Solicitation_Attachment_1_Summary_of_Experience_Form.docx

DOCX document 14 KB Posted

Attached to
U. S. Army Evaluation Center Support Services - W91CRB-19-R-0032
Solicitation number
W91CRB-19-R-0032
Issued by

About this file

This document contains instructions for offerors responding to solicitation number W91CRB-19-R-0032 for U.S. Army Evaluation Center Support Services. Offerors must demonstrate experience in various competency areas related to evaluation services contract support, integrated survivability disciplines, integrated suitability disciplines, methodology disciplines, and training disciplines. For each competency area, offerors must provide contract numbers, titles, prime contractors, period of performance dates, and explanations of relevance. The solicitation requires a minimum of three years' experience in five out of six competency areas for the first section, six out of eight areas for the second section, three out of four areas for the third section, three out of five areas for the fourth section, and two out of three areas for the fifth section. Proposals were due by 10:00am local Maryland time on September 24, 2019 in accordance with the solicitation instructions.

Solicitation Attachment 1 - Summary of Experience Form

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
W91CRB-19-R-0032_AMD_0009.pdf PDF
W91CRB-19-R-0032_AMD_0008.pdf PDF
Attachment_2_-_AECSS_Labor_Category_Qualifications_AMD_0007.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W91CRB-19-R-0032_AMD_0007.pdf PDF
Solicitation_Attachment_7_-_AECSS_LOE_Spreadsheet_AMD_0007.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation_Attachment_9_-_Questions_and_Answers_AMD_0007.pdf PDF
W91CRB-19-R-0032,_Amendment_0006.pdf PDF
Solicitation_Attachment_9_-_Questions_and_Answers_AMD_0005.pdf PDF
W91CRB-19-R-0032_AMD_0005.pdf PDF
Solicitation_Attachment_7_-_AECSS_LOE_Spreadsheet_Cost_Model_AMD_0005.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation_Attachment_7_-_AECSS_LOE_Spreadsheet_Cost_Model_AMD_0004.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation_Attachment_1_Summary_of_Experience_Form_AMD_0004.docx DOCX document
W91CRB-19-R-0032_AMD_0004.pdf PDF
Solicitation_Attachment_9_-_Questions_and_Answers_AMD_0004.pdf PDF
Amendment_0003,_posting_to_FBO_on_30_Aug_2019.pdf PDF
Attachment_3_-_DD_254_Security_Classsification_Draft_Revised.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_through_3_for_DD254.docx DOCX document
W91CRB-19-R-0032,_Amendment_0001.pdf PDF
Copy_of_Attachment_2_-_AECSS_Labor_Category_Qualifications_Revised.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
UPDATED_AEC_Development_Cost_Model_20190825.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W91CRB-19-R-0032_AECSS_QUESTIONS__ANSWERS__29_August_2019,_FINAL.pdf PDF
Attachment_1_-_AECSS_QASP_Revised.doc DOC document
Exhibits_A001_through_A015.pdf PDF
Solicitation_Attachment_7_AECSS_LOE_Spreadsheet.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation_Attachment_4_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
Attachment_2_-_AECSS_Labor_Category_Qualifications.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_1_-_AECSS_QASP.doc DOC document
Solicitation_Attachment_2_Resume_Format.docx DOCX document
Solicitation_Attachment_5_Purchasing_System_Review_Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation_Attachment_6_OCI_Certification.docx DOCX document
Solicitation_Attachment_3_Contract_References_Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Solicitation_Attachment_8_AEC_Systems_List.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_3_-_DD_254_Security_Classsification_Draft.pdf PDF
W91CRB-19-R-0032_AECSS.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Solicitation_Attachment_5_Purchasing_System_Review_Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT_Attachment_2_-_AEC_Labor_Categories_29_Apr_19.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT_Solicitation_Attachment_2_Resume_Format.docx DOCX document
DRAFT_Solicitation_Attachment_3_Contract_References_Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT_Attachment_1_-_AEC_QASP_11_Apr19.doc DOC document
DRAFT_Attachment_3_-_DD_254_Security_Classsification_Draft.pdf PDF
DRAFT_W91CRB-19-R-0032_AECSS_2_MAY_2019.pdf PDF
DRAFT_Solicitation_Attachment_4_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx DOCX document
DRAFT_W91CRB-19-R-0032_AECSS.pdf PDF
Show all 43

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE FORM

Competency Area: Volume 2 – Factor 2 Experience, A.

Instructions: The offeror shall demonstrate that they have a minimum 3 years (occurring within the past 5 years) of experience providing evaluation services contract support in at least 5 of the following 6 competency areas. *Note that 1 (one) of the 5 minimum competency areas demonstrated must be in Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) (PWS Section 1.3.a):

1. Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) (PWS Section 1. 3.a) (*competency area must be demonstrated in proposal)

2. Air Defense-Artillery Systems (PWS Section 1.3.e.1)

3. Tactical wheeled and tracked vehicle systems (PWS Sections 1.3.e.4)

4. Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Defense (CBRND) Systems (PWS Sections 1.3.e.2)

5. Command, Control, Communications, Computers Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) (C4ISR) Systems (PWS Sections 1.3.e.3)

6. Cyber Security, Mission Assurance, Information Assurance (IA) and Interoperability (PWS Sections 1.3.b) As part of the submission, the offeror shall include all applicable contract numbers, contract titles, identify the prime or major subcontractor that performed the effort, PWS references, and contract period of performance dates that will allow the Government to successfully evaluate the offeror’s experience volume of the proposal. In order for a contract effort to be considered, the discussion below must confirm that the prime or subcontractor that has the experience identified will support the same competency areas if the offeror receives the resultant award.

Explain relevance of experience with the Competency areas:

Example:

Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) (PWS Section 1.3.a) Contract No.

Contract Title:

Prime Contractor:

Period of Performance:

PWS References/Summary:

Relevancy Discussion: This contract demonstrates previous evaluation services contract support with Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) in that….

Competency Area: Volume 2 – Factor 2 Experience, B.

Instructions: The offeror shall demonstrate that they have a minimum 3 years (occurring within the past 5 years) of experience providing evaluation services contract support in at least 6 of the following 8 integrated survivability disciplines as identified under PWS Section 1.3.c:

1. Ballistics

2. Lethality

3. Cybersecurity and Electromagnetic Affects (CEMA)

4. Signature management (susceptibility, vulnerability)

5. Electronic warfare (EW)

6. Directed energy

7. Nuclear Weapons Effects

8. Cybersecurity (architecture, T&E methods, threat methods, protection methods) As part of the submission, the offeror shall include all applicable contract numbers, contract titles, identify the prime or major subcontractor that performed the effort, PWS references, and contract period of performance dates that will allow the Government to successfully evaluate the offeror’s experience volume of the proposal. In order for a contract effort to be considered, the discussion below must confirm that the prime or subcontractor that has the experience identified will support the same competency areas if the offeror receives the resultant award.

Explain relevance of experience with the Competency areas:

Competency Area: Volume 2 – Factor 2 Experience, C.

Instructions: The offeror shall demonstrate that they have a minimum 3 years (occurring within the past 5 years) of experience providing evaluation services contract support in at least 3 of the following 4 integrated suitability disciplines as identified under PWS Section 1.3.d:

1. Readiness and Suitability

2. Reliability, Availability, Maintainability (RAM)

3. Integrated Product Support (IPS)

4. Human Systems Integration (HSI) As part of the submission, the offeror shall include all applicable contract numbers, contract titles, identify the prime or major subcontractor that performed the effort, PWS references, and contract period of performance dates that will allow the Government to successfully evaluate the offeror’s experience volume of the proposal. In order for a contract effort to be considered, the discussion below must confirm that the prime or subcontractor that has the experience identified will support the same competency areas if the offeror receives the resultant award.

Competency Area: Volume 2 – Factor 2 Experience, D.

Instructions: The offeror shall demonstrate that they have a minimum 3 years (occurring within the past 5 years) of experience providing evaluation services contract support in at least 3 of the following 4 methodology disciplines as identified under PWS Section 1.3.d:

1. Design of Experiments (DoE);

2. Modeling and Simulation (M&S);

3. Data Sciences;

4. Data Visualization

5. Evaluation Methodologies As part of the submission, the offeror shall include all applicable contract numbers, contract titles, identify the prime or major subcontractor that performed the effort, PWS references, and contract period of performance dates that will allow the Government to successfully evaluate the offeror’s experience volume of the proposal. In order for a contract effort to be considered, the discussion below must confirm that the prime or subcontractor that has the experience identified will support the same competency areas if the offeror receives the resultant award.

Competency Area: Volume 2 – Factor 2 Experience, E.

Instructions: The offeror shall demonstrate that they have a minimum 3 years (occurring within the past 5 years) of experience providing contract support in at least 2 of the following 3 training disciplines as identified in PWS Section 1.3.d.1, 1.3.d.2, 1.3.d.3:

1. On-line training development

2. Facilitating a workgroup environment

3. Military leadership experience As part of the submission, the offeror shall include all applicable contract numbers, contract titles, identify the prime or major subcontractor that performed the effort, PWS references, and contract period of performance dates that will allow the Government to successfully evaluate the offeror’s experience volume of the proposal. In order for a contract effort to be considered, the discussion below must confirm that the prime or subcontractor that has the experience identified will support the same competency areas if the offeror receives the resultant award.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .