W912QR26RA016_Specs-0001.pdf

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of theoffer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER.

If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

J 1 3

0001 20 APR 2026 99248

W912QR

W072 ENDIST LOUISVILLE

KO CONTRACTING DIVISION, 600 DR MARTIN LUTHER KING JR PL

LOUISVILLE, KY 40202-2230

UNITED STATES

RANZEL MERIDETH, EMAIL: RANZEL.L.MERIDETH@USACE.AMY.MIL TELEPHONE:

(502) 315-6590

SCD: PAS:

W912QR26RA016

13 MAR 2026

SEE SECTION G - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA

See Summary of Changes

W912QR26RA016_Specs-0001

AMENDMENT 0001 - P2 511686 UEPH FY 26 Barracks

Ft Campbell, KY

W912QR26RA016

Amendment 0001

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

1. The following SPECIFICATION SECTIONS have been revised and replaced in their entirety:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

00 10 00 PRICE BRAKOUT SCHEDULE HAS BEEN REPLACED

00 22 00 CUI MARKINGS REMOVED FROM EVALUATION CRITERIA

05 12 00 STRUCTURAL STEEL

05 50 13 MISCELLANEOUS METAL FABRICATIONS

05 51 33 METAL LADDERS

05 52 00 METAL RAILINGS

06 41 16.00 10 PLASTIC-LAMINATE-CLAD ARCHTECTURAL CABINETS

10 26 00 WALL AND DOOR PROTECTION

10 28 13 TOILET ACCESSORIES

21 13 13 WET PIPE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS, FIRE PROTECTION

28 31 76 FIRE ALARM / MASS NOTIFICATION

2. The following SPECIFICATION SECTIONS have been added in their entirety:

11 31 13 ELECTRIC KITCHEN EQUIPMENT

07 13 53 ELASTOMERIC SHEET WATER PROOFING

3. The following SPECIFICATION SECTIONS have been deleted in their entirety:

DFARS 252.204-7055 HAS BEEN REMOVED

4. The following PLAN SHEETS have been revised and replaced in their entirety:

G1002 SHEET INDEX

G1003 SHEET INDEX

CS102 CIVIL SITE PLAN

CS103 CIVIL SITE PLAN

CS104 CIVIL SITE PLAN

CS105 CIVIL SITE PLAN

CU101 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN

CU102 UTILITY PLAN

CU103 UTILITY PLAN

CU104 UTILITY PLAN

CU105 UTILITY PLAN

CU106 UTILITY PLAN

CU107 UTILITY PLAN

A-201 EXTERIOR NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS

A-452 ENLARGED DUMPSTER PLANS AND SECTION AND DETAILS

A-691 MISC DETAILS

S-113 FOUNDATION PLAN AREA 1C

S-502 TYPICAL FOUNDATION DETAILS

S-523 TYPICAL FRAMING DETAILS

S-601 COLUMN SCHEDULE

5. The following PLAN SHEETS have been added new:

A-445 ENLARGED BIKE RACK SECTIONS AND DETAILS

6. The following PLAN SHEETS have been deleted:

NONE for Amendment 0001

7. The following REFERENCE documents have been added new:

NONE for Amendment 0001

8. The proposal due date has been extended from 27-APR-2026 to 12-MAY-2026.

Section 00 10 00 Page 1

FINAL REVIEW SUBMITTAL

Section 00 10 00 – Price Breakout Schedule

PRICE BREAKOUT

SCHEDULE PROJECT : UEPH Barracks FY26

LOCATION : Ft. Campbell, Kentucky

PROPOSER’S NAME :

BASE PROPOSAL

Item No. Description Unit Amount

0001 Primary Facilities JOB $ ____________

0002 Project Site Work (excluding demo) JOB $ ____________

0003 Demolition JOB $ ____________

0004 Base Bid 30 Inch Drilled Shaft – No Socket JOB $ ____________

0005 Base Bid 42 Inch Drilled Shaft – With Socket JOB $ ____________

0006 City Light & Power Inc. (CLP) Construction and Demolition JOB $ 745,100.00

0007 Jacobs Engineering Water and Sewer construction and demolition JOB $ 1,060,467.00

BASE PROPOSAL SUBMITTAL $ ____________

BID OPTION ITEMS

UNIT OF

MEASURE

Est. QTY TOTAL

0008 Optional Bid Item ‘001’ 30” Drilled Shaft – No Socket $ __________ PER FOOT 240 ft $ __________

0009 Optional Bid Item ‘002’ 42” Drilled Shaft – With Socket $ __________ PER FOOT 60 ft $ __________

0010 Optional Bid Item ‘003’ Additional Proof Test Hole

$ __________ PER FOOT 120 ft $ __________

TOTAL BID OPTION ITEMS $ ____________

TOTAL BASE PROPOSAL + BID OPTION ITEMS $ ____________

511686 (PN 99248) UEPH Barracks FY26

Ft. Campbell, Kentucky

Section 00 10 00 Page 2

Description of Base Proposal Items

(a) Item No. 0001 “Primary Facilities – Barracks Building” includes all Base Proposal construction work required within a line five feet outside of the building.

(b) Item No. 0002 “Project Site Work”, includes all Base Proposal construction work required beyond a line five feet outside the building. The Project Site Work includes, but is not limited to, the construction of grading and drainage, utilities (outside of 5’ from the building), pavements for the parking lot, entrances, sidewalks, equipment pads, etc.

(c) Item No. 0003 “Demolition’, includes the cost for demolition of all existing structures currently covering area of building site.

(d) Item No. 0004 “Base Bid 30 Inch Drilled Shaft – No Socket” includes the cost, material, proof hole inspection and labor to install 30 inch drilled shafts with no rock socket. This includes 4,080 feet of soil and rock drilling and 800 feet of proof hole drilling. Drilling is unclassified.

(e) Item No. 0005 “Base Bid 42 Inch Drilled Shaft – Socket” includes the cost, material, proof hole inspection and labor to install 42 inch drilled shafts with a rock socket. This includes 1,120 feet of soil and rock drilling, and 200 feet of proof hole drilling. Drilling is unclassified.

(f) Item No. 0006 “City Light & Power Inc. (CLP) Construction and Demolition” includes all existing site overhead distribution-level primary conductors, street lighting, associated poles, and underground wiring to be removed/demolished by CLP prior to construction. CLP (City Light and Power) will tie into existing overhead utility and install primary ug duct bank consisting of one (1) 6 inch conduit containing one (1) 15kv 4/0 al 133% 1/3 concentric neutral cable. Transformer sizes specified and supplied by CLP based on available load data. CLP utilizes a concrete pad of a sufficient size for three phase transformers. CLP will install bollards around transformers. For each transformer, CLP will install a grounding electrode system consisting of two ground rods and a ground ring. CLP subcontractor will install an empty elbow with caps and will mark through GIS for future (re)location.

CLP will make secondary connections to transformers, then route cables through separate duct banks to line side of MCB in 1st floor electrical room for final connection by customer. CLP will bond neutral to ground at the transformer secondary and will not run a dedicated ground to service entrance equipment.

(g) Item No. 0007 “Jacobs Engineering Water and Sewer construction and demolition” includes the demolition of existing water and sewer lines that serve the two (2) existing facilities on site and any water lines serving hydrants on site. The demolition plan outlines existing lines and features to be demolished by Jacobs. Jacobs is responsible for the construction of the 8 inch sanitary sewer service line and connections to the existing pipe and junctions and cleanouts until 5 feet outside of the facility.

Jacobs is responsible for the construction of the 12-inch water main loop that will serve the hydrants and facilities for the FY26 Barracks and tie into the existing water line infrastructure for the surrounding area. Jacobs will provide the water service lines to the building, including domestic and fire protection lines up to five (5) feet outside of the building. Jacobs provides the meter for the building. Jacobs provides the three (3) fire hydrants exterior to the building and post indicator valve and gate valves and bends of various sizes for lines outside of the facility. The contractor must appropriately phase construction activities to ensure water line and sewer line services are not impacted to existing facilities still in use.

511686 (PN 99248) UEPH Barracks FY26

Ft. Campbell, Kentucky

Section 00 10 00 Page 3

Description of Option Items

(h) Item No. 0008 “Option ‘001’ 30 Inch Drilled Shaft – No Socket includes all cost, material and labor to install extra footage of 30 inch drilled shaft to account for variations in rock elevation that differ for the original lump sum. Drilling is unclassified.

Option Item No. 001 can be exercised 365 calendar days after Administrative NTP.

(i) Item No. 0009 “Option ‘002’ 42 Inch Drilled Shaft – With Socket includes all cost, material and labor to install extra footage of 42 inch drilled shaft to account for variations in rock elevation that differ from the original lump sum. Drilling is unclassified.

Option Item No. 002 can be exercised 365 calendar days after Administrative NTP.

(j) Item No. 0010 “Option ‘003’ Additional Proof Test Holes includes all cost, material, and labor to install additional proof test holes to account for variations in rock irregularities that differ from the original lump sum.

Option Item No. 003 can be exercised 365 calendar days after Administrative NTP.

00 22 00 Evaluation Criteria

1.1 The intent of this solicitation is to select one contractor for the construction of a Standard Design Barracks to accommodate 260 unaccompanied enlisted personnel. Primary facilities include living and sleeping quarters, baths, storage, service areas, building information systems, fire protection and alarm systems, antiterrorism measures, Intrusion Detection System (IDS) installation, and Energy Monitoring Control Systems (EMCS) connection. Supporting facilities include site development, utilities and utility connections, exterior lighting, paving, sidewalks, curbs and gutters, storm drainage, landscaping and signage. Heating and air conditioning will be provided by self-contained system for each living quarters unit along with a central system for common areas. Post Construction Award Services (PCAS) will be provided. Utility connections are required to a privatized electric distribution, natural gas, water, and wastewater systems. Measures in accordance with the

Department of Defense (DoD) Minimum Antiterrorism for Buildings standards will be provided.

Comprehensive building and furnishings related interior design services are required. Access for individuals with disabilities will be provided. Cyber Security Measures will be incorporated into this project.

Sustainability/Energy measures will be provided. Facilities will be designed to a minimum life of 40 years in accordance with DoD's Unified Facilities Criteria (UFC 1-200-02) including energy efficiencies, building envelope and integrated building systems performance. Demolish 2 buildings at Fort Campbell, KY (6,389

Total SF). Air Conditioning (Estimated 266 Tons).

This project will be funded with Military (Army) Construction (MILCON) type Procurement dollars (Fiscal

Year 26).

The design for this work is being completed in-house by USACE Louisville (CELRL).

There are no existing contract vehicles that have the capacity and scope to accomplish the scope of this project in the division or across the entire enterprise, as further discussed below.

There have not been any previous construction acquisitions for this project. The project will be competed as an unrestricted procurement. In-house effort during the procurement of this project will be for both the procurement activities and the related design activities of this project.

2. Submittal of offers.

2.1 Offerors submitting proposals for this project should limit submissions to data essential for evaluation of proposals so that a minimum of time and monies will have been expended in preparing information required herein. However, in order to be effectively and equitably evaluated, the proposals must include information sufficiently detailed to clearly describe the offeror's capability for successfully completing the solicited project.

Requirements stated in this Request for Proposal (RFP) are minimums. Proposals should follow in the order of sequence set forth in the RFP. Failure to place the required submission information under the appropriate tab may result in a lower rating if the evaluators cannot readily find the appropriate information.

2.2 Offerors shall submit their proposals to the US Army Corps of Engineers via Procurement Integrated

Enterprise Environment (PIEE) as detailed in the Electronic Proposal Submission Instructions, no later than the time and date specified in Block 13 of Standard Form 1442. Mark your proposal submission to the attention of Ranzel Merideth. NOTE: The Louisville District is in the Eastern Time Zone.

2.3 Offerors are required to submit a proposal consisting of the information identified in paragraphs 2.4 – 2.5 below. All proposal materials shall be submitted electronically with a table of contents and section dividers.

The sections should parallel the submission requirements identified herein.

2.4 Volume I shall be submitted electronically in accordance with the Proposal Submission Instructions in Section

00 21 00 and include the following information:

• Volume I – Factor I: Past Performance

• Volume I – Factor II: Management Plan

• Volume I – Factor III: Small Business Participation Plan

*NOTE: Failure to place the required submission information under the appropriate tab may result in a lower rating if the evaluators cannot readily find the appropriate information. Any specified page limits will be strictly adhered to and enforced. Information submitted that exceeds the specified limit will not be evaluated.

2.5 Volume II shall be submitted electronically in accordance with the Proposal Submission Instructions in

Section 00 21 00 and include the following information:

• Volume II – Tab A: Standard Form 1442 and Price Breakout Schedule

• Volume II – Tab B: Joint Venture Agreements

• Volume II – Tab C: Bid Bond and Proof of Financial Ability

• Volume II – Tab D: Pre-Award Information

• Volume II – Tab E: Subcontracting Plan

• Volume II – Tab F: Project Labor Agreement (PLA)

*NOTE: Failure to place the required submission information under the appropriate section may result in a lower rating if the evaluators cannot readily find the appropriate information. Any specified page limits will be strictly adhered to and enforced. Information submitted that exceeds the specified limit will not be evaluated.

2.6 Proposals: ALL SUBMISSIONS TO THIS PROPOSAL ANNOUNCEMENT SHALL BE SUBMITTED

ELECTRONICALLY. No paper copies, CD-ROMs or facsimile submissions will be accepted. Electronic

Proposal Submission is required through the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE)

Solicitation Module https://wawf.eb.mil/.

Instructions on how to create a vendor account will be posted to www.sam.gov and can be located at:

https://www.acq.osd.mil/asda/dpc/ce/cap/docs/piee/PIEE_Solicitation_Module_Vendor_Access_Instructions.p df

Instructions on how to submit an offer will be posted to www.sam.gov and can be located at:

https://pieetraining.eb.mil/wbt/sol/Posting_Offer.pdf

NOTE: Do NOT enter Privacy Act Data (Personal Identification Information (PII)) in the File Description.)

W912QR26RA016_Specs-0001 https://wawf.eb.mil/ http://www.sam.gov/ https://www.acq.osd.mil/asda/dpc/ce/cap/docs/piee/PIEE_Solicitation_Module_Vendor_Access_Instructions.p%09df https://www.acq.osd.mil/asda/dpc/ce/cap/docs/piee/PIEE_Solicitation_Module_Vendor_Access_Instructions.p%09df http://www.sam.gov/ https://pieetraining.eb.mil/wbt/sol/Posting_Offer.pdf

File Naming Convention: To ensure your submission is received and processed appropriately, it is important that interested parties CAREFULLY ensure their electronic files adhere to the following naming convention:

• W912QR26RA016-FIRMNAME-VOLUME I

• W912QR26RA016-FIRMNAME-VOLUME II

Each file name shall begin with the solicitation number followed by the firm’s name and a brief file description. Please see examples above.

File Organization: Although hard copies are not accepted, each file shall be clearly indexed, and logically assembled. Font size shall be 11 or larger. Pages shall be letter sized (larger page sizes (such as 11x17 foldouts, etc.) will be counted as two pages. Proposals shall be in a narrative format, organized and titled so that each section of the proposal follows the order and format of the factors. Information presented should be organized so as to pertain to only the evaluation factor in the section that the information is presented.

Information pertaining to more than one evaluation factor should be repeated in each section for each factor.

Upload Completion & Deadline: Interested parties shall submit responses no later than the date specified on the solicitation document. The time & date of proposal receipt will be the upload completion / delivery time & date recorded within PIEE. Do not assume that electronic submission will occur instantaneously. Large files

(e.g., 10MB or more) will take some time to upload. Offerors should time their upload effort with prudence by not waiting until the last few minutes—this will allow for unexpected delays in the transmittal process.

Offerors are encouraged to keep a copy of the upload confirmation for their record. As noted above, offerors will not receive a confirmation email but instead will receive upload confirmation in the browser following successful upload. Submissions after the deadline will be considered late and will be processed in accordance with FAR 15.107.

Electronic Files: Files shall be in their native format (i.e., doc, xls, ppt, etc.), or if in pdf format, shall be in searchable text. Text and graphics portfolios of the electronic copies shall be in a format readable by

Microsoft Office or Adobe applications. Data submitted in a spreadsheet format shall be readable by MS Excel

(all cells and formulas should be unlocked).

Any information, presented in a proposal that the Offeror wants safeguarded from disclosure to other parties must be identified and labeled in accordance with the requirements of Provision “FAR 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisition,” subparagraph (e), which is found in Section 00 10 00 of the RFP. The

Government will endeavor to honor the restrictions against release requested by Offerors, to the extent permitted under United States law and regulations.

3. Proposal Evaluation Process.

3.1. A Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) comprised of representatives of the Corps of Engineers, User/Customer, and other required personnel will evaluate the proposals. Offerors are advised that the technical evaluation and rating of proposals will be conducted in strict confidence. Technical proposals

(Volume I) will be reviewed and rated without knowledge of the price offered. The number and identities of offerors are not revealed to anyone not involved in the evaluation and award process or to other offerors.

Proposals will be evaluated based on the factors described herein, and the basis of award is a Best Value

Trade-Off.

3.2 The evaluation process essentially consists of four parts: proposal compliance review and responsibility review, technical evaluation, price evaluation, and price/technical trade-off analysis.

3.2.1 Proposal Compliance/Responsibility Review: This is an initial review to ensure that all required forms and certifications are complete, that both a technical and price proposal were received, and that the offeror is financially capable of sustaining performance under the contract and is able to obtain the required level of performance and payment bonds from an acceptable surety.

3.2.2 Technical Evaluation: The SSEB will evaluate and rate the Volume I proposals against the RFP requirements.

Factor I – Past Performance will be rated using Tables 1 and 2 below. The rating will be based on overall confidence in performance, with the final confidence assessment rating based on the extent of recent, relevant past performance and the quality of the offeror’s performance. Factor II – Management Approach will be rated using Table 3 below. Factor III – Small Business Participation Plan will be rated using Table 4 below.

3.2.3 Price Evaluation: The SSEB and Contracting Officer/SSA will evaluate price proposals independent of, and subsequent to, the technical evaluation. The SSEB will not have access to price information until completion of the technical evaluation.

3.2.4 Price/Technical Trade-off Analysis: After all the above evaluations are complete, the Contracting Officer/SSA will compare the relative advantages and disadvantages of technical proposals and compare prices. The

Source Selection Authority (SSA) will then consider all factors to select the proposal offering the best value to the Government.

4. Proposal Information and Related Evaluation Factors.

4.1 Proposals will be evaluated in accordance with the factors below, listed in relative order of importance. All non-price factors, when combined, are considered approximately equal to price. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors. Therefore, the offeror’s initial proposal should contain the offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. If the

Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

Volume/Factor Relative Order of Importance

4.2 Volume I – Factor I – Past Performance 1st

4.3 Volume I – Factor II – Management Plan 2nd

4.4 Volume I – Factor III – Small Business Participation Plan 3rd

4.5 Volume II - Price and Pro Forma Information (Separate file from Volume I)

Tab A - Standard Form 1442 and Price Breakout Schedule Not Rated

Tab B - Joint Venture Agreement Not Rated

Tab C – Bid Bond and Proof of Financial Ability Not Rated

Tab D - Pre-Award Information Not Rated

Tab E - Subcontracting Plan Acceptable/Unacceptable

Tab F – Project Labor Agreement (PLA) Acceptable/Unacceptable

4.6 Ratings

Evaluators will apply the adjectival rating for the definition that most closely matches the evaluation.

TABLE 1

Past Performance Relevancy Ratings

Rating Description

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

TABLE 2

Performance Confidence Assessments

Rating Description

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available, or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned. The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

TABLE 3

Combined Technical/Risk Rating Method

Adjectival Rating Description

Outstanding Proposal demonstrates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths and/or at least one significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Good Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength or significant strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Acceptable Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation and, thus, contains one or more deficiencies and is unawardable, and/or risk of performance is unacceptably high.

TABLE 4

Small Business Participation Plan Ratings

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal indicates an adequate approach and understanding of small business objectives.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet small business objectives.

4.7 Definitions

1. Deficiency. A material failure of a proposal to meet a Government requirement or a combination of significant weaknesses in a proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance to an unacceptable level. See FAR 15.001.

2. Strength. An aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has merit or exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be advantageous to the Government during contract performance.

3. Significant Strength. An aspect of an offeror’s proposal that has appreciable merit or appreciably exceeds specified performance or capability requirements in a way that will be appreciably advantageous to the

Government during contract performance.

4. Weakness. A flaw in the proposal that increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR

15.001.

5. Significant Weakness. A flaw in the proposal that appreciably increases the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. See FAR 15.001.

6. Uncertainty. Any aspect of a non-price factor proposal for which the intent of the offeror is unclear (e.g., more than one way to interpret the offer or inconsistencies in the proposal indicating that there may have been an error, omission, or mistake).

7. Clarifications. Limited exchanges between the Government and offerors that may occur when award without discussions is contemplated. See FAR 15.202(a)(2).

8. Adverse Past Performance. Past performance information that supports a less than satisfactory rating from sources where the information is from other than formal rating systems such as “PPIRS” or “FAPIIS.”

9. Discussion. Exchanges (i.e., negotiations) in a competitive environment that are undertaken with the intent of allowing the offeror to revise its proposal. Discussions take place after establishment of the competitive range.

10. Best Value. The expected outcome of an acquisition that, in the Government’s estimation, provides the greatest overall benefit in response to the requirement. See FAR 2.101.

11. Relevancy. As it pertains to past performance information, is a measure of the extent of similarity between the service/support effort, complexity, dollar value, contract type, and subcontract/teaming or other comparable attributes of past performance examples and the solicitation requirements; and a measure of the likelihood the past performance is an indicator of future performance.

12. Recency. As it pertains to past performance information, is a measure of the elapsed time since the past performance reference occurred. Recency is generally expressed as a time period during which past performance references are considered relevant.

13. Risk. As it pertains to source selection, is the potential for unsuccessful contract performance. The consideration of risk assesses the degree to which an offeror’s proposed approach to achieving the technical factor or subfactor may involve risk of disruption of schedule, degradation of performance, the need for increased Government oversight, and the likelihood of unsuccessful contract performance.

5.0 Volume I – Factor I: Past Performance

5.1 Submission Requirements:

5.1.1 Provide descriptions of up to three (3) projects substantially complete or completed by the Prime Contractor within the last five (5) years (from the solicitation issue date) that are similar to this project in size and scope.

Projects completed more than five (5) years before the solicitation issue date may be considered for evaluation purposes but may lessen the overall relevancy rating for that project. Projects are considered substantially complete if enough work has been performed such that it demonstrates the ability to complete all phases of the project (i.e., only punchlist items remain) or at least 95% complete. An Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity

(IDIQ) contract may be submitted only if a single task order could be considered similar to this project. Task orders may not be combined in order for the project to be considered similar.

NOTE: Do not submit more than three (3) projects. Any projects submitted that exceed the three (3) project limit will not be evaluated.

NOTE: Renovation work is not considered similar in size or scope.

5.1.2 Projects considered similar in size would be a minimum of 75,000 SF of new construction, only primary residential and ancillary common areas and conference space square footage are included in the 75,000 SF.

5.1.3 Projects considered similar in scope to this project include new construction of multi-story barracks/dormitory building, hotels or apartment buildings.

5.1.4 The prime contractor must have self-performed at least 15 percent of the direct contract labor (including testing and layout personnel), exclusive of other general conditions or field overhead personnel, material, equipment, or subcontractors to be considered similar.

5.1.5 Additional consideration may be given for projects that contain the following features:

a) Project is built on a military installation for USACE.

b) Project includes deep foundations/drilled shaft piers

c) Project includes demolition work

5.1.6 The following information shall be provided for each project:

a) Project Title, Location, and Contract Number/Unique Identifier;

b) Current percentage of construction complete and the date it was or will be complete

a. For projects that are not yet complete, provide description of work remaining to be completed;

c) Scope of the project, to include purpose/use of facility;

d) Size of the project, differentiate square footage of new construction versus renovation if the project includes both;

e) Portion and percentage of work that was self-performed;

f) Two references, including name, telephone number, and email address.

5.1.7 For this factor, also include any ratings, letters, awards, etc. that support past performance on these projects.

Any of this information that is submitted shall clearly identify to which of the submitted projects it pertains. A sample Past Performance Questionnaire is attached for your convenience. If used, the Past Performance

Questionnaire must be submitted by the offeror with the proposal submission and not sent directly to the agency from the reference. For each project, the offeror may provide information on problems encountered on the identified contracts and the offeror’s respective corrective action.

NOTE: For purposes of evaluating past performance, the Prime Contractor is defined as the contractor identified in Block 14 of the Standard Form 1442. Projects performed by contractors other than the offeror, including, but not limited to, teaming partners, subcontractors, sister or parent companies, and affiliates will not be evaluated for past performance, unless those other contractors are part of a joint venture offeror as demonstrated by a signed joint venture agreement. If more than one contractor is listed in Block 14, then a signed joint venture must be submitted with the proposal and the joint venture shall be registered as such in the

System for Award Management (SAM). However, each party of the Joint Venture (JV) must submit their own

Unique Entity Identifier Number (formerly known as DUNS) with the JV proposal. If the offeror represents the combining of two or more companies as a JV for the purpose of this RFP, each company in the JV may submit project examples, but the total submitted by the JV will not exceed three (3).

Relevant past performance information provided for affiliates of the offeror will be considered. Affiliates (as defined by FAR 2.101) means associated business concerns or individuals if, directly or indirectly either one controls or can control the other; or third-party controls or can control both. Affiliation will be determined in accordance with 13 CFR 121.103. In determining whether affiliation exists, the Government will consider the totality of the circumstances and may find affiliation even though no single factor is sufficient to constitute affiliation. If an offeror is submitting the past performance of an affiliate, the offeror must submit proof of affiliation pursuant to 13 CFR 121.103.

5.2 Evaluation Criteria:

5.2.1 The SSEB will first evaluate the relevancy of recent past performance identified in the proposal in response to paragraph 5.1 above. By using the criteria identified above, the SSEB will determine how relevant a past project is when compared to the scope, size, and magnitude of effort and complexities of the solicited project.

A relevancy rating will be assigned to each submitted project using the Past Performance Relevancy Ratings table above.

5.2.2 The SSEB will next review how well the offeror performed on those projects. The Government will, at a minimum, review past performance information retrieved through the Contractor Performance Assessment

Reporting System (CPARS), using all Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) numbers identified in the offeror’s proposal. The Government reserves the right to check any or all cited references to verify supplied information and to assess owner satisfaction. The Government also reserves the right to not contact the provided references. In addition to the information submitted by the offeror, the Government reserves the right to review any other sources of relevant information for evaluating past performance, including projects other than those submitted by the offeror. Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved from inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information

System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the offeror.

5.2.3 The SSEB will review all past performance information collected and determine the quality of the offeror’s performance, general trends, and usefulness of the information and incorporate this information into the performance confidence assessment. The SSEB will assign a final, overall Performance Confidence rating, using the ratings in the Performance Confidence Assessment table (Table 2) above, based on the SSEB’s assessment of (1) the degree of the offeror’s recent, relevant experience, and (2) how well the offeror performed that experience.

6.0 Volume I – Factor II: Management Plan

6.1 Submission Requirements:

Provide a management plan narrative for the project that describes how your labor, resources, designers, subcontractors, material suppliers, and procurement of long lead items will be managed, supervised, coordinated, and used to ensure successful completion of the project. At a minimum, the Management Plan shall also include the following information:

• Describe your process for managing, coordinating, and tracking changes that arise during construction.

• Describe how you will manage, supervise, and coordinate the subcontractors’ work and who in the organization will be responsible for this management and coordination.

• Describe how the offeror will approach the construction of the Fort Campbell UEPH Barracks.

• Describe the teams’ quality control approach and capabilities to maintain quality control of the construction.

• Describe, in a narrative format, the commissioning process and critical milestones of the commissioning process and how they relate to critical construction milestones. Describe, in narrative format, the key submittals for commissioning process. Describe, by role and qualifications, who will be in lead authority for the contractor (in-house or first tier sub) during the commissioning process.

Lay out their roles and authority over all involved subcontractors.

NOTE: There is a page limit of ten (10) single-sided, 8.5” x 11” pages, using a minimum font size of 11 and a minimum margin of one-half inch on all sides, for the Management Plan.

6.2 Evaluation Criteria:

Plans will be evaluated based on the level of understanding of the work and the involvement the contractor will have in the management, oversight, control, and coordination of the work performed during construction of the project. Plans that demonstrate a clear understanding of the project requirements and provide a thorough approach for successfully managing the Fort Campbell UEPH Barracks project may be rated more favorably by the SSEB. In your proposal, please detail your proposed management approach for this project. We are particularly interested in your strategy for identifying and mitigating risks associated with critical solicitation tasks. Furthermore, demonstrate your qualifications by providing a summary of your past performance and experience on other USACE projects. A rating will be assigned using the Technical Assessment Rating table above.

7.0 Volume I – Factor III: Small Business Participation Plan

7.1 Submission Requirements

ALL OFFERORS ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN.

The Small Business Participation Plan shall be based on the offeror’s best effort and is required to address each of the following areas individually:

• The extent to which the small business programs listed in FAR 19 (small business, small disadvantaged business, woman-owned small business, HubZone, service disabled veteran owned small business, etc.) are specifically identified in the Small Business Participation Plan;

• The extent of participation of such firms in terms of the value of the total acquisition in %’s for the base year and for each individual option year; the extent of commitment to use such firms (for example, enforceable commitments, i.e., teaming agreements signed, are to be considered more heavily than non-enforceable ones);

• The complexity and variety of the work small firms are to perform on this acquisition;

• The practicality of the Small Business Participation Plan, i.e., aggressive goals.

The Small Business Participation Plan shall be organized as follows:

(1) Prime Contractor type of business (check all that apply):

( ) Large

( ) Small (also check type of small business)

( ) Small Non-Disadvantaged Business

( ) Small Disadvantaged Business

( ) Woman-Owned Small Business

( ) HUBZone Small Business

( ) Veteran Owned Small Business

( ) Service Disabled, Veteran Owned Small Business

(2) Percentage of your participation as a prime contractor: %

NOTE: Small Business primes’ self-performance counts as Small Business Participation, and small business primes may achieve small business participation goals through their own performance/participation as a prime and/or through subcontracting to other small businesses.

(3) Percentage of total contract value of subcontracts planned for:

% of Total Contract Value

Large %

Total Small %

Small Non-Disadvantaged %

Small Disadvantaged %

Small Woman Owned %

Small HUB Zone %

Small Veteran Owned %

Small Service Disabled Veteran

Owned

Each percentage above shall be accompanied by detailed supporting documentation regarding individual commitments.

NOTE: The sum of the percentages of Small Non-Disadvantaged and Small Disadvantaged should equal the entries for the Total Small; however, the sum of all of the percentages need not equal 100% since the prime is not included and individual subcontractors may be counted towards more than one category.

(4) List principal supplies/services (be specific) to be subcontracted to:

Name of Company Type of Service/Supply

Large

Small Non-Disadvantaged

Small Disadvantaged

Small Woman Owned

Small HUB Zone

Small Veteran Owned

Small Service Disabled Veteran

Owned

(5) Prior Performance Information: Provide any information substantiating the offeror’s track record of utilizing small business on past contracts.

(6) For Large and Small Businesses provide descriptive information for all small business categories.

Any information concerning long-term relationships with Small Business subcontractors, such as mentor-protégé relationships, should be provided.

(7) Extent of Commitment: Provide documentation regarding enforceable commitments to utilize any small business category as defined in FAR Part 19 as subcontractors.

(8) Small Business Subcontracting Plan: Each Large Business Offeror shall provide a Small

Business Subcontracting Plan that contains all of the elements required by FAR Clause 52.219-9

ALT II. This Plan shall be submitted separately from the Small Business Participation Plan information required above which applies to both Large and Small Businesses. The

Subcontracting Plan is not a requirement for evaluation in source selection but rather a requirement for award to a Large Business. The approved Small Business Subcontracting Plan will be incorporated into any resultant contract(s).

7.2 Evaluation Criteria:

ALL OFFERORS ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT A SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN.

The Small Business Participation Plan will be evaluated based on the offeror’s best efforts, the level of small business commitment that is being demonstrated for the proposed acquisition, and the prior level of commitment to utilizing small businesses in performance of prior contracts. The Small Business Participation

Plan must meet the minimum Total Small Business Participation goal of 20% of the total contract value

(through collective small business participation from any type of small business or sub-category small business).

Pursuant FAR 52.219-9 (d), Small Business Subcontracting Plan. the following elements will be considered in evaluating an offeror’s Small Business Participation Plan:

• The extent to which such firms, as defined in FAR Part 19, are specifically identified in plans;

• The extent of commitment to use such firms (enforceable commitments will be weighted more heavily than non-enforceable ones);

• The complexity and variety of the work such firms are to perform;

• The realism of the plans;

• Past performance of offerors in complying with the requirements of the Subcontracting Plan Goals for such firms and monetary targets for participation;

• The extent of participation of such firms in terms of the proposed subcontracted value; and

• The extent to which the offeror provides detailed explanations/documentation supporting the proposed participation percentages, or lack thereof. The Department of Defense (DOD) has established small business goals to help ensure small business receives a fair proportion of DOD awards.

8.0 Volume II - Price and Proforma Information

8.1 Tab A - Standard Form 1442 and Proposal Price Breakout Schedule.

8.1.1 Submission Requirements:

The offeror shall complete and submit Standard Form 1442 and Section 00 10 00, Proposal Price Breakout

Schedule.

8.1.2 Evaluation Criteria:

The price will be evaluated on the total price for the base proposal plus all options. The price will be evaluated by the Government for fairness and reasonableness through the use of a price analysis. Price will also be checked for unbalancing of line items. Unbalanced pricing exists when, despite an acceptable total evaluated price, the price of one or more line items is significantly over or understated as indicated by the application of price analysis techniques. An offer may be rejected if the contracting officer determines that the lack of balance poses an unacceptable risk to the Government. Offerors are cautioned to distribute pricing appropriately.

8.2 Tab B – Joint Venture Agreements

8.2.1 Submission Requirements:

If more than one contractor is listed in Block 14, or the offeror listed in Block 14 is a joint venture (JV), then a signed JV agreement must be submitted with the proposal and the offeror shall be registered in the System for

Award Management (SAM) as a legal entity separate from the individual joint venture members. However, each member of the JV must submit its own Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) with the proposal. A copy of the offeror’s signed joint venture agreement shall be submitted with the proposal.

In addition to the joint venture agreement, small business offerors submitting a proposal as a Mentor-Protégé

JV under the SBA Mentor-Protégé program (MPP) shall submit a copy of their SBA-approved Mentor-Protégé agreement.

8.2.2 Evaluation Criteria:

This information will be used for the purpose of completing the Pre-Award Survey and will not be rated. Small business joint venture agreements must comply with the relevant regulations in Title 13 of the Code of Federal

Regulations in order for an offeror to be eligible for any small business set-aside acquisitions and/or small-business price preference.

8.3 Tab C – Evidence of Ability to Obtain Bonding and Proof of Financial Ability

8.3.1 Submission Requirements:

A. Financial Capability. Submit Proof of Financial Ability (most recent financial statement covering assets and liabilities). Include the name, address, and telephone number of offeror's banking institution. If offeror is a joint venture, submit this information for all joint venture members.

B. Bonding Capability. Submit information showing offeror's ability to be bonded for this project (minimum amount of $50M single project bonding capacity required). Include the name, address, and telephone number of the offeror's bonding company.

8.3.2 Evaluation Criteria:

This information will be used for the purpose of completing the Pre-Award Survey and will not be rated. See

RFO Part 28 for information related to bonds.

If the offeror is a joint venture, submit this information for all joint venture members.

8.4 Tab D – Pre-Award Information

8.4.1 Submission Requirements:

A. The offeror shall submit one completed copy of Section 00 45 00, Representations and Certification.

B. The offeror shall submit the following information:

a) Number of years the firm has been in business

b) Name, address, and telephone numbers of two credit/trade references

c) A list of present commitments, including the dollar value

Note: If the offeror is a joint venture, submit this information for all joint venture members.

8.4.2 Evaluation Criteria:

This information will be used for the purpose of completing the Pre-Award Survey and will not be rated.

8.5 Tab E - Subcontracting Plan

8.5.1 Submission Requirements:

Large business offerors shall submit a Subcontracting Plan in accordance with FAR Clauses 52.219-8, 52.219-

9 ALT II, and RFO 19.109. The offeror may use the attached sample sub-contracting plan as a starting point.

Percentage goals apply to the total amount being subcontracted.

8.5.2 Evaluation Criteria:

Submitted information will be evaluated for acceptability in accordance with FAR 52.219-9(d).

8.6 Tab F – Project Labor Agreement (PLA)

8.6.1 Submission Requirements

ALL OFFERORS ARE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT AN EXECUTED PROJECT LABOR AGREEMENT. All offerors shall submit a Project Labor Agreement in accordance with FAR Solicitation Provision 52.222-33 and

FAR Clause 52.222-34. To be acceptable, the agreements must adequately address the required statutory elements and provide sufficient information…