Electroimpact Inc.

Mukilteo, WA

UEI
GKZLEMB7K1D6
CAGE
4EST6
Primary NAICS
333248 All Other Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
SAM.gov registration
Active through

Company facts

FY2025 rankings
Self-certified in SAM.gov
  • For Profit Organization
  • Manufacturer of Goods
Entity structure
Corporate Entity (Not Tax Exempt)
SAM.gov registration date
Physical address
Electroimpact Building A, 4413 Chennault Beach Rd, Mukilteo, WA 98275, USA
Founded
1986
Employees
251-1K
Estimated annual revenue
$50M-$100M
Industry
  1. Industrials
  2. Capital Goods
  3. Industrial Conglomerates
  4. Industrials & Manufacturing
SIC code
38 Instruments & Related Products
Profiles

Registration and certifications come from SAM.gov and the SBA; company details from public web sources. Updated .

Contract obligations by fiscal year

Fiscal year Obligated
FY2027 To date $0
FY2026 $234,584
FY2025 $566,518
FY2024 $574,554
FY2023 $817,359

Top agencies by obligations

Rank Agency Obligated, FY2026–FY2027 Share
1 National Aeronautics and Space Administration $234,584

Contract awards

Latest 5 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

Contract subawards

Prime contractor Prime award Amount Awarded
Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation MANUFACTURING CAPACITY ENHANCEMENT - HACM ABPS Machine Tool Manufacturing FA865625FB003 $196,423
Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies, LLC IGF::CL, CT::IGF MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION OF THE NATIONAL SECURITY CAMPUS -- CONTRACT NO. DE-NA0002839 Services DENA0002839 $65,911
University Of Dayton EPSE IV TO34 AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS In direct support of TO34 47QFLA23F0176 $329,852
University Of Dayton AUTOMATION AND ROBOTICS TO 24 - DEOBLIGATE UNUSED FUNDS Engineering supplies/services in support of the Prime contract. 47QFLA22F0156 $772,679

Grant awards

Similar vendors

About the company

Electroimpact Inc., a for-profit aerospace manufacturing and automation equipment company based in Mukilteo, Washington, serves the federal government primarily as a prime contractor on NASA missions, with specialized expertise in advanced composite manufacturing systems, automated fiber placement (AFP) equipment, and related maintenance and integration services. The company competes full-and-open without SBA set-asides across its federal footprint. Electroimpact operates as a manufacturer of aerospace tooling, automation equipment, and advanced manufacturing technologies; the source describes it as holding a long-standing relationship with NASA and established expertise in AFP systems and laser manufacturing systems.

NASA dominates Electroimpact's customer base, accounting for 84% of awards and all $11 million of combined potential value across recent federal work. Within NASA, the Shared Services Center anchors the portfolio with 29 awards worth $3.7 million combined potential value, followed by Langley Research Center (6 awards, $3.4 million) and Marshall Space Flight Center (3 awards, $2.6 million). The Department of the Army Materiel Command Research Development and Engineering Command contributes $1.2 million on one award; the Department of the Air Force rounds out the customer set. Electroimpact holds seats on three IDIQs: Indefinite Delivery Contract 47QFLA18D0006 (2 task orders), Eglin Wide Agile Acquisition Contract (1 task order), and Indefinite Delivery Contract N6660488C2271 (1 task order).

Recent prime work centers on planned preventative maintenance, system integration, and design-build deliverables tied to NASA's ISAAC (Integrated Structural Assembly of Advanced Composites) facility and AFP manufacturing capability. Representative awards include a $1.79 million cooperative agreement (July 2022 through September 2029) for participation in NASA's High-Rate Composites Aircraft Manufacturing (HICAM) Phase 1 project on thermoplastic automated fiber placement and advanced composite aircraft manufacturing; a $187,522 sole-source purchase order (October 2025) for system integration, replacement parts, and three years of preventative maintenance on an AFP system at NASA Marshall; and a $234,584 sole-source purchase order (January 2027) for design, integration, documentation, and operator training on Class IV laser safety interlocks at NASA Langley's ISAAC facility. All recent awards carry sole-source designations under FAR 13.106-1(b)(1)(i), reflecting Electroimpact's position as the original equipment manufacturer or exclusive provider for these specialized systems.

Subcontract activity is minimal (4 of 56 awards, 7% of footprint). Electroimpact subcontracts to Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation on manufacturing capacity enhancement work (January 2026), to Honeywell Federal Manufacturing & Technologies on National Security Campus operations (February 2025), and to the University of Dayton on automation and robotics tasks (October 2024 and November 2022). Activity has remained flat or declining in recent years (one award in 2023, three in 2024, three in 2025, one in 2026, one in 2027), with only $422 thousand in combined potential value facing recompete in the next twenty-four months. Top NAICS categories reflect manufacturing orientation: Machine Tool Manufacturing (17 awards), Carbon and Graphite Product Manufacturing (7 awards), and All Other Industrial Machinery Manufacturing (3 awards).

Quick answers

Is Electroimpact Inc. registered in SAM.gov?

Yes. Electroimpact Inc.'s SAM.gov registration is active through June 4, 2027.

How much has Electroimpact Inc. received in federal contracts?

Federal contracts obligated $566,518 to Electroimpact Inc. in fiscal year 2025 and $2,193,015 in fiscal years 2023 through 2027.

How does Electroimpact Inc. rank among federal contractors?

Electroimpact Inc. ranked #89 in PSC AR11 in FY2025.

What is Electroimpact Inc.'s most recent federal award?

Electroimpact Inc.'s most recent federal contract award is Design, integration, documentation, and training on class IV laser safety interlocks (80NSSC26P1190), from Shared Services Center, on January 1, 2027.

On GovTribe

See Electroimpact Inc.'s full federal record

  • Federal contract awards
  • IDV awards
  • Federal grant awards
  • Subcontracting relationships
  • Funding analysis by agency, NAICS and set-aside
  • Similar vendors