IDC209_TO001_SPJ4-QA_e4Rpt_Final_PrintVersion.pdf
PDF 40 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912DS-15-B-0013
About this file
W912DS-15-B-0013-IDC 209
View the file
Other files
Show all 37
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Department Of The Army New York District Corps of Engineers Jacob K. Javits Federal Building 26 Federal Plaza New York, NY 10278-0090
Contract #W912DS-12-D-0002 Task Order #0001
QA data collection and review of contractor QC data on
S-PJ-4; NYNJHDP
November 27, 2012
27 GLEN ROAD, NORTH ENTRANCE
SANDY HOOK, CONNECTICUT 06482
P.O. BOX 178, NEWTOWN, CT 06470
(203) 270-8100, FAX (203) 364-0480
www.e4sciences.com
All interpretations are opinions based on inferences from geophysical or other measurements. We cannot, and do not, guarantee the accuracy or correctness of any interpretation. We shall not, except in the case of gross or willful negligence on our part, be liable or responsible for any loss, costs, damages or expenses incurred or sustained by anyone resulting from any interpretations made by any of our officers, agents or employees.
ii
Executive Summary
The United States Army Corps of Engineers, New York District (USACE-NAN) and the New Jersey Department of Transportation Maritime Division (NJDOT-MD) are deepening the Port Jersey Channel to an elevation of -52ft MLW. The Passaic Valley Sewerage Commission (PVSC) Tunnel crosses the Port Jersey Channel at an elevation of -64±2ft. The channel deepening, from -37ft to -52ft, removed half of the sediment overburden that confined and protected the PVSC tunnel. The USACE-NAN and NJDOT-MD designed the S-PJ-4 contract to dredge the channel and construct the protection for the tunnel. The protection consists of over four hundred and twenty-nine steel plates placed with the top face between an elevation of -52.0ft and -52.5ft. The PVSC tunnel was not to be damaged.
The USACE-NAN selected Weeks Marine Incorporated (WMI) to construct the project.
The plates are 30ft x 4ft x 0.42ft (5”). The allowable gap between the plates was 0.33ft (4”), except in the area where the contractor encountered hard rock. The top of the plates was to be placed below -52.0ft and above -52.5ft. The tilt of each plate must be less than ±2%, with less than ±9.6% confidence interval. The ramp of each plate must be less than ±1%. The contractor placed plates of different sizes (e.g., 15ft x 4ft x 0.42ft) to accommodate changes
The overall construction achieved the objective of protecting the PVSC without damaging it. The four hundred and twenty-nine plates were placed within or near the specified tolerances. Of these four hundred and thirteen were full-sized plates and sixteen were half-sized plates. Some remediation was required throughout the construction. Five remediation plates were added all within the Bayonne triangle. The construction took longer than planned. The complementary report addresses the overall quality control and quality assurance on a 100-plate.1
The USACE-NAN assigned e4sciences (e4) to perform quality assurance. e4 monitored and reviewed the project throughout the construction. For this Task Order #0001 in Contract W912DS-12-D-0002, e4sciences performed the following tasks:
1. Meet regularly with team to discuss progress and issues
2. Review the WMI quality-control surveys
3. Submit USACE-NJDOT quality-control reviews
4. Produce the quality-assurance surveys
5. Submit the quality-assurance report
6. Back check of WMI response
Table ES-1 lists the twenty-one plate groups. A few issues occurred during the construction: (a) disagreement regarding the as-built placement in Bayonne triangle and Global berth, (b) a dropped plate, (c) excavator fell over, (d) rock diggability, (e) a lost plate, and (f) a large boulder outside the protection zone.
In the Bayonne triangle, WMI placed P001-P012. e4 measured these plates with two side-scan sonar systems, sub-bottom reflection seismology with single-beam bathymetry, sonar sector scans, and ROV video images. In the Bayonne triangle, WMI took some time to place plates and to remediate some observed offsets. Five remediation plates were placed. WMI placed R1, R2, and R3 on gaps. P001A and P002A were placed on the side slope.
1 e4sciences, 2012, Non design services for side-scan sonar, multibeam bathymetry, sonar sector scanning, and close proximity video for S-PJ-4 and support during construction, USACE Contract W912DS-09-DS-0001, IDC-204, Task Order #0027.
iii
Table ES-1. Plate Groups.
Plate groups Plate numbers 1 P001-P012 2 P013-P045 3 P046-P065 4 P066-P085 5 P086-P105 6 P106-P125 7 P126-P145 8 P146-P164 9 P165-P189
10 P190-P209 11 P210-P229 12 P230-P249 13 P250-P269 14 P270-P289 15 P290-P309 16 P310-P329 17 P330-P349 18 P350-P369 19 P370-P389 20 P390-P409 21 P410-P430
In the Global berth, WMI placed P012 to P105. Measurements indicated that several plates were at the very edge of tolerance. The contractor evaluated these instances carefully. At P033, the USACE-NAN construction division approved the contractor ripper-tooth soundings as the quality-control survey. For quality-assurance (QA), e4 continued with side-scan sonar and sub-bottom reflection seismology with single-beam bathymetry. The USACE-NAN survey branch continued with multibeam bathymetry as part of the quality assurance.
WMI placed P106-P255 in the northern section of the channel. e4 continued with side-scan sonar and sub-bottom reflection seismology with single-beam bathymetry. The USACE-NAN survey branch continued with multibeam bathymetry. Two concerns arose in this section: (a) the rock area2 between P165 and P189, and (b) rapid sedimentation on P195-P254. P173, P174, P177, P178, and P179A,B are half-sized plates. There are no plates P175 and P176.
WMI placed P256 to P430 on the southern section of the channel. e4 continued with side-scan sonar and sub-bottom reflection seismology with single-beam bathymetry. The USACE-NAN survey branch continued with multibeam bathymetry. WMI found a boulder east of P319. The boulder, just outside the protection zone, was found to be an element of the till. WMI removed the boulder.
The plates in the MOTBY triangle, P410 through P428, were placed parallel to the plates in the channel; that is, they were placed normal to the PVSC tunnel trajectory. P429 and P430 were placed obliquely. P430 provides protection on the slope. e4 observations imply that the construction did not affect the New York Bay Shaft, 100ft to the southeast.
2e4sciences, 2012, Investigation of more-resistant schist between planned-plate locations P165 and P190 in S-PJ-4, Contract #W912DS-12-D-0002, Task Order #0004, August 02.
iv
Table of Contents Disclaimer ......................................................................................................................................... ii Executive Summary ........................................................................................................................ iii
Table of Contents ............................................................................................................................. v
List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. vi
List of Tables ................................................................................................................................... vi
List of Plates .................................................................................................................................... vi
1. Introduction
2. Scope of work
2.1 Task 1A: QA/QC
2.2 Task 1B: Meetings
2.3 Task 1C: QC review
2.4 Task 1D: QA report
2.5 Task 1E: Back check
2.6 Task 1F: Reporting
3. Methodology
3.1 Task 1A: QA/QC
3.2 Task 1B: Meetings
3.3 Task 1C: QC review
3.4 Task 1D: QA survey
3.4.1 QA Measurements
3.4.2 Global area, Bayonne triangle
3.4.3 Northern half of channel
3.4.4 Rock area
3.4.5 Southern half of channel
3.4.6 MOTBY area
3.5 Task 1E: Back check
3.6 Task 1F: Reporting
4. Results
4.1 Overview
4.2 Plates P001-P012
4.3 Plates P013-P045
4.4 Plates P046-P065
4.5 Plates P066-P085
4.6 Plates P086-P105
4.7 Plates P106-P125
4.8 Plates P126-P145
4.9 Plates P146-P164
4.10 Plates P165-P189
4.11 Plates P190-P209
4.12 Plates P210-P229
4.13 Plates P230-P249
4.14 Plates P250-P269
4.15 Plates P270-P289
4.16 Plates P290-P296
4.17 Plates P297-P309
4.18 Plates P310-P329
4.19 Plates P330-P349
4.20 Plates P350-P369
4.21 Plates P370-P389
v
4.22 Plates P390-P409
4.23 Plates P410-P430
5. Conclusions
Appendix I. QA/QC plan Appendix II. QC reviews Appendix III. QA reports Appendix IV. WMI response Appendix V. Back checks Appendix VI. Additional letters Appendix VII. 11x17 version of plates
List of Figures Figure 1. Location map for S-PJ-4
Figure 2. Steel plates
Figure 3. Tilt and ramp
Figure 4. Side-scan sonar image after construction
Figure 5. Side-scan sonar image for the -48ft grade after removal of non-HARS material
Figure 6. Bathymetry after construction Figure 7. Side-scan sonar of the Bayonne triangle Figure 8. Side-scan sonar image of the piles in the Global berth Figure 9. Close-up side-scan sonar images for New York Bay Shaft
List of Tables Table ES-1. Plate groups .................................................................................................................. iv Table 1. Plate groups Table 2. Project chronology Table 3. Overview Table 4. Bayonne triangle
List of Plates Plate 1. Location map for S-PJ-4 with planimetrics Plate 2. Side-scan sonar image Plate 3. Side-scan sonar image Plate 4. Side-scan sonar image for -48ft MLW Plate 5. Multibeam bathymetry Plate 6. Multibeam bathymetry Plate 7. Seismic cross section vi
1.
Introduction
The United States Army Corps of Engineers, New York District (USACE-NAN) and the New Jersey Department of Transportation (NJDOT-MD), Maritime Division are deepening the Port Jersey Channel to an elevation of -52ft MLW. The Passaic Valley Sewerage Commission (PVSC) Tunnel crosses the Port Jersey Channel at an elevation of -64±2ft. The channel deepening, from -37ft to -52ft, removed half of the sediment overburden that confined and protected the PVSC tunnel. The USACE-NAN and NJDOT-MD designed the S-PJ-4 contract to dredge the channel and construct the protection for the tunnel. The protection consists of over four hundred and twenty-nine steel plates placed with the top face between an elevation of -52.0ft and -52.5ft. The PVSC tunnel was not to be damaged.
The USACE-NAN selected Weeks Marine Incorporated (WMI) to construct the project.
The USACE-NAN assigned e4sciences (e4) to perform quality assurance. e4 monitored and reviewed the project throughout the construction. For this Task Order #0001 in Contract W912DS-12-D-0002, e4sciences performed the following tasks:
1. Meet regularly with team to discuss progress and issues
2. Review the WMI quality-control surveys
3. Submit USACE-NJDOT quality-control reviews
4. Produce e4 quality-assurance surveys
5. Submit USACE-NJDOT quality-assurance report
6. Back check of WMI response
Figure 1 (Plate 1) is a location map of the S-PJ-4 contract area. Table 1 lists the twenty-one (21) plate groups. The map shows the plate groups.
Table 1. Plate Groups.
Plate groups
Plate numbers
1 P001-P012 2 P013-P045 3 P046-P065 4 P066-P085 5 P086-P105 6 P106-P125 7 P126-P145 8 P146-P164 9 P165-P189
10 P190-P209 11 P210-P229 12 P230-P249 13 P250-P269 14 P270-P289 15 P290-P309 16 P310-P329 17 P330-P349 18 P350-P369 19 P370-P389 20 P390-P409 21 P410-P430
The horizontal coordinate system is New Jersey State Plane NAD83. The vertical datum is the USACE datum, NGVD29 MLW at Sandy Hook.
Table 2 summarizes the chronology of the project. e4 attended over sixty conference calls.
Besides conference calls every other working day, the team met onsite or at Caven Point intermittently to discuss the progress.
Table 2. Project chronology. Group = Plate groups as defined in table 1.
Group Task Start Finish yyyy.mm.dd yyyy.mm.dd 1 Notice to proceed 2012.06.01 2012.06.01 2 Land testing 2011.09.09 2011.09.15 3 Non-HARS removal to -48ft 2011.08.01 2011.09.15 4 Bayonne triangle remediation 2011.09.29 2011.11.08 5 Bayonne triangle 2011.11.09 2012.02.07 6 1 P001-P012 2011.10.28 2012.02.07 7 2 P013-P045 2011.11.05 2011.12.28 8 3 P046-P065 2012.02.09 2012.02.10 9 4 P066-P085 2012.02.15 2012.02.16
10 5 P086-P105 2012.02.24 2012.02.24 11 6 P106-P125 2012.03.01 2012.03.02 12 7 P126-P145 2012.03.08 2012.03.09 13 8 P146-P164 2012.03.15 2012.03.15 14 9 P165-P189 2012.07.31 2012.08.13 15 10 P190-P209 2012.03.26 2012.03.28 16 11 P210-P229 2012.04.03 2012.04.04 17 12 P230-P249 2012.04.10 2012.04.10 18 13 P250-P269 2012.04.15 2012.04.16 19 14 P270-P289 2012.04.21 2012.04.21 20 15A P290-P296 2012.04.25 2012.04.25 21 Excavator fell over 2012.04.25 2012.05.17 22 Dropped plate P297 2012.04.25 2012.05.01 23 15B P297-P309 2012.05.17 2012.05.28 24 P001A-P002A 2012.05.18 2012.05.18 25 16 P310-P329 2012.05.21 2012.05.23 26 17 P330-P349 2012.05.26 2012.05.26 27 18 P350-P369 2012.06.04 2012.06.05 28 19 P370-P389 2012.06.10 2012.06.12 39 20 P390-P409 2012.06.18 2012.06.18 30 21 P410-P430 2012.06.23 2012.06.24 31 Missing plate P190 2012.07.17 2012.08.02 32 Rock area, P165-P189 2012.07.14 2012.08.15 33 Draft report 2012.11.01 2012.11.08 34 Final report 2012.11.10 2012.11.25
2. Scope of work
The USACE-NAN objective of the S-PJ-4 contract was to complete the deepening of the Port Jersey Channel to -52ft MLW. The first step was to remove the sediment overburden above the PVSC tunnel and to immediately replace the weight with steel overburden. The construction required removal of black silt, then Pleistocene, and then placement of stone bed and steel plates in iterative and sequential manner. The specifications in the construction required careful monitoring to ensure that they were met during the construction. Going back would have incurred a large cost in time and money.
The construction in the S-PJ-4 contract had proven particularly challenging as the project evolved.
This scope provided for weekly review of the contractors signed-and-sealed ripper-tooth analyses, followed by a more focused and repetitive geophysical survey of 40 to 60 plates at a time in order to maintain quality assurance of the construction.
The contractor had encountered rock along the trajectory of the tunnel at locations for P165 to P189. The morphology, foliation, nature and properties of the rock were critical to best action to take with regard to completion of the protection at this location. e4 was to determine the likelihood of further rock outcrops along the trajectory.
The District reviewed and approved all documents before they were released to any party outside the USACE-NAN. All information, documents, correspondence, reports, conversations, meetings, etc. generated under this task order were to be used exclusively for executing this SOW and must have District approval before being released or used for any other purpose.
The A/E was to have communicated with the USACE, New York District Project Engineer daily, informing him of the e4’s location and progress of work during the performance of fieldwork. e4 was to directly coordinate the schedule with U.S. Coast Guard as necessary.
Work under this task order shall be completed within 240 calendar days after receipt of the Notice to Proceed.
2.1 Task 1A: Quality control
e4 was to complete a quality control plan ensuring that the evaluations were accurate, and that the concepts were practical, and that uncertainties and errors were quantified.
2.2 Task 1B: Meetings
e4 was to attend 25 meetings with the PDT.
2.3 Task 1C: Review of contractor QC data log packages and report e4 was to receive every week a signed and sealed package of data from the contractor surveying the plate placement at 20-plate intervals. e4 was to analyze the data for self-consistency. Each point was to plotted in x, y and z. The tilt and ramp were to be assessed. e4 was to examine the NJDOT interpretation of the data. e4 was to produce a report within 24-hours on the contractor plate-placement data including the review by NJDOT and their consultants. The report was to include a map of the ripper tooth data, and plots of the elevations and their range and of ramp and tilt.
2.4 Task 1D: Plate surveys and QA survey report
e4 was to conduct regular QA surveys (every 40 to 60 plates) to ensure that the contractor data was consistent and to back up the multibeam surveys of plate elevations. These surveys were to include but no be limited to side-scan sonar, sub-bottom seismic reflection, ROV imaging, single-beam bathymetry, sector scanning, and ROV sonar imaging. e4 was to describe the findings on the small QA surveys in a report. The report was to show maps, images, and cross sections that test the consistency of the contractor and government surveys.
2.5 Task 1E: Back check
e4 was to have received written response from WMI on the QA report. e4 was to complete the process by making final comments – the back check – on the WMI certification on each plate.
The back check was to incorporate findings from USACE survey branch and QA report.
2.6 Task 1F: Reporting
e4 was to produce a brief report describing the findings as soon as possible after the sample analyses are complete. The report was to include scope, methodology, analyses, cross sections, and maps.
3. Methodology
The USACE-NAN objective of the S-PJ-4 contract was to complete the deepening of the Port Jersey Channel to -52ft MLW. The horizontal coordinate system was New Jersey State Plane (NJSP) NAD 83ft. The vertical datum was NGDV29 MLW at Sandy Hook. The first step was to remove the sediment overburden above the PVSC tunnel and to immediately replace the weight with stone bed and steel plate overburden. The construction required removal of black silt and then Pleistocene sediments. WMI laid the stone bed, and then placed the steel plates in an iterative and sequential manner. The specifications in the construction required careful monitoring to ensure that the specifications were met during construction. Going back to remove more sediment or repair misplaced plates incurred a cost in time and money. Figure 2 shows the steel plates in preparations before the construction. The steel plates are 30ft x 4ft x 0.42ft (5”).
3.1 Task 1A: QA/QC plan
e4 produced a QA/QC plan for each of the tasks. Appendix I contains the plan. The sole purpose of the QA/QC plan was to ensure accuracy in the reviews and reports. The underlying theme was
(a) to acquire redundant measurements to ensure accuracy in the work, (b) coordinate with USACE-NAN survey branch, (c) coordinate with the NJDOT and Parsons Brinkerhoff, the engineers of record, and (d) work with WMI to establish agreement on accuracy.
Timeliness was controlled by the fact that all results were turned around in 24hr.
Communications with the project manager and the stakeholder team occurred nearly everyday, if not more frequently. e4 was in contact with the USACE program manager every day.
Cost control was managed by two facts (1) e4 is a fixed price, lump sum team, and (2) e4 shares the project mission with its clients. Regular communications and good planning kept e4 on cost.
William Murphy 3, the e4 project manager, was responsible daily to make sure that no cost concerns would arise. Once the construction achieved momentum after the Bayonne triangle (~ February, 2012), the project settled into a rhythm where progress and costs were predictable.
3.2 Task 1B: Meetings
e4sciences attended forty (40) meetings throughout the course of the project with the contractor and the NY District. Both the field team and the data processors attended the meetings. The meetings were held to review the results and better understand plans and progress of the plate placement. e4 monitored and ensured contractor quality control during construction.
Before March 2012, e4 attended conference calls roughly one per week. After the rock was discovered to be undiggable with the WMI excavator at P165, e4 participated in every conference call on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, thereafter, up to sixty calls.
3.3 Task 1C: Review of contractor QC data log packages and report
The USACE and e4 received quality control reports from WMI each week for the set in Table 1, twenty or so plates at a time. WMI certified the results. The QC reports include ripper-tooth measurements for plate elevations, basically nine measurements per plate. Based on these measurements, WMI produced an as-built model for the plate configurations. If the tilt, ramp, or offset were out of or near specifications, Remotely Operated Vehicle (ROV) took photographs of the areas of concern. Every plate was surveyed under these guidelines. Figure 3 is a 3-D representations of tilt and ramp.
The QC reports were delivered to e4 on Thursdays, and were turned around within 24 hours. e4 produced as-built maps. e4 produced self-evident graphs for elevations, tilt, and ramp. NJDOT and Parsons Brinckerhoff (PB) reviewed the WMI QC reports. Their findings were included in the e4 response.
Also included was the multibeam bathymetry of the stone blanket before the plates were placed.
The original plan was for e4 to work with the USACE survey branch and evaluate stone bed.
However, as the contract evolved, contractor took responsibility for stone bed survey. Stone bed was laid 100ft at a time. This area was prepared for twenty plates, and the review was done immediately thereafter. e4 received multibeam surveys of the stone bed from the contractor on a weekly basis for IDC-209 Task Order #0001. e4 reviewed the contractor’s methods of multibeam survey to determine the elevation of the stone bed. Review of multibeam evaluation continued throughout the project lifespan.
3.4 Task 1D: Plate surveys and QA survey report
3.4.1 QA Measurements
As instructed, e4 monitored the placement of stone bed and steel plate placement. The measurements were made while the construction proceeded. e4 mapped areas using high definition side-scan sonar, sonar sector scanning, sub-bottom seismic reflection, e4 single bathymetry, USACE-NAN multibeam bathymetry and underwater close-proximity video. As the project evolved, USACE-NAN Contracting Division adjusted monitoring parameters to expedite the progress of the project.
The horizontal coordinate system was New Jersey State Plane (NJSP) NAD 83ft. The vertical datum was NGDV29 MLW at Sandy Hook.
e4 imaged and measured the placement of and seams between the plates using the side-scan sonar, sector scanner, sub-bottom seismic, single-beam bathymetry and ROV video.
3.4.1.1 Side-scan sonar. e4 executed two completely different side-scan sonar investigations. The 4200-chirp sonar tool was fixed to the hull at -6ft below water level. The survey was conducted at 330kHz and 440kHz. The 4200 survey tracked four planned survey lines along the trajectory of the PVSC tunnel. The lines were measured traveling in both directions.
The second side-scan sonar investigation used a 4125-chirp sonar tool. It was towed at -40ft below water level. This survey was conducted at 660kHz and 1.9MHz. The 4125 survey tracked the same four planned survey lines. The lines were measured traveling in both directions.
3.4.1.2 Sonar Sector Scans. e4 measured the plates with a 2MHz sonar sector scanner. A 5ft tripod holding the scanner was lowered to the bottom. The scans were obtained at 15ft and 30ft range. The position was incremented 15ft to 30ft at a time.
3.4.1.3 Sub-bottom reflection seismology. e4 used a 424-chirp and a 512i-chirp tools. The piezoelectric sources, we chirped at 4 to 24kHz for 5msec and 1 to 10kHz for 5msec, respectively.
3.4.1.4 Bathymetry. The USACE-NAN survey branch measured the bathymetry of the top of plates with multibeam sonar throughout the S-PJ-4 contract. e4 received the multibeam surveys from the USACE-NAN results within a few days of the survey.
e4 measured single-beam bathymetry simultaneously with the sub-bottom profiles. e4 used an Odom Echotrack CDM single-beam system with SMBB200-3 200kHz shallow water transducer.
The sonar properties of the water column were measured with an Odom digibar system. The single-beam results were used only to benchmark the sub-bottom reflection seismology.
3.4.1.5 ROV. e4 performed underwater video of the plates and plate gaps with a Video Ray underwater remotely-operated vehicle (ROV).
3.4.2 Global area, Bayonne triangle P001 – P011 and P012 – P105
After WMI placed the first set (P001-P011), they reported that the plates were placed as planned.
e4’s initial survey indicated otherwise. Surveys were performed over the next several months until remediation was completed. Plates R1, R2 and R3 were placed once P001-P011 had been adjusted. P001A and P002A were placed on the slope to complete the Bayonne triangle protection. Thereafter, riprap from the new Global pier construction covered the Bayonne triangle plates.
Immediately after the riprap was placed, WMI drove piles into the ground for the Global terminal.
Access to the Bayonne triangle area was limited due to the barges and other construction facilities.
Figure 7 shows a side-scan sonar image of the plate in the Bayonne triangle. Figure 8 shows a side-scan sonar image of the driven concrete piles in the water column.
The full suite of measurements continued through to P012-P033. Early in the process WMI determined that multibeam bathymetry on fresh steel plates was not accurate enough to satisfy the specifications. The contractor developed a new method, ripper-tooth sounding survey. At this point USACE Construction Division chose to rely on the contractor’s stone bed and ripper tooth soundings for QC. e4 developed a technique to perform analysis for the stone bed survey and ripper-tooth soundings. QA monitoring would thereafter, only consist of side-scan sonar, sub-bottom seismic reflections, e4 single beam bathymetry, and USACE multibeam bathymetry. e4 would thereafter hold out the sector scans and ROV-video images.
3.4.3 Northern half of channel, P106 – P255
For plates above P106, e4 acquired only side-scan sonar and sub-bottom reflection seismology with single bathymetry. e4 used fewer cross lines normal to the PVSC trajectory and parallel to the long axis of the plates. The USACE-NAN survey branch measured the bathymetry with multibeam sonar.
3.4.4 Rock area, P165 – P189
At P165, WMI encountered rock. The rock was particularly difficult to dig. WMI decided to use an excavator to complete the rock dredging at P165-P189 and postponed this work until July after the rest of the project was complete. e4 measured the rock area with side-scan sonar and sub-bottom reflection seismology supplemented by single-beam bathymetry. The USACE-NAN survey branch measured the bathymetry with multibeam sonar. P173, P174, P177, P178, and P179A,B are half-sized plates. A complementary report for rock3 in this area shows the analysis of the rock. PB analysis of the strength of the rock suggested the half-sized plates would be suffice to maintain the overburden weight in this section. It was also in this area that a plate was lost during remediation. WMI said that plate had been stuck under other plates; e4 could not confirm this assertion.
3.4.5 Southern half of the channel, P255 – P430
For P256 to P430, WMI cut quickly through sediment and rock. e4 acquired side-scan sonar images and sub-bottom profiles after the plates were placed.
3.4.6 MOTBY area, P410 – P430
In the MOTBY triangle, WMI placed P410 to P428 in parallel configuration to the other plates.
P429 and P430 were rotated and placed on the slope. e4 acquired side-scan sonar images and sub-bottom profiles. The investigation focused on the slope and the effect on the New York Bay Shaft 100ft to the southeast from the last plate.
3.5 Task 1E: Back check
At the end of the completion of the plate placement, e4 re-measured the entire project with side-scan sonar. Sub-bottom seismology was used to replace the sonar sector scans and ROV-video images. The sector scans and ROV-video images were held back after the decision by USACE- NAN Construction Division to honor the WMI quality-control surveys. The final survey did not include the P001 through P059 as the access to these plates was limited by WMI barges and construction in the new Global berth.
3.6 Task 1F: Report
e4 compiled the results detailing the subsurface monitoring of the plate placement into this report that briefly describes the principle conclusions, the scope, the methods and the results archived.
The report is complementary to a second report on the overall quality assurance and monitoring throughout construction
3 e4sciences, 2012, Investigation of more-resistant schist between planned-plate locations P165 and P190 in S-PJ-4, Contract #W912DS-12-D-0002, Task Order #0004, August.
Figure 2. Steel plates. (Above) Over four hundred, 30ft x 4ft x 0.42ft (5”), 13-ton, steel plates. (Middle and below) Process using magnets and cameras for placing plates on channel floor along PVSC tunnel trajectory.
Figure 3. (Above) tilt. (Below) ramp.
4. Results
The project began in July 2011. The construction was completed in August 2012. The original expectation was to be completed by December of 2011. Four hundred and twenty-nine plates were placed on the PVSC trajectory. Of these four hundred and thirteen were full-sized plates and sixteen were half-sized plates. Some remediation was required throughout the construction Five remediation plates were added all within the Bayonne triangle. One plate was apparently lost under other plates. e4 could not confirm the location of the lost plate.
The plates are 30ft x 4ft x 0.42ft (5”). The allowable gap between the plates was 0.33ft, except in the area of exposed rock. The top of the plates was to be placed below -52.0ft and above -52.5ft.
The tilt of each plate (Figure 3) must be less than ±2%, with less than ±9.6% confidence interval.
This condition was introduced during for the ripper-tooth sounding analysis, due to the probability analysis and the short range of the measurements. The ramp of each plate (Figure 3) must be less than ±1%.
A complementary report addresses the quality control and quality assurance on a 100-plate basis.
A few issues occurred during the construction: (a) disagreement regarding the as-built placement in Bayonne Triangle and Global Berth, (b) a dropped plate, (c) excavator fell over, (d) rock diggability, and (e) a lost plate.
4.1 Overview
Table 3 lists the dates of delivery of the WMI-QC reports, the QC reviews, the WMI re-certifications, QA reports, the WMI-QA response, and the back checks. Appendix II contains the
QC reviews of the WMI-QC reports. Appendix III contains the QA reports. Appendix IV contains
WMI response to the QC reviews and QA reports. Appendix V contains the back checks.
Appendix VI contains other letters beyond the standard QA processes.
Figure 4 (Plates 2 and 3) plots the final side-scan image(s) of the plates placed in the protection zone. Please note that Plate 2 does not plot the planimetrics. Plate 3 plots the WMI as-built certified planimetrics.
Figure 5 (Plate 4) shows a side-scan image for the -48ft grade after the removal of non-HARS material before the placement of the stone blanket. Figure 6 (Plates 4 and 5) plots the USACE-
NAN multibeam survey(s) for the plates after construction. Some siltation may affect the multibeam result. Please note that Plate 5 does not plot the planimetrics. Plate 6 plots the WMI as-built certified planimetrics.
Plate 7 plots the results of seismic imaging after construction. Plate 7 plots the WMI as-built certified planimetrics on the cross section.
Figure 7 shows side-scan sonar images of the plates in the Bayonne triangle. Note the presence of the barges that were engaged in the construction of the berth through the S-PJ-4 project. Figure 8 shows a side-scan image of the piles for the global berth construction. Table 4 lists the reports and re-certifications for P011 to P045. At P033, the USACE construction division approved the contractor ripper-tooth system to be the QC survey.
e4sciences, 2012, Non design services for side-scan sonar, multibeam bathymetry, sonar sector scanning, and underwater close proximity video for S-PJ-4 and support during construction, USACE Contract W912DS-09-D-0001, IDC-204, Task Order #0027, November 02.
Figure 9 shows a close-up of the area where the New York Bay Shaft remains in the slope. e4 observations imply that the construction did not affect the New York Bay Shaft, 100ft to the southeast.
Table 3. Overview of the QC reviews, QA reports, and back checks. * plate log not received. **See Appendix VI "QC review of the WMI recertification of Plates P001A and P002A".
Plate Plate group Placement date
(as noted on plate logs) QC report / Record of transmittal e4 QC review e4 QA report 1 WMI response 1 e4 QA report 2 WMI - recert 1 WMI response
2 WMI - recert 2 WMI - recert 3 e4 back check USACE bathymetry P001 P001-P012 October 28, 2011 February 7, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 14, 2012 April 11, 2012 November 10, 2011
P001A P001-P012 May 24, 2012* May 31, 2012** May 31, 2012** June 4, 2012 November 15, 2012
P002 P001-P012 October 28, 2011 February 7, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 14, 2012 April 11, 2012 November 10, 2011
P002A P001-P012 May 24, 2012* May 31, 2012** May 31, 2012** June 4, 2012 November 15, 2012
R1 P001-P012 February 2, 2012 February 7, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 14, 2012 April 11, 2012 November 10, 2011
R2 P001-P012 February 2, 2012 February 7, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 14, 2012 April 11, 2012 November 10, 2011
R3 P001-P012 February 2, 2012 February 7, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 14, 2012 April 11, 2012 November 10, 2011
P003 P001-P012 October 27, 2011 February 7, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 14, 2012 April 11, 2012 November 10, 2011
P004 P001-P012 October 27, 2011 February 7, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 14, 2012 April 11, 2012 November 10, 2011
P005 P001-P012 October 27, 2011 February 7, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 14, 2012 April 11, 2012 November 10, 2011
P006 P001-P012 October 27, 2011 February 7, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 14, 2012 April 11, 2012 November 10, 2011
P007 P001-P012 October 27, 2011 February 7, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 14, 2012 April 11, 2012 November 10, 2011
P008 P001-P012 October 27, 2011 February 7, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 14, 2012 April 11, 2012 November 10, 2011
P009 P001-P012 October 27, 2011 February 7, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 14, 2012 April 11, 2012 November 10, 2011
P010 P001-P012 October 27, 2011 February 7, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 14, 2012 April 11, 2012 November 10, 2011
P011 P001-P012 October 27, 2011 February 7, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 14, 2012 April 11, 2012 December 27, 2011
P012 P001-P012 February 1, 2012 February 7, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 14, 2012 April 11, 2012 December 27, 2001
P013 P013-P045 November 5, 2011 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 April 11, 2012 December 27, 2011
P014 P013-P045 November 5, 2011 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 April 11, 2012 December 27, 2011
P015 P013-P045 November 5, 2011 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 April 11, 2012 December 27, 2011
P016 P013-P045 November 5, 2011 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 April 11, 2012 December 27, 2011
P017 P013-P045 November 5, 2011 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 April 11, 2012 December 27, 2011
P018 P013-P045 November 5, 2011 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 April 11, 2012 December 27, 2011
P019 P013-P045 November 5, 2011 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 April 11, 2012 December 27, 2011
P020 P013-P045 November 27, 2011 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 April 11, 2012 December 27, 2011
P021 P013-P045 November 27, 2011 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 April 11, 2012 December 27, 2011
P022 P013-P045 November 27, 2011 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 April 11, 2012 December 27, 2011
P023 P013-P045 November 27, 2011 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 April 11, 2012 December 27, 2011
P024 P013-P045 November 27, 2011 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 April 11, 2012 December 27, 2011
P025 P013-P045 December 4, 2011 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 April 11, 2012 December 27, 2011
P026 P013-P045 December 4, 2011 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 April 11, 2012 December 27, 2011
P027 P013-P045 December 4, 2011 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 April 11, 2012 December 27, 2011
P028 P013-P045 December 5, 2011 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2011
P029 P013-P045 December 5, 2011 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P030 P013-P045 December 9, 2011 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P031 P013-P045 December 10, 2011 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P032 P013-P045 December 10, 2011 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P033 P013-P045 December 10, 2011 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P034 P013-P045 December 27, 2011 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 24, 2012 February 21, 2012 March 13, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P035 P013-P045 December 27, 2011 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 24, 2012 February 21, 2012 March 13, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P036 P013-P045 December 28, 2011 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 24, 2012 February 21, 2012 March 13, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P037 P013-P045 December 28, 2011 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P038 P013-P045 January 9, 2012 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P039 P013-P045 January 9, 2012 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P040 P013-P045 January 9, 2012 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P041 P013-P045 January 9, 2012 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P042 P013-P045 January 9, 2012 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P043 P013-P045 January 9, 2012 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P044 P013-P045 January 9, 2012 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 10, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P045 P013-P045 January 9, 2012 January 24, 2012 January 27, 2012 January 27, 2012 February 2, 2012 February 24, 2012 February 10, 2012 March 13, 2012 February 21, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P046 P046-P065 February 9, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 16, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 February 24, 2012 March 12, 2012 March 13, 2012 February 21, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P047 P046-P065 February 9, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 16, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 February 24, 2012 March 12, 2012 March 13, 2012 February 21, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P048 P046-P065 February 9, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 16, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P049 P046-P065 February 9, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 16, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P050 P046-P065 February 9, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 16, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P051 P046-P065 February 9, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 16, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P052 P046-P065 February 9, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 16, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P053 P046-P065 February 10, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 16, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P054 P046-P065 February 10, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 16, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P055 P046-P065 February 10, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 16, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P056 P046-P065 February 10, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 16, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P057 P046-P065 February 10, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 16, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P058 P046-P065 February 10, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 16, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
Placement date
(as noted on plate logs) QC report / Record of transmittal e4 QC review e4 QA report 1 WMI response 1 e4 QA report 2 WMI - recert 1 WMI response
2 WMI - recert 2 WMI - recert 3 e4 back check USACE bathymetry P059 P046-P065 February 10, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 16, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P060 P046-P065 February 10, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 16, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P061 P046-P065 February 10, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 16, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P062 P046-P065 February 10, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 16, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P063 P046-P065 February 10, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 16, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P064 P046-P065 February 10, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 16, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P065 P046-P065 February 10, 2012 February 13, 2012 February 16, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P066 P066-P085 February 15, 2012 February 21, 2012 February 24, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P067 P066-P085 February 15, 2012 February 21, 2012 February 24, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P068 P066-P085 February 15, 2012 February 21, 2012 February 24, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P069 P066-P085 February 16, 2012 February 21, 2012 February 24, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P070 P066-P085 February 16, 2012 February 21, 2012 February 24, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P071 P066-P085 February 16, 2012 February 21, 2012 February 24, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P072 P066-P085 February 16, 2012 February 21, 2012 February 24, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P073 P066-P085 February 16, 2012 February 21, 2012 February 24, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P074 P066-P085 February 16, 2012 February 21, 2012 February 24, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P075 P066-P085 February 16, 2012 February 21, 2012 February 24, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P076 P066-P085 February 16, 2012 February 21, 2012 February 24, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P077 P066-P085 February 16, 2012 February 21, 2012 February 24, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P078 P066-P085 February 16, 2012 February 21, 2012 February 24, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P079 P066-P085 February 16, 2012 February 21, 2012 February 24, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P080 P066-P085 February 16, 2012 February 21, 2012 February 24, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P081 P066-P085 February 16, 2012 February 21, 2012 February 24, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P082 P066-P085 February 16, 2012 February 21, 2012 February 24, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P083 P066-P085 February 16, 2012 February 21, 2012 February 24, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P084 P066-P085 February 16, 2012 February 21, 2012 February 24, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P085 P066-P085 February 16, 2012 February 21, 2012 February 24, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P086 P086-P105 February 24, 2012 February 29, 2012 March 2, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 February 21, 2012
P087 P086-P105 February 24, 2012 February 29, 2012 March 2, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 March 9, 2012
P088 P086-P105 February 24, 2012 February 29, 2012 March 2, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 March 9, 2012
P089 P086-P105 February 24, 2012 February 29, 2012 March 2, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 March 9, 2012
P090 P086-P105 February 24, 2012 February 29, 2012 March 2, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 March 9, 2012
P091 P086-P105 February 24, 2012 February 29, 2012 March 2, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 March 9, 2012
P092 P086-P105 February 24, 2012 February 29, 2012 March 2, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 March 9, 2012
P093 P086-P105 February 24, 2012 February 29, 2012 March 2, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 March 9, 2012
P094 P086-P105 February 24, 2012 February 29, 2012 March 2, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 March 9, 2012
P095 P086-P105 February 24, 2012 February 29, 2012 March 2, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 March 9, 2012
P096 P086-P105 February 24, 2012 February 29, 2012 March 2, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 March 9, 2012
P097 P086-P105 February 24, 2012 February 29, 2012 March 2, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 March 9, 2012
P098 P086-P105 February 24, 2012 February 29, 2012 March 2, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 March 9, 2012
P099 P086-P105 February 24, 2012 February 29, 2012 March 2, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 March 9, 2012
P100 P086-P105 February 24, 2012 February 29, 2012 March 2, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 March 9, 2012
P101 P086-P105 February 24, 2012 February 29, 2012 March 2, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 March 9, 2012
P102 P086-P105 February 24, 2012 February 29, 2012 March 2, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 March 9, 2012
P103 P086-P105 February 24, 2012 February 29, 2012 March 2, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 March 9, 2012
P104 P086-P105 February 24, 2012 February 29, 2012 March 2, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 March 9, 2012
P105 P086-P105 February 24, 2012 February 29, 2012 March 2, 2012 March 5, 2012 March 13, 2012 March 12, 2012 April 11, 2012 March 9, 2012
P106 P106-P125 March 1, 2012 March 6, 2012 March 7, 2012 May 3, 2012 March 19, 2012 March 19, 2012 November 15, 2012 March 9, 2012
P107 P106-P125 March 1, 2012 March 6, 2012 March 7, 2012 May 3, 2012 March 19, 2012 March 19, 2012 November 15, 2012 March 9, 2012
P108 P106-P125 March 1, 2012 March 6, 2012 March 7, 2012 May 3, 2012 March 19, 2012 March 19, 2012 November 15, 2012 March 9, 2012
P109 P106-P125 March 1, 2012 March 6, 2012 March 7, 2012 May 3, 2012 March 19, 2012 March 19, 2012 November 15, 2012 March 9, 2012
P110 P106-P125 March 2, 2012 March 6, 2012 March 7, 2012 May 3, 2012 March 19, 2012 March 19, 2012 November 15, 2012 March 9, 2012
P111 P106-P125 March 2, 2012 March 6, 2012 March 7, 2012 May 3, 2012 March 19, 2012 March 19, 2012 November 15, 2012 March 9, 2012
P112 P106-P125 March 2, 2012 March 6, 2012 March 7, 2012 May 3, 2012 March 19, 2012 March 19, 2012 November 15, 2012 March 9, 2012
P113 P106-P125 March 2, 2012 March 6, 2012 March 7, 2012 May 3, 2012 March 19, 2012 March 19, 2012 November 15, 2012 March 9, 2012
P114 P106-P125 March 2, 2012 March 6, 2012 March 7, 2012 May 3, 2012 March 19, 2012 March 19, 2012 November…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .