES GROWING

BELOW AND ON UPSTREAM SIDE OF STRUCTURE ALSO AID IN TRAPPING DEBRIS.

222.3 ONE SINGLE SECTION OF GUARDRAIL PRESENT AT SOUTWEST CORNER OF STRUCTURE. IMPACT DAMAGE TO WEST END OF

APPROACH GUARDRAIL WITH ONLY ONE POST REMAINING.

222.4 MINOR RUTTING AND CRACKING OF ASPHALT PAVEMENT WITH VEGETATION GROWTH AT EAST APPROACH.

222.7 NORTHEAST, NORTHWEST, AND SOUTHEAST END POSTS: 4" SQUARE REFLECTORS

SOUTHWEST END POST: 3" CIRCULAR REFLECTORS

222.8 SHARP TURN PRESENT AT WEST END OF STRUCTURE.

STRUCTURE LOAD RATING STRUCTURE NO. 8750-017P

TRUCK TYPE

INVENTORY RATING (NORMAL TRAFFIC) OPERATING RATING (MAXIMUM LOAD)

TONS METRIC TONS TONS METRIC TONS

H 11 10 20 18

HS 21 19 36 33

TYPE 3 14 13 25 23

TYPE 3S2 21 19 36 33

TYPE 3-3 36 33 40 36

DESIGN LOADING: 0 - UNKNOWN

X CAPACITY MEETS OR EXCEEDS DESIGN LOAD

CAPACITY IS LESS THAN DESIGN LOAD

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION APPLICABLE

ORIGINAL LOAD RATING CALCULATION REVISED

DATE OF LOAD RATING CALCULATION: 12/01/2020

LOAD RATING CONTROLLED BY: ENGINEERING JUDGEMENT / LOAD TEST

REMARKS: RATING BASED ON RESULTS OF LOAD TEST PERFORMED BY FLDOT FOR SIMILAR BAILEY-TYPE BRIDGES.

SEE BRIDGE FILE FOR MORE INFORMATION.

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 8750-017P

STRUCTURE IDENTIFICATION

(201) PARK: WHISKEYTOWN NATIONAL RECREATION AREA

(202) STRUCTURE NAME:..............CRYSTAL CREEK TRUSS BRIDGE

(203) STRUCTURE KIND:............... 1 - BRIDGE

(204) STRUCTURE NUMBER:.........8750-

017P

6 - PACIFIC WEST(205) NPS REGION:

(206) ROUTE CODE NUMBER:

(207) ROAD SECTION NO:............. 017P

(208) NPS ROAD CLASS:............... 5 - ADMINISTRATIVE

(209) WITHIN NPS BNDRY?:.......... Yes

(210) OPERATING UNIT:.................PARK

(211) PROJECT NO(S):

(212) DRAWING NUMBERS:

(21) MAINTAINED BY:......................66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(22) OWNER:................................... 66 - NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

(1) STATE:

(2) STATE HWY. AGENCY DIST:

(3) COUNTY CODE:

(4) CITY / PLACE CODE:

(5) INVENTORY ROUTE:

(6) FEATURES INTERSECTED:

(7) FACILITY CARRIED:

(8) STATE STRUCTURE NO:

(9) LOCATION:

(10) INV. RTE. - MIN. VERT. CLR:

(11) MILE POINT:

(27) YEAR BUILT:

(106) YEAR RECONSTRUCTED:

(20) TOLL:

(37) HISTORIC DESIGNATION:

069 - CALIFORNIA

01089 MADISON

1 6 1 0000 0

CRYSTAL CREEK

CRYSTAL CREEK ROAD

8750017P0000000

South from CA Route 299 on Crystal Creek Road, 3.9 miles to locked gate.

Bridge located 0.1 miles beyond gate.

99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

4 0 (KM PT: 6.44 )

3 - ON FREE ROAD

5 - NOT ELIGIBLE

STRUCTURE DESCRIPTION, FOUNDATION, AND DECK TYPE

(43A) MAIN STR. MATERIAL:..........3 - STEEL (44A) APPR. STR. MATERIAL:............ 0 - Other

(43B) MAIN STR. TYPE:.................. 10 - TRUSS - THRU (44B) APPR. STR. TYPE:.................... 00 - OTHER

(45) NO. OF MAIN SPANS:..............1 (46) NO OF APPROACH SPANS:

(48) MAX. SPAN LENGTH:..............50 FT ( 15.2 M)

(49) STRUCTURE LENGTH:........... 53.3 FT ( 16.2 M) (108) WEAR SURFACE/PROTECT SYSTEM:

(216A) ABUTMENT #1 FDN:........... 0 - UNKNOWN A) TYPE WEARING SURFACE:.. N - NA

(216B) ABUTMENT #2 FDN:........... 0 - UNKNOWN B) TYPE MEMBRANE:................. N - NA

(217A) PREDOM. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A C) TYPE PROTECTION:.............. N - NA

(217B) SECOND. PIER FDN:.......... 6 - N/A (218) IS SALT USED?.......................... NO

(107) DECK TYPE:.......................... 3 - OPEN GRATING

LOAD RATING AND POSTING

(31) DESIGN LOAD:.........................0 - UNKNOWN (41) LOAD RESTRICTION:.................. A - OPEN

(66) INVENTORY RATING:..............21.0 METRIC TONS) (70) BRIDGE POSTING:...................... 5 - EQUAL TO OR ABOVE LEGALTONS ( 19.1

LOADS

(64) OPERATING RATING:..............36.0 TONS ( 32.7 METRIC TONS)

INSPECTION DATES

(90) INSPECTION DATE: 07/21/2021 (91) FREQ. OF INSP: 24 MONTHS (92 / 93) CRITICAL FEATURE INSPECTION (CFI):

(219) ADD. STUDIES NEEDED: N - 0 - NONE (A) FRACTURE CRITICAL:.......... Y

(220) SPECIAL STUDY TYPE: 0 - NONE INSP. EVERY 24 MONTHS - LAST INSP: 08/17/2020

(221) SPECIAL STUDY DATE: (B) UNDERWATER:

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

(C) SPECIAL INSPECTION:

INSP. EVERY MONTHS - LAST INSP:

https://RATING:

https://RATING:

STRUCTURE INVENTORY AND APPRAISAL STRUCTURE NO. 8750-017P

GEOMETRY, TRAFFIC, AND NAVIGATIONAL DATA

(16) LATITUDE:................................ 40° 38' 03" (51) CURB TO CURB WIDTH:............ 11 FT ( 3.4 M)

(17) LONGITUDE:............................122°40 ' 37" (52) DECK WIDTH:.......................... 12.3 FT ( 3.7 M)

(19) DETOUR LENGTH:.................. 99 MI ( 159 KM) (32) APPR. ROADWAY WIDTH:...... 12.0 FT ( 3.7 M)

(28A) LANES ON STRUCT:.............01 (213) APPR. PAVEMENT WIDTH:... 12.0 FT ( 3.7 M)

(28B) LANES UNDER STRUCT:......00 LEFT SHOULDER:............... 2 0 FT ( 0.6 M)

(42A) SERVICE ON:.........................1 - HIGHWAY RIGHT SHOULDER:.......... 2 0 FT ( 0.6 M)

(42B) SERVICE UNDER:................. 5 - WATERWAY (33) BRIDGE MEDIAN:.................... 0 - NO MEDIAN

(29) AVG DAILY TRAFFIC:..............5 (34) SKEW ANGLE:......................... 0 °

(30) YEAR OF ADT:......................... 2020 (35) STRUCTURE FLARED:............ 0 - NO FLARE

(114) FUTURE ADT:.........................6 (47) TOTAL HORIZ. CLEARANCE:.. 11.0 FT ( 3.4 M)

(115) YEAR OF FUTURE ADT:........2040 (50) SIDEWALKS

(101) PARALLEL STRUCTURE:......N - NO PARALLEL STRUCTURE LEFT:.................................... 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

(38) NAVIGATION CONTROL:.........N - NOT APPLICABLE, NO RIGHT:.................................. 0 0 FT ( 0 M)

WATERWAY

(39) VERTICAL CLEARANCE:.........0.0 FT ( 0 M) (214) BRIDGE RAIL TYPE

1 - FULL HEIGHT (NO PARAPET)(40) HORIZ. CLEARANCE:..............0.0 FT ( 0 M) RAIL CONFIGURATION:

(111) ABUT OR PIER PROT:...........1 - NAVIGATION PROTECTION NOT MATERIAL:........................... 4 - STEEL

REQUIRED

LATERAL UNDERCLEARANCE: DESIGN TYPE:..................... 1 - CONTINUOUS RAIL

(55) RIGHT:..............................0.0 FT ( 0 M) (215) BRIDGE RAIL HEIGHT:.......... 3 33 FT ( 1 01 M)

(56) LEFT:................................ 0.0 FT ( 0 M) (53) MIN. VRT. CLR. OVER DECK: 99.99 FT ( 99.99 M)

(54) MIN. VRT. UNDRCLRANCE:... 0 00 FT ( 0 M)

CONDITION AND APPRAISAL DATA, PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS, AND COST

(58) DECK:....................................... 6 (67) STRUCTURAL EVALUATION:

(59) SUPERSTRUCTURE:...............6 (68) DECK GEOMETRY:......................N

(60) SUBSTRUCTURE:.......... 6 (69) UNDERCLEARANCES:................ N

(61) CHANNEL:................................6 (71) WATERWAY ADEQUACY:

(62) CULVERT:.................................N (72) APPROACH ALIGNMENT:

(222) APPROACHES:...................... 5 (113) SCOUR CRITICAL:.................... 4 - ACTION IS REQUIRED TO

PROTECT EXPOSED FOUNDATIONS

(223) RETAINING WALL:.................N (225) PROPOSE OF IMPROVEMENT: 2 - REHAB/RECONSTRUCTION

(36) TRAFFIC SAFETY FEAT: 0 0 0 0 (226) PRIORITY OF IMPROVEMENT: D - MINOR

(75A) TYPE OF WORK:................... (227) MAINTENANCE COST:.............$ 0

(75B) WORK DONE BY:.................. (228) REHAB / RECNSTR COST:..... $ 80000

(76) IMPROVEMENT LENGTH:....... FT ( M) (229) CONSTRUCTION COST:.......... $ 0

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

(230) STRUCTURE HISTORY:

(YEAR UNKNOWN) - TRUSS LENGTHENED 10' SINCE INITIAL CONSTRUCTION WITH TRUSS NO LONGER BEARING ON ABANDONED PIER; MODIFIED

FLOORBEAM AND STRINGER CONFIGURATION MPLEMENTED.

(231) ADDITIONAL CONSIDERATIONS:

STRUCTURE BEHIND LOCKED GATE - COMBINATION REQUIRED

(330) ADDITIONAL CONFIGURATION INFORMATION:

Inspector: Jordan Hensley Structure Number: 8750017P0000000

Inpsection Date: 07/21/2021 Facility Carried:

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 3

Description LOOKING EAST TOWARD CAMP

PHOTO 4

Description NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) PROFILE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 5

Description GENERAL TOPSIDE VIEW, LOOKING EAST

PHOTO 6

Description TYPICAL DAMAGE AND RUSTING OF DECK GRATE, SOUTHWEST CORNER SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 7

Description TYPICAL VIEW OF BRIDGE CURB AND RAILING, DOWNSTREAM SIDE SHOWN

PHOTO 8

Description GENERAL UNDERSIDE VIEW OF THE SUPERSTRUCTURE, LOOKING EAST

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 9

Description RUSTING OF THE UNDERSIDE OF THE DECK GRATE, FLOOR BEAMS, AND STRINGERS

PHOTO 10

Description TYPICAL PAINT DETERIORATION AND RUSTING OF EXPOSED STEEL IN THE FLOOR

BEAMS AND STIFFENERS

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 11

Description TYPCIAL RUSTING OF L-BOLT CONNECTIONS, SOUTHWEST CORNER SHOWN

PHOTO 12

Description TYPICAL CRACKED WELDS BETWEEN THE FLOOR BEAMS AND STRINGERS

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 13

Description DOWNWARD DEFLECTION OF LATERAL BRACING MEMBER AT THE EAST END OF THE

SPAN

PHOTO 14

Description TYPICAL DEBRIS ACCUMULATION ON THE BEARINGS; SOUTHWEST BEARING SHOWN

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 15

Description GENERAL VIEW OF THE WEST ABUTMENT

PHOTO 16

Description EXPOSED FOOTING AT THE NORTH CORNER OF THE WEST ABUTMENT AND ALONG THE

NORTHWEST WINGWALL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 17

Description MINOR UNDERMINING OF THE NORTHWEST WINGWALL FOOTING

PHOTO 18

Description GENERAL VIEW OF THE EAST ABUTMENT; NOTE, STEEL FLOOR BEAM IN CONTACT WITH

SOIL

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 19

Description GENERAL VIEW OF THE EAST ROCK EMBANKMENT

PHOTO 20

Description EROSION OF THE EAST BANK DOWNSTREAM OF THE STRUCTURE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 21

Description TREE OVERGROWTH OVER THE UPSTREAM RAILING, LOOKING EAST

PHOTO 22

Description SIGNIFICANT DEBRIS BUILD-UP UPSTREAM OF THE STRUCTURE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 23

Description DAMAGED SOUTHWEST APPROACH GUARDRAIL

PHOTO 24

Description GENERAL VIEW OF THE JOINT ABOVE THE WEST ABUTMENT; NOTE, GAP AND SPALLING

OF APPROACH WEARING SURFACE

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 25

Description WEST APPROACH

PHOTO 26

Description EAST APPROACH

Bridge Inspection Report

Pictures

PHOTO 27

Description SOUTH (UPSTREAM) CHANNEL

PHOTO 28

Description NORTH (DOWNSTREAM) CHANNEL

APPENDIX D:

CCC Building Complex Plans

APPENDIX E:

QC Daily Inspection Form

REPORT

NUMBER

PROJECT MANAGEMENT

INFORMATION SYSTEM

NUMBER (PMIS No.):

PROJECT CONTRACT NUMBER DATE

PARK CONTRACTOR CMR REPORTING

WEATHER

(Rain, Snow, Cloudy, Windy)

MOISTURE

AMOUNT

(INCHES)

TEMPERATURE

WEATHER

DELAY

DESCRIBE WEATHER DELAYED WORK GROUND CONDITIONS

(Dry, Damp, Wet, Frozen)

MAXIMUM MINIMUM Yes

No

PRIME CONTRACTOR:

EMPLOYEES BY JOB CATEGORIES NUMBER HOURS

EQUIPMENT ON JOB

(Include model, manufacture, size, year.)

NUMBER

OF UNITS

EQUIPMENT HOURS WORKING

YES STANDBY MOBILIZED/

DEMOBILIZED DATE

Project Manager (PM)

Superintendent

Quality Control Officer

Safety Officer

Laborers

MATERIALS DELIVERED QUANTITY OFFICIAL VISITORS

WORK PERFORMED BY PRIME: (Include detail description per each activity including location, quantities, and production.)

SPECIFIC INSPECTIONS: (Inspections performed, results, and corrective actions, and Primes and Subprimes.)

TESTING:

Was any testing performed today YES / NO. (Complete and attach Test Report Information Sheets.)

Type and Location of Testing:

Construction Management Representative (CMR) & Contractor Quality Control (CQC) Daily Report

National Park Service (NPS) - Denver Service Center (DSC) | 2-6-18

SUBCONTRACTOR(S): PMIS Number: Date:

SUBCONTRACTOR NAME

EMPLOYEES BY JOB CATEGORIES NUMBER HOURS

EQUIPMENT ON JOB

(Include model, manufacturer, size, and year.)

NUMBER

OF UNITS

EQUIPMENT HOURS WORKING

YES STANDBY MOBILIZED/

DEMOBILIZED DATE

MATERIALS DELIVERED QUANTITY EQUIPMENT MOBILIZIED/DEMOBILIZED

WORK PERFORMED BY SUBCONTRACTOR: Include detail description per each activity. Include location, quantity, and production.

SUBCONTRACTOR NAME

EMPLOYEES BY JOB CATEGORIES NUMBER HOURS

EQUIPMENT ON JOB

(Include model, manufacturer, size, and year.)

NUMBER

OF UNITS

EQUIPMENT HOURS WORKING

YES STANDBY MOBILIZED/

DEMOBILIZED DATE

MATERIALS DELIVERED QUANTITY EQUIPMENT MOBILIZIED/DEMOBILIZED

WORK PERFORMED BY SUBCONTRACTOR: Include detail description per each activity. Include location, quantity, and production.

SUBCONTRACTOR NAME

EMPLOYEES BY JOB CATEGORIES NUMBER HOURS

EQUIPMENT ON JOB

(Include model, manufacturer, size, and year.)

NUMBER

OF UNITS

EQUIPMENT HOURS WORKING

YES STANDBY MOBILIZED/

DEMOBILIZED DATE

MATERIALS DELIVERED QUANTITY EQUIPMENT MOBILIZIED/DEMOBILIZED

WORK PERFORMED BY SUBCONTRACTOR: Include detail description per each activity. Include location, quantity, and production.

SUBCONTRACTOR(S): PMIS Number: Date:

SUBCONTRACTOR NAME

EMPLOYEES BY JOB CATEGORIES NUMBER HOURS

EQUIPMENT ON JOB

(Include model, manufacturer, size, and year.)

NUMBER

OF UNITS

EQUIPMENT HOURS WORKING

YES STANDBY MOBILIZED/

DEMOBILIZED DATE

MATERIALS DELIVERED QUANTITY EQUIPMENT MOBILIZIED/DEMOBILIZED

WORK PERFORMED BY SUBCONTRACTOR: Include detail description per each activity. Include location, quantity, and production.

SUBCONTRACTOR NAME

EMPLOYEES BY JOB CATEGORIES NUMBER HOURS

EQUIPMENT ON JOB

(Include model, manufacturer, size, and year.)

NUMBER

OF UNITS

EQUIPMENT HOURS WORKING

YES STANDBY MOBILIZED/

DEMOBILIZED DATE

MATERIALS DELIVERED QUANTITY EQUIPMENT MOBILIZIED/DEMOBILIZED

WORK PERFORMED BY SUBCONTRACTOR: Include detail description per each activity. Include location, quantity, and production.

SUBCONTRACTOR NAME

EMPLOYEES BY JOB CATEGORIES NUMBER HOURS

EQUIPMENT ON JOB

(Include model, manufacturer, size, and year.)

NUMBER

OF UNITS

EQUIPMENT HOURS WORKING

YES STANDBY MOBILIZED/

DEMOBILIZED DATE

MATERIALS DELIVERED QUANTITY EQUIPMENT MOBILIZIED/DEMOBILIZED

WORK PERFORMED BY SUBCONTRACTOR: Include detail description per each activity. Include location, quantity, and production.

PMIS Number: Date:

CRITICAL POINT/MILESTONE OBSERVATIONS (Describe item inspected, observations, problems, and action items.)

DESCRIPTION OF WORK BEING MONITORED ON A TIME AND MATERIAL BASIS AND WHY

BREAKDOWN OF TIME AND MATERIAL WORK PERFORMED

Location:

Labor:

Equipment:

Material:

Production Rates:

STATUS OF GOVERNMENT FURNISHED SERVICES AND/OR SUPPLIES

SAFETY COMMENTS

Accidents / Lost Time:

Incidents:

First Aid Administered:

Other:

DIFFICULTIES WITH CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR

UNFORESEEN DEVELOPMENTS (Describe conditions, action taken, person contacted, and recommended actions.)

CONSTRUCTION DEFICIENCIES OR RE-TESTING REQUIRED

OTHER COMMENTS

CERTIFICATION

For Construction Management Representative (CMR): I certify the above report is complete and correct and that I, or my authorized representative, have inspected all work performed this day by the Prime Contractor and each Subcontractor and determined all materials, equipment, and workmanship are in strict compliance with plans and specifications except as may be noted above.

I certify that I or my authorized representative have reviewed and reconciled all differences between this daily report and the Construction Contractors. In the event a discrepancy is found, the Construction Contractor was notified and an acceptable revision was completed and resubmitted by either or both parties within this document. If unable to agree with the Construction Contractor, explain nature of disagreement in "Other Comments" above as needed.

For Contractor's Representative: I certify that the above report is complete and correct and that I, or my authorized representative, have inspected all work performed this day by the Prime Contractor and each Subcontractor and determined that all materials, equipment, and workmanship are in strict compliance with the plans and specifications except as may be noted above. I have reconciled all differences found when comparing this CQC daily diary with the CMR's daily diary. All unresolved issues are described under "Other Comments" above.

SIGNATURE TITLE:

RParrish Rectangle

RParrish Rectangle

Date:PMIS Number:

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS OR INFORMATION (Describe item inspected, observations, problems, and action items.)

Date:

IMAGES IN SUPPORT OF REPORT INFORMATION

PMIS Number: