Past Performance Relevant Experience Questionaire.pdf
PDF 93 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 12445225R0027
- Issued by
-
Department of Agriculture Forest Service
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire template designed to comprehensively evaluate a contractor's performance across multiple dimensions. The form includes detailed rating scales ranging from 1 (Unsatisfactory) to 5 (Exceptional), with sections for assessing quality of product/service, cost control, schedule management, business relations, regulatory compliance, and an overall rating. The questionnaire allows a client to provide granular feedback on specific performance attributes like deliverable quality, invoice accuracy, personnel management, subcontractor coordination, and adherence to contract requirements.
The template is structured to capture both quantitative ratings and qualitative comments, with rating categories including Quality of Product or Service, Cost Control, Schedule, Management/Business Relations, Regulatory Compliance, and an Overall Rating. A final recommendation section asks whether the client would recommend the contractor for similar future work. The form is intended to provide a comprehensive and standardized method for documenting a contractor's performance, which can be used in future contract evaluations and source selection processes.
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Questionnaire
Contractor Information:
Firm Name:
Point of Contact at the Firm:
POC Phone Number:
POC Email:
Project Information:
Contract/Task Order Number:
Project Title:
Project Description:
Project Location:
Award Date: Completion Date:
Actual Completion Date:
Explain Difference:
Original Contract Price:
Final Contract Price:
Explain Difference:
CLIENT’S ASSESSMENT OF THE CONTRACTOR
Client Information:
Business/Organization Name:
Point of Contact for the Client:
Title:
Phone Number:
Email:
Point of Contact’s Role in the Project:
Date Questionnaire Completed:
Client’s Signature:
Rating Scale:
EXCEPTIONAL
(5)
Performance EXCEEDS MOST contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.
VERY GOOD
(4)
Performance EXCEEDS SOME contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.
SATISFACTORY
(3)
Performance MEETS contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
MARGINAL
(2)
Performance MEETS SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.
UNSATISFACTORY
(1)
Performance DOES NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
NOT APPLICABLE
(N/A)
Performance information not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation.
Unable to provide assessment.
Quality of Product or Service:
N/A 1 2 3 4 5 Quality of Deliverable (Met Specifications) Conformance to good standards of workmanship Adequacy of the QC Plan Implementation of the QC Plan Quality of QC Documentation Identification/Correction of Deficient Work Adequacy of Submittals Use of Specified Materials Comments:
Cost Control:
N/A 1 2 3 4 5
Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s) Were invoices current, accurate, and complete Reasonableness of price change proposals submitted Proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client Comments:
Schedule:
N/A 1 2 3 4 5
Adequacy of Initial Schedule Adherence to Approved Schedule Resolution of Delays Timely submission of Required Documentation Timely submission of Updated and Revised Schedules Comments:
Management / Business Relations:
N/A 1 2 3 4 5
Management of Resources/Personnel Key Personnel were Utilized Appropriately and Effectively Coordination and Control of Subcontractors Professional Conduct Review/Resolution of Subcontractor’s Issues Change Order Activity (By Contractor) Maintains an Adequate Work Force Responsiveness to Corrective Actions Identifies and Mitigates Risk Comments:
Regulatory Compliance:
N/A 1 2 3 4 5
Complied With Contract Clause Requirements Complied With Reporting Requirements Complied With Design Requirements Compliance With Labor Laws And Regulations Complied With Safety Laws And Regulations Correction Of Noted Deficiencies Comments:
Overall Rating:
N/A 1 2 3 4 5
Overall Rating Comments:
Recommendation Given what you know today about the contractor’s ability to perform the work required, would you recommend the selection of this firm for similar requirements in the future?
Would Would Not
APPENDIX E
Construction Experience Form
Experience For:
(Firm Name) Point of Contact:
Phone:
Construction Project Information:
Construction Project Title:
Contract / Project Number:
Location:
Award Date: Completion Date:
Explain Difference:
Award Amount: Final Amount:
Explain Difference:
Owner:
Point of Contact for Owner:
Phone:
Email:
Type of Contract:
Firm Fixed Price Other (Explain) :
Cost Reimbursement
Role: Prime Contractor Other (Explain):
Sub Contractor Joint Venture
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .