Amend3 LWS Campground Recon.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 20 KB Posted
- Attached to
- GAOA Lake Winfield Scott Campground (GA)
- Solicitation number
- 12445226Q0003
- Issued by
-
Department of Agriculture Forest Service
About this file
This file is a Questions and Answers (Q&A) document for Amendment 3 of the GAOA Lake Winfield Scott Campground Construction RFQ (Solicitation 12445226Q0003). The document addresses contractor inquiries regarding permits, material specifications, and site conditions for the campground reconstruction project located at Blue Ridge Ranger District, Chattahoochee-Oconee National Forests in Suches, Georgia. Key clarifications include: the Forest Service will obtain all permits at no contractor cost; updated specifications for wood doors and wood frames will be provided to the awarded offeror; and the project shall be bid as designed with alternate materials subject to review and approval during post-award negotiations with the winning contractor. The Q&A confirms the existing Hillman keying system for hardware specifications and clarifies that vegetation removal requirements are subject to Forest Service coordination and approval, with contractors instructed to avoid trees as practical during water main installation per demolition note 8 on drawing CD-101.
The file provides specific responses to approximately 13 inquiries regarding acceptable manufacturers for doors, windows, hardware components (hinges, closers, gasketing, thresholds), and keying systems. Multiple questions referencing Specification Section 087100 regarding manufacturers such as Special-Lite, McKinney, Pemko, Accentra, Sargent, Rockwood, and Norton are directed to answer #14, which advises bidding the project as specified with alternate materials to be considered post-award. A clarification is also provided on Hardware Set D regarding deadbolt specifications with thumb turn interior operation and exterior occupancy indicators, confirming contractors should follow the specification as written.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| A1- rev3 RFQ T and C.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment 4- 12445226Q0003.pdf | ||
| Amendment 3- 12445226Q0003.pdf | ||
| A3 - Rev SOI LWS Mar2026.pdf | ||
| A5 - rev LWS Architectural Set.pdf | ||
| A1 - rev2 RFQ T and C.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment 0002 - 12445226Q0003.pdf | ||
| Questions 12445226Q0006.docx | DOCX document | |
| A2 - Rev SOW LWS Feb2026.docx | DOCX document | |
| A3 - Rev SOI LWS Feb2026.pdf | ||
| A1 - rev2 RFQ T and C.docx | DOCX document | |
| Amendment 0001 - 12445226Q0003.pdf | ||
| A1 - rev RFQ Terms and Conditions 12445226Q0003.docx | DOCX document | |
| A4 - Updated Combined SPECS.pdf | ||
| A6 - Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf | ||
| A1 -RFQ Terms and Conditions 12445226Q0003.docx | DOCX document | |
| A2 - Rev SOW LWS Final.docx | DOCX document | |
| A3 - SOI.pdf | ||
| A5 - LWS Architectural Set.pdf | ||
| A7 - LWS CIVIL_100_R1_signed-final.zip | ZIP file | |
| A8 - Info SR 180 at Slaughter Crk.docx | DOCX document | |
| A9 - WD GA20250107 Bldg Union County.pdf |
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFI's
| Are there any permits that will be obtained by the GC? If so, will the cost be included in the proposal? | No, contractor does not need to acquire permits. No cost for permits is anticipated by the Forest Service. |
| Specification is missing for wood doors and wood frames. Please provide. | Updated specifications will include wood doors and wood frames sections. These shall be made available to awarded offeror. |
| Specification Section 081613 Fiberglass Doors & Windows. ChemPruf Door company is listed as the Basis of Design. Please confirm Special-Lite will be acceptable. | Bid the project as designed. Alternate materials will be reviewed and considered during the submitting process with the awarded offeror. |
| Specification Section 087100 Part 2.3 #A. Will McKinney be an acceptable manufacturer? | Please see the answer to question #14 for more information and clarification. |
| Specification Section 087100 Part 2.3 #B. Will Pemko be an acceptable manufacturer? | Please see the answer to question #14 for more information and clarification. |
| Specification Section 087100 Part 2.4 #F. Will Accentra 4700 series or Sargent 10X series be acceptable manufacturers? | Please see the answer to question #14 for more information and clarification. |
| Specification Section 087100 Part 2.4 #G. Will Accentra 8800 series or Sargent 8200 series be acceptable manufacturers? | Please see the answer to question #14 for more information and clarification. |
| Specification Section 087100 Part 2.5 #A. Is there an existing key system in use were to use? Will Accentra or Sargent key systems be acceptable? | Yes, Hillman keying system. Please see the answer to question #14 for more information and clarification. |
| Specification Section 087100 Part 2.6 #A. what is the existing key system in use were to use? | Hillman keying system. |
| Specification Section 087100 Part 2.7 #A. Will Rockwood operating trim be acceptable? | Please see the answer to question #14 for more information and clarification. |
| Specification Section 087100 Part 2.8 #A. Will Sargent or Norton door closers be acceptable? | Please see the answer to question #14 for more information and clarification. |
| Specification Section 087100 Part 2.9 #A. Will Rockwood mechanical stops and holder be acceptable? | Please see the answer to question #14 for more information and clarification. |
| Specification Section 087100 Part 2.10 #A. Will Pemko door gasketing be acceptable? | Please see the answer to question #14 for more information and clarification. |
| Specification Section 087100 Part 2.11 #A. Will Pemko thresholds be acceptable? | Please see the answer to question #14 for more information and clarification. |
| Specification Section 087100 Part 3.3, Hardware Set D. Please confirm item #2 is intended to be deadbolt with a thumb turn on the inside and occupancy indicator on the exterior. | Yes. Please follow specification as written. |
| Can the vegetation removal requirements be clarified on the CD drawings? Exaple CD-101 shows the piping system to be removed, but item 12 - vegetation is note noted as to remove, protect & maintain, etc… | Per note 8 of the demolition notes on CD101 the contractor is to avoid trees as practical for the installation of the water main. Any vegetation removal will ultimately be subject to coordination and approval by the USFS. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .