IFB_Questions_19-23_Response.pdf
PDF 16 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912PQ-16-B-0001
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attendance_Sheet.pdf | ||
| OF_1419_Page_2.pdf | ||
| OF_1419_Page_1.pdf | ||
| OF_1419_Page_3.pdf | ||
| IFB_Questions_25-36_Response.pdf | ||
| IFB_Questions_24.pdf | ||
| IFB_Question_17-18_Response.pdf | ||
| Boring_Location_Plan.pdf | ||
| IFB_Questions_4-16_Response.pdf | ||
| Boring_Log_B101.pdf | ||
| W912PQ-16-B-0001.pdf | ||
| Boring_Log_B103.pdf | ||
| Boring_Log_B102.pdf | ||
| 2016_08_23_12_55_31.pdf | ||
| PREBID_Slides_-_Hangar_A.pptx | PPTX presentation | |
| RFI_Questions_1-3.pdf | ||
| Wage_Determination.pdf | ||
| W912PQ-16-B-0001.pdf | ||
| Addendum_1_to_Specifications.pdf | ||
| Specifications_Vol_1.pdf | ||
| Specifications_Vol_2.pdf | ||
| Drawings_Burns_and_Mac.pdf |
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
30 August 2016
RFI Question 19-23
Project: WKVB142002, Repair Fuel Cell Hangar and WKVB139016 Add Fuel Cell Hangar
106th Rescue Wing, Gabreski ANG Base, Westhampton Beach, New York
Q19. In spec section 26-20-00, page 33, section #3.1.10 discusses using nonmetallic sheath cable for this project.
Is this acceptable? (Discrepancy with drawing #E-001, General note #1)
AQ19: Not acceptable. Bidders shall disregard section 26 20 00 – 3.1.10.
Q20. In spec section 26-20-00, page 12, section #2.6.7 discusses using MC cable for this project.
Is this acceptable? (Discrepancy with drawing #E-001, General note #1)
AQ20: Acceptable as used as noted in section 26 20 00 – 2.6.7 for power wiring only and shall not be used in hazardous locations.
Q21. On drawing #ES100, Note #9, “New Secondary Service ductbank serving POD Building.
Conduit & wiring shall match existing in type, quantity & size”
What size service feeds the POD Building? Since we cannot verify before bid date, please provide us with an allowance or reasonable guidelines so that we can price correctly & all bidders are pricing equally.
AQ21: 400A, 480Y/277V, 3 phase, 4-wire electrical service in underground concrete encased ductbank with a minimum of 2-4”C.
Q22. DISCREPANCY: On drawing #T-602, Communications scope of work, note #1 & 2 states to include cabling & equipment, etc. However, on this same drawing under the riser diagram, note #4, states this same scope of work is government furnished & installed. Please verify & clarify correct scope of work.
AQ22: The “COMMUNICATIONS SCOPE OF WORK” listed on T-602 pertains to the communications work as noted in items 1 through 5. The Intrusion Detection System work as noted in the riser diagram on T-602 does not fall under the Communications Scope of Work. Bid the security scope of work as noted in Note #4.
Q23. On drawing #E-002, site new work note #8, what size temporary service is required?
AQ23: The size of the temporary utility service will depend on which building electrical service is affected/shut down during construction for Hangar A and adjacent facilities. Contractor shall provide a schedule of service shutdowns to the BCE and Design Engineer indicating which facility and services will be affected prior to commencing work.
AQ23: The size of the temporary utility service will depend on which building electrical service is affected/shut down during construction for Hangar A and adjacent facilities. Contractor shall provide a schedule of service shutdowns to the BCE and D...
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .