WOCC ICI Past Performance Questionnaire.pdf

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE COVER LETTER

W9124G25RA005

USAWOCC Institution Contract Instructors

13 June 2025

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Mission and Installation Contracting Command – Fort Novosel is in the process of selecting a contractor to provide non-personal services contract to provide Tech Analyst support services for the United States Army Aviation Center of Excellence (USAACE), Organization and Personnel Force Development Directorate (OPFD) in its mission to develop active and reserve component Aviation Officers, Aviation Warrant Officers, and Enlisted personnel in accordance with organizational and personnel life cycle management functions. OPFD identifies, evaluates, develops, monitors, and adjusts personnel programs in order to forecast Army Aviation organizational and personnel requirements, reducing costs by accurately forecasting Aviation structure, acquisition, distribution, development, deployment, compensation, sustainment, and transition of Aviation personnel.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past and present performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had firsthand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts.

Our areas of interest in the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. Your written response is required no later than (NLT) the solicitation closing date/time, in order for your input to be included in the evaluation of the offeror’s past performance.

Please email completed questionnaire responses and/or any questions related to this request to Rowan Anderson at rowan.e.anderson.civ@army.mil CC: Christopher Martin christopher.w.martin24.civ@army/.mil and Laura Blackmon laura.j.blackmon2.civ@army.mil (Subject: W9124G24RA005 WOCC ICI Technical Analyst Past Performance Questionnaire).

Your help is greatly appreciated, and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

ATTACHMENT 2

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION

IAW FAR 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

A. Contractor:

B. Cage Code: _________________________________

C. Contract number: _______________________________________

D. Contract type: ______________________________

E. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

F. Period of performance:

G. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

H. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

I. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

J. Description of service provided:

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

A. Customer or agency name:

B. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

C. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

A. Evaluator's name:

B. Evaluator's title:

C. Evaluator's phone/fax number:

D. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

S SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements.

The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

US UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

NA NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.

The questions shown below should be tailored to the Factors/Subfactors of the instant acquisition.

Technical Performance S US N A

T1. Quality & repeatability of operations & maintenance.

T2. Quality of technical system testing and certification efforts

T3. Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts

T4. Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements

T5. Ability to implement current standard practices for computer hardware design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control

T6. Ability to implement current standard practices for computer software design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control

T7. Adequacy/effectiveness of environmental safety procedures

Program Management S US N

P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)

P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

P4. Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements

P5. Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations

P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts

P7. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)

P8. Effectiveness of acquisition management

P9. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer

Program Management S US N

P10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.

Transition/phase-in S U S

N A

T1. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.

T2. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.

Employee Retention/Attraction S US NA

E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.

E2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

E3. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.

Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation S U

N A

S1. Ability to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan

S2. Ability to effectively manage small business participation to meet technical performance.

Cost Performance S U

N A

C1. Accuracy in forecasting contract costs

C2. Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs

C3. Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur

Cost Performance S U

N

C4. Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting

1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated US (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

2. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes____ Default____ Convenience____ Pending Terminations____ No ____

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

E-mail to: rowan.e.anderson.civ@army.mil CC: christopher.w.martin24.civ@army.mil and laura.j.blackmon2.civ@army.mil