Attachment_8Tech_Review_Document_12-17-15.doc

UH Technical Review Round # Camp Carroll, Camp Casey, Camp Humphreys, Korea and Camp Zama, Japan, Lodging Buy

Vendor Directions: The Technical Documents Checklist section (below) must be completed and returned in Word format by the contractor performing as the lead quoter. A quote that is submitted without the necessary documents compliance may not be considered for award. Each vendor shall demonstrate in written form how they are meeting the FID requirements. A blanket statement that vendor is meeting the FID requirements will not be acceptable. Manufacturer’s published catalogs and CAD drawings are acceptable forms of demonstrations.

Technical Documents Checklist

Vendor or Lead Quoter:

Point of Contact for this RFQ:

Email Address:

Telephone Number:

1. Are beds specified in this RFQ’s Attachment 2, Furniture Item Description (FID)?

Yes

If Yes, please continue to question 1a.

No

If No, please skip to question 2.

1a. Is a copy of the applicable pages of the quoter’s and teaming partner’s GSA Contracts and all modifications (or GSA correspondence showing modification is pending) with the approved bed model number and GSA-approved testing results, provided with the quote and highlighted?

Yes

If No, please do not continue; to be considered for award, technical documents shall be complete and formatted as stated above.

Bed frames that accommodate 53” or wider mattresses are exempt from the requirement for GSA approval of testing documents.

2. Are underbed drawers required in this RFQ’s FID?

Yes

If Yes, please continue to question 2a.

No

If No, please skip to question 3.

2a. Is a copy of the applicable pages of the quoter’s and teaming partner’s GSA Contracts and all modifications (or GSA correspondence showing modification is pending) with approved underbed drawer model number and GSA-approved testing results, provided with the quote and highlighted?

Yes

If No, please do not continue; to be considered for award, technical documents shall be complete and formatted as stated above.

3. Are wooden casegoods required in this RFQ’s FID?

Yes

If Yes, please continue to question 3a and 3b.

No

If No, please skip to question 4.

3a. Is GSA-approved documentation provided with the quote, which shows contractor meets Department of Army-UH Furnishings Program Specifications?

Yes

If No, please do not continue; Vendor is not eligible to provide furnishings for a procurement that may result from this RFQ.

3b. Is a copy of the applicable pages of the quoter’s and teaming partner’s GSA Contracts and All Modifications (or GSA correspondence showing modification is pending) with the quote, and highlighted to show model numbers and salient features to meet the FID?

Yes

If No, please do not continue; to be considered for award, technical documents shall be complete and formatted as stated above.

4. Are metal casegoods required in this RFQ’s FID?

Yes

If Yes, please continue to question 4a and 4b.

No

If No, please do not complete this section

4a. Is a copy of the applicable pages of the quoter’s and teaming partner’s GSA Contracts and all modifications (or GSA correspondence showing modification is pending) with the quote, and highlighted to show model numbers and salient features to meet the FID?

Yes

If No, please do not continue; to be considered for award, technical documents shall be complete and formatted as stated above.

4b. Is the manufacturer’s metal casegood specifications, along with salient features highlighted, provided with the contractor’s quote?

Yes

If No, please do not continue; to be considered for award, technical documents shall be complete and formatted as stated above.

5. Are technical documents organized sequentially according to the Furniture Item Descriptions (FID)?

Yes

No

If No, please do not continue; to be considered for award, technical documents shall be organized sequentially according to the FID.

Vendors: Do not go beyond this point unless requested by the Government during clarifications or communications.

Vendor Technical Review of Quoted Items

Vendor Reply: (Green Shaded Area)

HNC

Accept

(Yes/No)

1.

1st Round HNC:

1st Round Vendor:

2nd Round HNC:

2nd Round Vendor:

3rd Round HNC:

3rd Round Vendor:

2.

1st Round HNC:

1st Round Vendor:

2nd Round HNC:

2nd Round Vendor:

3rd Round HNC:

3rd Round Vendor:

3.

1st Round HNC:

1st Round Vendor:

2nd Round HNC:

2nd Round Vendor:

3rd Round HNC:

3rd Round Vendor:

4.

1st Round HNC:

1st Round Vendor:

2nd Round HNC:

2nd Round Vendor:

3rd Round HNC:

3rd Round Vendor:

5.

1st Round HNC:

1st Round Vendor:

2nd Round HNC:

2nd Round Vendor:

3rd Round HNC:

3rd Round Vendor:

6.

1st Round HNC:

1st Round Vendor:

2nd Round HNC:

2nd Round Vendor:

3rd Round HNC:

3rd Round Vendor:

7.

1st Round HNC:

1st Round Vendor:

2nd Round HNC:

2nd Round Vendor:

3rd Round HNC:

3rd Round Vendor:

8.

1st Round HNC:

1st Round Vendor:

2nd Round HNC:

2nd Round Vendor:

3rd Round HNC:

3rd Round Vendor:

9.

1st Round HNC:

1st Round Vendor:

2nd Round HNC:

2nd Round Vendor:

3rd Round HNC:

3rd Round Vendor:

10.

1st Round HNC:

1st Round Vendor:

2nd Round HNC:

2nd Round Vendor:

3rd Round HNC:

3rd Round Vendor:

11.

1st Round HNC:

1st Round Vendor:

2nd Round HNC:

2nd Round Vendor:

3rd Round HNC:

3rd Round Vendor:

12.

1st Round HNC:

1st Round Vendor:

2nd Round HNC:

2nd Round Vendor:

3rd Round HNC:

3rd Round Vendor:

13.

1st Round HNC:

1st Round Vendor:

2nd Round HNC:

2nd Round Vendor:

3rd Round HNC:

3rd Round Vendor:

14.

1st Round HNC:

1st Round Vendor:

2nd Round HNC:

2nd Round Vendor:

3rd Round HNC:

3rd Round Vendor:

To be filled in by HNC only:

1st Round Technical Review

No:

Date:

HNC Technical Evaluator:

Comments:

2nd Round Technical Review

No:

Date:

HNC Technical Evaluator:

Comments:

3rd Round Technical Review

No:

Date:

HNC Technical Evaluator:

Comments:

Attachment 8

Tech Review Document 12-17-15.doc