Appendix D - Performance Assessment Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 65 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Base Operations Support Services, Ft. Wainwright, AK Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W912CN22R0013
About this file
This document contains a Performance Assessment Questionnaire and details of a related federal contract opportunity for Base Operations Support Services at Fort Wainwright in Alaska. The Questionnaire is a template for evaluating offeror past performance on a previous contract and includes rating criteria for compliance, project management, timeliness, cost control, customer satisfaction and general comments.
The federal contract opportunity is a 100% small business set-aside solicitation seeking a non-personal Single Award IDIQ services contract to provide base operations support at Fort Wainwright and its Area of Responsibility. Services include facilities support maintenance, fire system maintenance, solid waste management, grounds maintenance, HVAC, and more. The requirement is posted on SAM.gov as solicitation number W912CN22R0013 with proposals due on the closing date listed. The North American Industry Classification System code is 561210 and the small business size standard is $41.5 million. The Army Contracting Command is the contracting agency.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 50
Base Operations Support Services, Ft. Wainwright, AK has more files on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Performance Assessment Questionnaire Please provide your candid responses. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up by the evaluators. If you do not have knowledge of or experience with the company in question, please forward this Questionnaire to the person who does and notify the Contracting Officer. Please return the completed Questionnaire to the Contracting Officer identified below immediately.
Rating Definitions:
Substantial Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. The offeror has been highly successfully in performing the required effort.
Satisfactory Confidence: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. The offeror has successfully performed the required effort.
Limited Confidence: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective. The offeror has had little success performing the required effort.
No Confidence: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective. The offeror has not successfully performed the required effort.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above): Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date: Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)
Total Contract Value:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent) *Note: rationale is required for each response.
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
· Substantial Confidence
· Satisfactory Confidence
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale:
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
· Limited Confidence
· No Confidence
Rationale:
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
· Limited Confidence
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)
Rationale:
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs
· Limited Confidence
Rationale:
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest
· Limited Confidence
Rationale:
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
Comments:
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
Point of Contact (Name):
SOURCE SELECTION INFORMATION (SEE FAR 3.104)
Telephone Number:
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number Address:
E-mail Address:
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire to briana.m.watkins.civ@army.mil AND ryan.m.brown78.civ@army.mil.
Thank you for your assistance.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .