afi32-7064_Tree_Clearing_Guidance.pdf

BY ORDER OF THE

SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE

AIR FORCE INSTRUCTION 32-7064

18 NOVEMBER 2014

Incorporating Change 2, 22 November 2016

Civil Engineering

INTEGRATED NATURAL RESOURCES

MANAGEMENT

COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PUBLICATION IS MANDATORY

ACCESSIBILITY: Publications and forms are available on the e-Publishing website at www.e-Publishing.af.mil for downloading or ordering.

RELEASABILITY: There are no releasability restrictions on this publication.

OPR: HQ USAF/A4CF

(Energy and Environment Branch)

Supersedes: AFI32-7064, 17 September 2004

Certified by: HQ USAF/A4CF

(Mr. Robert M. Gill)

Pages: 96

This publication implements Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 4715.03, Natural

Resources Conservation Program and Air Force Policy Directive (AFPD) 32-70, Environmental

Quality. It identifies requirements to manage natural resources on Air Force installations in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations. It applies to individuals at all levels who manage natural resources on AF installations within the United

States and its territories, including the Air Force Reserve, Air National Guard (ANG), and government-owned, contractor-operated facilities on Air Force controlled lands except where noted otherwise. At installations outside the United States and its territories, implement this AFI consistent with applicable international agreements, Unified Combatant Command (UCC) policy, environmental annexes to operational orders or plans, country-specific Final Governing

Standards (FGS), or in their absence, the Overseas Environmental Baseline Guidance Document

(OEBGD). In case of conflict, UCC policy, the environmental annex, the FGS, or the OEBGD takes precedence over this AFI. Any organization may supplement this instruction, to include the Major Commands (MAJCOMs), ANG, and AFRC, however, direct supplements must be provided to the OPR of this publication for coordination prior to certification and approval.

Further, the ANG or AFRC will support the intent of this Air Force Instruction, and where needed may prepare an appropriate policy, supplement, guidance, and/or procedural document reflecting its unique legal status, resources, and structure, as recognized by the reserve component authorities of Title 10 of the United States Code, Air Force Doctrine and other governing authorities. Refer recommended changes and questions about this publication to the

Office of Primary Responsibility (OPR) listed above using the Air Force Form 847, Recommendation for Change of Publication; route Air Force Forms 847 from the field through http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/

2 AFI32-7064 18 NOVEMBER 2014

the appropriate functional chain of command. The authorities to waive wing/unit level requirements in this publication are identified with a tier (“T-0, T-1, T-2, T-3”) number following the compliance statement. See AFI 33-360, Publications and Forms Management, Table 1.1 for a description of the authorities associated with the tier numbers. Submit requests for waivers through the chain of command to the appropriate tier waiver approval authority, or alternately, to the publication OPR for non-tiered compliance items. Ensure that all records created as a result of processes prescribed in this publication are maintained in accordance with

Air Force Manual (AFMAN) 33-363, Management of Records, and disposed of in accordance with the Air Force Records Disposition Schedule (RDS) located in the Air Force Records

Information Management System (AFRIMS). The use of the name or mark of any specific manufacturer, commercial product, commodity, or service in this publication does not imply endorsement by the Air Force.

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

These interim changes (IC-2) revise AFI 32-7064 by reflecting changes identified and agreed to during the compliance statement review by SAF/AA to ensure adherence to AFI 33-360 compliance statement format and waiver tier requirements. Interim changes (IC-1) revise AFI

32-7064 by (1) removing incorrectly identified Finding of No Practicable Alternatives (FONPA) delegated decision authority, (2) clarifying consideration of alternatives and FONPA decision making for wetlands via the Environmental Impact Analysis Process (EIAP), (3) clarifying EIAP and related references, (4) providing signatory authority for cooperative agreements in accordance with Sikes Act, (5) and clarifying issues related to EIAP and the Endangered Species

Act.

Chapter 1— PROGRAM OVERVIEW 8

1.1. Overview

Chapter 2— ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES. 9

2.1. Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Installations, Environment, and Energy

(SAF/IE)

2.2. Secretary of the Air Force, General Counsel of the Air Force (SAF/GC)

2.3. Headquarters, United States Air Force, Deputy Chief of Staff for Logistics, Engineering, & Force Protection, Director of Civil Engineers (AF/A4C)

2.4. Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC) Environmental Directorate

(AFCEC/CZ)

2.5. Air Force Legal Operations Agency, Environmental Law Field Support Center

(AFLOA/JACE-FSC)

2.6. Air Force Safety Center (AFSEC/SEFW) Bird/Wildlife Aircraft Strike Hazard

(BASH) Team

2.7. Installation Commander

AFI32-7064 18 NOVEMBER 2014 3

2.8. Environmental Management System

Chapter 3— IMPLEMENTING INTEGRATED NATURAL RESOURES

MANAGEMENT 12

3.1. Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan

3.2. Determining the Need for an INRMP

3.3. Cooperative INRMP Preparation

3.4. INRMP Approval

3.5. Annual INRMP Review and Coordination

3.6. INRMP Update and Revision

3.7. Environmental Impact Analysis Process (EIAP) and INRMP Implementation

3.8. Ecosystem Management

3.9. Staffing

3.10. Integration of Natural Resources Management with Other Air Force Programs

3.11. Preventing Natural Resources Damage from Air Force Activities

3.12. Assessing Natural Resources Damage by Other Parties

3.13. Natural Resources Program Metrics

3.14. Recognition of Outstanding Natural Resources Management

Chapter 4— WETLANDS AND WATERS OF THE UNITED 20

4.1. Protection of Wetlands

4.2. Clean Water Act (CWA) Compliance

4.3. Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899 Compliance

4.4. EIAP for Actions that May Affect Wetlands

4.5. Wetland Mitigation Banks

Chapter 5— FLOODPLAINS 24

5.1. Floodplain Protection

5.2. Floodplain Boundary Determination

5.3. Assessment of Proposed Actions within a Floodplain

Chapter 6— COASTAL AND MARINE RESOURCES 26

6.1. Protection of Coastal and Marine Resources

4 AFI32-7064 18 NOVEMBER 2014

6.2. Coastal Zone Management Act (CZMA) Compliance

6.3. Coastal Barrier Resources Act of 1982 Compliance

6.4. Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 Compliance

6.5. Coral Reef Protection

6.6. Coastal America Partnership

Chapter 7— FISH AND WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT 28

7.1. Wildlife Management Programs on Air Force Lands

7.2. Hunting, Fishing, Trapping and Outdoor Recreation Programs

7.3. Conservation Law Enforcement

7.4. Protection of Migratory Birds

7.5. Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act

7.6. Wildlife Damage Control

7.7. Participation in Conservation Banking Programs

Chapter 8— THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES MANAGEMENT 33

8.1. ESA Compliance

8.2. Inventory and Monitoring

8.3. Interagency Consultation and Coordination

8.4. The INRMP as a Substitute for Critical Habitat Designation

8.5. Exclusion of Critical Habitat Designation Due to Economic Impacts or National

Security Issues

Chapter 9— FOREST MANAGEMENT 36

9.1. Forest Management Practices on Air Force Lands

9.2. Forest Product Sale Procedures

9.3. Procuring Forest Management Services

9.4. Financial Management

9.5. Forest Protection

Chapter 10— AGRICULTURAL OUTGRANTS 40

10.1. Agriculture Outgrant Programs on Air Force Lands

10.2. Agricultural Outgrant Program Management

AFI32-7064 18 NOVEMBER 2014 5

10.3. Guidelines for Livestock Grazing

10.4. Guidelines for Agricultural Crop Production

10.5. Monitoring Outgrant Lands for Compliance with the INRMP

10.6. Pest Management on Outgranted Lands

10.7. Financial Management

Chapter 11— OUTDOOR RECREATION 44

11.1. Outdoor Recreation Planning

11.2. Public Access for Outdoor Recreation

11.3. Off-Road Vehicle (ORV) Use

11.4. Watchable Wildlife Programs

Chapter 12— LAND MANAGEMENT 46

12.1. Land Management Programs

12.2. Grounds Maintenance Categories

12.3. Designing and Maintaining Landscapes

12.4. Golf Course Environmental Management (GEM)

12.5. Urban Forestry

12.6. Pest Management

12.7. Non-point Source Pollution Prevention

12.8. Mineral Leasing

Chapter 13— WILDLAND FIRE MANAGEMENT 48

13.1. Wildland Fire Management Policy

13.2. Program Authority

13.3. Wildland Fire Management Plan Components

13.4. Wildland Fire Operations

13.5. Wildland Fire Reporting

13.6. Qualifications, Certification, Training, Fitness and Medical Surveillance

Standards for Wildland Fire Personnel

13.7. Programming for Wildland Fire Management Activities

6 AFI32-7064 18 NOVEMBER 2014

Chapter 14— INVASIVE SPECIES MANAGEMENT 54

14.1. Invasive Species Management Policy

14.2. Invasive Species Management Program

14.3. Invasive Species Detection and Monitoring

14.4. Invasive Species Control on Agricultural Outgrants

14.5. Control of Feral Animals

14.6. Interagency Cooperation

Chapter 15— BIRD/WILDLIFE AIRCRAFT STRIKE HAZARD 55

15.1. Bird/Wildlife Aircraft Strike Hazard (BASH) Program

15.2. Natural Resources Management in the Airfield Environment

15.3. Management of Wildlife in Support of the BASH Plan

Chapter 16— NATURAL RESOURCES BUDGETING 58

16.1. Funding Sources

16.2. Air Force Conservation Program Funding

16.3. Reimbursable Conservation Program Funds

16.4. Legacy Resources Management Program

16.5. Strategic Environmental Research and Development Program (SERDP)

16.6. Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP)

Chapter 17— PUBLIC AWARENESS AND INVOLVEMENT IN NATURAL

RESOURCES PROGRAMS 64

17.1. Public Awareness and Involvement in Natural Resources Program

17.2. Public Access to Air Force Land and Water Areas

17.3. Special Natural Areas

17.4. Special Restrictions for Disclosing Natural Resources Information

Chapter 18— NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT TRAINING 66

18.1. Natural Resources Training

18.2. Guidance for Installation Commanders

AFI32-7064 18 NOVEMBER 2014 7

Attachment 1— GLOSSARY OF REFERENCES AND SUPPORTING INFORMATION 68

Attachment 2— INRMP FORMAT AND CONTENT 78

Attachment 3— COORDINATION AND APPROVAL PROCESS FOR INRMP

DEVELOPMENT AND REVISION 93

Attachment 4— ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT COORDINATION 95

8 AFI32-7064 18 NOVEMBER 2014

Chapter 1

PROGRAM OVERVIEW

1.1. Overview . This instruction addresses the management of natural resources on Air Force

(AF) properties to comply with federal law and applicable state and local standards. This instruction provides AF installations a framework for planning, implementing, and documenting natural resources management programs. The primary objective of AF natural resources programs is to sustain, restore and modernize natural infrastructure to ensure operational capability and no net loss in the capability of AF lands to support the military mission of the installation.

AFI32-7064 18 NOVEMBER 2014 9

Chapter 2

ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES.

2.1. Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Installations, Environment, and Energy

(SAF/IE).

2.1.1. Oversee the AF natural resources program as the Air Force Natural Resources Trustee.

2.1.2. Promulgate and oversee policy for integrated natural resources management as part of the AF Environmental Management System (EMS) IAW AFI 32-7001 Environmental

Management.

2.1.3. Serve as principal representative and advocate for integrated natural resources compliance with the Office of Secretary of Defense (OSD) staff, federal agencies, and

Congress.

2.1.4. Coordinate Air Force natural resource management procedures with those of the other military services for the purpose of exploring common areas of interest and to prevent duplication of effort.

2.1.5. Approve establishment of conservation banks, wetland banks, or other property easements on Air Force property for the purpose of mitigation for development and military readiness activities that affect natural resources and the military mission.

2.2. Secretary of the Air Force, General Counsel of the Air Force (SAF/GC).

2.2.1. Provide legal advice to SAF and HQ USAF organizations, as appropriate, on natural resources laws, regulations, policy, international conventions, treaties, and agreements involving multiple installations, controversy, other agencies or tribal entities.

2.3. Headquarters, United States Air Force, Deputy Chief of Staff for Logistics, Engineering, & Force Protection, Director of Civil Engineers (AF/A4C).

2.3.1. Execute policy, advocates for, allocates resources, and oversees execution of AF natural resources programs.

2.3.2. Coordinate and analyze environmental performance reporting, compliance tracking and resource needs.

2.3.3. Collect, analyze and report AF-wide performance information to SAF/IE.

2.3.4. Advocate for conservation funding through the Planning, Programming, Budgeting, and Execution process.

2.3.5. Determine the need for an installation Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan

(INRMP) IAW the Sikes Act, Title 16 United States Code (U.S.C.), Section (§)

670a(a)(1)(B), and based on the criteria in paragraph 2.2. The Director of Civil Engineers may re-delegate this authority to no lower than Division Chief level within AF/A4C.

2.3.6. Designate one primary voting member and up to three alternates to the Department of

Defense (DoD) Conservation Committee.

10 AFI32-7064 18 NOVEMBER 2014

2.3.7. Establish and maintain cooperative working relationships with federal agency headquarters level environmental regulators, OSD, Major Commands, and other stakeholders.

2.3.8. Serve as process-owner for overall environmental requirements development for AF-owned IT systems.

2.4. Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC) Environmental Directorate (AFCEC/CZ).

2.4.1. Staff a natural resources Subject Matter Expert (SME) that serves as the natural resources program manager and provides technical assistance and guidance to AF on natural resources issues. (T-2).

2.4.2. Advocate for resources required to implement approved installation Integrated Natural

Resources Management Plans. The Deputy Director, Air National Guard (ANG), programs for resources required to implement INRMPs at ANG installations. (T-2).

2.4.3. Provide and manage contracts, interagency agreements, and cooperative agreements on behalf of, and for use by AF organizations for natural resources program management assistance and implementation of natural resources management projects, with the exception of the installation BASH program, which is managed by the Wing Flight Safety Office.

AFCEC Director is delegated authority to sign cooperative agreements and interagency agreements entered into pursuant to the Sikes Act, 16 U.S.C. §670c-1. (T-1).

2.4.4. Administer the reimbursable forestry, agricultural and grazing, and fish and wildlife account programs as well as dispersed outdoor recreation programs on AF installations. (T-

2).

2.4.5. Manage the Department of Defense Forest Reserve Account program for AF and distributes funds for approved projects. (T-2).

2.4.6. Operate the AF Wildland Fire Center at Eglin Air Force Base, administers National

Wildfire Coordinating Group (NWCG) training and certification records for personnel involved in wildland fire management activities, and maintains records of wildfires and prescribed fires on AF property. (T-1).

2.4.7. Administer training and certification records for AF conservation law enforcement officers. (T-2).

2.4.8. Develop and promotes the natural resources program requirements to support the AF

Environmental Management System (EMS). (T-2).

2.4.9. Manage the AF General Thomas D. White and the Secretary of Defense environmental awards program IAW AFI 36-2817, Engineering Awards Program.

2.4.10. Provide technical guidance and expertise to AF for grounds maintenance and pest management. (T-3).

2.5. Air Force Legal Operations Agency, Environmental Law Field Support Center

(AFLOA/JACE-FSC). Provide legal support to AFCEC, Major Commands, and installations on issues concerning natural resources. (T-1).

AFI32-7064 18 NOVEMBER 2014 11

2.6. Air Force Safety Center (AFSEC/SEFW) Bird/Wildlife Aircraft Strike Hazard

(BASH) Team . Provide guidance and directives on minimizing wildlife hazards to aircraft operations. (T-1).

2.7. Installation Commander.

2.7.1. Approve the INRMP by signature on all revised INRMPs. The Installation

Commander may re-delegate signature authority to a lower level provided that the signatory has control over all aspects and management objectives addressed within the subject INRMP.

(T-2).

2.7.2. Certifiy the annual review of the INRMP as valid and current; or delegates thecertification of the annual INRMP review authority to no lower than the Civil Engineer

Squadron Commander. (T-2).

2.7.3. Provide appropriate staffing to ensure implementation of the INRMP. (T-2).

2.7.4. Control access to and use of installation natural resources. (T-2).

2.7.5. Sign cooperative agreements and interagency agreements entered into, pursuant to the

Sikes Act, 16 U.S.C. §670c-1. The Chief of the National Guard Bureau, or an official duly delegated authority to act on his/her behalf, signs Sikes Act cooperative agreements and interagency agreements for the ANG. (T-1).

2.7.6. Approve and sign the installation Wildland Fire Management Plan (WFMP). The

Installation Commander may re-delegate signature authority to a lower level provided that the signatory has control over all aspects of WFMP implementation. (T-2).

2.7.7. Ensure that a notice of intent (NOI) is prepared, per 32 C.F.R. Part 989.17, and a public scoping process initiated per 32 C.F.R. Part 989.18 as described in section 4.4.2. for the EIAP on actions that may affect wetlands. (T-1).

2.7.8. Consider, in coordination with the Environmental Planning Function (EPF), the impact of proposed actions on federally listed threatened and endangered species by including the species in the scoping of the NEPA analysis at the earliest possible time and follow the process described in section 8.3.4. (T-1).

2.7.9. Consider, in coordination with the Environmental Planning Function (EPF), the impact of their proposed actions on federally listed threatened and endangered species by including the species in the scoping of the NEPA analysis at the earliest possible time and follow the process described in section 8.3.4. (T-1).

2.8. Environmental Management System. Consistent with Executive Order (E.O.) 13423, Strengthening Federal Environmental, Energy, and Transportation Management, January 24, 2007, and E.O. 13514, Federal Leadership in Environmental, Energy, and Economic

Performance, October 5, 2009, Air Force installations must develop and implement an EMS to sustain, restore, and modernize natural infrastructure to support mission capability. AFI 32-

7001, Environmental Management provides direction for the Air Force Environmental

Management System. Natural Resources are an Environmental Aspect within the Air Force

EMS.

12 AFI32-7064 18 NOVEMBER 2014

Chapter 3

IMPLEMENTING INTEGRATED NATURAL RESOURES MANAGEMENT

3.1. Integrated Natural Resources Management Plan. In accordance with the Sikes Act, 16

U.S.C §670 et. seq., the INRMP is the principal tool for managing military installation natural resources. Each military installation in the United States under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense must prepare and implement an INRMP unless a determination is made that the absence of significant natural resources makes preparation of such a plan inappropriate (see 3.2).

(T-0). Prepare INRMPs to assist the installation commander with the conservation and rehabilitation of natural resources consistent with the use of the installation to ensure the readiness of the Armed Forces. The INRMP defines natural resources management goals and objectives that are consistent with the military mission, and ensures no net loss in the capability of installation lands to support the military mission. All installation organizations, to include tenant units, must support the implementation of INRMP goals and objectives, as applicable. (T-

0). Attachment 2 provides guidelines for INRMP preparation.

3.2. Determining the Need for an INRMP. Air Force determines the requirement for an installation INRMP based on Category I and II criteria defined below.

3.2.1. Category I Criteria: Category I installations require an INRMP. Category I installations have significant natural resources requiring conservation and management.

Installation size (acreage) should not be used as a sole determining factor in deciding the need for an INRMP. The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and the state fish and wildlife management agency should be consulted when determining if significant natural resources exist to warrant an INRMP. Installations including or bordering marine environments should also consult with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric

Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service (NOAA Fisheries). An installation has significant natural resources, and will develop and implement an INRMP, if any of the following criteria apply: (T-0).

3.2.1.1. The installation conducts on-the-ground military missions on unimproved lands that necessitates conservation measures to sustain the natural resources and minimize impacts (e.g. soil erosion control).

3.2.1.2. Species listed as threatened or endangered in accordance with the Endangered

Species Act (ESA) (16 U.S.C. §§1531-1544) are present on the installation, or critical habitat has been designated or is currently proposed on the installation, and active installation conservation measures are necessary to conserve the species.

3.2.1.3. Hunting, fishing or other natural resources-based outdoor recreation activities

(e.g. off-road vehicles) are allowed on the installation.

3.2.1.4. The installation operates outgrants (leases, licenses, permits) for livestock grazing, crop production, or stable operations that allow horseback riding on unimproved lands.

3.2.1.5. The installation operates a commercial forestry program or manages other non-urban forest lands in support of: readiness and training activities, maintaining forest health, or in support of other ecosystem management goals and objectives.

AFI32-7064 18 NOVEMBER 2014 13

3.2.1.6. The installation has significant Bird/wildlife Aircraft Strike Hazard issues that require habitat manipulation outside the managed airfield; or require wildlife hazing or depredation activities that are beyond the scope of standard bird/wildlife prevention, control, and dispersal operations conducted under the auspices of a BASH Plan administered by the Wing Flight Safety office.

3.2.1.7. Important or unique biological resources are present, such as wetlands, species listed for state protection, candidate species for federal protection, or unique habitats that provide essential loafing, nesting, or foraging areas for migratory birds, bats, or other wildlife protected by state or federal law. The unique character of a biological resource is determined through consultation with the USFWS and state fish and wildlife agency, whereby it is established that ecological issues related to the resource require a level of planning and management that can only be addressed by an INRMP.

3.2.2. Category II Criteria: Category II installations do not require an INRMP. Category II installations are deemed exempt from the INRMP requirement because of the absence of significant natural resources as defined by the Category I criteria. Consult with the USFWS and appropriate state natural resource management agencies when determining whether significant natural resources exist. Additionally, consult with NOAA Fisheries if the installation includes or borders marine environments. The Director, AF/A4C, or delegated authority will confirm Category II status.

3.3. Cooperative INRMP Preparation. Prepare INRMPs in cooperation with appropriate stakeholders. Notify stakeholders when a new or revised INRMP is prepared, and solicit participation and input to the INRMP development and review process. Attachment 3 specifies the required coordination and approval process and timeline for cooperative INRMP preparation.

3.3.1. Internal Stakeholder Participation. Implementation of an INRMP requires the action and/or collaboration of the entire installation command structure as well as tenant organizations to ensure mission readiness. Solicit participation from known installation stakeholders early in the INRMP preparation process, to include the Flight Safety office.

3.3.2. Interagency Stakeholder Participation. The Sikes Act Section 101(a)(2) (16 U.S.C. §

670a(a)(2))., requires that an INRMP be prepared in cooperation with the USFWS, the appropriate state fish and wildlife agency for the state in which the military installation is located, and NOAA Fisheries for installations that include or border marine environments.

Invite the USFWS, NOAA Fisheries (if applicable), and the state fish and wildlife agency to participate in the scoping, design, and preparation of an INRMP. For installations occupying lands withdrawn from the public domain, invite the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to participate in the scoping and design of an INRMP. On withdrawn lands where the BLM is a stakeholder, a Memorandum of Understanding between the installation and the BLM may be used to establish agreement on the roles and responsibilities of each party for the management of installation natural resources.

3.3.3. Internal Review. Draft INRMP documents require internal agency review prior to release for review and comment by external agencies and the general public.

3.3.3.1. Submit the draft INRMP for formal review and comment within the installation chain of command. Incorporate comments into the INRMP as appropriate.

14 AFI32-7064 18 NOVEMBER 2014

3.3.3.2. Provide the Installation Support Team the opportunity to review and comment on draft INRMP documents; and to Headquarters, Air National Guard for ANG installations (T-2).

3.3.4. Interagency Review. Provide the USFWS, state fish and wildlife agency, and NOAA

Fisheries (when applicable), the opportunity to review a draft INRMP before submitting the document for public review. For installations occupying lands withdrawn from the public domain, ensure the BLM is also given the opportunity to review a draft INRMP before submitting for public review.

3.3.5. Public Review. Provide an opportunity for the public to review any initial draft

INRMP document, or major INRMP revision, and provide comments. Make public notification when a draft INRMP is available for comment, and ensure the period allowed for the submittal of comments is no less than 30 days. Ensure the USFWS, state fish and wildlife agency, and NOAA Fisheries (if applicable), are also given the opportunity to review all public comments received on an INRMP.

3.4. INRMP Approval. An INRMP is considered compliant with the Sikes Act if it has been approved in writing by the appropriate representative from each cooperating agency within the past five years. Approval of a new or revised INRMP is documented by signature on a signature page signed by the Installation Commander (or designee), and a designated representative of the

USFWS, state fish and wildlife agency, and NOAA Fisheries when applicable. A letter of coordination and approval signed by the designated representative of a cooperating agency suffices in lieu of a signature on the INRMP signature page. INRMP approval is sustained through the annual INRMP review and coordination process (see 3.5). The INRMP is considered current until an annual review coordination process results in a determination by the cooperating agencies that a revision is necessary; or if concurrence is rescinded by notice from a cooperating agency. The BLM is not a required signatory to an INRMP, but ensure the agency is given the opportunity to review and comment on draft INRMP documents.

3.4.1. Establishment of Mutual Agreement. Each signature on an INRMP signature page, or approval letter, reflects the mutual agreement of the parties on those portions of the INRMP within the scope of each agency’s authority. By signature of the authorized representative from a cooperating agency, the agency asserts agreement that the INRMP is sufficient and compliant in accordance with the Sikes Act. Mutual agreement is the goal with respect to the entire INRMP. However, mutual agreement is necessary only with respect to those elements of the INRMP that are subject to the jurisdictional authority of the USFWS or NOAA

Fisheries as specified by law (e.g. ESA, Marine Mammal Protection Act), or the inherent rights of the state to conserve, protect, and manage fish and wildlife resources.

3.4.2. Failure to Reach Mutual Agreement. In cases where the USFWS or state withholds its agreement to an INRMP based on objections to elements of the INRMP that are clearly not within the scope of the particular agency's authority, an installation may, notwithstanding the objections, finalize the INRMP as specified in Attachment 3 and proceed to manage its natural resources in accordance with the terms of the plan. The installation shall seek a written explanation from a cooperating agency to document why a signature is withheld.

3.5. Annual INRMP Review and Coordination. Establish and maintain regular communications with the appropriate federal and state agencies for the region where the installation is located (see 2.3). At a minimum, the installation natural resources manager shall

AFI32-7064 18 NOVEMBER 2014 15

conduct an annual review of the INRMP in coordination with internal stakeholders and local representatives of the USFWS, state fish and wildlife agency, and NOAA Fisheries where applicable. Installations will document the findings of the annual review in an Annual INRMP

Review Summary. By signature to the Annual INRMP Review Summary, the collaborating agency representative asserts concurrence with the findings. If any agency declines to participate in an on-site annual review, the installation shall submit an Annual INRMP Review Summary document to the agency via official correspondence and request return correspondence with concurrence. (T-0).

3.5.1. The installation natural resource manager must ensure the following is included in the

Annual INRMP Review Summary: (T-1).

3.5.1.1. A summary of specific INRMP accomplishments since the last review.

3.5.1.2. A summary of the required INRMP updates into the INRMP to keep the INRMP current in operation and effect for the management of installation natural resources; or alternatively, a statement that significant changes to the installation mission or natural resources goals require an INRMP revision (see 3.6) meeting.

3.5.1.3. A statement that sufficient numbers of qualified natural resources management personnel and resources are available to oversee implementation of projects and activities identified in the INRMP Work Plan.

3.5.1.4. An Annual Work Plan for implementing the INRMP that includes the current year and at least two future fiscal years. The Work Plan must include all projects and activities identified as essential for the successful implementation of INRMP goals and objectives, and an implementation schedule that is realistic and practicable.

3.5.1.5. A statement indicating the projects in the Annual Work Plan for which the collaborating agencies have expressed an interest in participating in project execution. If the collaborating agencies do not express an interest in executing projects in the Annual

Work Plan, then include the following statement in the Annual INRMP Review

Summary: “The execution strategy for the Annual Work Plan has been discussed with the participating agencies, and the agency representatives have not expressed an interest in participating in project execution, and agree that implementation will be performed through other authorized acquisition methods.”

3.6. INRMP Update and Revision. Conduct INRMP updates and revisions in cooperation with the USFWS, state fish and wildlife agency, and NOAA Fisheries where applicable. Include all appropriate internal and external stakeholders in the update and revision process. In accordance with the Sikes Act, ensure the cooperating agencies review an INRMP on a regular basis, but not less often than every five years. Cooperating agencies should mutually agree that the INRMP presents a natural resources management program that is current as to operation and effect for those elements of the INRMP under the jurisdictional authority of each agency.

3.6.1. INRMP Update. An INRMP update consists of minor edits that provide current information, or adjusts implementation timelines that would not result in changes to management goals and objectives that are substantively different than those previously agreed to by the cooperating agencies, and would not result in environmental consequences different from those in the existing INRMP. Minor update requirements are identified during the annual INRMP review and coordination (see 3.5). An INRMP update documents minor

16 AFI32-7064 18 NOVEMBER 2014

changes agreed to by the partners on how the INRMP is implemented, and does not represent a change in the scope of the INRMP. Mutual agreement by cooperating agencies that an updated INRMP remains current as to operation and effect with respect to the Sikes Act is documented by signatures to the Annual INRMP Review Summary document. An INRMP update does not require public review and comment on the decision to continue implementing the INRMP as updated.

3.6.2. INRMP Revision. Revise an INRMP if changes in the installation mission or land use would alter the biogeophysical environment such that significant edits need to be made to ensure that the INRMP reflects the current natural resources management requirements and appropriate program goals and objectives. Revise an INRMP if a change in land use or condition would result in environmental impacts not anticipated by the parties to the INRMP when the INRMP was last reviewed as to operation and effect. The need for an INRMP revision is determined during the annual INRMP review (see 3.5). Provide an opportunity for the public to review and comment on a draft INRMP revision (see 3.3.3). For new and revised INRMPs, mutual agreement by a cooperating agency is documented by the signature of an authorized representative from each agency on the signature page for the INRMP, or by written correspondence (see 3.4).

3.7. Environmental Impact Analysis Process (EIAP) and INRMP Implementation. Actions proposed as part of development of an INRMP generally constitute an action subject to the

National Environmental Policy Act, the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the NEPA, and the Air Force’s EIAP. Consider the effects of implementing the INRMP in support of the decision(s) to implement the INRMP and in furtherance of 40 C.F.R. §1505.25. Alternative means of implementing the proposed

INRMP constitute the alternatives considered, and integrated, in the NEPA analysis and should be generally formatted and generally scoped to allow tiering consistent with 40 C.F.R. §1500.4, 40 C.F.R. 1502.4(b), and 40 C.F.R. §1502.20.

3.8. Ecosystem Management. The INRMP implements ecosystem management on AF installations by setting goals for attaining a desired land condition. When preparing or revising an INRMP, follow the ecosystem management principles and guidelines in DoDI 4715.03, Natural Resources Conservation Program, and the guidance provided herein. (T-0).

3.8.1. Air Force Principles for Ecosystem Management.

3.8.1.1. Maintain or restore native ecosystem types across their natural range where practical and consistent with the military mission.

3.8.1.2. Maintain or restore ecological processes such as fire and other disturbance regimes where practical and consistent with the military mission.

3.8.1.3. Maintain or restore the hydrological processes in streams, floodplains, and wetlands when feasible and practical and consistent with military mission.

3.8.1.4. Use regional approaches to implement ecosystem management on an installation by collaboration with other DoD components as well as other federal, state and local agencies, and adjoining property owners.

AFI32-7064 18 NOVEMBER 2014 17

3.8.1.5. Provide for outdoor recreation, agricultural production, harvesting of forest products, and other practical utilization of the land and its resources, provided that such use does not inflict long-term ecosystem damage or negatively impact the AF mission.

3.8.2. Biodiversity Conservation. Biodiversity conservation is an integral part of ecosystem management. Maintain or reestablish viable populations of all native species on AF-controlled lands when practical and consistent with the military mission and not in conflict with airfield operations. Consider the effects of climate change in plans to restore native ecosystems.

3.8.3. Climate Change. Changing climate conditions may significantly affect native ecosystems and require the Air Force to adjust natural resources management strategies to support military mission requirements and address the needs of sensitive species. INRMP goals and objectives for ecosystem management and biodiversity conservation must consider projected climate change impacts, and favor an adaptive ecosystem-based management approach that will enhance the resiliency of the ecosystem to adapt to changes in climate.

The INRMP will assess climate change risks, vulnerabilities, and adaptation strategies using authoritative region-specific climate science, climate projections, and existing tools. The

INRMP should list, or include by reference, installation-specific climate data and region-specific climate projections from the most current quadrennial National Climate Assessment

Report, and include other pertinent Federal climate science documents as appropriate. (T-

2).

3.8.4. Exotic and Invasive Species Control. The INRMP indicates if any exotic and invasive species are present on an installation, and identifies any existing programs to control and/or eradicate those species. Develop and implement management strategies oriented toward the control of exotic and invasive species when practical and consistent with the military mission.

3.9. Staffing. As defined in DoDI 4715.03, installations will use professionally trained natural resources management personnel with a degree in the natural sciences to develop and implement the installation INRMP. (T-0).

3.9.1. Outsourcing Natural Resources Management. As stipulated in the Sikes Act, 16

U.S.C. §670 et. seq., the Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-76, Performance of Commercial Activities, August 4, 1983 (Revised May 29, 2003) does not apply to the development, implementation and enforcement of INRMPs. Activities that require the exercise of discretion in making decisions regarding the management and disposition of government owned natural resources are inherently governmental. When it is not practicable to utilize DoD personnel to perform inherently governmental natural resources management duties, obtain these services from federal agencies having responsibilities for the conservation and management of natural resources.

3.9.2. Use of Non-Appropriated Fund Personnel. Non-Appropriated Fund personnel and resources may be utilized to assist in the implementation of natural resources management programs. In such cases, supervision and control of natural resources management programs remain under the designated natural resources program manager for the installation.

3.9.3. Wildland Fire and Conservation Law Enforcement. Title 10, U.S.C., §2465 prohibits contracts for performance of firefighting or security guard functions, with some exceptions.

18 AFI32-7064 18 NOVEMBER 2014

Contractors may not perform firefighting or conservation law enforcement as a primary task unless an exception to 10 U.S.C. §2465 applies.

3.10. Integration of Natural Resources Management with Other Air Force Programs.

3.10.1. Integration with the Installation Planning Process. The INRMP is a key component plan of the Installation Development Plan as detailed in AFI 32-7062, Air Force

Comprehensive Planning. The INRMP identifies natural resource features that need to be considered and incorporated into the Installation Development Plan and other component plans and studies regarding future installation development.

3.10.2. Integration with EIAP. Integration with EIAP. The installation or IST natural resources manager will collaborate with the action proponent and the EIAP manager to ensure that activities that may affect natural resources are fully considered in compliance with NEPA.(T-0).

3.10.3. Integration with Other Installation Programs. Coordinate draft INRMP revisions through the installation chain of command and the BASH working group. Ensure that the

INRMP, Integrated Cultural Resources Management Plan, Bird/Wildlife Strike Hazard

(BASH) Plan, Integrated Pest Management Plan (IPMP), and Air Installation Compatible

Use Zone studies are mutually supportive and not in conflict.

3.11. Preventing Natural Resources Damage from Air Force Activities.

3.11.1. Prior to initiation of any new construction activity, the installation natural resources manager will coordinate on all Certificates of Compliance for Critical Planning Actions prepared IAW AFI 32-1021, Planning and Programming Military Construction (MILCON)

Projects.

3.11.2. Ensure Environmental Restoration Program operations conducted IAW AFI 32-7020, The Environmental Restoration Program include plans to mitigate potential damage to natural resources from restoration activities.

3.11.3. Real property outleases, easements, or licenses on Air Force property may not negatively impact the ability of an installation to meet statutory requirements for compliance with federal and applicable state laws related to natural resources conservation.

3.12. Assessing Natural Resources Damage by Other Parties. In the event that natural resources under AF control are damaged by another party, such as an accidental spill of a hazardous substance, the installation incurring the damage assesses and claims damages. Refer to Title 43, C.F.R. §11, Natural Resource Damage Assessments for guidance on claiming damages. Recovered funds are used to restore, replace, or acquire equivalent natural resources on the installation where the damage occurred. Installations must coordinate with AFCEC/CZ, SAF/IEE and AFLOA/JACE during the claims process. (T-0).

3.13. Natural Resources Program Metrics. DoDI 4715.03 identifies the natural resources conservation metrics that must be tracked and reported to DoD as part of the annual

Environmental Management Review, and for the Defense Environmental Programs Annual

Report to Congress. AF/A4C may develop and track other measures of merit to monitor natural resources program performance and ensure compliance with law. Installations will report required metrics data to AFCEC for integration and upward reporting to AF/A4C and SAF/IE.

(T-0).

AFI32-7064 18 NOVEMBER 2014 19

3.14. Recognition of Outstanding Natural Resources Management. The AF General

Thomas D. White and the Secretary of Defense environmental awards program recognizes outstanding individual and installation contributions to natural resources management. See AFI

36-2817, Engineering Awards Program, for standards and submittal procedures.

20 AFI32-7064 18 NOVEMBER 2014

Chapter 4

WETLANDS AND WATERS OF THE UNITED

4.1. Protection of Wetlands. In compliance with Executive Order 11990, Protection of

Wetlands, May 24, 1977, the AF will seek to preserve the natural values of wetlands while carrying out its mission on both AF lands and non-AF lands. To the maximum extent practicable, the AF will avoid actions which would either destroy or adversely modify wetlands.

The AF will fully disclose the location of known wetlands, and any land-use restrictions imposed by regulatory authority, on lands that are leased, transferred or sold to non-federal entities.

4.1.1. Baseline Wetlands Inventory. Develop a baseline inventory and map that indicates the location of known wetlands, water bodies, and waterways on lands controlled by the AF.

The baseline wetlands inventory would include all wetland areas, regardless of regulatory status. Installations are not required to update existing wetland inventory maps unless there exists a change in hydrology or in the wetland delineation methodology.

4.1.2. Finding of No Practicable Alternative (FONPA). DoDI 4715.03, Natural Resources

Conservation Program, Clean Water Act Sections 401, 404 and 404(b)(1) Guidelines, and provisions of E.O. 11990, prohibits agencies from undertaking or supporting any new construction or related activities located in wetlands, unless the head of the agency, or the

Chief of the National Guard Bureau, or an official duly delegated authority to act on his/her behalf, for ANG, finds that (1) there is no practicable alternative to such new construction or related activities, and (2) that the proposed action includes all practicable measures to minimize harm to the wetlands from such use.

4.1.2.1. The FONPA is a finding contained within a NEPA Finding of No Significant

Impact (FONSI) or Record of Decision (ROD) (ref. 32 CFR 989.14(g)), explaining why there are no practicable alternatives to an action affecting a wetland, as established in an appropriate level NEPA analysis (see section 4.4.2.). This finding is made by the

Secretary of the Air Force or an official who has been duly delegated the authority to act on the Secretary’s behalf or the Chief of the National Guard Bureau, or an official duly delegated authority to act on his/her behalf, for ANG.

4.1.2.2. To support the required FONPA, prior to any new construction or related activities located in wetlands, proponents first prepare an analysis and documentation, in accordance with CWA Sections 401, 404 and 404(b)(1) Guidelines, Dodi 4715.03, Natural Resources Conservation Program, and provisions of E.O. 11990, that demonstrates no practicable alternatives to such construction or activities exist, and that the proposed action includes all practicable measures to minimize harm to wetlands. This required assessment of proposed actions potentially affecting wetlands will follow the process outlined in Section 4.4. (T-0).

4.1.2.3. When there is no practicable alternative to taking an action in a wetland, a

FONPA determination is made by the Secretary of the Air Force, or an official who has been duly delegated the authority to act on the Secretary’s behalf or the Chief of the

National Guard Bureau, or an official duly delegated authority to act on his/her behalf, for ANG, via signature on the FONSI or ROD (section 4.4.3.).

AFI32-7064 18 NOVEMBER 2014 21

4.1.3. Coastal Zone Management Act Consistency. Proposed actions in wetlands may require a Coastal Zone Management Act consistency determination. Refer to Chapter 6 for further guidance.

4.2. Clean Water Act (CWA) Compliance. Activities that may impact waters and wetlands of the United States as defined in Title 40, C.F.R. §110.1, require evaluation for compliance with

CWA regulations.

4.2.1. Jurisdictional Wetlands Delineation. Jurisdictional wetlands are those wetlands, water bodies and waterways that fulfill the criteria as jurisdictional waters of the United States subject to the regulatory requirements of the CWA. Site level jurisdictional wetland delineations are mandatory for proposed development activities that may affect wetlands, and are the responsibility of the proponent as part of project costs. The proponent of any activity that may affect known or suspected wetlands should conduct a jurisdictional wetland delineation utilizing the criteria approved by the Environmental Protection Agency and affirmed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). The AF will refer to and accept as determinative the current USACE definitions for wetlands under USACE jurisdiction.

Jurisdictional delineations are valid for a limited period of time, as established by the

USACE District Regulatory Office. Installations are not required to update an expired jurisdictional wetland delineation unless there exists a proposed mission activity that necessitates an updated demarcation of jurisdictional wetland boundaries by the proponent activity.

4.2.2. CWA Section 404 Compliance. Section 404 of the CWA establishes a program to regulate the discharge of dredged or fill material into jurisdictional waters and wetlands of the United States. Actions that may impact wetlands, to include dredging, filling, and activities that may displace soil or other materials into a wetland, may require a 404 permit from the USACE. Submit USACE ENG Form 4345, Application for Department of the

Army Permit to the appropriate USACE District Engineer prior to any land disturbance activity located in or near a regulated wetland area or regulated waters of the United States.

Along with the permit application, submit a vicinity map and site development plan that includes a cross-sectional view of the affected area showing limits of jurisdictional waters, the normal water level, volume of fill material to be discharged below ordinary high water, and the area of waters affected. In some states, the authority to issue CWA Section 404 permits has been delegated to the state.

4.2.3. CWA Section 401 Compliance. Section 401 of the CWA directs that any proponent of an action that requires a federal license or permit, such as a Section 404 or National

Pollution Discharge Elimination System permit, must obtain a Water Quality Certificate from the state water pollution control agency. The Water Quality Certificate certifies that the action complies with state water quality criteria. State permits to undertake projects within a specified buffer zone surrounding wetlands may also be required. When applying for a permit under state wetland protection laws, certain information not required for an USACE permit, such as a delineation of a regulated buffer area, may also be required. In some cases, permit applications may be submitted concurrently for review by both the state and the

USACE.

4.3. Rivers and Harbors Act of 1899…