Solicitation_Attachment_1_Summary_of_Experience_Form_AMD_0004.docx
DOCX document 15 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W91CRB-19-R-0032
About this file
This document contains instructions for a Summary of Experience Form required as part of a proposal submission for a test analysis and test evaluation support services contract opportunity with the U.S. Army Evaluation Center. Offerors must demonstrate a minimum of three years of relevant experience within the past five years in various competency areas related to weapons systems, such as Ballistic Missile Defense, air defense systems, CBRN defense, and cybersecurity. Experience must be shown in five competency areas including Ballistic Missile Defense, six integrated survivability disciplines, three integrated suitability disciplines, three methodology disciplines, and two training disciplines. For each area of experience, offerors must provide contract numbers, titles, names of involved contractors, period of performance dates, and an explanation of relevance. Proposals are due by September 24, 2019 according to the related federal contract opportunity.
Solicitation Attachment 1
View the file
Other files
Show all 43
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
SUMMARY OF EXPERIENCE FORM
Competency Area: Volume 2 – Factor 2 Experience, A.
Instructions: The prime offeror and/or its major subcontractor(s) shall demonstrate that they have a minimum 3 years (occurring within the past 5 years) of experience in test analysis and test evaluation support provided under DoD contracts in at least 5 of the following 6 competency areas. (Each of the 5 competency areas must demonstrate a minimum 3 years of experience.) *Note that 1 (one) of the 5 minimum competency areas demonstrated must be in Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) (PWS Section 1.3.a):
1. Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) (PWS Section 1. 3.a) (*competency area must be demonstrated in proposal)
2. Air Defense-Artillery Systems (PWS Section 1.3.e.1)
3. Tactical wheeled and tracked vehicle systems (PWS Sections 1.3.e.4)
4. Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear (CBRN) Defense (CBRND) Systems (PWS Sections 1.3.e.2)
5. Command, Control, Communications, Computers Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) (C4ISR) Systems (PWS Sections 1.3.e.3)
6. Cyber Security, Mission Assurance, Information Assurance (IA) and Interoperability (PWS Sections 1.3.b) As part of the submission, the offeror shall include all applicable contract numbers, contract titles, identify the prime or major subcontractor that performed the effort, PWS references, and contract period of performance dates that will allow the Government to successfully evaluate the offeror’s experience volume of the proposal. In order for a contract effort to be considered, the discussion below must confirm that the prime or subcontractor that has the experience identified will support the same competency areas if the offeror receives the resultant award.
Explain relevance of experience with the Competency areas:
Example:
Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) (PWS Section 1.3.a) Contract No.
Contract Title:
Prime Contractor:
Period of Performance:
PWS References/Summary:
Relevancy Discussion: This contract demonstrates previous evaluation services contract support with Ballistic Missile Defense System (BMDS) in that….
Competency Area: Volume 2 – Factor 2 Experience, B.
Instructions: The prime offeror and/or its major subcontractor(s) shall demonstrate that they have a minimum 3 years (occurring within the past 5 years) of experience in test analysis and test evaluation support provided under DoD contracts in at least 6 of the following 8 integrated survivability disciplines as identified under PWS Section 1.3.c (Each of the 6 integrated survivability disciplines must demonstrate a minimum 3 years of experience.):
1. Ballistics
2. Lethality
3. Cybersecurity and Electromagnetic Affects (CEMA)
4. Signature management (susceptibility, vulnerability)
5. Electronic warfare (EW)
6. Directed energy
7. Nuclear Weapons Effects
8. Cybersecurity (architecture, T&E methods, threat methods, protection methods) As part of the submission, the offeror shall include all applicable contract numbers, contract titles, identify the prime or major subcontractor that performed the effort, PWS references, and contract period of performance dates that will allow the Government to successfully evaluate the offeror’s experience volume of the proposal. In order for a contract effort to be considered, the discussion below must confirm that the prime or subcontractor that has the experience identified will support the same competency areas if the offeror receives the resultant award.
Explain relevance of experience with the Competency areas:
Competency Area: Volume 2 – Factor 2 Experience, C.
Instructions: The prime offeror and/or its major subcontractor(s) shall demonstrate that they have a minimum 3 years (occurring within the past 5 years) of experience in test analysis and test evaluation support provided under DoD contracts in at least 3 of the following 4 integrated suitability disciplines as identified under PWS Section 1.3.d (Each of the 3 integrated suitability disciplines must demonstrate a minimum 3 years of experience.):
1. Readiness and Suitability
2. Reliability, Availability, Maintainability (RAM)
3. Integrated Product Support (IPS)
4. Human Systems Integration (HSI) As part of the submission, the offeror shall include all applicable contract numbers, contract titles, identify the prime or major subcontractor that performed the effort, PWS references, and contract period of performance dates that will allow the Government to successfully evaluate the offeror’s experience volume of the proposal. In order for a contract effort to be considered, the discussion below must confirm that the prime or subcontractor that has the experience identified will support the same competency areas if the offeror receives the resultant award.
Competency Area: Volume 2 – Factor 2 Experience, D.
Instructions: The prime offeror and/or its major subcontractor(s) shall demonstrate that they have a minimum 3 years (occurring within the past 5 years) of experience in test analysis and test evaluation support provided under DoD contracts in at least 3 of the following 5 methodology disciplines as identified under PWS Section 1.3.d (Each of the 3 methodology disciplines must demonstrate a minimum 3 years of experience.):
1. Design of Experiments (DoE);
2. Modeling and Simulation (M&S);
3. Data Sciences;
4. Data Visualization
5. Evaluation Methodologies As part of the submission, the offeror shall include all applicable contract numbers, contract titles, identify the prime or major subcontractor that performed the effort, PWS references, and contract period of performance dates that will allow the Government to successfully evaluate the offeror’s experience volume of the proposal. In order for a contract effort to be considered, the discussion below must confirm that the prime or subcontractor that has the experience identified will support the same competency areas if the offeror receives the resultant award.
Competency Area: Volume 2 – Factor 2 Experience, E.
Instructions: The prime offeror and/or its major subcontractor(s) shall demonstrate that they have a minimum 3 years (occurring within the past 5 years) of experience in DoD contract support in at least 2 of the following 3 training disciplines as identified in PWS Section 1.3.d.1, 1.3.d.2, 1.3.d.3 (Each of the 2 training disciplines must demonstrate a minimum 3 years of experience.):
1. On-line training development
2. Facilitating a workgroup environment
3. Military leadership experience As part of the submission, the offeror shall include all applicable contract numbers, contract titles, identify the prime or major subcontractor that performed the effort, PWS references, and contract period of performance dates that will allow the Government to successfully evaluate the offeror’s experience volume of the proposal. In order for a contract effort to be considered, the discussion below must confirm that the prime or subcontractor that has the experience identified will support the same competency areas if the offeror receives the resultant award.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .