Top 100 Contractors in PSC AR11: Space R&D Services; Space Flight, Research and Supporting Activities; Basic Research, FY2025
Parent companies by net contract obligations Oct 1, 2024 – Sep 30, 2025 Code page on GovTribe
The top 10 won 87% of FY2025 PSC AR11 contract dollars
Ranking facts
- Contract obligations
- $2,054,124,660 Net of deobligations, by contracts coded PSC AR11
- Contractors
- 192 Parent companies with an obligation
- Largest contractor
- The Boeing Company $997 million, 47.9% of obligations
- Data as of
Contract actions from FPDS (SAM.gov). How the rankings work · Download all 100 rows as CSV · Free to reuse with credit to GovTribe (CC BY 4.0)
Full ranking
| Rank | Contractor | Net obligations | Share | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $997,303,534 | |||
| 2 |
Johns Hopkins University
|
$399,654,127 | ||
| 3 | $105,221,578 | |||
| 4 | $83,890,589 | |||
| 5 | $54,693,047 | |||
| 6 | $50,145,822 | |||
| 7 | $38,953,452 | |||
| 8 | $30,224,479 | |||
| 9 |
Apex Technology, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$22,000,000 | ||
| 10 |
Analytical Mechanics Associates Inc.
Top agencies
|
$21,069,297 | ||
| 11 | $20,378,955 | |||
| 12 | $20,050,323 | |||
| 13 | $19,111,458 | |||
| 14 | $11,683,137 | |||
| 15 | $10,492,430 | |||
| 16 | $9,120,744 | |||
| 17 |
KBR Wyle Services LLC
Top agencies
|
$8,986,887 | ||
| 18 |
Forward Edge Ai Inc.
Top agencies
|
$6,225,447 | ||
| 19 | $5,899,000 | |||
| 20 | $5,485,414 | |||
| 21 |
RTX Corporation
Top agencies
|
$5,484,889 | ||
| 22 | $4,850,000 | |||
| 23 | $4,710,984 | |||
| 24 | $4,358,120 | |||
| 25 | $3,862,849 | |||
| 26 | $3,532,239 | |||
| 27 | $3,531,266 | |||
| 28 | $3,458,993 | |||
| 29 |
XO Markets Holdings Inc.
Top agencies
|
$3,395,738 | ||
| 30 | $3,146,288 | |||
| 31 | $3,095,980 | |||
| 32 | $2,974,312 | |||
| 33 |
The University of Toledo
|
$2,877,738 | ||
| 34 | $2,638,570 | |||
| 35 | $2,596,761 | |||
| 36 | $2,396,910 | |||
| 37 | $2,230,055 | |||
| 38 | $2,188,329 | |||
| 39 | $2,152,061 | |||
| 40 | $2,131,846 | |||
| 41 | $2,056,050 | |||
| 42 | $1,872,338 | |||
| 43 |
Mason Electric Co.
Top agencies
|
$1,788,151 | ||
| 44 | $1,760,283 | |||
| 45 | $1,751,493 | |||
| 46 | $1,715,823 | |||
| 47 | $1,701,617 | |||
| 48 |
Tactair Fluid Controls Inc
Top agencies
|
$1,655,316 | ||
| 49 |
Computational Physics, Inc.
Top agencies
|
$1,644,921 | ||
| 50 | $1,589,207 | |||
| 51 | $1,527,591 | |||
| 52 | $1,504,395 | |||
| 53 | $1,477,353 | |||
| 54 | $1,471,493 | |||
| 55 | $1,394,759 | |||
| 56 | $1,389,358 | |||
| 57 | $1,349,889 | |||
| 58 | $1,320,641 | |||
| 59 |
Sev1Tech, LLC
Top agencies
|
$1,216,047 | ||
| 60 | $1,203,220 | |||
| 61 | $1,164,715 | |||
| 62 | $1,020,129 | |||
| 63 | $1,010,510 | |||
| 64 | $1,000,000 | |||
| 65 | $905,049 | |||
| 66 | $900,000 | |||
| 67 | $854,621 | |||
| 68 | $853,000 | |||
| 69 | $847,965 | |||
| 70 | $820,597 | |||
| 71 | $796,672 | |||
| 72 | $784,186 | |||
| 73 | $682,698 | |||
| 74 | $673,127 | |||
| 75 | $598,894 | |||
| 76 | $597,856 | |||
| 77 | $547,683 | |||
| 78 | $527,798 | |||
| 79 | $525,560 | |||
| 80 | $514,505 | |||
| 81 | $507,432 | |||
| 82 | $499,512 | |||
| 83 |
RPM Innovations Inc
Top agencies
|
$498,190 | ||
| 84 | $492,983 | |||
| 85 | $487,263 | |||
| 86 | $483,442 | |||
| 87 | $458,821 | |||
| 88 | $450,188 | |||
| 89 | $441,003 | |||
| 90 | $437,728 | |||
| 91 |
Coldquanta Inc.
Top agencies
|
$433,323 | ||
| 92 | $423,650 | |||
| 93 | $398,548 | |||
| 94 | $395,825 | |||
| 95 | $394,987 | |||
| 96 | $392,244 | |||
| 97 | $389,059 | |||
| 98 | $388,670 | |||
| 99 | $374,995 | |||
| 100 | $360,964 |
Show 75 more
100 of 192 contractors listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
How this ranking works
- Source: every contract action FPDS records (as published on SAM.gov) in the period, as GovTribe received it.
- Amounts are net obligations: what was obligated, less what was deobligated. Shares are of $2.08 billion obligated before deobligations, so they never pass 100%.
- Parent companies: each action counts under the ultimate parent its award record names, or under the awardee when it names none, so no dollar counts twice. An awardee whose own actions mostly name no parent, and that no other company's actions name as their parent, rolls up its SAM.gov registration's chain of parent companies: it counts under the first company there that other companies' actions name as their parent, or under the parent most of a company's own actions name, whichever comes first; with neither, under the highest company in the chain with federal contracts of its own. Joint ventures stay companies of their own. Parents of the same name (Inc., LLC and the like aside) count as one company, since FPDS records a company's parent under more than one UEI over time. GovTribe corrects a few parents and names by hand; see the corrections.
- Fiscal year 2025 ran Oct 1, 2024 – Sep 30, 2025. The Department of Defense reports its contract actions to FPDS about 90 days late, so a fiscal year is ranked once they're in, in February, and the list doesn't change after.
- Rank changes compare with FY2024. "New" marks a company outside that period's top 500, and "Returned" one of those that was on an earlier fiscal year's list.
- Rank lines show each company's rank on every fiscal year's list since FY2021, #1 at the top, on a scale that gives the top of the list more room. A dashed stretch spans years it wasn't on the list. The step from FY2024 takes the color of the rank change beside it.
- Placeholder recipients FPDS uses when it names no company ("Miscellaneous Foreign Contractors" and the like) aren't ranked.
Quick answers
Who were the top 10 PSC AR11 contractors in FY2025?
1. The Boeing Company ($997M), 2. Johns Hopkins University ($400M), 3. University System of Maryland ($105M), 4. Adnet Systems Inc. ($83.9M), 5. The Regents of the University of California ($54.7M), 6. Peraton Inc. ($50.1M), 7. Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation ($39M), 8. The University of Alabama In Huntsville ($30.2M), 9. Apex Technology, Inc. ($22M), 10. Analytical Mechanics Associates Inc. ($21.1M).
On GovTribe
Research every contractor on this list
- Every contract, task order and IDV they hold
- Their subsidiaries, teammates and competitors
- Open opportunities they're positioned for
- Alerts when they win new work