Q_and_A_Amendment_0007.pdf

PDF 64 KB Posted

Attached to
Replace Primary Potable Water Pumps 1&2 Which Provides Water to the South Rim - Indian Garden
Solicitation number
140P2018R0105
Issued by

About this file

Q and A_Amendment 0007

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
SF30_Amendment_0008.pdf PDF
Q_and_A_Amendment_0008.pdf PDF
SF30_Amendment_0007.pdf PDF
SF30_Amendment_0006.pdf PDF
Amendment_0006_Valve_Replacement.pdf PDF
Q_and_A_Amendment_0006.pdf PDF
SF30_Amendment_0005.pdf PDF
Amendment_0005_Attachment_1.pdf PDF
SF30_Amendment_0004.pdf PDF
Pre-Proposal_Conference_Sign_In_Sheet_08.07.2018.pdf PDF
Q_and_A_Amendment_0004.pdf PDF
Amendment_0003_Revised_Section_J_08.02.18.pdf PDF
Attachment_7_Scope_of_Work_Sediment_Removal_and_Condition_Assessment.pdf PDF
SF30_Amendment_0003.pdf PDF
Amendment_0003_Revised_Contract_Price_Schedule.pdf PDF
SF30_Amendment_0002.pdf PDF
Amendment_0002_Section_J_of_RFP_08.02.18.pdf PDF
Attachment_1A_Specifications_Part_2_GRCA_182403_Div_02-49.pdf PDF
Amendment_0002_Technical_Specification_Section_01_11_00_1.9D_REVISED.pdf PDF
Attachment_5_IG_Pumphouses_Asbestos_and_LBP_Report_092816.pdf PDF
Attachment_6_Statement_of_Structural_Tests_and_Special_Inspections.pdf PDF
SF30_Amendment_0001_140P2018R0105_GRCA_182403.pdf PDF
02_80_00_Facility_Remediation_ACM_and_LBP_-_FINAL.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_Specifications_GRCA_182403.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_Construction_Wage_Determination.pdf PDF
Attachment_4_South_Rim_Map_with_Heli-base_location.pdf PDF
B08_Proposal_Submission_Package.zip ZIP file
Attachment_2_Drawings_GRCA_182403.pdf PDF
FINAL_RFP_GRCA_182403_Indian_Gardens_Phase_II.pdf PDF
Show all 29

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

140P2018R0105 / Amendment 0007

GRCA 182403

Indian Gardens Pumphouse ‐ Phase 2 8/20/2018

Question Answer

Gould’s providing a no quote for their 3393 pumps because they are not capable of the flow and pressures. Flowserve will not sell to companies they view as competitors, preventing us from purchasing from them.

Would manufacturers of rings pumps such as Ruhrpumpen or KSB be acceptable?

The supplied pumps must be manufactured in the USA by a company incorporated in the USA.

Although ring pumps are easier with maintenance and disassembly if there are issues, they are less reliable due to the imbalance thrust created from the impellers being the same direction. Can multi‐stage horizontal split case centrifugal pumps with balanced thrusts be considered since they typically exhibit better long‐term performance?

No. Imbalanced thrust is a concern due to floor slab loads and associated vibration. The piping configuration will not allow a split case pump.

Would rebuilt or surplus pumps that were never used be acceptable to use for the project or are new pumps only required?

No. The intent of the project is to provide new pumps with associated warrantees.

Would rebuilding the two pumps being replaced to like new conditions be an option?

No. The scope of the project is to replace these pumps due to on‐going maintenance and reliability issues.

Would the new ITT Gould’s 3x6‐9 pumps owned by Park Services that are currently in storage be considered as an option for the project if they were inspected, past QC and were warrantied for 2 years?

No. These pumps are too large for building entry and if inside the building too large for O&M activities.

Would Dropbox or other electronic tool be acceptable for proposal submission? Are any hard copies required?

Please mail a USB with separate technical and business/price volumes on it for submission. No paper copies are needed.

File details come from the government source that posted it.