Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE COVER LETTER

W9124G24RA005

USAWOCC Institution Contract Instructors (WOCC ICI)

13 June 2025

FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Mission and Installation Contracting Command – Fort Rucker is in the process of selecting a contractor to provide non-personal services contract to provide US Army Warrant Officer Career College (USA WOCC) Services shall provide U.S. Army Warrant Officer Career College (USAWOCC) Services shall provide PME and IMT instruction to USAWOCC students and candidates in the subject areas to include leadership; international strategic studies; joint, interagency, and multinational operations; history; and communications and management systems. Services include assistance in maintaining relevancy and accuracy of instructional contact.

One of the considerations in proposal evaluation is the verification of the offerors' past and present performance on contracts, which reflect the offeror's ability to perform on the proposed effort. We depend on information received from agencies such as yours, which have had firsthand experience with an offeror, for the evaluation of the offeror's performance on those contracts.

Our areas of interest in the offeror are summarized in the enclosed questionnaire. Your written response is required no later than (NLT) 4:30 p.m. Central Standard Time (CST), 18 July 2025 in order for your input to be included in the evaluation of the offeror’s past performance.

Please email completed questionnaire responses and/or any questions related to this request to Rowan Anderson at rowan.e.anderson.civ@army.mil CC: Justin LapPiana justin.f.lapiana.civ@army.mil. (Subject: W9124G24RA005 USAWOCC Institution Contract Instructors (WOCC ICI) Past Performance Questionnaire).

Your help is greatly appreciated, and your prompt response will be one of the keys to the successful and timely completion of this Source Selection.

ATTACHMENT 2

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

1. Contractor: _______________________________________________________________________________

1. Cage Code: _________________________________

1. Contract number: _______________________________________

1. Contract type: ______________________________

1. Was this a competitive contract? Yes _____ No _____

1. Period of performance: _________________________________________________________

1. Initial contract cost: $____________________________

1. Current/final contract cost: $_______________________________

1. Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

1. Description of service provided: ______________________________________________________________

SECTION 2: CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

1. Customer or agency name: _______________________________________________________________________________________

1. Customer or agency description (if applicable): _______________________________________________________________________________________

1. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e. local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3: EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

1. Evaluator's name: ______________________________________________________________________________________

1. Evaluator's title: ______________________________________________________________________________________

1. Evaluator's phone/fax number: ______________________________________________________________________________________

1. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an “X” in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

S SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

US UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

NA NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.

The questions shown below should be tailored to the Factors/Subfactors of the instant acquisition.

T1. Quality & repeatability of operations & maintenance.

T2. Quality of technical system testing and certification efforts

T3. Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts

T4. Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements

T5. Ability to implement current standard practices for computer hardware design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control

T6. Ability to implement current standard practices for computer software design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control

T7. Adequacy/effectiveness of environmental safety procedures

P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes)

P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

P4. Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements

P5. Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations

P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts

P7. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material)

P8. Effectiveness of acquisition management

P9. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer

P10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.

T1. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.

T2. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.

E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.

E2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

E3. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.

S1. Ability to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan

S2. Ability to effectively manage small business participation to meet technical performance.

C1. Accuracy in forecasting contract costs

C2. Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs

C3. Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur

C4. Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting

1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated US (Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

2. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to:

E-mail to: rowan.e.anderson.civ@army.mil CC: justin.f.lapiana.civ@army.mil.