Pre-Bid_RFI_W912L6-16-R-0007_11-14-2016__Answered.pdf

Date: RFI No. RFP Reference

(Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

11/8/2016 1 Solicitation

Section 2.5.2.1.1

The Solicitation references Exhibit A for evaluation of experience. However, Exhibit A cannot be found. Please provide Exhibit A.

Exhibit A Uploaded.

11/8/2016 2 Solicitation

Section 2.5.2.2

The Solicitation references Exhibit B

Subcontractor/Team/Key Personnel Information and

Consent Form". However, Exhibit B cannot be found. Please provide Exhibit B.

Exhibit B Uploaded.

11/8/2016 3 Solicitation

Section 2.5.3.2

The Solicitation references Exhibit C for Past/Present

Performance. However, Exhibit C cannot be found. Please provide Exhibit C.

Exhibit C Uploaded.

11/8/2016 4 Solicitation

Section 2.4.4

Section states pages and charts shall be on 8.5x11 inch paper. This will be very small formatting for the proposal schedule, making it difficult to read. Can the proposal schedule be on 11x17 inch paper?

8.5x11 inch paper.

11/8/2016 5 N/A The drawings state they are the "Final Design Submittal".

Please confirm these are the construction drawings and that no additional design is anticipated from the successful offeror.

Government confirms there will be no other drawings from the A&E and government unless amended prior to award. (Documents are sealed by the DOR as final and issued for bid.)

11/8/2016 N/A Is an Independent Fire Protection Engineer needed to review/approve the "Final Design Submittal" fire protection drawings?

No. The Final Design Submittal issued by Benham was prepared and signed and sealed by a Registered Fire

Protection Engineer and are to be used as the

Construction Documents. No approval of these documents by another FPE is required. The contractor's

FPE may use the signed sealed documents as a bridging document for their design. However, the Contractor's FPE will be fully responsible for the fire protection systems design and acceptance.

11/8/2016 6 Drawing Sheet

F‐0001, Note 2.

Please confirm all the current bid documents, designs, and calculations comply with all applicable codes, standards, and all minimum AF ETL 02‐15, the UFCs, and the AHJ requirements.

To the best of our knowledge, all current bid documents comply with the required minimum codes and standards.

The hydraulic calculations are to be used as a basis of design and shall be verified by the contractor's FPE.

Please note that this design complies with the new Air

Force foam system requirements which are not addressed in ETL 02‐15.

11/8/2016 7 N/A Please confirm the FP contractor is to provide shop drawings that have been reviewed/approved by the FPE to meet the government's criteria as found in the bid documents.

Yes. Per the specifications, the FPE shall be subcontracted by the Prime Contractor and shall be fully responsible for signing and sealing all fire alarm/MNS and fire protection systems as required by the ANG ETL.

11/8/2016 8 N/A Can the FPE who prepared the contract drawings also perform the FPE services to the successful offeror?

No. This is a conflict of interest. A third party FPE shall be hired.

11/8/2016 9 00 22 13.00 20 Pricing is required for pipe asbestos abatement. Please provide the asbestos assessment specifying the quantity and extent of asbestos found.

The design documents were based on information provided per the Hazardous Materials report. The exact quantity of asbestos containing pipe insulation fittings is not known, however the unit price per CLIN 0001AB shall be based on 100 units.

11/8/2016 10 Solicitation

Section 00100

Para 3.

RFIs sre to be sent to "christine.m.walker30.mail.mil". This appears to be a typo. Please clarify the correct address.

christine.m.walker30.mil@mail.mil

11/9/2016 11 00 22 13.00 20

Part 1

1.1

CLIN 0001AB appears to be mislabeled as 0001AE on the

(boxed out portion) schedule of values. It appears it should it read 0001AB. Will the government confirm or re‐issue bid sheet to correct this? Or, Shall we make this correction on the form? Is there an Excel version of the bid form available?

Corrected to CLIN 0001AB and uploaded. There is not an excel version available.

11/9/2016 12 N/A At the site visit, it sounded as if email (PDF) proposal submissions were acceptable, instead of the hardcopies required in the RFP. Please confirm an electronic submission is acceptable.

Email proposals are not accepted. Per instructions there is to be a CD included with the hard copy submissions.

Pre‐Bid RFI Log for W912L6‐16‐R‐0007

Bldg 1011 Medium Altitude Manned ISR Beddown, YZEU139006

Date: RFI No. RFP Reference

(Sect/Para/Page)

QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSE

Pre‐Bid RFI Log for W912L6‐16‐R‐0007

Bldg 1011 Medium Altitude Manned ISR Beddown, YZEU139006

11/9/2016 13 N/A At the site visit, furniture was observed in the areas to be renovated. Who is responsible for removing the personal effects? Who is responsible for removing the govt furniture?

If the contractor is responsible, is the furniture returned to the govt or disposed of by the contractor?

Personal effects to be removed by the government.

Furniture is to be removed by the contractor. Furniture to be disposed of by the contractor.

11/9/2016 14 N/A At the site visit, a hoist was observed in the areas to be renovated. Who is responsible for removing the hoist? If the contractor is responsible, is the hoist to be returned to the govt or disposed of by the contractor?

Contractor is to remove the hoist. Hoist is to be disposed of by the contractor.