L2047 Little Sahara Visitor Center ACM Report_0003.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- LITTLE SAHARA VISITOR CENTER CONSTRUCTION & DEMO
- Solicitation number
- 140L5721R0001
About this file
This document contains details regarding a federal contract opportunity for the construction of a new Little Sahara Visitor Center in Utah. The Bureau of Land Management seeks to award a firm-fixed price contract to construct a 3,100 square foot wood framed structure with concrete masonry exterior, demolish an existing 2,800 square foot building, and perform associated site work. The work includes installing subsurface storm water collection, new utilities, septic system, site landscaping, and a photovoltaic roof system. The period of performance is from May to December 2021. This 100% small business set-aside project is subject to Davis Bacon Act wages. Interested vendors must register in the System for Award Management and monitor the listed sites for solicitation details and amendments. A pre-proposal site visit will be held and questions shall reference the solicitation number and be directed to the specified contracting officer.
View the file
Other files
Show all 35
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIAL (ACM) SURVEY AND
ABATEMENT COST ESTIMATE
BLM Task Order 135, BPA L09PA00228 (NAB060001 Legacy Number)
L2047 – Little Sahara Visitor Center
39.72635 / -112.30715
Fillmore Field Office, Utah
Report Date October 2, 2010 Site Survey Date August 24, 2010
ACM Identified in Building?* No ACM Abatement Cost Estimate* $0.00 *Subject to the assumptions and limitations as described in the following report.
Submitted by:
Aarcher, Inc.
910 Commerce Road Annapolis, Maryland 21401 410-897-9100 Program Manager: Mark R. Serio, P.G.
Submitted to:
U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Attn: Suzanne Buntrock, Engineer Building 50, Denver Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225-0047
Tetra Tech
3801 Automation Way, Suite 100, Fort Collins, Colorado 80526
Tel 970.223.9600 Fax 970.223.7171 www.tetratech.com
October 2, 2010
Aarcher, Inc.
Mr. Mark Serio Vice President 910 Commerce Road Annapolis, Maryland 21401
RE: Asbestos-Containing Materials Survey and Asbestos Abatement Cost Estimates L2047 – Little Sahara Visitor Center Fillmore Field Office, Utah Tetra Tech Project Number 114-182065, Task 200
Dear Mr. Serio:
Tetra Tech is pleased to submit the attached Asbestos-Containing Materials Survey and Asbestos Abatement Cost Estimates report for the above-referenced site. This report includes the scope of work, procedures and methodologies, tables, figures, analytical laboratory results, and abatement cost estimate for each asbestos-containing material identified during this survey.
Tetra Tech appreciates the opportunity to perform these services for Aarcher, Inc. (AARCHER) and we look forward to working with you in the future. If you have questions or comments regarding the information in this report or if we can be of further assistance please do not hesitate to contact the Tetra Tech Fort Collins, Colorado office at (970) 223-9600.
Sincerely, Tetra Tech
Ryan Egan Mark Daley AHERA & State of Utah AHERA & State of Utah Building Inspector/Management Planner Building Inspector Project Designer/Supervisor
Daniel Lawrence AHERA & State of Utah Building Inspector
L2047 – Little Sahara Visitor Center Fillmore Field Office, Utah i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES
2.0 GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS
3.0 REGULATORY STANDARDS
4.0 ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS SURVEY AND ASBESTOS ABATEMENT COST
ESTIMATES
4.1 Homogeneous Materials
4.2 Hazard Assessment Factors
4.3 Sampling Strategy
4.4 Suspect Asbestos-Containing Material
4.5 Laboratory Analytical Results
5.0 ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS SURVEY AND ASBESTOS ABATEMENT COST
ESTIMATES SUMMARY TABLE
6.0 CONCLUSIONS
7.0 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A: ACM Laboratory Analytical Results Appendix B: Site Drawing Appendix C: Inspector and Laboratory Accreditations Appendix D: ACM Photographs
1.0 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF SERVICES
The purpose of this project was to conduct an Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM) survey and provide Asbestos Abatement Cost Estimates for identified ACM located in the L2047 – Little Sahara Visitor Center located at Fillmore Field Office, Utah. Tetra Tech provided services as outlined below:
Conduct a representative asbestos survey of the identified building, which includes the following:
1. Review existing asbestos reports for the building areas, if provided;
2. Survey all of the interior and exterior areas of the building, including building roofs;
3. Identify accessible suspect ACMs using Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Asbestos
Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) protocols;
4. Collect and analyze bulk samples of suspect friable and non-friable materials to eliminate suspect materials as asbestos containing;
5. Quantify ACMs, including material condition and location; and
6. Provide ACM abatement cost estimates for ACM identified during the survey of the building.
2.0 GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS
The building is a single story, wood framed structure, situated on a slab on grade foundation, covered by a sealed foam roof. Reportedly, the building was constructed in 1979 and is approximately 2,535 gross square feet. Interior finishes include drywall, wood, ceiling panels, concrete, 12”x12” floor tile, and vinyl sheet flooring. Exterior finishes consist of brick and wood.
3.0 REGULATORY STANDARDS
The survey was performed in accordance with Federal, State and local rules for conducting asbestos surveys to meet Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) and United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) / National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) requirements. The work was also performed in general accordance with AARCHER Subcontract Number 522-S004, dated May 27, 2010 and Task Orders 522- S004-001, dated June 1, 2010 and 522-S004-002, dated July 27, 2010.
Additionally, all work conducted within the State of Utah was conducted in accordance with Asbestos Certification, Asbestos Work Practices, and Implementation of Toxic Substances Control Act, Title II, Section R307-801, Utah Air Conservation Rules.
4.0 ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS SURVEY AND ASBESTOS
ABATEMENT COST ESTIMATES
Tetra Tech representatives Mr. Ryan Egan, Mr. Daniel Lawrence, and/or Mr. Mark Daley conducted the asbestos survey of the building on August 24, 2010. Mr. Egan is an AHERA and State of Utah accredited Building Inspector, Management Planner, Project Designer and Supervisor (Certificate Number ASB-4437). Mr. Lawrence and Mr. Daley are AHERA and State of Utah accredited Building Inspectors (Certificate Numbers ASB-4457 and 4443, respectively).
Tetra Tech is a State of Utah certified Asbestos Company (certificate ASBC-358). All field work was performed by and/or under the guidance of Mr. Ryan Egan.
The scope of the Asbestos-Containing Materials Survey included all of the accessible suspect building materials and finishes of the interior and exterior areas of the building, including building roofs. If ACM was identified in the building, Asbestos Abatement Cost Estimates were provided for each identified material.
Previous ACM survey reports for the building were not made available for review.
The building areas were visually inspected for the presence of building materials that are suspected to contain asbestos. Bulk samples of identified suspect ACMs were collected and placed into individual containers for transport to a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP)/American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA)-accredited laboratory for analysis. Materials visibly identified as non-asbestos (fibrous glass, foam rubber, wood, metal, etc.) were not sampled. The asbestos survey consisted of three basic procedures: 1) conducting a visual inspection of the structure and identifying functional spaces; 2) identifying homogeneous material areas of suspect surfacing, thermal system insulation, and miscellaneous materials; and 3) sampling accessible, friable and non-friable suspect materials.
4.1 Homogeneous Materials
Prior to collecting any samples, homogenous materials were identified and listed to develop a sampling strategy. A homogeneous material sampling area can be described as one or more areas of material that are similar in appearance and texture and that have the same installation date and function. The actual number of samples collected from each homogeneous sampling area was based upon criteria detailed in the following sections.
4.2 Hazard Assessment Factors
From the list of suspect homogeneous materials, a physical assessment was performed for each material on the list. A physical assessment includes evaluating the condition, assessing the potential for disturbance, and determining the friability of each material. Friability is a term used to describe the ease in which a building material inherently lends itself to disturbance. By definition, "friable" materials are those that can be crumbled or reduced to powder by hand pressure when dry. Each material on the list was further classified into one of three categories, which have specific sampling requirements for each category.
Surfacing Materials: Refers to spray-applied or troweled surfaces such as plaster ceilings and walls, fireproofing, textured paints, textured plasters, and spray applied acoustical surfaces.
Thermal System Insulation Refers to insulation used to inhibit heat gain or loss on pipes, boilers, tanks, ducts, and various other building components.
Miscellaneous Materials Refers to friable and non-friable products and materials that do not fit in any of the above two categories such as resilient floor covering, baseboards, mastics, adhesives, roofing material, caulking, glazing, and siding. This category also contains wallboard and joint compound wall systems and acoustical ceiling tile.
All confirmed ACMs were then assessed by their condition as good (no visible damage or showing only very limited damage or deterioration), damaged (less than 25% localized damage or 10% distributed damage), significantly damaged (25% or greater localized damage or 10% or greater distributed damage) per Title 40 Code of Federal Regulations Part 63.
4.3 Sampling Strategy
The asbestos inspection was conducted in general accordance with the AHERA requirements using a minimum number of samples collected for each homogenous material, which also meet the sampling requirement found in 29 CFR 1926.1101.
If the analytical results indicated that all the samples collected per homogenous material did not contain asbestos, then the homogenous material would be considered a non-ACM. However, if the analytical results of one or more of the samples collected per homogenous material indicate that asbestos is present in quantities of greater than 1 percent asbestos by weight (as defined by EPA), all of the homogenous material would be treated as an ACM regardless of any other analytical results. Material which can visually be determined to be non-asbestos (i.e., fibrous glass, foam rubber, metal, etc.) by the accredited inspector are not required to be sampled.
Miscellaneous materials require adequately representative sampling, which is typically done by collecting from one to three samples per material. Inspectors typically rely on other survey observations such as the condition, friability, and quantity of material to determine what would be a sufficient amount of samples to accurately evaluate the presence or absence of asbestos content. For this survey, three samples per each homogenous miscellaneous material were collected.
Actual collection of a bulk asbestos sample involves physically removing a small piece of material and placing it in a marked, airtight container. Sample containers are marked with a unique identification number, which is also noted in the field notes.
4.4 Suspect Asbestos-Containing Material
28 bulk asbestos samples were collected from the building and 54 sample layers were analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) based on the number of distinct layers (materials) associated with each bulk sample. For example, floor tile and associated mastic are collected as one bulk sample but are analyzed as two distinct materials by the asbestos laboratory, as required by NVLAP.
4.5 Laboratory Analytical Results
Bulk samples were analyzed by FRS Geotech, Inc. analytical laboratory located in Denver, Colorado, using PLM according to EPA method 600/R-93/116. This laboratory participates in the NVLAP, a quality assurance program for PLM.
Any material that contains greater than 1 percent (>1%) asbestos by PLM is considered an ACM and must be handled according to OSHA, EPA, and applicable state and local regulations.
In addition, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) define asbestos as building materials containing between one tenth of one percent and one percent (0.1%-1%).
For friable materials, when the amount of asbestos in the sample material is reported as “None- Detected” by PLM analysis, no further verification of the sample results by Point Counting Methodology is recommended.
For friable materials, when the amount of asbestos in the sample material is reported as “Trace Asbestos Detected” or less than 10% asbestos by PLM analysis, the client may either assume the amount to be greater than 1% and treat the material as ACM or require further verification of the amount by Point Counting Methods. If the result obtained by Point Counting is different from the result obtained by PLM analysis, the Point Count Method result should be used.
For non-friable materials, when the amount of asbestos in the sample material is reported as greater than 1% asbestos by PLM analysis, no further verification of the sample results by alternative methods of identification such as Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) Chatfield Method is recommended.
For non-friable materials such as vinyl/asphaltic products (floor tiles/floor sheeting, mastics, shingles, etc.), where small, thin asbestos fibers may have been potentially milled into the nonorganic binder matrix, when the amount of asbestos in the sample material is reported as “None-Detected” by PLM analysis, due to the difficulty in analyzing such small, thin asbestos fibers in resinously bound materials by PLM analysis, EPA recommends but does not require that these types of materials, which were reported as non-ACMs by PLM, be further analyzed using TEM Chatfield Method. Tetra Tech did not conduct such analysis.
The results of the laboratory analysis are summarized in tabular form in Section 5.0. The laboratory analytical report and corresponding chain-of-custody documents are included in Appendix A. Results are reported in percent asbestos by volume and indicate the types of asbestos. Other common non-asbestos components may also be noted on the analytical reports. A drawing(s) showing bulk sample locations is provided in Appendix B. Inspector and laboratory accreditations are provided in Appendix C, and Appendix D presents photographs of all ACM’s identified in the building (if present).
5.0 ASBESTOS-CONTAINING MATERIALS SURVEY AND ASBESTOS ABATEMENT COST
ESTIMATES SUMMARY TABLE
ACM Bulk Sampling Results
L2047 – Little Sahara Visitor Center
Fillmore Field Office, Utah
Homogeneous
Material
Material
Category
Required
Number of
Samples to be
Collected
Number of
Samples
Collected
Sample
Number(s) Location of Material Condition
Friable
(Yes/No)
Approximate
Material
Quantity
Asbestos
Content
ACM
Abatement
Cost
Estimate
Drywall & Joint
Compound M N/A 5
M3.1A, B, C, D, E
101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109 G Yes 3,675 SF ND $0.00
Cove Base &
Mastic - Tan M N/A 3
M11.1A, B, C 102, 103, 104, 107, 108 G No 59 SF ND $0.00
Cove Base &
Mastic –Black M N/A 3
M11.2A, B, C 106 G No 19 SF ND $0.00
12”x12” Floor
Tile M N/A 3
F2.1A, B, C 107, 108 G No 250 SF ND $0.00
Vinyl Sheet
Flooring M N/A 3
F1.1A, B, C 102, 103, 104 G Yes 624 SF ND $0.00
Ceiling Panel M N/A 5 M5.1A, B, C, D, E
100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 107, 108, 109 G Yes 2,125 SF ND $0.00
Wall Texture SM 3 3 S1.1A, B, C 104, 107, 108 G Yes 935 SF ND $0.00
Tar Paper M N/A 3 M1.1A, B, C Ext G Yes 1,560 SF ND $0.00
AHERA Guidelines for Determining the Number of Samples to Collect ND = None Detected N/A = Not Applicable
MATERIAL CATEGORY:
M = Miscellaneous Material
SM = Surfacing Material
TSI = Thermal System Insulation
APPROXIMATE MATERIAL QUANTITIES:
SF = Square Feet
LF = Linear Feet
Ea = Each
CONDITION:
G = Good
D = Damaged
SD = Significantly Damaged
Homogeneous Material
Category
Homogeneous
Material Quantity Number of Samples Required
Surfacing Materials
<1000 SF 3
1000 - 5000 SF 5
>5000 SF 7 or more
Thermal System Insulation No Stipulation 3 (Must also sample all repair patches)
Miscellaneous Materials No Stipulation
Per AHERA, these materials must be sampled "in a manner sufficient to determine whether or not they contain asbestos." To satisfy National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) requirements, a minimum of 3 samples were collected.
6.0 CONCLUSIONS
The results of the asbestos survey conducted at the L2047 – Little Sahara Visitor Center, Fillmore Field Office, Utah facility building indicate that: none of the accessible suspect building materials sampled were found to contain more than 1% asbestos.
Contractors and employees working in this building should be made aware of the possibility that concealed ACMs may be found during demolition/renovation. They should be advised not to disturb known or suspect ACMs without owner approval.
Any concealed building materials discovered during maintenance or renovation activities, which are suspected to contain asbestos, should be sampled and analyzed to confirm the presence of asbestos prior to disturbing.
The EPA has not prohibited the manufacture and import of miscellaneous materials, such as vinyl floorings, mastics, roofing materials, etc. As a result, any future replacement materials should be checked for the presence of asbestos prior to installation.
7.0 ASSUMPTIONS AND LIMITATIONS
The results, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in the report are based only on conditions that were noted during Tetra Tech’s inspection of the L2047 – Little Sahara Visitor Center located at the Fillmore Field Office, Utah.
The selection of sample locations and frequency of sampling was based on Tetra Tech’s observations and the assumption that like materials in the same area are homogeneous in content. Limited destructive investigation was conducted as needed. Concealed ACMs may exist in concealed areas not investigated or identified.
The report is designed to aid the client in understanding the extent of ACM issues as they pertain to the “Recognition and Measurement of Asbestos-Related Cleanup Costs,” Technical Bulletin 2006-1, prepared by the Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board, dated September 28, 2006 and to the renovation/demolition areas of the facility building areas. It should be noted that this report is not a complete Asbestos Abatement Specification or Work Plan.
Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained, and our conclusions prepared in accordance with customary principles and practices in the fields of environmental science and engineering. This statement is in lieu of other statements either expressed or implied. This report does not warrant against future operations or conditions, nor does it warrant against operations or conditions present of a type or at a location not investigated.
Asbestos abatement cost estimates were obtained from asbestos abatement contractors who have not visited the site and have not seen the ACM to be abated. The costs provided herein, are magnitude estimates of costs with the following assumptions made:
Assumes free and clear access to the work area during working hours.
Assumes one mobilization to complete the abatement of one ACM.
Assumes both Power and water at no cost to contractor.
Assumes protect in place all above ceiling electrical wiring, fire alarm, and WiFi cables.
Does not include the demolition of any building components other than ACM.
Pricing assumes that any required inspections and air testing is provided by the building owner or owner’s representative.
Assumes that no special conditions are added by any State or local regulatory agency.
Work hours 7:00 AM to 5:00 PM Monday through Friday.
Not be held responsible for packaging, moving or damage to items being moved, nor for providing storage and/or inventory of these items. If storage or inventory is needed the owner will provide what is necessary. Responsibility of any personal items is the owner’s.
No delays interfering with the diligent execution of the work beyond the contractor’s control will be encountered.
APPENDIX A
ACM LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Laboratory Code: RES Subcontract Number: NA Laboratory Report: RES 199464-1 Project # / P.O. # 114-182065 / 200 Project Description:
Ryan Egan
RES 199464-1
Sincerely, Anita Bridges Robert R. Workman Jr.
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. is an analytical laboratory accredited for the analysis of Industrial Hygiene and Environmental matrices by the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP), Lab Code 101896-0 for Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) analysis and the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA), Lab ID 101533 - Accreditation Certificate #480 for Phase Contrast Microscopy (PCM) analysis. This laboratory is currently proficient in both Proficiency Testing and PAT programs respectively.
Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. has analyzed the following samples for asbestos content as per your request. The analysis has been completed in general accordance with the appropriate methodology as stated in the attached analysis table. The results have been submitted to your office.
Tetra Tech (Ft. Collins) 3801 Automation Way Ft. Collins CO 80525
BLM - Bldg. L2047
September 29, 2010
Analyst(s): _________________________ Paul D. LoScalzo Wenlong Liu Michael Scales Rich Wegrzyn is the job number assigned to this study. This report is considered highly confidential and the sole property of the customer. Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. will not discuss any part of this study with personnel other than those of the client. The results described in this report only apply to the samples analyzed. This report must not be used to claim endorsement of products or analytical results by NVLAP or any agency of the U.S. Government. This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval from Reservoirs Environmental, Inc. Samples will be disposed of after sixty days unless longer storage is requested. If you have any questions about this report, please feel free to call 303-964-1986.
Jeanne Spencer Orr President
Dear Customer, P: 303-964-1986 F: 303-477-4275
5801 Logan Street, Suite 100 Denver, CO 80216
1-866-RESI-ENV
www.reilab.com
TABLE PLM BULK ANALYSIS, PERCENTAGE COMPOSITION BY VOLUME
RES Job Number:
Client:
Client Project Number / P.O.:
Client Project Description:
Date Samples Received:
Analysis Type:
Turnaround:
Date Analyzed:
Client Non Non- Sample Sub Asbestos Fibrous Number Physical Part Fibrous Components
Description (%) Mineral Visual Components (%) Estimate (%) (%)
F1.1A EM 634057 A White/gray sheet vinyl w/ white fibrous backing
100 ND 10 90
F1.1B EM 634058 A Yellow mastic TR ND 0 100 B White/gray sheet vinyl w/ white fibrous backing
100 ND 10 90
F1.1C EM 634059 A Yellow mastic 3 ND 0 100 B White/gray sheet vinyl w/ white fibrous backing
97 ND 10 90
F2.1A EM 634060 A Cream tile 100 ND 0 100
F2.1B EM 634061 A Cream tile 100 ND 0 100
F2.1C EM 634062 A Brown mastic 15 ND 0 100 B Cream tile 85 ND 0 100
M1.1A EM 634063 A Black tar paper 100 ND 75 25
M1.1B EM 634064 A Black tar paper 100 ND 75 25
M1.1C EM 634065 A Black tar paper 100 ND 75 25
Asbestos Content
RES 199464-1
September 28, 2010
114-182065 / 200 BLM - Bldg. L2047
Tetra Tech (Ft. Collins)
September 22, 2010
RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
NVLAP Lab Code 101896-0
TDH Licensed Laboratory # 30-0136
ID Number L A Y E R
Lab
PLM, Short Report 3-5 Day
ND=None Detected TR=Trace, <1% Visual Estimate Trem-Act=Tremolite-Actinolite Note: Further analysis by TEM is recommended for organically bound material (i.e. floor tile) if PLM results are <1%.
Data QA
RES Job Number:
Client:
Client Project Number / P.O.:
Client Project Description:
Date Samples Received:
Analysis Type:
Turnaround:
Date Analyzed:
Client Non Non- Sample Sub Asbestos Fibrous Number Physical Part Fibrous Components
Description (%) Mineral Visual Components (%) Estimate (%) (%)
Asbestos Content
RES 199464-1
September 28, 2010
114-182065 / 200 BLM - Bldg. L2047
Tetra Tech (Ft. Collins)
September 22, 2010
RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
NVLAP Lab Code 101896-0
TDH Licensed Laboratory # 30-0136
ID Number L A Y E R
Lab
PLM, Short Report 3-5 Day
M3.1A EM 634066 A White/brown paint TR ND 0 100 B White tape 5 ND 95 5 C White compound 10 ND 0 100 D White/brown drywall 85 ND 15 85
M3.1B EM 634067 A White tape TR ND 0 100 B White compound 5 ND 95 5 C White/brown drywall 15 ND 0 100 D White/brown paint 80 ND 15 85
M3.1C EM 634068 A White/brown paint TR ND 0 100 B White tape 5 ND 95 5 C White compound 10 ND 0 100 D White/brown drywall 85 ND 15 85
M3.1D EM 634069 A White/brown paint TR ND 0 100 B White tape 5 ND 95 5 C White compound 7 ND 0 100 D White/brown drywall 88 ND 15 85
M3.1E EM 634070 A White/brown paint TR ND 0 100 B White tape 5 ND 95 5 C White compound 7 ND 0 100 D White/brown drywall 88 ND 15 85
ND=None Detected TR=Trace, <1% Visual Estimate Trem-Act=Tremolite-Actinolite Note: Further analysis by TEM is recommended for organically bound material (i.e. floor tile) if PLM results are <1%.
RES Job Number:
Client:
Client Project Number / P.O.:
Client Project Description:
Date Samples Received:
Analysis Type:
Turnaround:
Date Analyzed:
Client Non Non- Sample Sub Asbestos Fibrous Number Physical Part Fibrous Components
Description (%) Mineral Visual Components (%) Estimate (%) (%)
Asbestos Content
RES 199464-1
September 28, 2010
114-182065 / 200 BLM - Bldg. L2047
Tetra Tech (Ft. Collins)
September 22, 2010
RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
NVLAP Lab Code 101896-0
TDH Licensed Laboratory # 30-0136
ID Number L A Y E R
Lab
PLM, Short Report 3-5 Day
M5.1A EM 634071 A White/gray ceiling tile 100 ND 90 10
M5.1B EM 634072 A White/gray ceiling tile 100 ND 90 10
M5.1C EM 634073 A White/gray ceiling tile 100 ND 90 10
M5.1D EM 634074 A White/gray ceiling tile 100 ND 90 10
M5.1E EM 634075 A White/gray ceiling tile 100 ND 90 10
M11.1A EM 634076 A White mastic 10 ND 0 100 B Tan cove base 90 ND 0 100
M11.1B EM 634077 A White mastic 10 ND 0 100 B Tan cove base 90 ND 0 100
M11.1C EM 634078 A White mastic 10 ND 0 100 B Tan cove base 90 ND 0 100
M11.2A EM 634079 A White resinous material 1 ND 0 100 B Brown cove base 99 ND 0 100
M11.2B EM 634080 A White resinous material TR ND 0 100 B Brown mastic 5 ND 0 100 C Brown cove base 95 ND 0 100
ND=None Detected TR=Trace, <1% Visual Estimate Trem-Act=Tremolite-Actinolite Note: Further analysis by TEM is recommended for organically bound material (i.e. floor tile) if PLM results are <1%.
RES Job Number:
Client:
Client Project Number / P.O.:
Client Project Description:
Date Samples Received:
Analysis Type:
Turnaround:
Date Analyzed:
Client Non Non- Sample Sub Asbestos Fibrous Number Physical Part Fibrous Components
Description (%) Mineral Visual Components (%) Estimate (%) (%)
Asbestos Content
RES 199464-1
September 28, 2010
114-182065 / 200 BLM - Bldg. L2047
Tetra Tech (Ft. Collins)
September 22, 2010
RESERVOIRS ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
NVLAP Lab Code 101896-0
TDH Licensed Laboratory # 30-0136
ID Number L A Y E R
Lab
PLM, Short Report 3-5 Day
M11.2C EM 634081 A Brown mastic TR ND 0 100 B Brown cove base 100 ND 0 100
S1.1A EM 634082 A Beige paint w/ white texture 50 ND 0 100 B Brown fibrous material 50 ND 95 5
S1.1B EM 634083 A Beige paint w/ white texture 50 ND 0 100 B Brown/pink drywall 50 ND 50 50
S1.1C EM 634084 A Beige paint w/ white texture 40 ND 0 100 B Brown/pink drywall 60 ND 50 50
ND=None Detected TR=Trace, <1% Visual Estimate Trem-Act=Tremolite-Actinolite Note: Further analysis by TEM is recommended for organically bound material (i.e. floor tile) if PLM results are <1%.
APPENDIX B
SITE DRAWING
(100)
(101)
(102)
(103)
(104)
(105) (106)
(107) (108)
(109)
(110)
M3.1A
M3.1B
M3.1C
M3.1D
M3.1E
M11.1A
M11.1B M11.1C
M11.2A-C
F2.1A-C
F1.1A
F1.1B
F1.1C
M5.1A
M5.1B
M5.1C
M5.1D
M5.1E
S1.1A
S1.1B
S1.1C
M1.1A M1.1B
M1.1C
Figure 1 Little Sahara Visitor Center - Building L2047
Sample Location Map
NORTH
August 2010Project No. 114-182065
Suspect ACM Sample Location
APPENDIX C
INSPECTOR AND LABORATORY ACCREDITATIONS
Utah Department of Environmental Quality Division of Air Quality
The Utah Division of Air Quality certifies that:
Tetra Tech is hereby certified as an asbestos company in accordance with the provisions of Utah Administrative Code R307-801.
ertification number: ASBC-358 Expiration date: 12/31/10 """'. C~! ~
Executive Secretary Utah Air Quality s"da~d
Utah Asbestos Certification
Mark J. Daley
ASB-4443
Inspector (Exp. 03/24/11)
Executiv~creta~ Air~ Board
Utah Asbestos Certification
Ryan J. Egan
ASB-4437
Supervisor (Exp. 03/19/11)
Inspector (Exp. 03/24/11)
Management Planner (03/24/11 )
Project Designer (02124111)
Executive Secretary Uta
Utah Asbestos Certification
Daniel L. Lawrence
ASB-4457
. Inspector (Exp. 03/24111)
Executive Secretary Uta Air Q a ty Board
APPENDIX D
ACM PHOTOGRAPHS
NOT USED
| L2047_Final_Report.pdf |
| L2047_Draft_Report.pdf |
| Utah_Certs_All_With_RES.pdf |
| FRS_Certs.pdf |
| Introduction to the Quality Assurance-Quality Control Progra |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .