11-Evaluation Criteria PNC2131299P1.pdf
PDF 188 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- PNC2131299P1
- Issued by
- Broward County, Fort Lauderdale City, Florida
About this file
This is an evaluation criteria document for a state and local contract opportunity issued by the Broward County Aviation Department (BCAD) for environmental planning and consulting services at Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport (FLL) and North Perry Airport (HWO). The solicitation seeks up to two consultants to provide environmental planning and consulting services, including environmental permitting and NEPA services, sustainability and resiliency services, energy and resource conservation services, technical review and program support, and Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) implementation services. The scope may also include aviation-related training, on-call or on-site support, and assistance with general planning issues impacting the airports. Specific response dates, due dates, site visits, and bidders' meetings are not detailed in this evaluation criteria document; vendors are directed to the Instructions to Vendors section and BPRO for additional solicitation requirements and submission procedures.
The evaluation criteria document establishes a 100-point scoring framework for vendor assessment. Evaluation is based on the ability of professional personnel (30 points), project approach (20 points), past performance (45 points), and pricing (5 points). Past performance evaluation requires vendors to demonstrate experience on similar projects at commercial service airports or large hub airports, provide minimum three project references with detailed completion information, and demonstrate expertise in federal and state aviation requirements including FAA 150-series Advisory Circulars, FAR Part 77 and 139 standards, and AIP/AGIS grant management. Vendors must also demonstrate experience with FDOT aviation processes and stakeholder communication. Pricing points are awarded using a formula where the lowest proposed price receives the maximum allocation. The document notes that Broward County will review its own database for performance evaluations on previous County contracts rather than accepting references for those projects, and vendors should be aware of potential conflict-of-interest restrictions on subsequent design work arising from studies or assessments.
View the file
Other files
Show all 17
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EVALUATION CRITERIA
Environmental Planning and Consulting Services at FLL and HWO
Submit responses to all Evaluation Criteria. Vendors who fail to submit the information and/or documentation required by any Evaluation Criteria by the solicitation’s closing date and time—excluding Reference Forms—may receive no points (if applicable) for the corresponding Evaluation Criteria.
Refer to Instructions to Vendors, Section K, for additional information. Vendors should structure proposals to align in the order of the Evaluation Criteria.
Evaluation Criteria
1. Ability of Professional Personnel Maximum Points
A. Describe the qualifications and relevant experience of Project Manager and key staff, including Subconsultants/Subcontractors (Project Team) assigned to this Project.
Include resumes for each Project Team member. Relevant experience should highlight work involving commercial service airport systems and/or large hub airports.
Provide an Organizational Chart of the Project Team. The chart should clearly outline team roles, names of personnel, relevant licenses and certifications, areas of expertise as related to this RFP, years of experience, and the Project Team’s reporting structure.
B. Describe Prime Vendor’s experience and ability to manage on-call or as needed contracts, including responsiveness and adaptability to changing needs.
Demonstrate the ability of the proposed Project Manager to dedicate 100% of his/her time to the Broward County Aviation Department (BCAD), if requested (Include current workload of the proposed Project Manager).
2. Project Approach Maximum Points Provide a concise description of your approach for delivering all services outlined in the Scope of Services for Environmental Permitting & NEPA Services, Sustainability & Resiliency Services, Energy & Resource Conservation Services and Technical Review & Program Support and Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) Implementation Services.
Include how Subconsultants/Subcontractors will be incorporated into your team and their key roles.
3. Past Performance Maximum Points A. Describe Prime Vendor’s experience on projects of similar nature (at commercial service airport systems and/or large hub airports), scope and duration, along with a detailed description of completion, both on time and within budget, for the past five years.
The Prime Vendor’s specific past experience should include experience and expertise in projects that clearly address the following requirements:
EVALUATION CRITERIA
Environmental Planning and Consulting Services at FLL and HWO
Evaluation Criteria
• Environmental Permitting & NEPA Services, Sustainability & Resiliency Services, Energy & Resource Conservation Services and Technical Review & Program Support
• Noise Compatibility Program (NCP) Implementation Services
Provide a minimum of three projects with references (at commercial service airport systems and/or large hub airports). Refer to Vendor Reference Verification Form and submit as instructed. Only provide references for non-Broward County Board of County Commissioners’ contracts. For Broward County contracts, the County will review performance evaluations in its database for vendors with previous or current contracts with the County. The County considers references and performance evaluations in the evaluation of Vendor’s past performance.
B. Provide clear examples demonstrating the Project Team’s experience and operational knowledge of key federal and state aviation requirements relevant to the Scope of Services. This should include familiarity with FAA 150-series Advisory Circulars, FAR Part 77 airspace evaluations, FAR Part 139 certification standards, and AIP/AGIS grant management procedures
Additionally, describe the team’s experience navigating FDOT aviation processes, including coordination with District Aviation Offices to align airport master plans and Capital Improvement Plans with the Florida Aviation System Plan (FASP).
Include concrete examples showing how this regulatory expertise will be applied to minimize review delays, maintain safety compliance, and protect grant funding throughout project delivery.
C. Describe the Project Team’s experience related to airport planning projects communication with some or all of the following: citizens groups, stakeholders, airport tenants, local communities, local planning boards, and neighborhood groups.
4. Pricing Maximum Points Refer to Instructions to Vendors for additional instruction and Bid Table in BPRO and submit as instructed.
Points awarded for price will be determined by applying the following formula:
(Lowest Proposed Price/Proposer’s price) x 10 = Price Score
TOTAL POINTS
Form Date 9/23/25
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .