Top 33 Contractors in PSC B541: Defense Studies, FY2022
Parent companies by net contract obligations Oct 1, 2021 – Sep 30, 2022 Code page on GovTribe
The top 10 won 93% of FY2022 PSC B541 contract dollars
Ranking facts
- Contract obligations
- $619,114,573 Net of deobligations, by contracts coded PSC B541
- Contractors
- 33 Parent companies with an obligation
- Largest contractor
- Institute for Defense Analyses $219 million, 34.5% of obligations
- Data as of
Contract actions from FPDS (SAM.gov). How the rankings work · Download all 33 rows as CSV
Full ranking
| Rank | Contractor | Net obligations | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $219,495,878 | |||
| 2 | $119,019,983 | |||
| 3 | $105,146,706 | |||
| 4 | $96,254,107 | |||
| 5 | $12,226,922 | |||
| 6 | $10,239,773 | |||
| 7 |
BAE Systems PLC
Top agencies
|
$9,312,252 | ||
| 8 | $8,938,596 | |||
| 9 | $7,012,246 | |||
| 10 | $4,174,220 | |||
| 11 |
Hart Technologies, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$4,024,679 | ||
| 12 | $3,246,823 | |||
| 13 | $3,040,704 | |||
| 14 | $2,852,500 | |||
| 15 | $2,386,239 | |||
| 16 | $1,965,728 | |||
| 17 | $1,787,333 | |||
| 18 | $1,609,480 | |||
| 19 |
The Boeing Company
Top agencies
|
$1,347,230 | ||
| 20 | $1,295,533 | |||
| 21 | $1,205,016 | |||
| 22 |
Kbr, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$948,008 | ||
| 23 | $850,000 | |||
| 24 |
Zekiah Technologies Inc.
Top agencies
|
$592,055 | ||
| 25 |
Applied Mathematics, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$419,040 | ||
| 26 |
Leonardo S.p.A.
Top agencies
|
$292,588 | ||
| 27 | $176,510 | |||
| 28 | $104,861 | |||
| 29 |
Booz Allen Hamilton Inc.
Top agencies
|
$95,456 | ||
| 30 |
Hudson Institute, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$75,000 | ||
| 31 |
The Gel Group, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$38,120 | ||
| 32 |
Solutions Development Corp
Top agencies
|
$16,445 | ||
| 33 | $12,811 |
Show all 33
How this ranking works
- Source: every contract action FPDS records (as published on SAM.gov) in the period, as GovTribe received it.
- Amounts are net obligations: what was obligated, less what was deobligated. Shares are of $636 million obligated before deobligations, so they never pass 100%.
- Parent companies: each action counts under the ultimate parent its award record names, or under the awardee when it names none, so no dollar counts twice. Parents of the same name (Inc., LLC and the like aside) count as one company, since FPDS records a company's parent under more than one UEI over time. GovTribe corrects a few parents and names by hand; see the corrections.
- Fiscal year 2022 ran Oct 1, 2021 – Sep 30, 2022. The Department of Defense reports its contract actions to FPDS about 90 days late, so a fiscal year is ranked once they're in, in February, and the list doesn't change after.
- Rank changes compare with FY2021. "New" marks a company outside that period's top 500, and "Returned" one of those that was on an earlier fiscal year's list.
- Rank lines show each company's rank on every fiscal year's list since FY2021, #1 at the top, on a scale that gives the top of the list more room. A dashed stretch spans years it wasn't on the list. The step from FY2021 takes the color of the rank change beside it.
- Placeholder recipients FPDS uses when it names no company ("Miscellaneous Foreign Contractors" and the like) aren't ranked.
Quick answers
Who were the top 10 PSC B541 contractors in FY2022?
1. Institute for Defense Analyses ($219M), 2. The Rand Corporation ($119M), 3. The Johns Hopkins University ($105M), 4. The CNA Corporation ($96.3M), 5. Lockheed Martin Corporation ($12.2M), 6. Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation ($10.2M), 7. BAE Systems PLC ($9.31M), 8. BAE Systems Technology Solutions & Services Inc. ($8.94M), 9. Gomez Research Associates Inc. ($7.01M), 10. American Systems Corporation ($4.17M).
On GovTribe
Research every contractor on this list
- Every contract, task order and IDV they hold
- Their subsidiaries, teammates and competitors
- Open opportunities they're positioned for
- Alerts when they win new work