1-Contract Performance Evaluation FOR REFERENCE USE ONLY.pdf
PDF 312 KB Posted
- Attached to
- JH27-107 Fivemile Pasture and Three Creeks Habitat Improvement and Fuels Reduction Mastication project
- Solicitation number
- JH27-107
- Issued by
- Utah
About this file
This is a Contract Performance Evaluation form used by the State of Utah Division of Forestry, Fire and State Lands to assess contractor performance on rangeland projects. The evaluation applies to the JH27-107 Fivemile Pasture and Three Creeks Habitat Improvement and Fuels Reduction Mastication project, which requires mechanical removal and shredding of standing live and dead pinyon pine and juniper trees across up to 2,347 acres using wheeled or tracked mechanical mulching/shredder equipment. Participation in this solicitation is limited to prequalified contractors only. Work must begin as soon as possible following the prework meeting, with project completion required by April 1, 2027. No contract time extensions are permitted due to wildlife habitat use timing stipulations. While a mandatory site visit is not required, bidders are strongly encouraged to inspect the project site to understand all conditions affecting performance.
The evaluation criteria assess three categories—Quality of Product or Service, Timeliness of Performance, and Contract Management—each scored on a 1-5 scale with weighted multipliers (8 points, 8 points, and 4 points respectively) for a total possible score of 100 points. Contractors must maintain a minimum average performance score of 60 to remain on the Rangeland Pre-Qualification list; those falling below this threshold are removed from the pre-qualification list for that specific treatment/acreage category and all larger acreages within the same treatment category, though they may reapply at the next open RFSQ. Vendor pricing must be guaranteed through project completion, with no fuel surcharges or adjustments negotiable, and no government-provided materials supplied.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 10-JH27-107 Official Bid Results.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| FiveMileThreeMileLineItem1Mast - Stan Gurley.kmz | KMZ file | |
| 4-Attachment B Scope of Work ADA Compliant.pdf | ||
| ThreeCreeksMasticationVicinity.pdf | ||
| 8-JH27-107 Unofficial Bid Results.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| FiveMileThreeMileLineItem1Mast.kmz | KMZ file | |
| 6-Att.-A-PO-Terms-and-Conditions.docx | DOCX document | |
| Fivemile RidgeThreeMileContract.pdf | ||
| 2-Vendor Prerequisites - IFB Agency.pdf | ||
| Fivemile RidgeTreeSpacingMastication1_2.pdf | ||
| FiveMileLineItem2TreeSpacing - Stan Gurley.kmz | KMZ file | |
| 9-Award Memo.pdf.pdf | ||
| FiveMileLineItem2TreeSpacing.kmz | KMZ file |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RANGELAND CONTRACT PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
DATE Address
Firm Name City, State & Zip Code
Firm Contact Phone Number
Solicitation Number & Name
Project Manager Contract Amount
Service Provided/# of Acres
Overall Rating
In accordance with Procurement Code 63G-6a-410(5)(e), the State of Utah has determined that it is in its best interest to conduct a contractor performance review for each rangeland project. The State agency project manager will complete a performance review according to the evaluation criteria listed.
Vendors will be aware of their performance status as they will be monitored throughout the project. Any corrective action will be communicated to the vendor verbally or through a 10-day letter to cure, depending on the issues. Vendors must complete any corrective action requested or required, if not this will be reflected in their performance review scores.
In order for a vendor to remain on the Rangeland Pre-Qualification list, they must maintain a minimum average performance score of 60. If a vendor's average performance score drops below 60, they will be removed from the pre-qualification list for that specific treatment/acreage category and all larger acreage within that same treatment category. If a vendor is removed from the pre-qualification list they may still be eligible to submit a bid on Open Bid solicitations. Once a vendor is removed from the pre-qualification list, the vendor may reapply at the next open RFSQ.
RATINGS GUIDE
Quality of Service
Timeliness of Performance Contract Management
5-Excellent Contractor has demonstrated an exceptional level in any of the above three categories that justifies adding a point to the score. Contractor performance clearly exceeds the performance levels described as "Good"
4-Good Contractor is in compliance with contract requirements and or delivers quality product or service.
Contractor is effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedule.
Response to inquiries, technical, service, administrative issues is effective.
3-Satisfactory Minor deficiencies in meeting contract specifications have been identified.
Contractor is usually effective in meeting milestones and delivery schedules.
Response to inquiries, technical, service, administrative issues is somewhat effective.
2-Unsatisfactory Major problems have been encountered.
Contractor is having major difficulty meeting milestones and delivery schedule.
Response to inquiries, technical, service, and administrative issues is marginally effective.
1-Fail Contractor is not in compliance & is jeopardizing achievement of contract objectives.
Contractor delays are jeopardizing performance of contract objectives.
Response to inquiries, technical, service, and administrative issues is not effective.
Rate the Following Score (1 – 5)
COMMENTS
Quality of Product or Service
_____ x 8 = _____
Timeliness of Performance
_____ x 8 = _____
Contract Management _____ x 4 = _____
Overall Rating _____/100 pts
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .