02 HRTO Self Score Matrix.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 17 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SOF Enterprise Professional Services (SEPS) Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- H9240022R0008
- Issued by
- United States Special Operations Command
About this file
This document contains a self-scoring matrix and details for the SOF Enterprise Professional Services solicitation. The self-scoring matrix provides categories and criteria for applicants to assess themselves against maximum point values. Categories include total positions on single work samples, geographic locations, position transition times, qualifications and certifications for roles like budget analyst and strategic planner. The solicitation seeks proposals for the SOF Enterprise Professional Services acquisition to support the United States Special Operations Command. Final proposals are due on January 25, 2022 at 1100. The solicitation will be awarded under contract H9240022R0008.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 35
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
HRTO SSM
| HRTO Self Score Matrix (17 November 2021) | Citation - Section/Page # | ||||||||||||||
| Eval Section | Category / Criterion | Maximum Count | Offeror's Count | Points per Count | Weight Factor | Max Possible | Resulting Score | Down-grade | WS-1 | WS-2 | WS-3 | WS-4 | WS-5 | ||
| 3.1 Category 1 | Total positions on a single work sample | 100 | 1 | 2 | 200 | 0 | |||||||||
| 3.1 Category 2 | Geographic locations | 5 | 20 | 1 | 100 | 0 | |||||||||
| 3.1 Category 3 | Positions transitioned within 30 days | 50 | 2 | 3 | 300 | 0 | |||||||||
| 3.1 Category 4 | Positions with quals/certs that meet or exceed those for: | ||||||||||||||
| Budget Analyst/FIAR Analyst/Staff Accountant/Mgmt Analyst | 50 | 2 | 5 | 500 | 0 | ||||||||||
| 3.1 Category 5 | Positions with quals/certs that meet or exceed those for: | ||||||||||||||
| SOF Strategic Planner/Operations Analyst | 20 | 5 | 3 | 300 | 0 | ||||||||||
| 3.1 Category 6 | Retention Rate | 100 | 1 | 4 | 400 | 0 | |||||||||
| 3.1 Category 7 | Experience in filling positions that require | ||||||||||||||
| TS/SCI security clearances | 100 | 1 | 2 | 200 | 0 | ||||||||||
| TOTAL MAX POSSIBLE: | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
| TOTAL SELF SCORE: | 0 |
Column Definitions
| Column | Explanation |
| B | Eval Section: Points to the section in the Evaluation Criteria that corresponds to the Category/Criteria described in that row |
| C | Category/Criterion: Summarized description of the required measurment - with further detail available in the section identified in Column B |
| D | Maximum Count: The highest allowable count an Offeror can enter in Column E. These max values are selected either because a higher number is not mathematically possible (for example, retention cannot be higher than 100%), or a higher number is not relevant to the requirement (for example, it doesn't matter if your largest work sample includes MORE than 250 positions, but the government DOES want to know that your management experience includes oversight of a contracts/task order UP TO that size, comparable to the anticipated requriement, with growth) |
| E | Offeror's Count: Response provided by the Offeror for each criterion, in accordance with corresponding description and instructions in Atch 06. THIS IS THE ONLY COLUMN TO THE LEFT OF COLUMN J IN WHICH OFFERORS SHALL MAKE ENTRIES. |
| F | Points per Count: Mathematically derived by dividing the Maximum Count into 250, thus normalizing each category to a baseline of 250 for arithmetic evaluation/comparison purposes - equally weighted categories will equally impact the totals score regardless of the "unit of measure". Offerors then can achieve the maximum score for the Category/Criterion if their provided work sample(s) support(s) the maximum allowable count(s). |
| G | Weight Factor: Value designated by the Government for the purpose, as the name implies, of assigning weight to selected criteria to reflect relative importance to each category that impacts scoring totals proportionally to that weight. |
| H | Max Possible: Mathematically derived by multiplying 250 by the weight factor, and representing the maximum possible score an offeror can achieve in each category; done by achieving a validated maximum count. The sum of all values in Columns H is the "Total Max Possible" score an Offeror can achieve for technical evaluation purposes. |
| I | Resulting Score: Mathematically derived by multiplying Column E (Offeror's Count) by Column F (Points per Count), and then multiplying that product by Column G (Weight Factor). This represents the Offeror's score for each category. The sum of all values in Column I is the Offeror's "Total Self Score" for technical evaluation purposes. |
| J | Downgrade: Reserved for Governmnet Evaluator use. If the Government finds discrpencies during validation of Offeror provided counts, the Government reserves the right to downgrade scores to align with validated information. The governmnet will not upgrade scores in this process. See Atch 06 for further details pertinent to downgrading Offeror provided counts/scores. |
| K | SPARE - INTENTIONALLY BLANK |
| L-P | Citation - Section/Page # -- WS-1 thru WS-5: Space allocated to the Offeror to provide "pointers" within each of their provided work samples (WS-1 thru WS-5) to enable quick reference for the Government to find validation of Offeror's provided counts. |
ESRI_MAPINFO_SHEET
DO NOT EDIT
For Esri use only
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .